Q4 2022 Calix Inc Earnings Call
Speaker 2: Greetings everyone and welcome to the Calix 4th Quarter 2022 Earnings Conference Call. At this time, all participants are in a listen-only mode. A question-and-answer session will follow the brief prepared remarks. If anyone should require operator assistance during the conference, please press star zero on your telephone keypad. As a reminder, this conference is being recorded.
Speaker 3: It is now my pleasure to introduce your host, Jim Finucci, Vice President of Investor Relations. Sir, please go ahead. Thank you, Paul, and good morning, everyone. Thank you for joining our fourth quarter 2022 earnings call. Today on the call, we have President and CEO Michael Beeney, Chief Financial Officer Corey Sindelar, and Chairman Carl Russo. As a reminder, yesterday after the market closed, Calix issued a news release whichTom
Speaker 4: the company will make about its future financial operating performance, growth strategy, and market outlook. And actual results may differ materially from those contemplated by these forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause actual results and trends to differ materially are set forth in the fourth quarter of 2022 letter to stockholders. On March 25, lol.com, there's a holdup for the stockholders initial
Speaker 5: and in the annual and quarterly reports filed with the FCC. CalX assumes no obligation to update any forward-looking statements which speak only as of their respective dates.
Speaker 6: Also in this conference call, we will discuss both GAAP and non-GAAP financial measures. A reconciliation of GAAP to non-GAAP measures is included in the fourth quarter 2022 letter to stockholders. Unless otherwise stated, all numbers referenced in this call will be non-GAAP measures.
Speaker 7: With that, it is my pleasure to turn the call over to Michael. Michael, please go ahead. Thank you, Jim. In the fourth quarter, the CalX team, once again, executed with excellence.
Speaker 8: continuing our track record of improved financial performance across the four measurable objectives that we have outlined for investors.
Speaker 9: Divert revenue growth, gross margin expansion, discipline, operating expense management, and continued predictability.
Speaker 10: Demand from new broadband entrants, progressive broadband investors, and legacy-minded communications service providers that are transforming from dumb-pug providers to a callous, platform-based broadband service provider was strong in the fourth quarter.
Speaker 11: The team delivered 39% year-on-year growth in Q4. This closes out an incredible 2022.
Speaker 12: delivering our third consecutive year of greater than 25% revenue growth.
Speaker 13: Callas Connections, our customer success and innovation conference, hosted more than 3,000 attendees coming together in person and virtually. The excitement after Connections was a key contributor to our fourth quarter results as we added 26 new broadband service providers to our service.
Speaker 14: bringing the 2022 new BSP total to 119.
Speaker 15: As of 4th quarter, the number of BSPs starting their platform journey with us increased by 20% year on year. We ended the year with 950 BSPs leveraging the Revenue Edge, the Intelligent Access Edge or both.
Speaker 16: In addition, RPOs were $199 million in the fourth quarter, up 59% year-on-year and 15% sequentially as more BSPs leveraged Calix platforms and managed services to transform.
Speaker 17: their business.
Speaker 18: Thank you.
Speaker 19: Our platform and managed services bookings were more than 90% of our total bookings in fourth quarter, thereby completing our transformation to a platform company.
Speaker 20: As our transformation is complete, we will no longer talk about this metric.
Speaker 21: Instead, we will talk about how our team
Speaker 22: is enabling BSP customers to transform their business through the power of platform and managed service offerings.
Speaker 23: Every 91 days, our cadence of innovation delivers new capabilities that help the Calix platform-based DSP succeed.
Speaker 24: Before I share my thoughts on 2023, I'd like to turn it over to Corey for additional commentary. Corey? Thanks for your ================= oranges on4020 James Jurassic
Speaker 25: Thank you, Michael. On the supply front, the CalX team outperformed again, allowing us to deliver revenue of $245 million at 51.6% gross margin, both slightly above our guidance range. At the same time, we built an incremental inventory of 80% of our total revenue.
Speaker 26: The challenging areas remain unpredictable and result in surprises.
Speaker 27: Need times remain extended, decommits still happen, and sourcing components in the secondary markets require extraordinary effort.
Speaker 28: We continue to expect the supply chain environment to be challenging through 2023.
Speaker 29: Balancing our strong demand expectations.
Speaker 30: with our current view of supply chain performance.
