Q1 2026 Prosperity Bancshares Inc Earnings Call

April 29, 2026

Operator: Good day, welcome to the Prosperity Bancshares Q1 2026 earnings conference call. I would now like to turn the conference over to Charlotte Rasche, Executive Vice President and General Counsel. Please go ahead, ma'am.

Speaker #2: After today's presentation, there will be an opportunity to ask questions. Do ask a question you may press star, then one on a touchstone phone.

Speaker #2: To withdraw your question, please press star and then two. Please note this event is being recorded. I would now like to turn the conference over to Charlotte Rasche, Executive Vice President and General Counsel.

Speaker #2: Please go ahead, ma'am. Thank you. Good morning, ladies and gentlemen, and welcome to Prosperity Bancshares Inc. Q1 2026 Earnings Conference Call. This call is being broadcast live on our website and will be available for replay for the next few weeks.

Charlotte Rasche: Thank you. Good morning, ladies and gentlemen, and welcome to Prosperity Bancshares' Q1 2026 earnings conference call. This call is being broadcast live on our website and will be available for replay for the next few weeks. I'm Charlotte Rasche, and here with me today is David Zalman, Senior Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, H.E. Timanus, Jr., Chairman, Asylbek Osmonov, Chief Financial Officer, Eddie Safady, Senior Vice Chairman, Kevin Hanigan, President and Chief Operating Officer, Randy Hester, Chief Lending Officer, Mays Davenport, Director of Corporate Strategy, and Bob Dowdell, Executive Vice President. Also joining us this morning are Bob Franklin, Chief Executive Officer of Stellar Bancorp, Ray Vattuli, President of Stellar Bancorp, and Paul Agee, Chief Financial Officer of Stellar. David Zalman will lead off with a review of the highlights for the recent quarter.

Speaker #2: I'm Charlotte Rasche and here with me today is David Zalman, Senior Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, HE Tim Tamanis Jr., Chairman, Asylbek Osmanov, Chief Financial Officer, Eddie Saffity, Senior Vice Chairman, Kevin Hannigan, President and Chief Operating Officer, Randy Hester, Chief Lending Officer, Maze Davenport, Director of Corporate Strategy, and Bob Dowdell, Executive Vice President.

Charlotte Rasche: I'm Charlotte Rasche, and here with me today is David Zalman, Senior Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, H.E. Timanus, Jr., Chairman, Asylbek Osmonov, Chief Financial Officer, Eddie Safady, Senior Vice Chairman, Kevin Hanigan, President and Chief Operating Officer, Randy Hester, Chief Lending Officer, Mays Davenport, Director of Corporate Strategy, and Bob Dowdell, Executive Vice President.

Speaker #2: Also joining us this morning are Bob Franklin, Chief Executive Officer of Stellar Bancorp; Reva Tooley, President of Stellar Bancorp; and Paul Egge, Chief Financial Officer of Stellar.

Charlotte Rasche: Also joining us this morning are Bob Franklin, Chief Executive Officer of Stellar Bancorp, Ray Vattuli, President of Stellar Bancorp, and Paul Agee, Chief Financial Officer of Stellar. David Zalman will lead off with a review of the highlights for the recent quarter.

Speaker #2: David Zalman will lead off with a review of the highlights for the recent quarter. He will be followed by Asylbek Osmanov, who will review some of our recent financial statistics and Tim Tamanis, who will discuss our lending activities including asset quality.

Charlotte Rasche: He will be followed by Asylbek Osmonov, who will review some of our recent financial statistics, and Tim Timanus, who will discuss our lending activities, including asset quality. Finally, we will open the call for questions. Before we begin, let me make the usual disclaimers. Certain of the matters discussed in this presentation may constitute forward-looking statements for purposes of the federal securities laws, as such, may involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which may cause the actual results or performance of Prosperity Bancshares to be materially different from future results or performance expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements.

Speaker #2: Finally, we will open the call for questions. Before we begin, let me make the usual disclaimers. Certain of the matters discussed in this presentation may constitute forward-looking statements for purposes of the Federal Securities Laws.

Charlotte Rasche: Certain of the matters discussed in this presentation may constitute forward-looking statements for purposes of the federal securities laws, as such, may involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which may cause the actual results or performance of Prosperity Bancshares to be materially different from future results or performance expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements.

Speaker #2: And as such, may involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties, and other factors which may cause the actual results or performance of PROSPERITY BANKSHARES to be materially different from future results or performance, expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements.

Speaker #2: Additional information concerning factors that could cause actual results to be materially different than those in the forward-looking statements can be found in Prosperity Bancshares' filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including Forms 10-Q and 10-K, and other reports and statements we have filed with the SEC.

Charlotte Rasche: Additional information concerning factors that could cause actual results to be materially different than those in the forward-looking statements can be found in Prosperity Bancshares filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including Forms 10-Q and 10-K, and other reports and statements we have filed with the SEC. All forward-looking statements are expressly qualified in their entirety by these cautionary statements. Now let me turn the call over to David Zalman.

Speaker #2: All forward-looking statements are expressly qualified in their entirety by these cautionary statements. Now, let me turn the call over to David Zalman.

Speaker #3: Thank you, Charlotte. I would like to welcome and thank everyone listening to our first quarter 2026 conference call. The first quarter of 2026 was impactful for the company and I'm excited to announce that during the quarter we completed the merger of American Bank Holding Corporation on January 1st, 2026.

David Zalman: Thank you, Charlotte. I would like to welcome and thank everyone listening to our Q1 2026 Conference Call. The Q1 2026 was impactful for the company, and I'm excited to announce that during the quarter, we completed the merger of American Bank Hold Co. on 1 January 2026, and completed the merger of Southwest Bancshares Inc. on 1 February 2026, and announced the merger of Stellar Bancorp on 28 January 2026, for which we have now received all necessary regulatory approvals and expect to complete on 1 July 2026. Additionally, we completed a core system conversion in February. We and others believe that Prosperity is doing the right thing.

Speaker #3: And completed the merger of Southwest Bank Shares Inc. on February 1st, 2026. And announced the merger of Stellar Bank Corp on January 28th, 2026, for which we have now received all necessary regulatory approvals and expect to complete on July 1st, 2026.

Speaker #3: Additionally, we completed a core system conversion in February. We and others believe that PROSPERITY is doing the right thing. PROSPERITY has been ranked as one of four of America's best banks for 2026.

David Zalman: Additionally, we completed a core system conversion in February. We and others believe that Prosperity is doing the right thing.

David Zalman: Prosperity has been ranked as one of Forbes America's Best Banks for 2026, and since the list inception in 2010, was ranked in the top 10 for 14 consecutive years. Prosperity has also been re-recognized by Newsweek as one of America's best regional banks and was ranked 15th in the S&P Global Market Intelligence Top 50 U.S. Public Bank Rankings for 2025. In an effort to continue to enhance shareholder value, Prosperity Bancshares repurchased approximately 837,000 shares of its common stock at an average weighted price of $68.15 a share for a total of $57 million during the 3 months ending 31 March 2026.

Speaker #3: And since the list inception in 2010, was ranked in the top 10 for 14 consecutive years. PROSPERITY has also been recognized by Newsweek as one of America's best regional banks and was ranked 15th in the S&P Global Market Intelligence Top 50 U.S.

Speaker #3: Public Bank Rankings for 2025. In an effort to continue to enhance shareholder value, Prosperity Bancshares repurchased approximately 837,000 shares of its common stock at a weighted average price of $68.15 a share, for a total of $57 million during the three months ending March 31, 2026.

David Zalman: In an effort to continue to enhance shareholder value, Prosperity Bancshares repurchased approximately 837,000 shares of its common stock at an average weighted price of $68.15 a share for a total of $57 million during the 3 months ending 31 March 2026.

Speaker #3: Our net income was $116 million for three months ending March 31st, 2026, compared with $130 million for the same period in 2025. The net income per diluted common share was $1.16 for three months ending March 31st, 2026, compared to $1.37 for the same period in 2025.

David Zalman: Our net income was $116 million for three months ending 31 March 2026, compared with $130 million for the same period in 2025. The net income per diluted common share was $1.16 for three months ending 31 March 2026, compared to $1.37 for the same period in 2025. During Q1 2026, Prosperity incurred merger related expenses from the mergers with American and Southwest of $42.5 million, or $0.34 per diluted common share. Excluding these charges, the net income was $149.9 million, and net income per diluted common share was $1.50 for Q1 2026.

Speaker #3: During the first quarter of 2026, Prosperity incurred merger-related expenses from the mergers with American and Southwest of $42.5 million, or $0.34 per diluted common share.

Speaker #3: Excluding these charges, net income was $149.9 million, and net income per diluted common share was $1.50 for the first quarter of 2026. This represents a 9.5% increase over the $1.37 reported for the same period in 2025.

David Zalman: Excluding these charges, the net income was $149.9 million, and net income per diluted common share was $1.50 for Q1 2026.

David Zalman: This represents a 9.5% increase over the $1.37 reported for the same period in 2025. Our loans were $25.2 billion at 31 March 2026, an increase of $3.3 billion or 15.1% compared with $21.9 billion at 31 March 2025. The linked quarter loans increased to $3.4 billion or 16% from $21.8 billion at 31 December 2025. Loans increased primarily due to the mergers with American and Southwest. Excluding the loan increases due to the mergers and excluding the impact of the net charge-off, total loans decreased 1.2% or about 4.8% annually. That did include about a $100 million plus in warehouse lending increase. Excluding that, the decrease would have been somewhat more.

Speaker #3: Our loans were $25.2 billion at March 31, 2026, and increased $3.3 billion, or 15.1%, compared with $21.9 billion at March 31, 2025. Linked-quarter loans increased $3.4 billion, or 16%, from $21.8 billion at December 31, 2025.

Speaker #3: Loans increased primarily due to the mergers with American and Southwest. Excluding the loan increases due to the mergers and excluding the impact of the net charge-off, total loans decreased $1.2% or about $4.8% annually.

Speaker #3: That did include about $100 million plus in warehouse lending increase, so excluding that, the decrease would have been somewhat more. The deposits were $32.6 billion at March 31st, 2026, and increased to $4.6 billion or $16.4% compared with $28 billion at March 31st, 2025.

David Zalman: That did include about a $100 million plus in warehouse lending increase. Excluding that, the decrease would have been somewhat more.

David Zalman: The deposits were $32.6 billion at 31 March 2026. An increase of $4.6 billion or 16.4% compared with $28 billion at 31 March 2025. Our linked quarter deposits increased $4.1 billion or 14.6% from $28.4 billion at 31 December 2025. Deposits increased primarily due to the mergers. Excluding the deposits acquired from American and Southwest, our core deposits increased about 1.2% and public fund deposits experienced its normal seasonal decrease.

Speaker #3: Our linked quarter deposits increased $4.1 billion, or 14.6%, from $28.4 billion at December 31, 2025. Deposits increased primarily due to the mergers, excluding the deposits acquired from American and Southwest.

Speaker #3: Our core deposits increased about $1.2% and public fund deposits experienced its normal seasonal decrease. PROSPERITY has strong non-interest-bearing deposits of $32.4% of the total deposits as of March 31st, 2026, with a cost of funds of $1.45% and a cost of deposits of $1.32% compared with $1.38% for the same period last year.

David Zalman: Prosperity has strong non-interest-bearing deposits of 32.4% of the total deposits as of 31 March 2026, with a cost of funds of 1.45% and a cost of deposits of 1.32%, compared with 1.38% for the same period last year. Our net interest margin on a tax equivalent basis was 3.51% for three months ending 31 March 2026, compared with 3.3% for the three months ending 31 December 2025. Obviously, the net interest margin was affected by the mergers, but it was also impacted by the repricing of assets as we predicted and mentioned during previous calls.

Speaker #3: Our net interest margin on a tax equivalent basis was 3.51% for the three months ending March 31, 2026, compared with 3.30% for the three months ending December 31, 2025.

Speaker #3: Obviously, the net interest margin was affected by the mergers but it was also impacted by the repricing of assets as we predicted and mentioned during previous calls.

David Zalman: Obviously, the net interest margin was affected by the mergers, but it was also impacted by the repricing of assets as we predicted and mentioned during previous calls.

Speaker #3: Our asset quality or non-performing assets totaled $122 million or $33 basis points of quarterly average interest-earning assets as of March 31st, 2026, compared with $150 million or $46 basis points of quarterly average interest-earning assets at December 31st, 2025.

David Zalman: Our asset quality, our non-performing assets total $122 million or 33 basis points of quarterly average interest earning assets as of 31 March 2026, compared with $150 million or 46 basis points of quarterly average interest earning assets at 31 December 2025. The allowance for credit losses on loans and off-balance sheet credit exposure was $421 million at 31 March 2026, compared with $386 million at 31 March 2025. The allowance for credit losses on loans increased during Q1 2026 due to the mergers of which $47 million was attributable to the American merger and $43 million was attributable to the Southwest merger.