Speaker 31: We reiterate our target financial model of 10 to 15% revenue growth that we offered during our investor day last February and again last quarter.
Speaker 32: Albeit, we expect to be at the high end of this range for 2023.
We also reiterate 100 to 200 basis point of gross margin expansion.
Furthermore, as we continue to evolve,
and our platform and managed services grow, we are making modest changes to our operating expense model.
The sales and marketing operating expense range.
will increase to 18 to 20 percent of revenue from 17 to 19 percent.
R&D operating expenses will be 29% of gross profit.
versus 30% of product gross profit.
Remember, we are no longer breaking out product and services revenue.
and gross profit going forward.
and G&A operating expenses.
will decrease to 7% of revenue from 8% of revenue.
Calix is leading the disruption occurring in the communication industry, and to address this opportunity, we plan to invest fulsomely to the target financial model.
Back to you Michael. Thanks Corey. The market is entering a period of inflection.
The legacy provider is faced with the growing reality that speed as a go-to-market strategy will not succeed.
in the long term, as most consumers simply do not understand broadband.
In markets with more than one provider, a speed-only strategy will result in the commoditization of their product, which always starts a price-eroding battle with no path to revenue or subscriber gains.
This is the once in a generation opportunity that Calix is uniquely positioned to address. 12 years and over a billion dollars in investment into our platform and growing portfolio of managed services has enabled Calix to be the company.
that is uniquely enabling a growing number of broadband service providers to dominate their market and be the legacy provider.
We remain committed to our mission to enable our BSP customers to...
simplify their business, which consistently delivers new levels of operational efficiency.
They cite their subscribers through a growing portfolio of managed services and grow their business.
delivering subscriber-based expansion, improved profitability, revenue growth, and an ever-growing positive impact on the communities they serve. We thank everyone for their continued interest and support of Calix. Paul, let's open the call for questions.
Thank you. We will now be conducting a question and answer session. If you would like to ask a question, please press star 1 on your telephone keypad.
A confirmation tone will indicate your line is in the question queue. You may press star 2 if you would like to remove your question from the queue. For participants using speaker equipment, it may be necessary to pick up your handset before pressing the star key.
One moment please while we poll for questions.
Thank you. Our first question is from Ryan Kuntz with Needham & Company. Please proceed with your question.
I wonder if you could expand on your impressive surge in RPO you saw in Q4. Is that driven at all much by change in mix or contract duration across your customer segments? Any kind of color there would be helpful. Thank you.
As we said, we had strong demand across our broadband service providers as they continue to adopt our platforms and adopt our managed services.
part and parcel of that as you see growth in RPOs as we close more contracts.
Anything else you'd like to add, Corey? Yeah, right. I think it had more to do with the strength of coming off the connections. We also saw some specific around our new product, Marketing Cloud Plus.
but it was not contract duration extensions it was just increased business activity.
following the strong attendance coming out of connection. Yeah, I'll just add one piece on that, Ryan, is that, like I said, there were over 3,000 attendees, not just in person when we ran the event in October , but also we ran a very successful virtual connection two weeks later.
So, with over 3,000 people attending those different events, there was a huge amount of interest in what we're doing.
That's great, really helpful. And I wonder if you're making a comment at all on kind of the bookings climate out there in Q4. I know this is seasonally a softer time for major CapEx investments and there's been some commentary in the industry around booking softness as customer lead times.
customers don't order product in quite as far a lead. Any color you can share with us there on the general climate around bookings.
Thanks Ryan. As you know we do not disclose bookings or backlog. That said...
demand for our platform and managed services was strong in the quarter, as you can see by the red RPO growth, and our new land and expand chart, which we provided in the investor letter for the first time, gives you good insight into the growth of that land and expand.
Brian .
Still there, Ryan?-
I'm here. This is this is Carl. I want to
Take the benefit of my gray hair, advanced age.
and Vantage at the chair position to just share with folks.
the fact that I've been through these cycles not pandemic-induced.
multiple times.
And I want to highlight what Michael just alluded to and what Corey spoke about in your conference.
and say that from my perspective,
Hey.
Classic box company, by the way, which Calix 1.0, we remember way back when, was.
what you experienced in this time.
Higher book to bill ratios because of your point lead times extending out Customers will order further out sometimes they'll double order for example if you have a distribution channel
you're going to see double ordering. We saw that back at the dot-com bubble in the first 2002. Those are factors that...
to get people to think we're going to have the same sort of thing and I suspect you'll hear from vendors book the bills that are less than one. CalX is not CalX 1.0 anymore.
And what you're seeing is the strength of the platform and managed services and the difference it makes in our demand profile and the team's ability to forecast that demand.
What you're seeing is the strength of the platform and managed services and the difference it makes in our demand profile and the team's ability to forecast that demand. So while I appreciate the question.
I will implore you to understand that
will implore you to understand that this is no longer that sort of animal.
And so I'll simply amplify on what Michael said and what Corey spoke about at the conference. Demand visibility here is very good.
the demand for the platform and managed services business is strong.
managed services business is strong. Fair enough.
That's very fair, thanks Karl, appreciate that very much. You bet. I'll pass it.
Thank you. Our next question is from George Nauter with Jeffries. Please proceed with your question.
Hi guys, thanks very much. I was just looking at the shareholder letter, and there is a chart that focuses on platform and managed services adoption. I think you just referred to it, the land and expand slide. So it's great to see all the new customer adoption. But I guess the question I have is like when you look at the growth and the software side of the story.
going forward? Do you think more of it is really predicated on adding new customers? Or do you think more of it is really about deepening your penetration in existing customers? How do you think about those dynamics?
Thanks, George. So, as we put in that chart, it gives you good indications of the three levels of adoption, right? Starting out with the platforms and the second bar is what we're doing on the clouds. And the third bar is, as we've always stated, the early inception of us going down to managed services. And so,
your question, we actually think about it in all the ways that you identify. On one side of it, we're acquiring new customers. We talked about how quarter on quarter we keep adding more new customers. That was 119 in the year, right? Once we're in, they generally start out with our platform.
If they're a new broadband service provider, they're deploying a new network. If they're a brownfield existing service provider, they're doing maybe doing a new build out. They're overbuilding their old technology, whether it's old DSL or old cable. And then as they start to embrace the transformation of their business from a speed-oriented...
dumb type company into an experienced company, then they start rolling out our clouds to transform their call centers so they have a great experience and they have a managed service and their marketing organization and operations live automation and ROI which then leads them to the third stage in their transformation which is then going beyond speed and offering full managed services. And so my point is is that
by transforming their managed Wi-Fi into incremental services. So we have to land and expand all over the place.
Let me just add on to that, George.
I look at it in three dimensions.
So first dimension is adding customers. Second dimension is adding subscribers.
So as they grow their networks and evolve their networks and then adding new applications on top.
So to your point, to your question directly, we could stop landing new customers and continue to grow for a very long time.
and grow their subscriber base, and as they add additional platforms. Got it. That's helpful. And then one other one for you, Corey. I noticed a change in the target model. Can you talk a little bit about why you're making that change right now? Is there something you see that's different about the ultimate profitability of the company, or anything you're seeing fundamentally in your business? Or is it more just a recognition that you guys have been kind of under-shooting relative to some of those targets on the cost side previously?
we will invest more in the sales and marketing side. So I'll be at the increase that you're going to get on the sales and marketing side, will be offset by higher gross margins. But over time, if you think about a mature software model, sales and marketing is higher than where it is today. So what you're seeing there is, we took up that range to take an effect at a greater software contribution. At the same time, now that we've grown for 25% for the last three years, our T&A model is too high.
And you've seen that we've consistently underrun that by about a percent. So all we're doing is really lowering the G&A model to reflect the realities of where we're at with the size of the business and the synergy that we've achieved.
and moving that up to the cell and marketing reflecting the software contribution.
That makes sense, Jordan.
Thanks very much guys. Appreciate it.
As a reminder, if you would like to ask a question, please press star 1 on your telephone keypad. Your information tone will indicate your line is in the question queue.
Our next question is from Paul Silverstein with Cowan & Company. Please proceed with your question.
Thank you.
Can you all remind us relative to the 950 that adopted the platform managed services? The total customer count now is I think last time you
Data was 1700 plus. What's it now?
You'll see in the 10K that we're approaching 2,000, Paul.
wrap
So it's almost 50% penetration.
in terms of breadth of the law. That's the right way to look at it. That's the right way to look at it, though.