Speaker #3: The allowance for credit losses on loans and off-balance sheet credit exposure was $421 million at March 31st, 2026, compared with $386 million at March 31st, 2025.

Speaker #3: The allowance for credit losses on loans increased during the first quarter of 2026 due to the mergers, of which $47 million was attributable to the American merger and $43 million was attributable to the Southwest merger.

David Zalman: The allowance for credit losses on loans increased during Q1 2026 due to the mergers of which $47 million was attributable to the American merger and $43 million was attributable to the Southwest merger.

Speaker #3: Excluding warehouse purchase program loans, the allowance for credit losses on loans to total loans was $1.61% at March 31st, 2026. And that's compared with $1.67% at March 31st, 2025.

David Zalman: Excluding warehouse purchase program loans, the allowance for credit losses on loans to total loans was 1.61% at 31 March 2026. That's compared with 1.67% at 31 March 2025. Our quarterly net charge-offs were $41 million, the largest amount in our bank's history. This is mitigated somewhat by the total being comprised primarily of two credits, both which were unique in nature and we believe do not represent a trend in the potential future losses. This is evidenced by the lack of any material additions to non-performing loans in Q1 2026. Only two non-performing relationships of more than $10 million. Both charged-off credits were generated out of our Dallas office. Both loans were shared national credits.

Speaker #3: Our quarterly net charge-offs were $41 million; the largest amount in our bank's history. This is mitigated somewhat by the total being comprised primarily of two credits both which were unique in nature and we believe do not represent a trend in the potential future losses.

Speaker #3: This is evidenced by the lack of any material additions to non-performing loans in quarter one, 2026, and only two non-performing relationships of more than $10 million. Both charged-off credits were generated out of our Dallas office; both loans were shared national credits.

David Zalman: Only two non-performing relationships of more than $10 million. Both charged-off credits were generated out of our Dallas office. Both loans were shared national credits.

Speaker #3: However, both were initially originated and syndicated by us before the loans were moved to much larger banks that were willing to provide modified loan structures that we were not.

David Zalman: However, both were initially originated and syndicated by us before the loans were moved to much larger banks that were willing to provide modified loan structures that we were not. The larger charge-off of approximately $30 million was to a startup insurance company. Once that loan was moved and syndicated, Prosperity purchased a percentage of that loan back, although it was a smaller exposure than we previously had. While the borrower had allegedly a strong sponsor that is well-known in the industry with a history of backing its investments, it failed to do so this time. The smaller charge-off was a customer who legacy banked for over 15 years and is reflective that in lending money, sometimes things just don't work out.

Speaker #3: The larger charge-off of approximately $30 million was to a startup insurance company. Once that loan was moved and syndicated, PROSPERITY purchased a percentage of that loan back, although it was a smaller exposure than we previously had.

Speaker #3: While the borrower had allegedly a strong sponsor that is well known in the industry with a history of backing its investments, it felt to do so this time.

David Zalman: While the borrower had allegedly a strong sponsor that is well-known in the industry with a history of backing its investments, it failed to do so this time. The smaller charge-off was a customer who legacy banked for over 15 years and is reflective that in lending money, sometimes things just don't work out.

Speaker #3: The smaller charge-off was a customer who banked with legacy banks for over 15 years and is reflective that in lending money, sometimes things just don't work out.

Speaker #3: With regard to acquisitions, as previously mentioned, the merger of American Bank Holding Company was completed on January 1, 2026, and the operational integration is scheduled for September 2026. The merger of Southwest Bank shares was completed on February 1, 2026, and the operational integration is scheduled for November 2026.

David Zalman: With regard to acquisitions, as previously mentioned, the merger of American Bank Holding Corporation was completed on 1 January 2026. The operational integration is scheduled for September 2026. The merger of Southwest Bancshares was completed on 1 February 2026. The operational integration is scheduled for November 2026. We are fortunate to have American and Southwest associates on the Prosperity team. We are excited about our pending merger with Stellar Bancorp, Inc., and expect to complete the transaction on 1 July 2026. While we continue to have conversation with other bankers regarding potential acquisition opportunities, we remain focused on the completion of the Stellar merger and the integration of all three transactions.

Speaker #3: We are fortunate to have American and Southwest associates on the PROSPERITY team. We are excited about our pending merger with Sterling Bank Corp and expect to complete the transaction on July 1st, 2026.

David Zalman: We are excited about our pending merger with Stellar Bancorp, Inc., and expect to complete the transaction on 1 July 2026. While we continue to have conversation with other bankers regarding potential acquisition opportunities, we remain focused on the completion of the Stellar merger and the integration of all three transactions.

Speaker #3: While we continue to have conversation with other bankers regarding potential acquisition opportunities, we remain focused on the completion of the stellar merger and the integration of all three transactions.

Speaker #3: Texas and Oklahoma continue to benefit from strong economies and are home to 57 Fortune 500 headquartered companies. Texas also benefits from diversification in various industries including energy, oil, gas, renewables, technology, manufacturing, trade logistics, major ports, healthcare, and finance.

David Zalman: Texas and Oklahoma continue to benefit from strong economies and are home to 57 Fortune 500 headquartered companies. Texas also benefits from diversification in various industries including energy, oil, gas, renewables, technology, manufacturing, trade logistics, major ports, healthcare, and finance. Its business-friendly environment, no state income tax, population growth that supports spending and workforce expansion, and key role in trade and cross-border commerce position Texas

Speaker #3: Further, its business-friendly environment, no state income tax, population growth that supports spending, and workforce expansion and key role in trade and cross-border commerce positions Texas is well for 2026 and the future.

David Zalman: Texas as well for 2026 and the future. While Texas continues to outperform the US on output, on output growth, the labor market has cooled noticeably after years of rapid expansion. The growth in 2026 is expected to be steady, although the state size, diversity, and policy advantages position it well for a rebound. Overall, I would like to thank all of our associates for helping create the success we have had.

H.E. Timanus, Jr.: As well for 2026 and the future. While Texas continues to outperform the US on output, on output growth, the labor market has cooled noticeably after years of rapid expansion. The growth in 2026 is expected to be steady, although the state size, diversity, and policy advantages position it well for a rebound. Overall, I would like to thank all of our associates for helping create the success we have had. We have a strong team and a deep bench at Prosperity, and we'll continue to work hard to keep our customers and associates succeed and to increase shareholder value. Thanks again for your support of our company. Let me turn over the discussion to Asylbek Osmonov, our Chief Financial Officer, to discuss some of the specific financial results we achieved. Asylbek?

Speaker #3: While Texas continues to outperform the US on output growth, the labor market has cooled noticeably after years of rapid expansion. The growth in 2026 is expected to be steady although the state size, diversity, and policy advantages position it well for a rebound.

Speaker #3: Overall, I would like to thank all of our associates for helping create the success we have had. We have a strong team and a deep bench at Prosperity, and we'll continue to work hard to help our customers and associates succeed and to increase shareholder value.

David Zalman: We have a strong team and a deep bench at Prosperity, and we'll continue to work hard to keep our customers and associates succeed and to increase shareholder value. Thanks again for your support of our company. Let me turn over the discussion to Asylbek Osmonov, our Chief Financial Officer, to discuss some of the specific financial results we achieved. Asylbek?

Speaker #3: Thanks again for your support of our company. Let me turn over the discussion to Becca Osmanoff, our Chief Financial Officer, to discuss some of the specific financial results we achieved.

Speaker #3: Also, back.

Speaker #2: Thank you, Mr. Zalman. Good morning, everyone. Net interest income before provisions for credit losses for the three months ended March 31, 2026, was $321.2 million, an increase of $55.8 million compared to $265.4 million for the same period in 2025, and an increase of $46.2 million compared to $275 million for the quarter ended December 31, 2025.

Asylbek Osmonov: Thank you, Mr. Zalman. Good morning, everyone. Net interest income before provision for credit losses for the 3 months ended 31 March 2026 was $321.2 million, an increase of $55.8 million compared to $265.4 million for the same period in 2025, an increase of $46.2 million compared to $275 million for the quarter ended 31 December 2025.

Speaker #2: The net interest margin on a tax-equivalent basis was 3.51% for the three months ended March 31, 2026, an increase of 37 basis points compared to 3.14% for the same period in 2025, and an increase of 21 basis points compared to 3.30% for the quarter ended December 31, 2025.

Asylbek Osmonov: The net interest margin on a tax equivalent basis was 3.51% for the 3 months ended 31 March 2026, an increase of 37 basis points compared to 3.14% for the same period in 2025, an increase of 21 basis points compared to 3.3% for the quarter ended 31 December 2025. Excluding purchase accounting adjustments, the net interest margin for the 3 months ended 31 March 2026 was 3.44% compared to 3.1% for the same period in 2025 and 3.26% for the quarter ended 31 December 2025.

Speaker #2: Excluding purchase accounting adjustments, the net interest margin for the three-month end at March 31st, 2026 was 3.44% compared to 3.1% for the same period in 2025 and 3.26% for the quarter-ended December 31st, 2025.

Speaker #2: The increase in net interest income and net interest margin during the first quarter of 2026 is primarily due to repricing of earning assets and addition of American Bank and Texas Partner Bank during this period.

Asylbek Osmonov: The increase in net interest income and net interest margin during Q1 2026 is primarily due to repricing of earning assets and addition of American Bank and Texas Partners Bank during this period. The fair value loan income for Q1 2026 was $3.7 million compared to $3.1 million for Q4 2025. The fair value loan income for Q2 2026 is expected to be in the range of $3 to 4 million. Non-interest income was $46.5 million for the three months ended 31 March 2026 compared to $42.8 million for the quarter ended 31 December 2025 and $41.3 million for the same period in 2025.

Speaker #2: The fair value loan income for the first quarter of 2026 was 3.7 million, compared to 3.1 million for the fourth quarter of 2025. The fair value loan income for the second quarter of 2026 is expected to be in the range of 3 to 4 million.

Speaker #2: Non-interest income was $46.5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2026, compared to $42.8 million for the quarter ended December 31, 2025, and $41.3 million for the same period in 2025.

Asylbek Osmonov: Non-interest income was $46.5 million for the three months ended 31 March 2026 compared to $42.8 million for the quarter ended 31 December 2025 and $41.3 million for the same period in 2025.

Speaker #2: Non-interest expense was $217.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2026, compared to $138.7 million for the quarter ended December 31, 2025, and $140.3 million for the same period in 2025.

Asylbek Osmonov: Non-interest expense was $217.3 million for the 3 months ended 31 March 2026 compared to $138.7 million for the quarter ended 31 December 2025 and $140.3 million for the same period in 2025. The linked quarter increase was primarily due to merger-related expenses of $42.5 million and the addition of American Bank and Texas Partners Bank during this period. For Q2 2026, we expect non-interest expense to be in the range of $176 to 180 million. This projection does not include additional one-time merger expenses for the quarter.

Speaker #2: The link quarter increase was primarily due to merger-related expenses of 42.5 million, and the addition of American Bank and Texas Partner Bank during this period.

Speaker #2: For the second quarter of 2026, we expect non-interest expense to be in the range of $176 million to $180 million. This projection does not include additional one-time merger expenses for the quarter.

Speaker #2: The efficiency ratio was 59.2% for the three months ended March 31, 2026, compared to 43.7% for the quarter ended December 31, 2025, and 45.7% for the same period in 2025.

Asylbek Osmonov: The efficiency ratio was 59.2% for the 3 months ended 31 March 2026 compared to 43.7% for Q ended 31 December 2025 and 45.7% for the same period in 2025. Excluding merger-related expenses, the efficiency ratio was 47.6% for the 3 months ended 31 March 2026. The bond portfolio metrics at 31 March 2026 have a modified duration of 3.8 and projected annual cash flows of approximately $2.1 billion. With that, let me turn over the presentation to Tim Timanus from some details on loan and asset quality. Timanus.

Asylbek Osmonov: The efficiency ratio was 59.2% for the 3 months ended 31 March 2026 compared to 43.7% for Q ended 31 December 2025 and 45.7% for the same period in 2025. Excluding merger-related expenses, the efficiency ratio was 47.6timanu% for the 3 months ended 31 March 2026. The bond portfolio metrics at 31 March 2026 have a modified duration of 3.8 and projected annual cash flows of approximately $2.1 billion. With that, let me turn over the presentation to Tim Timanus from some details on loan and asset quality. Timanus.

Speaker #2: Excluding merger-related expenses, the efficiency ratio was 47.6% for the three months ended March 31, 2026. The bond portfolio metrics at 3/31/2026 have a modified duration of 3.8 and projected annual cash flows of approximately $2.1 billion. And with that, let me turn over the presentation to Tim Timanis for some details on loan and asset quality.

Speaker #2: Timanis.

Speaker #3: Thank you, Asylbek. Non-performing assets at quarter end March 31, 2026, totaled $122,107,000, or 48 basis points of loans and other real estate. This compares to $150,842,000, or 69 basis points, at December 31, 2025.