Well wait, it's 50% penetration of one platform or more starting the platform journey. So that means that they could have the intelligent access edge, the revenue edge, or both. Correct.
Understood. You're anticipating my next question, which is, if I look at the 844 disclosed customers that have adopted one or more clouds.
When you give us some sense from a depth of penetration standpoint, what was the incremental adoption? We would already previously adopted one or two clouds.
How many went to add in a second or third cloud or the bulk of those 84 already at three clouds?
Yeah, the bulk of those are not at three clouds.
And so, but we are not providing any further granularity on that, Paul.
Can you give us qualitative insight? Has there been a healthy progression?
So I assume most customers start with one cloud as opposed to two or three and then progress over time any sense for What's been the average per I recognize in one case you just didn't launch this past year But any sense in what the progression has been qualitatively You know you're right they always start with one cloud
the majority of the time they start with one cloud. And then what happens is that depending on the cycle of their deployment and their transformation again, so let's say they start out with support cloud, so you're transforming a call center and if you take a traditional network company, that transformation of a call center is very part and parcel of what you do every day. And then it goes into the next one which is do you actually
understand the need to transform away from a speed-based go-to-market model, and then you're going to go after the marketing cloud. Or you're looking for operational efficiencies and you're going to deploy operations cloud because it derives massive reductions in objects. So it really just depends.
So qualitatively, you're right. It depends on the length of the deployment before they go to the site.
depends on the length of the deployment before they go to the second. And then third.
And Paul, this is Carl.
I'm frankly amazed that you weren't simply overwhelmed by the addition of this new metric.
and didn't have you literally the oxygen snatched from your lungs.
didn't have you, literally the oxygen snatched from your lungs with the awe of this chart.
Thank you. Thank you.
Just that's the oxygen from my lungs Carl.
If Ryan already asked this, my apologies, I don't think he did. But from a macro perspective, of course, the investment community understandably worries about the current climate, the increase in interest rates, macro environment. I know you get asked this at least once every 90 days, if not more often. But any sign of a pullback in BSP deployment.
that in turn translates to more confidence in these projects going forward.
Yeah, it's a good question, Paul, and I think what's very interesting about interest rates as they have moved.
and the general economy.
is it actually highlights the differences in the market and the disruption, but rather than me answer that Michael obviously has relationships with many many of the leaders in our segment and I think can speak more eloquently to it.
Yeah, so Paul, interest rates create an opportunity cost bar. You know, if you're running a low ROI business, the opportunity cost bar is above your business case so you stop investing.
If you have a high ROI business model and the bar is lower, well you'll continue to invest even when interest rates go up. So now apply that to a service provider. The legacy provider who uses terms like homeless pass and only competes on speed and price, they're really just an infrastructure player. Where the Calix BSD uses subscribers served, and the
and that promoter score which enabled them to drive a dramatically higher ROI. So when these interest rates happen, it is irrelevant because their ROI is way over the bar.
So that's kind of how we're seeing the market. And on the recession side that Paul asked about from a jobs, labor, potentially layoffs or whatever, what are you seeing there from our customers?
Well, so with regards to the recession at this point, actually job ads are still strong.
So if you look back, if I, you know, correct me if I'm wrong, Corey, but in December , job ads in the United States were 230,000. I think they were the month before job ads were 261,000. So while we hear this general noise in the market for people who follow tech, it's actually a completely opposite scenario across the United States.
When I can still go into a Chipotle and get, you know, I see the signs of hiring, hiring, hiring, and they're offering $22 to $25 an hour, that doesn't really translate into labor markets bringing up in the rural market at all.
So for our customers
Does labor still a constraint and Yes, and I just had a conference with a bunch of CEOs and they also the same thing and said labor remains a constraint All right before passing on just just to clarify your previous comment about care activity Deployment activity. I've heard you make the comment before I understand your point about your higher ROI In therefore being less of a challenge, but if I could just ask you this simple question
labor is still a constraint and yes and I just had a conference with a bunch of CEOs and they all said the same thing and said labor remains a constraint. All right before I pass it on just to clarify your previous comment about career activity, deployment activity, I've heard you make the comment before I understand your point about your higher ROI and therefore being less of a challenge but if I could just ask you this simple question independent of that fact.