H.E. Timanus, Jr.: Thank you, Asylbek. Non-performing assets at quarter end 31 March 2026 totaled $122,107,000 or 48 basis points of loans and other real estate compared to $150,842,000 or 69 basis points at 31 December 2025. Since 31 March 2026, $7,936,000 of non-performing assets have been removed or put under contract for sale. The 31 March 2026 non-performing asset total was made up of $108,714,000 in loans, $136,000 in repossessed assets, and $13,257,000 in other real estate.

H.E. Tim Timanus, Jr.: Thank you, Asylbek. Non-performing assets at quarter end 31 March 2026 totaled $122,107,000 or 48 basis points of loans and other real estate compared to $150,842,000 or 69 basis points at 31 December 2025. Since 31 March 2026, $7,936,000 of non-performing assets have been removed or put under contract for sale. The 31 March 2026 non-performing asset total was made up of $108,714,000 in loans, $136,000 in repossessed assets, and $13,257,000 in other real estate.

Speaker #3: Since March 31, 2026, $7,936,000 of non-performing assets have been removed or put under contract for sale. The March 31, 2026, non-performing asset total was made up of $108,714,000 in loans, $136,000 in repossessed assets, and $13,257,000 in other real estate.

Speaker #3: Net charged loss for the three-month end at March 31st, 2026 were $41,309,000 compared to net charged loss of $5,884,000 for the quarter end at December 31st, 2025.

H.E. Timanus, Jr.: Net charge-offs for the three months ended 31 March 2026 were $41,309,000 compared to net charge-offs of $5,884,000 for the quarter ended 31 December 2025. There was no provision to the allowance for credit losses during the quarter ended 31 March 2026, but $91.4 million total was added via the mergers with American Bank and Texas Partners Bank. No dollars were taken into income from the allowance during the quarter ended 31 March 2026. The average monthly new loan production for the quarter ended 31 March 2026 was $312 million, compared to $314 million for the quarter ended 31 December 2025.

H.E. Tim Timanus, Jr.: Net charge-offs for the three months ended 31 March 2026 were $41,309,000 compared to net charge-offs of $5,884,000 for the quarter ended 31 December 2025. There was no provision to the allowance for credit losses during the quarter ended 31 March 2026, but $91.4 million total was added via the mergers with American Bank and Texas Partners Bank. No dollars were taken into income from the allowance during the quarter ended 31 March 2026.

Speaker #3: There was no provision to the allowance for credit losses during the quarter ended March 31, 2026, but $91.4 million total was added via the mergers with American Bank and Texas Partners Bank.

Speaker #3: No dollars were taken into income from the allowance during the quarter ended March 31st, 2026. The average monthly new loan production for the quarter ended March 31st, 2026 was $312 million, compared to $314 million for the quarter ended December 31st, 2025.

H.E. Tim Timanus, Jr.: The average monthly new loan production for the quarter ended 31 March 2026 was $312 million, compared to $314 million for the quarter ended 31 December 2025.

Speaker #3: Loans outstanding at March 31st, 2026 were approximately $25.288 billion, compared to $21.805 billion at December 31st, 2025. The March 31st, 2026 loan total is made up of $38% fixed-rate loans, $28% floating-rate loans, and $34% variable-rate loans.

H.E. Timanus, Jr.: Loans outstanding at 31 March 2026 were approximately $25.288 billion compared to $21.805 billion at 31 December 2025. The 31 March 2026 loan total is made up of 38% fixed rate loans, 28% floating rate loans, and 34% variable rate loans. I will now turn it over to Charlotte Rasche.

H.E. Tim Timanus, Jr.: Loans outstanding at 31 March 2026 were approximately $25.288 billion compared to $21.805 billion at 31 December 2025. The 31 March 2026 loan total is made up of 38% fixed rate loans, 28% floating rate loans, and 34% variable rate loans. I will now turn it over to Charlotte Rasche.

Speaker #3: I will now turn it over to Charlotte Rasche.

Speaker #4: Thank you, Tim. At this time, we are prepared to answer your questions. Our call operator next will assist us with questions.

Charlotte Rasche: Thank you, Tim. At this time, we are prepared to answer your questions. Our call operator, Nick, will assist us with questions.

Speaker #5: Thank you. We will now begin the question and answer session. To ask a question, you may press star, then 1 on your touch-tone phone.

Operator: Thank you. We will now begin the question and answer session. To ask a question, you may press star then one on your touch-tone phone. If you are using a speakerphone, please pick up your handset before pressing the keys. If at any time your question has been addressed and you would like to withdraw your question, please press star and then two. The first question will come from Kathryn Mueller with KBW. Please go ahead.

Speaker #5: If you are using a speakerphone, please pick up your handset before pressing the keys. If at any time your question has been addressed, and you would like to withdraw your question, please press star, and then 2.

Speaker #5: The first question will come from Kathryn Mueller with KBW. Please go ahead.

Speaker #6: Thanks. Good morning.

Kathryn Mueller: Thanks. Good morning.

Catherine Mealor: Thanks. Good morning.

Speaker #7: Good morning.

H.E. Timanus, Jr.: Good morning, Kathryn.

H.E. Tim Timanus, Jr.: Good morning, Kathryn.

Speaker #6: I wanted to first just start out on the NIM guidance. It was great to see the NIM move higher, and a part of this was just the addition of these two acquisitions.

Kathryn Mueller: Wanted to first just start out on the NIM guidance. It was great to see the NIM move higher. I know part of this was just the addition of these 2 acquisitions, but interested if you could, just help us think about how you're thinking about the margin moving forward next quarter and then once you add in Stellar. Maybe is there anything within the margin this quarter that felt one-time in nature, either some kind of one-time, loan payments or anything like that we should be aware of that we shouldn't be rolling forward to next quarter? Thanks.

Catherine Mealor: Wanted to first just start out on the NIM guidance. It was great to see the NIM move higher. I know part of this was just the addition of these 2 acquisitions, but interested if you could, just help us think about how you're thinking about the margin moving forward next quarter and then once you add in Stellar. Maybe is there anything within the margin this quarter that felt one-time in nature, either some kind of one-time, loan payments or anything like that we should be aware of that we shouldn't be rolling forward to next quarter? Thanks.

Speaker #6: But interested if you could just help us think about how you're thinking about the margin moving forward. Next quarter and then once you add in Stellar, and then maybe is there anything within the margin this quarter that felt one time in nature, either some kind of one-time loan payments or anything like that that we should be aware of that we shouldn't be rolling forward to next quarter?

Speaker #6: Thanks.

Speaker #3: I'll ask for Kathryn. So we are pleased with our margin expansion this quarter. It was, like I mentioned, the contributed from our asset repricing during the first quarter and addition of two banks.

Asylbek Osmonov: I'll answer, Kathryn. We are pleased with our margin expansion this quarter. You know, it was, like as mentioned, contributed from our assets repricing during Q1 and addition of two banks, so help us with increasing the margin. If you look at our rate track model, and it's like based on the static balance sheet, looking for Q2, we see that our projected margin for Q2 will be flat and a little slightly higher than Q1. The reason is that there was a few several factors that impacting Q1. We saw continuing, you know, repricing of earning assets, but we also had, we recognized about $4 million of loan income from non-accrual loan, which we don't expect in Q2.

Speaker #3: So it helped us with the increase in the margin. But if you look at our rate shock model and it's based on the static balance sheet looking for the second quarter, we see that our projected margin for second quarter will be flat and slightly higher than the first quarter.

Speaker #3: And the reason is that there was several factors that impacted Q1. We saw continued repricing of earning assets, but we also had recognized about $4 million of loan income from non-accrual loan, which we don't expect in the second quarter.

Asylbek Osmonov: We saw continuing, you know, repricing of earning assets, but we also had, we recognized about $4 million of loan income from non-accrual loan, which we don't expect in Q2.

Speaker #3: And also, I think that having fewer days in the calendar quarter has historically helped our margin. So those two things had an impact on it.

Asylbek Osmonov: I think the having fewer days in the calendar quarter historically helped our margin. If those two things had impact on it, but overall, we are very pleased with the expansion.

Speaker #3: But overall, we are very pleased with the expansion.

Speaker #7: And you want to go ahead and give them some kind of guidance?

David Zalman: You want to go ahead and give some kind of guidance.

Asylbek Osmonov: Yeah. Continue on the guidance. If you kind of long term, and I'm going to include the Stellar Bank in our model for 2026, I think what the model shows that we'd be exiting combined NIM around 3.70. For having full year of Prosperity and half year Stellar, I think average model shows about 3.60 for 2026.

Speaker #3: Yeah, so we’ll continue on the guidance. If you kind of look long-term—and I’m going to include Stellar Bank in our model for 2026—I think the model shows that we’ll be exiting combined NIM around 3.70.

Speaker #3: But for having full year of prosperity and half-year Stellar, I think average model shows around 360 for 2026.

Speaker #6: Okay, great. And then on the bond side, though, there's a big increase in bond yields. I assume you restructured the portfolios that you acquired. Is this a good run rate for the current yield on the securities book, or is there anything to be aware of there and how you're thinking about that going forward?

Kathryn Mueller: Okay, great. On the bond book, there was a big increase in the bond yield. I assume you restructured the portfolios that you acquired. Is this a good run rate for the current yield on the securities book or anything to be aware of there and how you're thinking about that going forward?

Catherine Mealor: Okay, great. On the bond book, there was a big increase in the bond yield. I assume you restructured the portfolios that you acquired. Is this a good run rate for the current yield on the securities book or anything to be aware of there and how you're thinking about that going forward?

Speaker #3: No, I think it's a good run rate. What we've done in the first quarter, we did, in addition to bringing the bond book from the acquired banks, we also did buy some securities.

Asylbek Osmonov: No, I think it's a good run rate. What we've done in Q1, we did, in addition to bringing the bond book from the acquired banks, we also did buy, you know, some securities. That's why you saw almost $1.4 billion enclosed in bond portfolio. I think we also continued to buy. From now on, I see that, you know, the yields on bonds should increase a little bit than what we had in Q1.

Speaker #3: That's why you saw almost 1.4 billion including bond portfolio. I think we also continue to buy. So from now on, I see that the yield on bonds should increase a little bit.

Speaker #3: Then what we had in the first quarter.

Speaker #6: Okay. And where does that $1.4 billion in securities—what was the new rate on that?

Kathryn Mueller: Okay. Where did that $1.4 billion in securities, what was the rate, the new rate on that?

Catherine Mealor: Okay. Where did that $1.4 billion in securities, what was the rate, the new rate on that?

Speaker #3: So I think it's between we were able to get between 450 and we were able to get around 485. So it was kind of in between when rates with the IRN were the rate fluctuated.

Asylbek Osmonov: I think it's, well, we were able to get between 450, and we were able to get around 485. It was kind of in between when rates, you know, as with, IRR where the rates fluctuated, so we were able to secure some at 485.

Speaker #3: So we were able to secure some at 485.

Speaker #6: Okay, great. Thank you. Great quarter, guys.

Kathryn Mueller: Great. Thank you. Great quarter, guys.

Catherine Mealor: Great. Thank you. Great quarter, guys.

Operator: The next question will come from Manan Gosalia with Morgan Stanley. Please go ahead.

Speaker #5: The next question will come from Manon Gasalia with Morgan Stanley. Please go ahead.

Speaker #8: Hey, good afternoon. Can you hear me?

Manan Gosalia: Hey, good afternoon. Can you hear me?

Speaker #7: We can.

H.E. Timanus, Jr.: We can.

H.E. Tim Timanus, Jr.: We can.

Speaker #8: All right. Sorry about that. So David, you in Texas. At the same time, you mentioned the labor market is kind of cooling right now.

Manan Gosalia: All right. Sorry about that. David, you mentioned the benefits of diversification in Texas. At the same time, you mentioned the labor market is kind of cooling right now. You know, maybe if I add on to that, there's, you know, clearly a lot more competition, especially from some out-of-state banks. Can you put that together for us in terms of how you're thinking about, you know, competition overall, loan spreads, deposit rates, loan growth, and, you know, just your bigger picture thoughts on the dynamics in the state?

Speaker #8: And then maybe if I add on to that, there's clearly a lot more competition, especially from some out-of-state banks. Can you put that together for us in terms of how you're thinking about competition overall, loan spreads, deposit rates, loan growth, and just your bigger picture thoughts on the dynamics in the state?

Speaker #7: Well, that's a big question. But even though it may be slower growth, it's probably still better growth than anywhere else in the United States.

David Zalman: Well, that's a big question. You know, even though it may be slower growth, it's probably still better growth than anywhere else in the United States. I still think that Texas is probably the best place to be as far as growth goes. I mean, it's really kind of split, you know. Everybody complains about prices going up and, you know, when they go to the grocery store or they go buy gas or, you know, a car that used to cost 60,000 now costs 100,000. Everybody complains about it, when I talk to people, again, I think probably middle class and upper middle class, it still hasn't slowed people down. People still have a lot of money, they're still spending money.

Speaker #7: So I still think that Texas is probably the best place to be as far as growth goes. I mean, it's really kind of a it's kind of split.