Are you seeing any pullback, any delays by carriers in project deployments? In Calis broadband service providers? No. Okay. Okay.
any pullback, any delays by carriers in project deployments? In Cowlitz broadband service providers? No. Okay. I'll pass it on. Appreciate it. Thank you.
Thank you. Our next question is from Michael Genevieve with Rosenblatt Security. Please proceed with your question.
All right, great, thanks. I guess I want to talk about the supply chain and.
Some of the comments made at the conference a couple weeks ago That there were you know D commits in the quarter You know, I think if you hadn't said that the conference We wouldn't have noticed it in the results
So could you talk a little bit more about you know this quarter's decommit versus last Peter T Quarters D commits, you know the kind of changes in the environment in the supply chain And then what you expect going forward for the next few quarters
Yeah, thanks Mike.
Over the last two, three years it's been a challenging and supplying environment.
We've had de-commits and schedule outs all the time.
So it's continuation of the same that we've been experiencing.
and what you've seen us this quarter do again
continue to execute with excellence and our supply chain has met those challenges and rose above them.
So, I think I've said that we think the worst is behind us.
Last quarter we talked about the supply chain bottoming and improving.
So we expect that.
that the supply chain will continue to improve.
Yet it remains challenging in certain regards. And so those things we'll continue to work through. But if I were to go year over year, it's a better supply environment than it was a year ago. And I guess just my question, a follow up to that is, so if it's better than it was a year ago,
I mean, do you expect the improvement in 23 to be sort of smooth sequentially with improvement as you move through the year? Or are you braced for, you know, potential lumping back and forth throughout the year and that a later quarter could be tougher than an earlier quarter if that, you know, if that question makes sense?
Well, that's the interesting thing about a challenging supply environment, they're surprising.
Well, that's the interesting thing about a challenging supply environment. There's surprises. So I can't tell you what's going to happen in the future.
But I can tell you that if you look back a year ago, we were only forecasting revenue growth of 5 to 10 percent.
We're sitting here today saying we're going to grow at 15%.
You're seeing that we've built inventory up year over year. We're sitting here at a turns ratio of three.
So we feel a lot better about where we are today, but yet you have to understand it's still a very challenging supply environment and surprises do happen and we will continue to manage through it like we have in the past. Okay perfect. Last question for me because I feel like I always have to kind of...
ask you guys a question just about, you know, level of disclosure and what kind of new stuff we can get. And you obviously gave us.
new disclosure on the platform and managed services customer count over the last
five quarters and I guess my question is
That if you're disclosing that customer count
It's not too far away from just telling us the revenue breakout What are your thoughts on that? If you're not trying to give away too much, you should be able to give away too much.
But you know, it's not that far of a step from just telling us, you know, more of a revenue segmentation of the company. Could I just get your thoughts on that?
Mike, let me take this real quickly. It's Carl. I'm excited by the change in leadership at Cowlitz with Michael and Corey leading the show. I'm so excited that they chose to share this new graph.
But I'm still in the room. And so to be clear, you're right directionally.
room. And so to be clear, you're right directionally, you're getting closer.
But remember.
Competition still is something that...
I have no personal interest in encouraging. And so I think the combination of RPOs
combined with customer land and expand penetration, gives those investors who have been following us.
an even better sense for the power of the model and probably aids them modeling the business. Subscriber counts, ARRs, things of that nature are way off in our future.
So I think you now have the new chart. We'll be speaking to it more as we go forward. I'm excited that Michael and Corey chose to show it.
And I think we would best stand back on that.
I think we would best stand pat on that. Fair enough.
Yes, absolutely. Thanks a lot. Appreciate the questions and nice execution. Thanks.
As a reminder, if you would like to ask a question, please press star 1 on your telephone keypad. The confirmation tone will indicate your line is in the question queue.
Our next question is from Greg Meznia with West Park Capital. Please proceed with your question.
Yes, thank you. Question on sales and marketing levels. You've partially addressed my question with raising the guidance on that. I did notice that your tier 2 customer breakdown was up most significantly.
in your letter. How does that correlate with the increase in sales and marketing? In other words, is that because you are targeting the tier twos a lot more now, and that's requiring higher sales and marketing resources? Thanks.
No, actually it has no correlation with sales and marketing. It's actually just focused on what we're doing with regards to the platforms and software. That's what's attracting them, but that doesn't require incremental and it's tier two at all. So there's no correlation. In one word, Comet bachelor could be more of a relative value cluster with you.