Speaker #7: Everybody complains about prices going up, and when they go to the grocery store or they go buy gas or a car—they used to cost $60,000, now it costs $100,000.

Speaker #7: And everybody complains about it. But when I talk to people, again, I think probably middle class and upper middle class, it still hasn't slowed people down.

David Zalman: Everybody complains about it, when I talk to people, again, I think probably middle class and upper middle class, it still hasn't slowed people down. People still have a lot of money, they're still spending money.

Speaker #7: People still have a lot of money, and they're still spending money. Probably it's affecting the lower earning group more than maybe the other group. But I think, for the long run, Texas has still had tremendous growth.

David Zalman: Probably it's affecting a lower earning group than maybe the other group. I think for the long run, Texas has still had tremendous growth. I mean, every time California does a thing like they're gonna tax people 5% on their net worth, it only makes states like Texas and Florida better. For the foreseeable future, we still see it very good. Talking about the competition, that is a big deal because you have a lot of banks that wanna be in Texas. It's hard for them to get market share, and we're competing against them on loans on a day-to-day basis.

Speaker #7: You're still seeing I mean, every time California does a thing like they're going to tax people 5% on their net worth, it only makes people it only makes states like Texas and Florida better.

Speaker #7: So for the foreseeable future, we still see it very good. Talking about the competition, that is a big deal because you have a lot of banks that want to be in Texas.

Speaker #7: It's hard for them to get market share. And we're competing against them on loans on a day-to-day basis. And the some of the bigger deals that we competed on, where we were in the 6% price range, they were down in the 5.9% range.

David Zalman: Some of the bigger deals that we competed on, where we were in the 6% price range, they were down in the 5.9% range. I understand that when we ever go into a new market, that's exactly what we do. We try to underprice something and try to get some market share. That's what we're looking at from the out-of-state banks coming in. On the deposit side, you still see them throw in sometimes if you're a non-customer right now, like Truist is advertising like a 4% rate on a money market rate, on a money market account. We're closer to the 3%. You know. They're trying to buy the business. We understand that. At the same time, we haven't acquiesced.

Speaker #7: I understand that when we ever go into a new market, that's exactly what we do. We try to underprice something and try to get some market share.

Speaker #7: So that's what we're looking at from the out-of-state banks coming in. On the deposit side, you still see them throwing—sometimes, if you're a non-customer right now, like Trudis is advertising, like, a 4% rate.

Speaker #7: On a money market rate on a money market account, we're closer to the 3. So they're trying to buy the business. We understand that.

David Zalman: We're closer to the 3%. You know. They're trying to buy the business. We understand that. At the same time, we haven't acquiesced.

Speaker #7: At the same time, we haven't acquiesced. We lost several big deals where we haven't come down on the price. So we haven't come down on the price yet.

David Zalman: We lost several big deals where we haven't come down on the price, or we haven't come down on the price yet, and we're still trying to maintain our margin. I think that we will continue. I think that overall, in the long run, we've been through this before. It's not our first rodeo. We'll continue to do good. Our partners, you could saw Stellar, they did much better than we did this time, you know, and I think it just shows that things happen over periods of time. They were up over $200 million where they might've been lagging before, and I think that's the same thing for us. We'll win. We have a number of big deals that we're looking at right now that, you know, I think we've agreed to the price.

Speaker #7: We're still trying to maintain our margin. I think that we will continue, and I think that overall, in the long run, we've been through this before.

Speaker #7: It's not our first rodeo. We'll continue to do good. Our partners, you could saw Stellar, they did much better than we did this time.

Speaker #7: And I think it just shows that things happen over periods of time. They were up over 200 million dollars where they might have been lagging before.

David Zalman: They were up over $200 million where they might've been lagging before, and I think that's the same thing for us. We'll win. We have a number of big deals that we're looking at right now that, you know, I think we've agreed to the price.

Speaker #7: And I think that's the same thing for us. We'll win. We have a number of big deals that we're looking at right now that I think we've agreed to the price or just making sure that we want to do the deal.

David Zalman: We're just making sure that we wanna do the deal. I do see that. Having said that, we have three mergers with banks, and if you look at us historically, you know, I'd like to tell you that you're gonna see this mid to single digit loan growth or double-digit loan growth, and that just doesn't happen. I think that, you know, if we can stay, you know, we can stay flat, that's pretty good this year. I mean, because I think that as you do these deals, you just see some change in that. Just historically, I'd like to say that we're gonna be there, we're gonna make it, but historically, that's not happening. Kevin, you may have some comments on the deal or-

Speaker #7: So I do see that. Having said that, we have three mergers with banks. And if you look at it, it's historically I'd like to tell you that you're going to see this mid-single-digit loan growth or double-digit loan growth.

Speaker #7: And that just doesn’t happen. I think that if we can stay—if we can stay flat, that’s pretty good this year, I mean, because I think that as you do these deals, you just see some, you see some change in that.

Speaker #7: And just historically, I'd like to say that you're going to be there. We're going to make it. But historically, that's not happening. Kevin, you may have some comments on the deal, or?

David Zalman: Just historically, I'd like to say that we're gonna be there, we're gonna make it, but historically, that's not happening. Kevin, you may have some comments on the deal or-

Speaker #9: No, I agree with it with you, David. I think not to get too granular, Prosperity X Acquisitions has not had growth in the last couple of quarters.

Kevin Hanigan: No, I agree with it, with you, David. I think, not to get too granular, Prosperity ex acquisitions has not had growth in the last couple of quarters. I think as I think about the whys to that, the market has gotten more competitive, particularly on very large construction deals, which we've always played a part in. The market's gotten cheaper in terms of the rates that they're willing to do those deals at, and they've come off levels of recourse, much lower levels of recourse, and we have not. We've not played in that game, and it's cost us. We've missed out on some deals.

Speaker #9: I think as I think about the whys to that, the market has gotten more competitive, particularly on very large construction deals, which we've always played a part in.

Speaker #9: The market's gotten cheaper in terms of the rates that they're willing to do those deals at. And they've come off levels of recourse, much lower levels of recourse.

Speaker #9: And we have not. We have not played in that game. And it's cost us. We've missed out on some deals. I think, to augment that or to fight that off a little bit, we're likely to set aside a bucket of, say, $750 million to $1 billion worth of commitments where we'll play in those markets with certain clients, very well-known folks that have been clients for a very long period of time.

Kevin Hanigan: We've not played in that game, and it's cost us. We've missed out on some deals.

Kevin Hanigan: I think to augment that or to fight that off a little bit, we're likely to set aside a bucket of, say, $750 million to $1 billion worth of commitments where we'll play in those markets with certain clients, very well-known folks that have been clients for a very long period of time. I think we'll fight some of that off ourselves, ex what happens in the acquisitions. As David said, this is no surprise to any of you, when we do acquisitions, it is more likely than not that there's some asset runoff from those acquisitions in the ensuing 18 months.

Speaker #9: So I think we'll fight some of that off ourselves. What happens in the acquisitions? As David said, and this is no surprise to any of you, when we do acquisitions, it is more likely than not that there's some asset runoff from those acquisitions in the ensuing 18 months.

David Zalman: Right.

Speaker #9: It's been the case time and time and time again. And we've got three of them. So we'll be fighting those headwinds for the next year to 15 months, 18 months.

Kevin Hanigan: It's been the case time and time and time again, and we've got three of them. We'll be fighting those headwinds for the next, you know, next year to 15 months, 18 months. I think if we are flat during that period of time overall, we'll have done pretty well.

Speaker #9: And I think if we are flat during that period of time overall, we'll have done pretty well.

Speaker #10: Well, and I'd even say when some of the out-of-state banks are offering 5.8, 5.9, and we can get 4.85 on a security with about a four-year average life, pretty hard to pay the lender, reserve some money for loan loss, and really go that low.

David Zalman: Well, I'd even say, you know, when some of the out-of-state banks are offering 5.8%, 5.9%, and we can get 4.85% on a security with about a 4-year average life, pretty hard to pay the lender, reserve some money for loan loss and really go that low. Again, at the same time, you know, if a customer is able to bring, and it's just not a dry relationship, and that customer is really over to bring over a deposit relationship, that's a whole different story, and we'll give you credit for that, and we'll probably get as low as that if it's not a dry relationship.

Speaker #10: But again, at the same time, if a customer is able to bring and it's just not a dry relationship and that customer is really over to bring over a deposit relationship, that's a whole different story.

Speaker #10: And we'll give you credit for that. And we'll probably get as low as that if it's not a dry relationship. But all in all, we still stick with the story that the core deposits are really what makes the bank.

David Zalman: All in all, we still stick with the story that, you know, The core, the core deposits are really what makes the bank, and that's what we're focused on. We're really focused on increasing net interest income and net income for the shareholder over the next 1 to 2 years. I have to tell you right now, I'm probably more excited than I've ever been in the last 3 years about our future. When I look at the numbers, I mean, we were going, as you all know, our net interest margin was what it got as low as 2.75% or something like that, 2.90%. Our numbers that we're looking at right now, we're really looking at some really great net interest margin going forward.

Speaker #10: And that's what we're focused on. And we're really focused on increasing net interest income. And net income for the shareholder over the next one or two years.

Speaker #10: And I have to tell you right now, I'm probably more excited than I've ever been in the last three years about our future when I look at the numbers.

David Zalman: When I look at the numbers, I mean, we were going, as you all know, our net interest margin was what it got as low as 2.75% or something like that, 2.90%. Our numbers that we're looking at right now, we're really looking at some really great net interest margin going forward.

Speaker #10: I mean, we were going as you all know, our net interest margin was what it got as low as 275 or something like that, 290.

Speaker #10: Our numbers that we're looking at right now, we're really looking at some really great net interest margin going forward. I think we're looking at probably for the next two years, net interest income increasing.

David Zalman: I think we're looking at probably for the next 2 years, net interest income increasing. I'm terribly excited for where we're at right now today.

Speaker #10: And so, I’m terribly excited for where we’re at right now, today.

Manan Gosalia: I appreciate all the color. I know that was a fairly broad question, but I appreciate the full amount there. Maybe just to follow up there, you know, given the excitement about the forward, you know, NIM expansion and forward growth as well, maybe how are you thinking about additional M&A from here? Does it make sense to integrate the current deals first, or do you think that there's room to pursue another one if you get something that makes sense for you?

Speaker #11: I appreciate all the color. I know that was a fairly broad question, but I appreciate the false amounts, sir. So maybe just to follow up there, given the excitement about the forward NIM expansion and forward growth as well, maybe how are you thinking about additional M&A from here?

Speaker #11: Does it make sense to integrate the current deals first, or do you think that there's room to pursue another one if you get something that makes sense for you?

Speaker #9: I think the answer that the answer that we've all need to be doing is these three deals are very important. I mean, we're going from a $38 billion bank to a $53, $54 billion bank.

David Zalman: I think the answer that we all need to be doing is these three deals are very important. I mean, we're going from a $38 billion bank to a $53, $54 billion bank. So that's, you know. So our main focus right now is the operational integration of these, of these three deals. So that's why when we talk about the things we talk about, our whole focus. I mean, I don't think you'd ever wanna say never on anything. At the same time, at the same time, our primary focus is bringing these three deals together and hitting those consensus numbers that you analysts all have out there, and we feel really good about that.

Speaker #9: And so that's—so our main focus right now is the operational integration of these three deals. And so that's why, when we talk about the things we talk about, our whole focus—I mean, I don't think you'd ever want to say 'never' on anything.

Speaker #9: At the same time, at the same time, our primary focus is bringing these three deals together. And hitting those consensus numbers that you analysts all have out there.

David Zalman: At the same time, at the same time, our primary focus is bringing these three deals together and hitting those consensus numbers that you analysts all have out there, and we feel really good about that.

Speaker #9: And we feel really good about that.

Speaker #11: Great. Thanks very much.

Manan Gosalia: Great. Thanks very much.

Speaker #12: The next question will come from Dave Rochester with Canter. Please go ahead.

Operator: The next question will come from Dave Rochester with Cantor. Please go ahead.

Speaker #13: Hey, good morning, guys.

Dave Rochester: Hey, good morning, guys.

Speaker #14: Good morning.

David Zalman: Good morning.

Speaker #13: So just as a part of your view on NIM going forward, how are you thinking about the cost of deposits here in a scenario of no rate cuts?

Asylbek Osmonov: Good morning.

Dave Rochester: Just as a part of your view on NIM going forward, how are you thinking about the cost of deposits here in a scenario of no rate cuts? Do you think you guys can hold deposit costs here? Can you shift them lower? Then was just curious where you're seeing new loan yields come in as the remaining fixed rate loans are still rolling off here. Thanks.

Speaker #13: Do you think you guys can hold deposit costs here? Can you shift them lower? And then was just curious where you're seeing new loan yields come in as the remaining fixed-rate loans are still rolling off here.

Speaker #13: Thanks.