No, actually it has no correlation with sales and marketing. It's actually just focused on what we're doing with regards to platforms and software. That's what's attracting them, because that doesn't require incremental and adhere to at all. So there's no correlation.
That's all I have right now, thanks. Thanks, Greg. Thank you. Our next question is from Raha Nadjian with Loop Capital. Please proceed with your question.
Good morning. Thank you for taking my question. I want to go back to the supply chain comments. If I look at the level of BEAT you had in Q3 versus the level of BEAT versus the consensus you had in Q4.
that is, you know, it's narrowing, yet your commentary about supply chain improving. So I'm trying to maybe understand, are you still like?
having golden parts missing and that impacted the quarter. Just if you can elaborate a little bit more on that.
Yeah, sure. So I think we were clear in the stopover letter last quarter that last quarter's revenue feed was more of the anomaly, right? We had a certain amount of our inventory line up.
That allowed us to overperform in the quarter. I think we also said that that was more of an exception at that time. What you should expect from us is to have narrower.
differences between what we actually execute to and the guidance we've performed. So that's what you've seen in the fourth quarter. We did what we thought we would do and now it wasn't anything related to golden screws or anything along that line. We just continue to work the problem and made steady progress on the quarter.
differences between what we actually execute to and the guidance we performed. So that's what you've seen in the fourth quarter. We did what we thought we would do, and now it wasn't anything related to golden screws or anything along that line. We just continued to work the problem and made steady progress on the quarter. Got it.
If I revisit your new disclosure, can you give us a sense? I know you mentioned that there's three dimensions to your opportunity. One is the number of service providers, but then the other is subscribers that they serve and how many subscribers they have.
enrolled onto your platform. Can you give us a sense on what percentage of your, or maybe directionally give us some helpful hints on how we should be thinking about the subscriber penetration within your broadband service providers that you have disclosed, those who have adopted the cloud versus those who are, you know, just adopting one portion of your cloud service.
Yeah, so as we stated frequently, it's early days, right? So when you think about the penetration on the sweeps, you know, we've demonstrated in there if you look at the number, there's two hundred and...
93 who have deployed one or more suites into their subscribers, but that also they have different go-to-market models with regards to Are they driving it's enough sell are they including it isn't embedded into their? Platform there's all kinds of different ways to look at this so I would say
Because it's early days, there's no additional insight other than they have at least one. It's against a portion of their subscriber base, and there's lots of upside. As we've mentioned in the letter, there's currently seven managed services that are available for them to deploy. And we've announced another four on top of them. So lots of opportunity ahead, but it's still early days. Thought?
I appreciate the answers. Thank you. As a reminder, if you would like to ask a question, please press star 1 on your telephone keypad.
Our next question is from Tim Savageo with Northland Capital Markets. Please proceed with your question. Hi good morning. My question is about kind of growth metrics I guess at a high level and you've given us some new ones here with the
platform adoption kind of indicators and at least if you take the...
The big ones, those appear to be growing kind of in the 15%, 20% range in terms of platform adoption.
Of course, as you mentioned, you've got customer additions on top of that.
And I want to contrast that with the RPO growth rate in the 60% range, 15% sequential.
You know as we look at those two metrics, I guess, which one would you say is more important in terms of
speaking to the overall future growth rate of the company.
how do you reconcile the delta to those two?
where do we end up? And also relative to your overall.
10 to 15 percent growth rate looks pretty conservative relative to the metrics. I'll leave it there. Okay. Thank you, Kim. Complex question. I would say that Corey mentioned that we were in the range of 10 to 15 percent, now confident and said, you know, we're at the top of that range as we look into 2023. So I think that's a pretty clear indicator.
with regards to future opportunity. That's why I stated in my opening remarks that we're at this inflection point in the industry where we have all these service providers who are legacy minded, who have been really focused on one go-to-market, which is speed, and then realizing really quickly that that's
coffin corner in the future because of the fact that it leads to the commoditization of their product and they need to differentiate. And so they're looking to us and as you can see there's a small number of the potential base which is up to 2,000 service providers who have deployed at only one or more managed services, right? So there's that two hundred and...
93 that have one or more. So I would say what's the future growth rate? We're just at the beginning of what's possible.
that have one or more. So I would say what's the future growth rate? We're just at the beginning of what's possible. That's the best way to state it.