Speaker #15: I don't think that if interest rates stay where they're at, our net interest margin targets are really good. I mean, I think also, back to talking to you just a minute ago, saying about a 3.6% average for this year, 3.7% exit.

David Zalman: I don't think that if interest rates stay where they're at, you know, our net interest margin targets are really good. I mean, I think also that talk to you just a minute ago saying about a 3.6 average for this year, 3.7 exit. 2027, I think you guys have about 3.8% net interest margin, 3.8. I think if interest rates stay where they're at, we'll hit that or even higher. If interest rates go down 100 basis points, we're probably, you know, we'll come off of that to some degree. I, again, I don't think that we're a lower deposit rates any, and I, and I think our numbers show really higher net interest margins than maybe you do deal.

Speaker #15: 2027, I think you guys have about 3.8% net interest margin, 3.8. I think if interest rates stay where they're at, we'll hit that or even higher.

Speaker #15: If interest rates go down 100 basis points, we're probably we'll come off of that to some degree. But again, I don't think that we're lower deposit rates any.

David Zalman: If interest rates go down 100 basis points, we're probably, you know, we'll come off of that to some degree. I, again, I don't think that we're a lower deposit rates any, and I, and I think our numbers show really higher net interest margins than maybe you do deal.

Speaker #15: And I think our numbers show really higher net interest margins than maybe you do. At the same time, I don't know that I really believe them, because as interest rates come down, we never went up as high on a lot of our customers as we—as they could have gone somewhere else.

David Zalman: At the same time, I don't know that I really believe them because as interest rates come down, we never went up as high on a lot of our customers as we, as they could have gone somewhere else. I don't know that we'll come down as faster at the same time. I don't know if that gives you any color or not, but.

Speaker #15: So I don't know that we'll come down as fast or at the same time. So I don't know if that gives you any color or not, but.

Speaker #16: I'll just add a little bit on the deposit side of it. So we hadn't decreased or changed our rates for the past few months now.

Asylbek Osmonov: I'll just add a little bit on the deposit side of it. We, you know, we hadn't decreased or changed our rates for past few months now. Based on what we see on the deposit growth we mentioned on our core deposit growth, I think we're holding our own with the current rate. I know it's a lot gonna depend on the competition, but at current rate, we believe that, you know, we don't need to increase the rates. They might come down rate overall because we have some higher CDs getting repriced. We'll see some overall deposit rate or cost of deposit come down a little bit, but not significant, but it will do because of repricing. Overall, I think as long rate doesn't change, we should be at this level or lower by ourselves.

Speaker #16: And based on what we see on the deposit growth, we mentioned on our core deposit growth, I think we're holding our own with the current rate.

Speaker #16: I know a lot is going to depend on the competition, but at the current rate, we believe that we don't need to increase the rate.

Speaker #16: So they might come down, rate overall, because we have some higher CDs getting repriced. So we'll see some overall deposit rate, or cost of deposits, come down a little bit.

Asylbek Osmonov: We'll see some overall deposit rate or cost of deposit come down a little bit, but not significant, but it will do because of repricing. Overall, I think as long rate doesn't change, we should be at this level or lower by ourselves.

Speaker #16: But not significant, but we'll do it because of repricing. But overall, I think as long as the rate doesn't change, we should be at this level or lower by ourselves.

Speaker #16: But if you add Stellar, of course, Stellar has a little bit higher, but in the combined one, it's still going to be cost of deposit around 140.

Asylbek Osmonov: If you add Stellar, of course, Stellar has a little bit higher, but in the combined one, it's still gonna be cost of deposit around 140. That's what our model shows.

Speaker #16: That's what our model shows. And I think on the loan repricing, they want to know the loan repricing. I think if you.

Dave Rochester: Great.

Asylbek Osmonov: I think on the loan repricing, they wanna know. On the loan repricing, I think if you-

Speaker #15: Yeah, the loan repricing—I mean, I think we're kind of good where we're at. I mean, I don't see—as I'm not saying we won't jump to maybe one or two deals to compete on the 5.9, under 6, but for the most part, we're really not going to play that game.

David Zalman: Yeah, the loan repricing, I mean, I think we're kinda good where we're at. I mean, I don't see us. I'm not saying we won't jump to maybe one or two deals to compete on the 5 point under 6. For the most part, we're really not gonna play that game. We'd rather buy securities, I think, than just try to play a game just to have a dry relationship to beat somebody out and take a lot of risk.

Speaker #15: And we'd rather buy securities, I think, than just try to play a game just to have a dry relationship to beat somebody out and take a lot of risks.

Speaker #16: Yeah. So new loan yields are kind of where the book is right now, or are they still a little bit higher? A little bit higher.

Asylbek Osmonov: Yeah.

Dave Rochester: Yeah. Okay. New loan yields are where the book is right now, or are they still a little bit higher?

Asylbek Osmonov: A little bit higher.

David Zalman: Little higher.

Speaker #17: A little higher.

Speaker #16: Okay. Maybe just one more switching to just the loan trends, your thoughts there going forward. I know you mentioned maybe flattish loans this year.

Dave Rochester: Okay. Maybe just one more switching to just the loan trends, your thoughts there going forward. I know you mentioned maybe flattish loans this year with all the deals closing. Maybe that carries into, you know, next year a little bit in terms of, like, the, a little bit of runoff that you normally get. Just looking at Stellar, you know, this quarter, which had a solid loan growth quarter, seemed pretty decently broad-based. You know, I was just thinking about you guys next year and the growth trajectory. I was wondering if you think that with Stellar in the fold, you know, after you have that little bit of runoff, you know, are you thinking that maybe your organic growth profile can improve from where it has been over time?

Speaker #16: With all the deals closing, maybe that carries into next year a little bit in terms of a little bit of runoff that you normally get.

Speaker #16: But just looking at Stellar, this quarter, which had a solid loan growth quarter, seemed pretty decently broad-based. I was just thinking about you guys next year and the growth trajectory.

Speaker #16: I was wondering if you think that with Stellar in the fold, after you have that little bit of runoff, are you thinking that maybe your organic growth profile can improve from where it has been over time?

Dave Rochester: I was wondering if you think that with Stellar in the fold, you know, after you have that little bit of runoff, you know, are you thinking that maybe your organic growth profile can improve from where it has been over time?

Speaker #17: Yeah. Post any what I would call normal for us, post-acquisition runoff, I do think particularly with Stellar hitting its stride that we'll return to kind of low to mid-single-digit kind of stuff.

Kevin Hanigan: Yeah. Post any, you know, what I would call normal for us, post-acquisition runoff. I do think, particularly with Stellar hitting its stride, that we'll return to, you know, kind of low to mid-single digit kind of stuff. It's gonna take a little while.

Speaker #17: But that's going to take a little while.

Speaker #15: I think even American Bank and Texas Partners are talking. They're excited with where their position is too and has done pretty good.

David Zalman: I think even American Bank and Texas Partners are talking. They're excited.

Matt Olney: Yeah

Kevin Hanigan: Yeah

David Zalman: where their position is too, and it's done pretty good.

Speaker #16: Yeah. Okay. Thanks, guys.

Dave Rochester: Yeah. Okay. Thanks, guys.

Speaker #17: Yeah. We just want to be cognizant of the fact that it is typical for us to have some loan declines post-acquisitions. And we've done three acquisitions.

Kevin Hanigan: Yeah. We just wanna be cognizant of the fact that it is typical for us to have some loan declines post-acquisitions, and we've done three acquisitions, and we wanna be realistic about it.

Speaker #17: And we want to be realistic about it.

Speaker #16: Yep. Understood. Thanks.

Dave Rochester: Yep. Understood. Thanks.

Speaker #12: The next question will come from David Chiaverini with Jefferies. Please go ahead.

Operator: The next question will come from David Chiaverini with Jefferies. Please go ahead.

Speaker #18: Hi. Thanks for taking the question. So following up on the deposit side, what sort of deposit growth should we expect? Should it kind of trend in line with loans and kind of flattish and the loans deposit ratio stays in the low 70s?

David Chiaverini: Hi. Thanks for taking the question. Following up on the deposit side, what sort of deposit growth should we expect? Should it, you know, kind of trend in line with loans and kind of flattish and the loans to deposit ratio stays in the low 70s? How should we think about the deposit side?

Speaker #18: How should we think about the deposit side?

Speaker #15: I think our deposit side is really not going to be affected. We should have our normal organic growth on the deposit side. With the exception of seasonal fluctuations with public funds.

David Zalman: I think our deposit side's really not gonna be affected. We should have our normal organic growth on the deposit side, with the exception of seasonal fluctuations with public funds. I think we've always done at least 2% to 3% more now. Having said that, one of the banks that joined us has some really larger accounts that, you know, that really operate under their treasury system that they have. They feel comfortable that they won't lose any of those accounts. On the other hand, it's always possible there's a handful of those accounts that, you know, are $30 million, $40 million, and that could always affect it to some degree.

Speaker #15: And I think we've always done at least 2% to 3% more now. Having said that, one of us has a really large account that really operates under their treasury system that they have.

Speaker #15: They feel comfortable that they won't lose any of those accounts. On the other hand, it's always possible there's a handful of those accounts that are $30, $40 million, and that could always affect it to some degree.

David Zalman: On the other hand, it's always possible there's a handful of those accounts that, you know, are $30 million, $40 million, and that could always affect it to some degree.

Speaker #15: But for the most part, I mean, all the banks that are joining us, we're in Texas. We should have growth on the deal. I think that we're fine.

David Zalman: For the most part, I mean, all the banks that are joining us, we're in Texas. We should have growth on the deal. I think that we're fine. You'll still can see core deposit growth with seasonal drops with public funds.

Speaker #15: You'll still continue to see you'll still can see core deposit growth with seasonal drops with public funds. As far as the loan deposit ratio is, I think I didn't answer that.

David Chiaverini: Great. Thanks for that.

David Chiaverini: As far as the loan to deposit ratio is, I think I didn't answer that. You know, we have a policy that it doesn't say we can't go above 85%, but once we hit 85%, we have to go in front of the board and discuss that with them. Unlike a lot of the other banks or a number of the other banks that are at 90% and 100%, I don't think you'll see us doing that. I think we feel more comfortable at the 75% and 80% for the most part.

David Zalman: As far as the loan to deposit ratio is, I think I didn't answer that. You know, we have a policy that it doesn't say we can't go above 85%, but once we hit 85%, we have to go in front of the board and discuss that with them. Unlike a lot of the other banks or a number of the other banks that are at 90% and 100%, I don't think you'll see us doing that. I think we feel more comfortable at the 75% and 80% for the most part.

Speaker #15: We have a policy that, while it doesn't say we can't go above 85%, once we start hitting 85%, we have to go in front of the board and discuss that with them.

Speaker #15: So, unlike a lot of the other banks, or a number of the other banks that are at 90% and 100%, I don't think you'll see us doing that.

Speaker #15: I think we feel more comfortable at the 75 and 80 percent for the most part.

Speaker #18: Got it. Thanks for that. And then shifting over to the capital side, can you talk about the Basel III endgame potential benefit to your capital ratios and then your buyback appetite from here?

David Chiaverini: Got it. Thanks for that. Shifting over to the capital side, can you talk about the Basel III endgame potential benefit to your capital ratios and then your buyback appetite from here? Last couple quarters, you've been a little bit more active than you had been historically. How should we think about that going forward?

Speaker #18: Last couple of quarters, you've been a little bit more active than you had been historically. How should we think about that going forward?

Speaker #15: I think that we're going to make a lot of money or at least it looks like we're going to be making a lot of money, at least combined.

David Zalman: I think that, you know, we're gonna make a lot of money, or at least it looks like we're gonna be making a lot of money, at least combined. So I think that whenever we see this, you'll see the price. You saw the buyback when the price of the stock was, I forgot what the average this time was, $68 or something like that. I think you'll still see us as when the price is an opportunity like it is right now, you'll see us continue to buy back.

Speaker #15: And so I think that as long as, whenever we see this, you'll see the price—you saw the buyback when the price of the stock was, I forgot what the average is, down, was $68 or something like that.

Speaker #15: So, I think you'll still see us, when the price is an opportunity like it is right now, you'll see us continue to buy back.

Speaker #15: And again, we have a lot of capital even with the combination of Stellar Bank. And I know we're paying 25 or 30 percent cash on that, but we still have a lot of capital.

David Zalman: Again, we have a lot of capital, even with the combination of Stellar Bank. I know we're paying 25% or 30% cash on that. We still have a lot of capital, you know, I think going forward, you'll see us continue to buy back if prices stay where they're at, for sure.

Speaker #15: And I think, going forward, you'll see us continue to buy back if prices stay where they're at, for sure.

Speaker #17: Yeah. And on the Basel III benefits, we did high-level analysis of impact of the mortgage loans. And it will benefit, but I think it's when we calculate maybe 50 basis points on the capital, that what we saw benefit on the once the rule passes on the mortgage loans.

Asylbek Osmonov: Yeah. On the Basel III benefits, we did high-level analysis of the impact of the mortgage loans, and it will benefit, but I think it's when we calculate maybe 50 basis points on the capital, that what we saw benefit once the rule passes on the mortgage loans.

Speaker #15: But from a capital standpoint, I mean, we're real rich. And I mean, when we look at a pro forma based on the combined earnings of both of these banks, even after you take out dividends, you're talking about $500 or $600 million a year in excess after dividends to do something with.

David Zalman: From a capital standpoint, I mean, we're well rich.

Asylbek Osmonov: Yeah, it's gonna benefit.

David Zalman: When we look at a pro forma based on a combined earnings of both of these banks, even after you take out dividends, you're talking about $500 or $600 million a year in excess after dividends to do something with. We have a strong capital going in, and I think we'll have a stronger capital going forward.

Speaker #15: So we have a strong capital going in, and I think we'll have a stronger capital going forward, really. And the ability to purchase our own stock back.

Asylbek Osmonov: Mm-hmm

Asylbek Osmonov: really, and the ability to purchase our own stock back.

David Zalman: really, and the ability to purchase our own stock back.

Speaker #18: Very helpful. Thank you.

David Chiaverini: Very helpful. Thank you.

David Zalman: Yeah.

Speaker #12: The next question will come from Matt Olney with Stevens. Please go ahead.

Operator: The next question will come from Matt Olney with Stephens. Please go ahead.

Speaker #19: Yeah, thanks for taking the question, guys. I want to go back to the Stellar Bank discussion. I think you mentioned the improving loan growth at the bank, but also it looks like the adjusted net income at Stellar Bank was almost $30 million in the first quarter, excluding a few non-recurring items.

Matt Olney: Yeah. Thanks for taking the question, guys. Wanna go back to the Stellar Bank discussion, and I think you mentioned the improving loan growth at the bank, but also looks like the adjusted net income at Stellar Bank was almost $30 million in Q1, ex a few non-recurring items. If I go back to the original assumptions when the deal was announced back in January, it looks like the earnings projections from Stellar for the full year was $113 million. Seems like you're tracking well above that number if I just annualize that Q1. Was there anything else unusual or anything else to consider with that Q1 net income number of almost $30 million? Or is that a clean number that we can carry forward from here?

Speaker #19: If I go back to the original assumptions when the deal was announced back in January, it looks like the earnings projections from Stellar for the full year was 113 million dollars.

Speaker #19: So it seems like you're tracking well above that number if I just annualize that first quarter. Was there anything else unusual or anything else to consider with that first quarter net income number of almost $30 million?

Matt Olney: Seems like you're tracking well above that number if I just annualize that Q1. Was there anything else unusual or anything else to consider with that Q1 net income number of almost $30 million? Or is that a clean number that we can carry forward from here?

Speaker #19: Or is that a clean number that we can carry forward from here?

Speaker #20: Matt, thanks for the question. It is a clean number. We actually feel great about the earning prospects entering into the second quarter, taking the cumulative nature of the growth that we had in the first quarter.

Paul Egge: Matt, thanks for the question. It is a clean number. We actually feel great about the earning prospects entering into Q2, taking the cumulative nature of the growth that we had in Q1. We feel good about the path that we're on and what that implies.

Speaker #20: So we feel good about the path that we're on, and what that implies.

Speaker #12: Okay. I appreciate that.

Matt Olney: Okay. Appreciate that.

Speaker #20: We're paying down or we paid down on April 1st, the last remaining piece of sub debt. So we actually see benefit to margin that will come back come out as a byproduct too.

Paul Egge: We paid down on 1 April the last remaining piece of sub debt. We actually see benefit to margin that will come out as a byproduct too.

Speaker #18: Okay.

Matt Olney: Okay. Perfect.

Speaker #15: For those that don't know, that was Paul's CFO at Stellar.

David Zalman: For those that don't know, that was Paul. That was Paul, CFO at Stellar.

Speaker #12: Great. Thank you. Thank you, Paul. And then I think you completed the core system conversion at the bank in February? I think there was a mention earlier in the prepared remarks, but I missed it.

Matt Olney: Great. Thank you. Thank you, Paul. Then, I think you completed the core system conversion at the bank in February. I think there was a mention earlier on the prepared remarks, but I missed it. Just remind us of the timeline expectations to complete the remaining conversions for each of the acquired banks.

Speaker #12: Just remind us of the timeline expectations to complete the remaining conversions for each of the acquired banks.

Speaker #15: Yeah, first of all, the DNA conversion was a huge deal. I don't want to just keep talking about it, but our bank was more on a back system.

David Zalman: First of all, the DNA conversion was a huge deal. I don't wanna just keep talking about it, but, you know, our bank was more on a batch system and, you know, over the weekend, if you had a long weekend, by the time we ran everything back through and brought everybody's account back up to date, we may be up by Monday morning, and we may not. Under this new system, we can update everything in about an hour and a half. That just tells you how much capacity we had. It was a real big deal. It took us years to complete. I think when you look at our bank and we had three major deals, we had a DNA conversion. We've had our plate full, so the team has done just a miraculous job.

Speaker #15: And over the weekend, if you had a long weekend, by the time we ran everything back through and brought everybody's account back up to date, we may be up by Monday morning, and we may not.

Speaker #15: And under this new system, we can update everything in about an hour and a half. So that just tells you how much capacity we had.

Speaker #15: It was a real big deal. It took us years to complete. And so, I think when you look at our bank—and we had three major deals.

David Zalman: It was a real big deal. It took us years to complete. I think when you look at our bank and we had three major deals, we had a DNA conversion. We've had our plate full, so the team has done just a miraculous job.

Speaker #15: We had a DNA conversion. We've had our plate full. So the team has done just a miraculous job. And so going forward, we're looking at a September operational integration for the American Bank.

David Zalman: Going forward, we're looking at a September operational integration for the American Bank. We're looking at a November operational integration for the Texas Partners Bank. For Stellar, we're looking at March 8th, I think so.

Speaker #15: We're looking at a November operational integration for the Texas Partners Bank and for Stellar. We're looking at March 8th, I think, so.

Speaker #12: Okay, thanks for the color. The next question will come from Brett Rabbiton with StoneX Group. Please go ahead.

Matt Olney: Okay. Thanks for the color.

Operator: The next question will come from Brett Rabatin with StoneX Group. Please go ahead.

Speaker #21: Hey, good morning, everyone.

Brett Rabatin: Hey, good morning, everyone.

Speaker #12: Good morning.

Kevin Hanigan: Morning.

Speaker #21: I wanted to go back I wanted to go back to the credits, the two credits you guys talked about. And you guys obviously have a historical, very low net charge-offs, really strong asset quality.

Brett Rabatin: Wanted to go back to the credits, the two credits you guys talked about. You know, you guys obviously have a historical, very, very low net charge-offs, really strong asset quality. The, you know, the two this quarter were obviously an outlier. Was hoping maybe for any other color. You mentioned one was an insurance company. You know, was there fraud involved? Were these loans from past acquisitions? You know, was there anything unusual that created the loss exposure, you know, relative to what you might have had as collateral?

Speaker #21: So the two this quarter were obviously an outlier. But was hoping maybe for any other color. And you mentioned one was an insurance company.

Speaker #21: Was there fraud involved? Were these loans from past acquisitions? Was there anything unusual that created the loss exposure relative to what you might have had as collateral?

Speaker #17: Yeah, the big one—this is Kevin Brett—the big one was an insurance company. They were in the business of selling Medicare products, so Medicare Plus, Medicare Advantage kind of products.

Kevin Hanigan: Yeah, this is Kevin. Brett, the big one was an insurance company. They were in the business of selling Medicare products, so Medicare Plus, Medicare Advantage kind of products. If you wanna get to the core of it, their business was doing pretty well for the first 18 to 24 months. Not to get too deep into the accounting, if you called them and you did a Medicare Advantage program through them, and your annual premium for the year was, let's just say $240 to make it easy, $20 a month. They would accrue $20 for that first month paid by the government, largely.

Speaker #17: And if you want to get to the core of it, their business was doing pretty well for the first 18 to 24 months. And not to get too deep into the accounting, but if you called them and you did a Medicare Advantage program through them, and your annual premium for the year was, let's just say, $240 to make it easy, $20 a month, they would accrue $20 for that first month paid by the government, largely.

Kevin Hanigan: They would accrue $20 for that first month paid by the government, largely.

Kevin Hanigan: The rest of it would be booked as a receivable, so $220 in account receivable. In that business, what you do is you model and project what your account turnover is gonna be. You may wake up three months from now and cancel that policy because you think you can get a better deal or you want a different deal. You're unhappy with the deal you've got. There is some modeling of the turnover of your receivables, of people canceling. What happened here was the cancellation rates were way higher than the model reflected.

Speaker #17: And then the rest of it would be booked as a receivable, so $220 in accounts receivable. In that business, what you do is you model and project what your account turnover is going to be.

Speaker #17: So you may wake up three months from now and cancel that policy because you think you can get a better deal, or you want a different deal.

Speaker #17: You're unhappy with the deal you've got. So, there is some modeling of the turnover of your receivables, of people canceling. And what happened here was the cancellation rates were way higher than the model reflected.

Speaker #17: And that causes, obviously, two things. It writes down your receivables by the remaining balance that has not been accrued in the income, and it can cause you to have to restate prior period earnings.

Kevin Hanigan: That causes obviously two things, a write-down of your receivables by the remaining balance that has not been accrued in the income, and it can cause you to have to restate prior period earnings. That was the big factor in that overall deal. The deal was backed by a very large, very well-known private equity firm that our bankers have had some experience with in the past, and they have typically backed their deals. In this case, at least to this time, they have not backed the deal. I think we began talking about this deal probably in the Q3 of last year. Talked about it again in the Q4. We chose to write the thing down this Q all the way.

Speaker #17: And that was the big factor in that overall deal. The deal was backed by a very large, very well-known private equity firm that our bankers have had some experience with in the past, and they have typically backed their deals.

Speaker #17: In this case, at least to this time, they have not backed the deal. I think we began talking about this deal probably in the third quarter of last year, talked about it again in the fourth quarter.

Kevin Hanigan: I think we began talking about this deal probably in the Q3 of last year. Talked about it again in the Q4. We chose to write the thing down this Q all the way.

Speaker #17: And we chose to write the thing down this quarter all the way. So I would call that a one-off in our case. If we look across the remaining non-accruals in our book, I think the largest non-accrual loan we have is $10 million.

Kevin Hanigan: I would call that a one-off in our case. If we look across the remaining non-accruals in our book, I think the largest non-accrual loan we have is $10 million. There's nothing else out there that looks anything like this. This is truly a one-off. David mentioned the other one. It's been a long time client. It was a legacy client in the buy here, pay here, car space. High-performing company for 15, 18 years with us that we banked them. They got a little more aggressive in their business model coming out of COVID, poor timing. I would differ the first one, which was a one-off and probably should never happen again, a loan we probably should not have made. Easy to say today.

Speaker #17: So there's nothing else out there that looks anything like this. This is truly a one-off. David mentioned the other one that's been a long-time client.

Speaker #17: It was a legacy client in the buy here, pay here car space. High-performing company for 15, 18 years with us that we banked them.

Speaker #17: And they got a little more aggressive in their business model coming out of COVID—poor timing. And I would differ on the first one, which was a one-off and probably should never happen again, a loan we probably should not have made.

Kevin Hanigan: I would differ the first one, which was a one-off and probably should never happen again, a loan we probably should not have made. Easy to say today.

Speaker #17: Easy to say today. The second one is a loan we would make. It would have made today. And it's just basic business. The guys changed their strategy a bit.

Kevin Hanigan: The second one is a loan we would've made today. It's just basic business. The guys changed their strategy a bit. The strategy was not successful, and it cost them dearly, and it cost us a bit. I'd say one is a way out there, nothing else looks like that in the portfolio kind of thing that we're worried about. The other one, you know, look, it was a bad day.

Speaker #17: The strategy was not successful, and it cost them dearly, and it cost us a bit. So I'd say one is a way out there—nothing else looks like that in the portfolio kind of thing that we're worried about.

Speaker #17: And the other one, look, it was a bad day.

Speaker #22: Well, and you'd have to say the original insurance deal we did have the backing of this big sponsor. We didn't want to release it.

David Zalman: Well, you'd have to say the original insurance deal, we did have the backing of this big sponsor.

Asylbek Osmonov: Right.

David Zalman: We didn't wanna release it. They wanted it released, a huge major bank took it, and they released the guarantee on it. Our stupidity is enough. Us being stupid, we bought a percentage back. However, a lesser percentage than what we had originally.

Speaker #22: They wanted it released. And so a huge, major, major bank took it. And they released the guarantee on it. Our stupidity is enough, us being stupid, we bought a percentage back.

Speaker #22: However, a lesser percentage than what we had originally.