Great, thanks very much. Thank you. Our next question is from George Nauta with Jeffrey. Please proceed with your question. Hi guys, thanks a lot for letting me follow up here. I guess I wanted to ask about the tax rate. So you guys….
change the long-term model a bit on tax rate. I also noticed that your deferred tax assets are not going down. If I look at DTA's relative to some prior quarters, could you talk about the picture on taxes going forward?
Sure, George, happy to do that. I can't believe I'm doing it this early, but go ahead.
Yeah, so we continue to generate some DTAs through R&D tax credits and stock compensation that keeps on adding back to it. But what you saw in the quarter was a benefit that was realized in the fourth quarter, and that had largely to do with some of those deferred tax assets that I talked about.
As far as the rate going forward, a couple things are happening. Obviously, our level of income is going up and the way something that I think I referred to this before with the guilty in peace was based on foreign...
foreign operations and that's relatively fixed relative to our growth rate. So you should expect that to come down and that's what you've seen. We've seen this bring down the effective rate by 8% relative to last year.
Thank you very much. And then also, you mentioned foreign operations. Obviously, the company is still very North American centric. Can you talk about your opportunity with the cloud platforms products looking into the UK or Europe or other parts of the world? Are you starting to invest there more aggressively and...
What's the catalyst for getting that side of the business growing? Yeah George, let me just clarify, when I said foreign operations, it was really our offshore development teams in China and India.
But I'll carry over to Michael to talk about what we're looking to do on the revenue side for international expansion. Yeah, George, we've been really clear that the focus on North America, because there's such a significant opportunity ahead, while we are running a limited expansion in the international market, primarily in the United Kingdom, we are...
making it limited. And the reason why is that until we have reached our full opportunity in North America, it would be foolhardy of us to go into other markets where there's so much opportunity. And you're going to see that so much consistently for the foreseeable future.
Thanks, guys. Thank you. Our next question is from Paul Silverstein with Cowan & Company. Please proceed with your question. I appreciate it. To go back to Tim's question and Michael's response, I appreciate that.
subsidy disbursements are always slower than a lot of us would like and you folks would like. And I appreciate that the supply chain is still challenging and I appreciate.
that there are risks to CapEx pullbacks, although you guys have said again and again with your return on investment that you enable, that risk is not as prominent as a lot of us perceive. So all that said, and I should add, I'm sure the investment community appreciates you all having been pretty conservative historically, but all that being said, is there anything wrong with the logic that supply chain directionally will improve?
Fund dispersing will increase. Over time there will be overlap. All those things can equal.
your clouds will progress in breadth of adoption, depth of adoption, as well as the solver-based applications.
Shouldn't all that translate into revenue acceleration over time?
Shouldn't all that translate into revenue acceleration over time? In the future, yes.
Maybe. You know the point is that Corey came out with confidence and said if you look back on you know let's step back a year or two years ago we were saying 5 to 10 now we're at 10 to 15 and Corey was pretty clear in his commentary that he sees 15% and so I think the key thing for us is that we look into 2023 and we're going to cross an incredible milestone we're going to be right at
a billion dollars organically. And the reason why we're doing that and accomplishing that as a leadership team and as an organization is because we're sticking to the tenants that we've intimated over and over again to be excellent at execution. We're focused on those four things, deliberate revenue growth, gross margin expansion.
disciplined operating expense management where we're investing fulsomely to ensure we capture all the opportunities and then most important or as important continued predictability. So what we're giving you Paul is that continued predictability by executing against all those things. So in the future maybe.
But this is what we feel confident as a leadership team. So Michael, just to be clear, if
Fund substitute disbursement did accelerate. If supply chain does improve meaningfully.
All of this being equal, unless there's some other factor, that would present up sizes or that's embedded in the 15%.
We feel comfortable at 15%. And that's with all the different variables affiliated with it. You know, if that's what we actually do when we determine what is the growth rate that we feel is a predictable one for our investors. And so we take all those different inputs.
if this was faster, if this was slower, if that was faster, to come up with our recommendation and our prediction for 2023. And our prediction for 2023, Corey speaking in a way that he hasn't spoken before, he actually, you know, would always talk in broad basis 10 to 15. He said, I see 15.