Brett Rabatin: Okay. That's very detailed color. Appreciate that. David, wanted to ask, you know, when I look at your map, I mean, you're pretty dense in Texas. You know, is the strategy from here, you're obviously very focused on integrating these three acquisitions, but would the strategy from here be more density? Would you look to new markets? Are there other smaller markets in Texas that might have great deposits, other community banks? You know, just any thoughts on how you see the environment from that perspective?

Speaker #12: Okay. Let's [get] very detailed color. Appreciate that. And then, David, I wanted to ask: when I look at your map, I mean, you're pretty dense in Texas.

Speaker #12: Is the strategy from here, you're obviously very focused on integrating these three acquisitions. But would the strategy from here be more density? Or would you look to new markets?

Speaker #12: Are there other smaller markets in Texas that might have great deposits? Other community banks—just any thoughts on how you see the environment from that perspective?

David Zalman: You know, as we mentioned before, first of all, I'd say, you know, we don't wanna grow just to be grow, but having said that, you know, scale has just become very, very important. I look at our income statement and I see, you know, just buying equipment technology is like $2 million a month sometimes. That doesn't count with the technology. We spend $75, 80, 90 million a year on that. Scale is important, but we don't wanna just say we grow to grow. We still, as we mentioned earlier, I think that we really think that a real bank, the real value in it is the core deposits, where if you don't wanna grow loans, that you can still buy bonds and still have a good 1.5% plus return.

Speaker #22: As we mentioned before, first of all, I'd say we don't want to grow just to grow, but having said that, scale has just become very, very important.

Speaker #22: I look at our income statement, and I see just buying equipment, technologies—like $2 million a month sometimes. That doesn't account for the technology we spend $75, $80, $90 million a year on, that.

Speaker #22: So, scale is important, but we don't want to just say we grow to grow. We still, as we mentioned earlier, I think that we really think that a real bank—the real value in it—is the core deposits.

David Zalman: We still, as we mentioned earlier, I think that we really think that a real bank, the real value in it is the core deposits, where if you don't wanna grow loans, that you can still buy bonds and still have a good 1.5% plus return.

Speaker #22: Where, if you don't want to grow loans, you can still buy bonds and still have a good one-and-a-half percent plus return.

David Zalman: I think that we've all talked about it. We like where we're at right now, but we still, again, our primary objective is still to put these three deals together. Our real, you know, our deal is to really be, and we grew up in the times when you had a Texas Commerce and a First City and an Allied and all that. It's still our plan and goal to continue to make one of the Texas' biggest banks, not just because it's big, but that can offer services from a technology standpoint to the biggest customers, to the smallest customers. We'll continue to do that, but we're gonna do it at a pace.

Speaker #22: I think that we've all talked about it. We like where we're at right now. But we also, we still, again, our primary objective is still to put these three deals together.

Speaker #22: But our real deal is to really be, and we grew up in the times when you had a Texas Commerce, and a First City, and an Allied, and all that.

Speaker #22: And it's still our plan and goal to continue to make one of Texas' biggest banks—not just because it's big, but because it can offer services from a technology standpoint to the biggest customers to the smallest customers.

Speaker #22: And we'll continue to do that. But we're going to do it at a pace—we're not going to do it at a pace until we really can put these deals together and really show you that we can make the $6 and something cents this year, when we make the $7 and something cents next year.

David Zalman: We'll continue to do that, but we're gonna do it at a pace.

David Zalman: We're not gonna do it at a pace until we really can put these deals together and really show you that everything that we can make the $6 and something cents this year and we make the $7 and something cents next year. We wanna show everybody that we can do that and that like in the past when we promised that we'd bring the net margins up, we wanna do what we say that we're gonna do. The future is still building that larger bank that we wanna be for everybody.

Speaker #22: And we want to show everybody that we can do that and that, like in the past when we promised we'd bring net margins up, we want to do what we say that we're going to do.

Speaker #22: But the future is still building that larger bank that we want to be for everybody.

Speaker #12: Okay. That's great color. Thanks so much, David. The next question will come from Janet Lay with TD Cowen. Please go ahead.

Brett Rabatin: Okay. That's great, color. Thanks so much, David.

Operator: The next question will come from Janet Lee with TD Cowen. Please go ahead.

Speaker #23: Hello.

Janet Lee: Hello.

Speaker #12: Hey, Janet.

David Zalman: Hey, Janet.

Speaker #24: Morning.

Asylbek Osmonov: Morning.

Rachel Smith: Morning. Appreciate the near-term guidance you provided on expenses for Q2, just given a lot of moving pieces with some cost saves and Stellar in Q3. Is there some sort of fuller expense guide you could give for the year or where the efficiency ratio could trend? Is this, you know, mid-forties level a good place to be, or how should we think about the trajectory?

Speaker #23: Morning. Appreciate that the near-term guidance you provided on expenses for the second quarter just given a lot of moving pieces with some cost saves and stellar in the third quarter.

Janet Lee: Morning. Appreciate the near-term guidance you provided on expenses for Q2, just given a lot of moving pieces with some cost saves and Stellar in Q3. Is there some sort of fuller expense guide you could give for the year or where the efficiency ratio could trend? Is this, you know, mid-forties level a good place to be, or how should we think about the trajectory?

Speaker #23: Is there some sort of fuller expense guide you could give for the year, or where the efficiency ratio could trend? Is this mid-40s level a good place to be?

Speaker #23: Or, how should we think about the trajectory?

Speaker #25: For Janet, I don't know if I can give a specific guidance long-term, because we're still trying to integrate two banks, and then Stellar coming in the second half of the—We said early on, at least two banks that we merge, cost savings that we announced, that we are working toward it.

Asylbek Osmonov: Janet, I don't know if I can give a specific guidance long term because we're still trying to integrate two banks and then Stellar coming in the H2 of the year. What we, you know, said early on, at least two banks that we merged, cost savings that we announced that we are working toward it, and we're gonna achieve those cost savings. I mean, we already getting some of the cost saves now, but most of them come when the integration of the system, what we mentioned in September, November, then when we're gonna see that. Also, you know, with the Stellar addition, we're gonna probably see most of the cost saving next year, and we said, what, 35% cost save, we feel very comfortable about the cost save on that side of it.

Speaker #25: And we're going to achieve those cost savings. I mean, we're already getting some of the cost savings now. But most of them come when the integration of the system—what we mentioned in September, November.

Speaker #25: Then when we're going to see that. Also, with the stellar addition, we're going to probably see most of the cost saving next year. And we said, what, 35% cost saving would feel very comfortable about the cost saves.

Asylbek Osmonov: Also, you know, with the Stellar addition, we're gonna probably see most of the cost saving next year, and we said, what, 35% cost save, we feel very comfortable about the cost save on that side of it.

Speaker #25: On that side of it. So if you combine all together, I think the goal for us to get back to the with all the cost savings and get back to the mid-40s that we'll rerun historically, 44, 45, 46 percent.

Asylbek Osmonov: If you combine all together, I think the goal for us to get back to the with all the cost savings and get back to the mid-forties, that will re-ran historically 44%, 45%, 46%. That's the goal, and I think it is achievable.

Speaker #25: So that's the goal. And I think it is achievable.

Speaker #23: Got it. That's fair. Thank you. And you said the loan accretion income expected to stay around this 3 to 4 million range on the loan side in the second quarter.

Rachel Smith: Got it. That's fair. Thank you. You said the loan accretion income expected to stay around this $3 to 4 million range on the loan side in Q2. Could you remind us where this could go with Stellar in Q3? Could you maybe provide projections around the full PAA as opposed to just loan accretion?

Janet Lee: Got it. That's fair. Thank you. You said the loan accretion income expected to stay around this $3 to 4 million range on the loan side in Q2. Could you remind us where this could go with Stellar in Q3? Could you maybe provide projections around the full PAA as opposed to just loan accretion?

Speaker #23: Could you remind us where this could go with the stellar in the third quarter? Or could you maybe provide projections around the full PAA as opposed to just loan accretion?

Speaker #25: Yeah. On the four second quarter, yeah, it stays the same, 3 to 4 million dollars. With the addition of stellar, I mean, it can a lot of change, right?

Asylbek Osmonov: Yeah. For Q2, yeah, it stays the same, $3 to 4 million. With the addition of Stellar, I mean, it can a lot of change, right? It depends on the market rate environment when we do merge with Stellar July. It's kind of hard to say. I'll tell you when we did our projection, when we put together in January, we said that, you know, we're probably gonna expect about at least on 2027, about $10 to 12 million of interest fair value income from Stellar. That's a pre-tax number. That's what we estimated. Again, a lot can change depending on the rate environment in July.

Speaker #25: It depends on the market rate environment when we do merge with Stellar in July. So it's kind of hard to say. But I'll tell you, when we did our projection—when we put it together in January—we said that we're probably going to expect, at least in 2027, about $10 to $12 million of interest fair value income from Stellar.

Speaker #25: That's a pre-tax number. That's what we estimated. But again, a lot of can change depending on the rate environment in July.

Asylbek Osmonov: That's what we estimated. Again, a lot can change depending on the rate environment in July.

Speaker #22: That was for loans and securities.

David Zalman: That was for loans and deposit-.

Asylbek Osmonov: For loans.

David Zalman: For loans and for securities.

Asylbek Osmonov: For loans, yeah, and securities is gonna reprice. I think Stellar was about, what, a 3.5 margin. That will gonna reprice a little bit.

Speaker #25: For loans, yeah, and securities are going to reprice. I think Stellar was about, what, three and a half margin. So that will kind of reprice a little bit, another maybe 100 basis points or so.

David Zalman: Right

Asylbek Osmonov: Another maybe 100 basis points or so.

Speaker #12: Right.

David Zalman: Right.

Speaker #23: Got it. And the 370 name, that was the target for the.

Janet Lee: Got it. The 370 NIM, that was the target.

Speaker #25: Yeah. That was a 370. Yeah. That's going to be our exit, meaning the end of the year combined prosperity bank and stellar. Together.

Asylbek Osmonov: Yeah, that was the 370-

Janet Lee: All reported then.

Janet Lee: Yeah, that's gonna be our exit, meaning the end of the year combined Prosperity Bank and Stellar together.

Asylbek Osmonov: Yeah, that's gonna be our exit, meaning the end of the year combined Prosperity Bank and Stellar together.

Speaker #22: For 36 average.

David Zalman: The 3 6 average.

Speaker #25: Thirty-six average for the year, because we're just going to have Stellar for half a year.

Janet Lee: Got it.

Janet Lee: The six average for the year, 'cause we're gonna.

David Zalman: The six average for the year, 'cause we're gonna.

Janet Lee: Right

Janet Lee: ... kind of have Stellar for half a year.

Janet Lee: Right

David Zalman: ... kind of have Stellar for half a year.

Speaker #23: Got it. All right. Thank you for taking my questions.

Janet Lee: Got it. All right. Thank you for taking my questions.

Asylbek Osmonov: Mm-hmm. You're welcome.

Speaker #25: You're welcome.

Speaker #12: The next question will come from Jared Shaw of Barclays. Please go ahead.

Operator: The next question will come from Jared Shaw of Barclays. Please go ahead.

Speaker #26: Good morning. Thanks. I guess just on the 30 million charge up that you had highlighted, was there a specific reserve associated with that prior to the charge up?

Jared Shaw: Good morning. Thanks.

Asylbek Osmonov: Good morning.

Jared Shaw: I guess for, just on the, on the $30 million charge-off that you had highlighted, was there a specific reserve associated with that, prior to the charge-off?

Speaker #25: Yeah. For that specific, we had a reserved half of it last year because I think when we kind of start seeing that and we reserved the rest of it and charge up this one.

Asylbek Osmonov: Yeah, for that specific, we had reserved half of it last year because I think when we kind of start seeing that. We reserved rest of it and charged off this one. That's why we didn't see any of the P&L impacts this quarter because we provisioned half last quarter. We charged off the remaining half this quarter.

Speaker #25: That's why we didn't see any of the P&L impacts this quarter—because we provisioned half last quarter, and we charged off the remaining half this quarter.

Speaker #26: Okay. Okay. Thanks. And then on the stellar deal, last quarter, a couple of times you mentioned that just given their underwriting and pricing, you didn't expect to see any runoff from that portfolio.

Jared Shaw: Okay. Okay, thanks. On the Stellar deal, last quarter a couple times you mentioned that, you know, just given their underwriting and pricing, you didn't expect to see any runoff from that portfolio. Today it sounds like, you know, maybe there could be some runoff. What should we assume is potentially at risk from the Stellar portfolio of running off? I guess what changed to change your view on that?

Speaker #26: But today, it sounds like maybe there could be some runoff. What should we assume is potentially at risk from the stellar portfolio of running off?

Speaker #26: And I guess, what changed to change your view on that?

David Zalman: Kevin can jump in a minute, but again, I think we're just trying to prepare everybody that, you know, you have Stellar, you have Texas Partners Bank and American, that from historically, you know, we have lost loans through these deals. Again, we don't wanna give somebody a deal that says, okay, you know, we thought it was great that they increased $200 and something million, but again, we don't wanna come here and tell you we're gonna have a 5% or 6% loan growth when historically we've seen things that. I guess we're just being cautious, really.

Speaker #22: Kevin can jump in a minute. But again, I think we're just trying to prepare everybody that you have stellar, you have Texas Partners Bank, An American that just from an historically, that we have lost loans through these deals.

Speaker #22: And again, we don't want to give somebody a deal that says, "Okay. We thought it was great that they increased 200 and something million dollars.

Speaker #22: But again, we don't want to come here and tell you we're going to have a 5 or 6 percent loan growth when historically we've seen things that I guess we're just being cautious, really.

Speaker #25: Yeah. I'd say it's being cautious. I do think they underwrite much like we do. It does take—and again, I went through this on the other side in 2019 with a large lending staff.

Kevin Hanigan: Yeah. I'd say it's being cautious. I do think they underwrite much like we do. Again, I went through this on the other side in 2019 with a, with a large lending staff. It takes 6 to 9 months to get integrated into the system and how the underwriting is done at Prosperity and the forms and the, and the process. It takes a while, and lenders get used to it, and things stabilize.

Speaker #25: It takes six to nine months to get integrated into the system and have underwriting done at Prosperity, and the forms and the process.

Speaker #25: It takes a while. And then lenders get used to it. And things stabilize.

Speaker #22: I think it's even more than that, Kevin. I think even I looked at what we did in our production this first quarter. And it was definitely impacted by doing a DNA conversion.

David Zalman: I think it's even more than that, Kevin. I think, you know, even I looked at what we did in our production this first quarter, and it was definitely impacted by, you know, doing a DNA conversion, people trying to get their loans to the loan committee, working with 3 different banks to put it all together. When you're doing this, I mean, you know, we increased our assets. You can do the math between 38 and $54 billion. That's a lot of increases. To try to massage and put all this together, things are not going to be just exactly the way they were. I would say this, that if you think they're going to be exact, plus you're going to have this exponential growth, I think it would be a mistake.

Speaker #22: People trying to get their loans to the loan committee. Doing three—working with three different banks to put it all together. So I think there's, when you're doing this—I mean, we increased our assets.

Speaker #22: You can do the math between $38 and $54 billion—that's a lot of increase. And so, to try to massage and put all this together, things are not going to be just exactly the way they were.

David Zalman: To try to massage and put all this together, things are not going to be just exactly the way they were. I would say this, that if you think they're going to be exact, plus you're going to have this exponential growth, I think it would be a mistake.

Speaker #22: And if you and I would say this, that if you think they're going to be exactly plus you're going to have this exponential growth, I think it would be a mistake.

Speaker #22: I think right now we really need to focus on putting all this together, making sure everybody fits in good, and take our time and doing it right.

David Zalman: I think right now we really need to focus on putting all this together, making sure everybody fits in good, and take our time in doing it right.

Speaker #26: Great. Thanks.

Jared Shaw: Great. Thanks.

Asylbek Osmonov: Jared, just to clarify one. In my mind I call provision, but that's the one. I meant like specific reserve. We put specific reserve on that loan, not provision expense.

Speaker #25: And Jared, just to clarify, when in my mind, I called provision, but that's the one I meant specific reserve. We put specific reserve on that loan, not provision expense.

Asylbek Osmonov: Jared, just to clarify one. In my mind I call provision, but that's the one. I meant like specific reserve. We put specific reserve on that loan, not provision expense.

Speaker #12: The next question will come from John Arfstrom with RBC Capital Markets. Please go ahead.

Operator: The next question will come from Jon Arfstrom with RBC Capital Markets. Please go ahead.

Speaker #27: Hey, thanks. Good morning. I might have missed this, but Kevin, can you touch on the warehouse lending business and your outlook there?

Jon Arfstrom: Hey, thanks. Good morning.

Asylbek Osmonov: Good morning.

David Zalman: Good morning.

Jon Arfstrom: I might have missed this, Kevin, can you touch on the warehouse lending business and your outlook there?

David Zalman: Yeah.

Speaker #25: Yeah. Warehouse as you know, John, averaged a billion 207, I think, for the quarter. But we closed out at a billion 430 something, maybe a billion 432 or a billion 433.

Kevin Hanigan: Yeah. warehouse, as you know, Jon, averaged $1.207 billion, I think, for the quarter. we closed out at $1.430 billion something, maybe $1.432 billion or $1.433 billion. it ended up the quarter really strong. It's backed off a bit from there. I think yesterday it closed at about $1.240 billion, $1.238 billion, something like that. I think it'll be higher on average in the Q2 than it was in the Q1. I'll call it $1.3 billion to $1.325 billion.

Speaker #25: So, it ended up the quarter really strong. It's backed off a bit from there. I think yesterday it closed at about $1.240 billion, $1.238 billion, something like that.

Speaker #25: I think it'll be higher on average in the second quarter than it was in the first. So I'll call it a billion three to a billion three twenty-five.

Speaker #22: Because even our own mortgage company, we're finally seeing where they're making money. And most of our mortgage companies are doing okay. They're doing pretty well.

David Zalman: Even our own mortgage company, we're finally seeing where they're making money, and most of our mortgage companies are doing okay now.

Kevin Hanigan: Doing a little, doing pretty well.

David Zalman: They're doing a little better. Yeah. It probably ought to be a little better.

Speaker #25: Yeah. So probably ought to be a little better.

Speaker #27: Okay. Good. And then maybe also, Kevin, you talked about construction and being a little more cautious there due to competition. But there was still decent growth for the quarter.

Jon Arfstrom: Okay, good. Maybe also, Kevin, you talked about construction and being a little more cautious there due to competition, but there was still decent growth for the quarter. Was that acquisition driven, or is there activity that you guys are putting on the balance sheet now?

Speaker #27: Was that acquisition-driven, or is there activity that you guys are putting on the balance sheet now?

Speaker #26: No, construction's been weak. What I was saying is we're losing out on a lot of construction deals because the competition in the market is willing to do it with less recourse and way cheaper spreads to SOFR.

Kevin Hanigan: No. C-construction's been weak. What I was saying is we're losing out on a lot of construction deals because of the competition in the market is willing to do it with less recourse and way cheaper spreads to SOFR. That we are looking at establishing a bucket for a handful of clients that would be our A-plus rated clients, where we might be willing to do things at a little cheaper rate and a little less recourse.

Speaker #26: And we are looking at establishing a bucket for a handful of clients that would be our A-plus-rated clients, where we might be willing to do things at a little cheaper rate and a little less recourse.

Speaker #22: Yeah. I mean, the bottom line is we lost some really larger deals, $100 million-plus deals because again, we just weren't willing to go down to the pricing and the terms and conditions that those guys are willing to do.

David Zalman: Yeah. I mean, the bottom line is we lost some really, you know, larger deals, 100 million dollar plus deals because, again, we just weren't willing to go down to the pricing and the terms and conditions that those guys were willing to do, and we could buy a bond, not have the risk, and still make the money.

Speaker #22: And we could buy a bond, not have the risk, and still make the money.

Speaker #27: Yeah. Okay. David, one for you. This may be an odd question with your stellar team in the room, but you got beat up last quarter on the pricing and during the quarter on the price paid.

Jon Arfstrom: David, one for you. This may be an odd question with your Stellar team in the room. You got beat up last quarter on the pricing and during the quarter on the price paid.

Speaker #27: Just curious how you're thinking about it a quarter later. Sounds like you still believe the accretion is there, and the 2027 EPS numbers are there.

David Zalman: Right.

Jon Arfstrom: Just curious how you're thinking about it a quarter later. Sounds like you still believe the accretion is there and the 2027 EPS numbers are there. Maybe Stellar's doing better than planned. How are you feeling about this a quarter later? Just it's a big deal, obviously.

Speaker #27: But—and maybe Stellar's doing better than planned—but how are you feeling about this quarter later? It's a big deal, obviously.

Speaker #22: I couldn't be happier. I think it's a great deal. I mean, I think there's a I think there's a huge difference between one bank and another bank.

David Zalman: I couldn't be happier. I think it's a great deal. I mean, I think there's a huge difference between one bank and another bank. I think, I'm not just saying this because these guys are in here. If we were ever to sell our bank, I wouldn't sell for anything less on a multiple that these guys that we paid for. I think it's top-notch. I think all the analysts in 2027, when we make the money we're going to make, I think everybody's going to say, I knew it the whole time. You know, right now I got to prove it.

Speaker #22: And I think I'm not just saying this because these guys are in here. If we were ever to sell our bank, I wouldn't sell for anything less on a multiple that these guys that we pay for.

Speaker #22: So I think it's top-notch. I think y'all are going to I think all the analysts in 2000 at the end of 2027, when we make the money, we're going to make.

Speaker #22: I think everybody's going to say, "I knew it the whole time." But right now, I got to prove it. But you guys are all going to say, "Well, we knew it the whole time." And that's when the stock is going to go to $95 or $100.

David Zalman: You guys are all gonna say, Well, we knew it the whole time, and that's when the stock is gonna go to 95 or $100. You know, which I'm telling you, it's gonna happen and I feel better than I have in 3 years about all these different deals.

Speaker #22: But I'm telling you, it's going to happen. And I feel better than I have in three years about all these different deals.

Speaker #25: Yeah. John, this is Kevin. Look, we did get a little dinged up, right? The market thought we paid a little too much. And they thought we were wait.

Kevin Hanigan: Yeah, Jon, this is Kevin. I, you know, we did get a little dinged up, right? The market thought we paid a little too much, what they thought, we were using estimates that were greater than the market had for 2026.

Speaker #25: They thought we were using estimates that were greater than the market had for 2026.

Speaker #22: But here's.

David Zalman: But here's-

Speaker #25: But I think we did it based upon a deep dive of due diligence and knowing these people really, really well in the course of putting the acquisition together and feeling comfortable with their internal numbers.

Kevin Hanigan: I think, you know, we did it based upon, you know, a deep dive of due diligence and knowing these people really, really well in the course of putting the acquisition together and feeling comfortable with their internal numbers. It's really rare for us to put out numbers that are above the consensus when we're doing a public deal. It's rare for anybody to do. We did it, and I think they've proven up with a clean quarter that's really good this quarter. My guess is, well, when we look back at all of this, the estimates that we used for Stellar for 2026 are gonna be better than we're gonna end up doing better than even the ones we used.

Speaker #25: And it's really rare for us to put out numbers that are above the consensus when we're doing a public deal. It's rare for anybody to do.

Speaker #25: We did it. And I think they've proven up with a clean quarter that's really good this quarter. And my guess is, well, when we look back at all of this, the estimates that we used for stellar for 2026 are going to be better than the one they're going to we're going to end up doing better than even the ones we used.

Kevin Hanigan: My guess is, well, when we look back at all of this, the estimates that we used for Stellar for 2026 are gonna be better than we're gonna end up doing better than even the ones we used.

Speaker #22: Well, I would even go a step farther than that, and Bob can jump in if he wants. But I know this goes for American, and probably for Bob both.

David Zalman: Well, I would even go a step further that. Bob can jump in if he wants. I know this goes for American and probably for Bob both. If they wouldn't have got the price that they wanted, they wouldn't have done the deal. I mean, they know what they're worth. Bob, you may jump in and say that. I wouldn't. I mean, I wouldn't do a deal if we knew we're worth more.

Speaker #22: If they wouldn't have got the price that they wanted, they wouldn't have done the deal. I mean, they know what they're worth, Bob. You may jump in and say that.

Speaker #22: But I wouldn't. I mean, I wouldn't do a deal if we knew we were worth more.

Speaker #26: No, absolutely. David, I'm kind of thinking now we didn't pay enough.

Robert Franklin: No, absolutely. David, I'm kind of thinking now we didn't pay enough.

Speaker #22: Okay. I knew that was coming. I knew that was coming.

David Zalman: Okay. I knew that was coming. I knew that was coming.

Speaker #25: Not a stripe, Bob.

Kevin Hanigan: Nice try, Bob.

Speaker #22: Yeah.

Speaker #27: All right. Thanks a lot. I appreciate it.

Jon Arfstrom: All right. Thanks a lot. I appreciate it.

Speaker #22: Thanks, John.

David Zalman: Thanks, Jon.

Speaker #28: Thank you.

Charlotte Rasche: Thank you.

Speaker #27: This concludes our question and answer session. I would like to turn the conference back over to Charlotte Rasche for any closing remarks.

Operator: This concludes our question and answer session. I would like to turn the conference back over to Charlotte Rasche for any closing remarks.

Speaker #28: Thank you. Thank you, ladies and gentlemen, for taking the time to participate in our call today. We appreciate your support of our company. And we will continue to work on building shareholder value.

Charlotte Rasche: Thank you. Thank you, ladies and gentlemen, for taking the time to participate in our call today. We appreciate your support of our company, and we will continue to work on building shareholder value.

Operator: The conference has now concluded. Thank you for attending today's presentation. You may now disconnect.

Q1 2026 Prosperity Bancshares Inc Earnings Call

Request DemoDemo

Prosperity Bancshares

Earnings