So that should be an indicator of confidence. Yeah I think your predicate all this for all you know if if and if I mean it's sort of like a mathematical proof if you take assumptions and make it as we said this we think this is a huge.....
generational opportunity. You know, if I think back, if I was handsomer, I'd never mind. No, but, Corey, you started. No, but, I'm sorry, everybody wants to complete that thought. You should really complete that. I was thinking about it, and then I was thinking...
It's not possible. No, but could you expand on one thing, though? That you've been through multiple, for example, government funding, say, you know, right? So give me your experience. Michael's looking over here and seeing a lot of gray hair. All those ifs, and Paul, I know you have some gray hair on this too because you remember broadband stimulus in 2009. It's good information, but it's just too complicated. It's just off the top of the bottom bar. So you could put your voice on the laptop so that you can connect those, too. Has anyone not had a heart attack, or had people taking the system inside? Not that I Construction. Not that I unionize people. Tight fellow people.
And the challenges are, I agree with the ifs. The problem is predicting the ifs. So the goal here with the team is to execute in the planning horizon knowing that this is a big opportunity, but predicting is...
It's just too hard Caught I appreciate that I'm not debating I appreciate the conservatism But it to me it seems like it's stating the obvious It's really not saying all that much to say that if
there's acceleration in disbursements, if there's a meaningful improvement in constraints, labor and components, that that should translate to acceleration for all of them, not just for you, but for the whole industry. I can't speak for one example about the logic, but... Well, wait a minute, hold on a second, sure.
It's not a matter of the whole industry. I can't speak to the whole industry. It's not a matter of the way you are conjugating the in essence the theorem, which is if FFF does that happen, I agree. The challenge is it's not conservative. It's actually realism. I've been through this before.
You've been through this before. And it's not being conservative. These programs simply don't happen that way. They never do. And standing in front of them, predicting them, you're just better off waiting until you start to see the demand, the actual orders.
then getting through to the point of revenue and then you got to get to deployments through a labor constraint or other issues. So there are so many steps in that sequence that if you simply go to the end and say if yeah sure but it's not being conservative.
It's literally being realistic. I appreciate the distinction. Understood. Okay. Okay.
Thank you. Our next question is from Fahad Majan with Loop Capital. Please proceed with your question.
Hey, thank you for getting back to me. So follow up on your previous discussion. Can you give us a sense on where your or how much of your revenue base is currently coming from RDOF? What's your expectations for this year from stimulus funding?
Thank you for getting back to me. So follow up on your previous discussion. Can you give us a sense on where your, or how much of your revenue base is currently coming from RDOF? What's your expectations for this year from stimulus funding? And then I have a follow up.
Sure, I'll take that. So today, I think we've been pretty consistent with what we've told folks. There is some money coming through, but understand that that program has had challenges with it. We did start seeing some of the money roll out last year. That money comes over a 10-year timeframe.
So it's just a small amount of revenue that we are seeing today, this is a lot more in front of it to come.
Correct me if I'm mistaken, but historically, I think your previous outlook has been 10-12% of the total amount of cancer stolen in a Sciences and Timberwolves rounds
fund end up in the com equipment supplier base. Is that still true?
end up in the com equipment supplier base. Is that still true? Yes.
Okay, so my long-term question to you is clearly your model is
My long-term question to you is, clearly your model has evolved to a point where...
it is almost getting close to if I...
was getting close to if I...
Thank you.
So, Todd, that's a much longer conversation.
on the rule of authority and the reality of it or not.
the foray and the reality of it or not. I'll take that one offline because.
I have a whole different set of beliefs.
from looking at the market and the rule of 40, etc. So rather than more everybody with that here, on another one of my pedantic lectures, I'll take that one offline with you. All right, appreciate it. Looking forward to it.
Thank you for that compliment.
Thank you. There are no further questions at this time. I would like to turn the floor back over to Jim Fanucchi for any closing comments.
Thank you, Paul. Calix leadership will participate in several investor events during the first quarter of 2023. Information about these events, including dates and times for public webcasts of management presentations when available, will be posted on the events and presentations page of the investor relations section of Calix.com.
Once again, thank you to everyone on this call and webcast for your interest in CALIX and for joining us today. This concludes our conference call. Have a good day. Goodbye. This concludes today's conference. You may disconnect your lines at this time. Thank you for your participation.