Hesai Group Q1 2023 Earnings Call
Speaker 1: The.
Speaker 2: Hello ladies and gentlemen, thank you for standing by for HESASE Group first quarter 2023 earnings conference call. At this time all participants are in a listen only mode. Please note that today's conference call is being recorded.
Speaker 2: I would now like to turn the call over to our first speaker today, Wan-Ting Shi, the company's investor relations director. Please go ahead.
Speaker 3: Thank you operator. Hello everyone and thank you for joining COSI Group's first quarter 2020 earnings conference call. Our earnings release is now available on our AYA website, dot investor dot cosep type dot com as well as our new Swire services.
Speaker 3: Today you will hear from our CEO , Dr. David Li, who will start the call with an overview of our recent updates. Next, our global CFO , Mr. Luis Tse, will address our financial results before we open the call for questions. Before we continue, I refer you to our Safe Harbor Statement in our earnings press release.
Speaker 3: which applies to this call as we will make forward-looking statements.
Speaker 3: Please also note that the company will discuss non-GAAP measures today, which are more thoroughly explained and reconciled to the most comparable measures recorded on the GAAP in our earnings release and its EC followings.
Speaker 3: With that, I'm pleased to turn over the call to our CEO , Dr. Deborah Lee. Deborah, please go ahead.
Speaker 4: Thank you Yuanqing and thank you everyone for joining our call today. Let's start with the big picture. We're pleased to deliver the strongest quarterly financial performance in our history.
Speaker 4: In the first quarter, our net revenues were up 73% year-over-year to a new record high, and our industry-leading growth margins increased quarter-over-quarter to 38%, up from 30% last quarter. Access-wise, including share-based compensation, R&D remains steady, and our product lines and organizational structure are approaching maturity.
Speaker 4: as a result.
Speaker 4: And most excitingly, we achieved non-GAAP profitability and positive operating cash flow in the first quarter, demonstrating our tremendous future profitability prospects.
Speaker 4: No validation is more encouraging than the recognition from our customers. Haven't delivered more than 135,000 LiDAR units to date, but that has become the most commercially successful LiDAR manufacturer in terms of shipments in both robotaxis and the ADAS market. We stand out from others for two reasons.
Speaker 4: First, our proven automotive-grade product quality viewed upon our methodology of having in-house manufacturing as a crucial part of the R&D to enable rapid iteration of our products. And second, in addition to taking advantage of economics of scale, we have committed to continued innovation on our proprietary ASIC platform.
Speaker 4: allowing more affordable solutions via highly integrated components.
Speaker 4: Since 2017, we've gone through four generations of unprepared ASIC development, with contributions from more than 150 dedicated semiconductor stuff.
Speaker 4: We're proud to be uniquely positioned to offer LIDAR solutions with the best combination of high performance, high quality, and affordability. Now I'd like to share some exciting first quarter business updates.
Speaker 4: First, we are thrilled to have the privilege of collaborating with 11 pioneering OEMs in the industry on multi-year ADAS contracts, including the auto-leading Chinese EV maker as well as another top selling EV maker in China.
Speaker 4: We're also working with a leading consumer electronics maker in China on their planned EV debut, and two of the largest automakers in China, including Chang'an and many other leading auto OEMs.
Speaker 4: In the first quarter, we continued to gain momentum in sending more contracts in the domestic market. We were selected by Li Auto for its new fully battery electric vehicle platform and by Jidoo, a joint venture between Baidu and Jidoo Group with new EV model.
Speaker 4: We also initiated a partnership with a new customer series, a leading EV maker in China whose new car models will be shipped with our AT128 LiDAR.
Speaker 4: As the China EV market is growing exponentially, we'll be shipping to 6 OEMs by end of 2023 and 11 by end of 2024.
Speaker 4: But I had a global vision since its inception.
Speaker 4: With our proven ability to shift large volumes of high quality data sensors,
Speaker 4: We already advanced in 8 RFI and RFQs with 5 leading global OEMs who are expecting a new round of sourcing decisions to materialize in the next coming 12 months.
Speaker 4: In the autonomous mobility market, we continue to lead as the best-in-class player. We recently signed the largest robot-happy contract in our company's history. According to an independent third-party report, we are the primary LIDAR provider for 12 out of the world's top 15 autonomous driving companies.
Speaker 4: with nearly 60% global market share.
Speaker 4: Next, we're dedicated to in-house manufacturing as we see this as the only way to meet automotive-grade standards at this early stage of development in the ADAS market. During the first quarter, we completed the first successful production sample from our HERT Center, a dedicated manufacturing center in Hangzhou, which takes automation to the next level.
Speaker 4: Featuring over 90% automation, Hertz produces one LiDAR every 45 seconds.
Speaker 4: With an optimized design, the AT series produced at Hertz would improve our AEDIS growth margin as it reaches economy of scale in manufacturing and utilization. Additionally, our Advanced R&D and Intelligent Manufacturing Center in Shanghai Maxwell is a true innovation center for new products to be designed, tested, and operated.
Speaker 4: calibrated on the one roof before they are handed over to mass production.
Speaker 4: Its construction is scheduled to be completed in Q3 of this year.
Speaker 4: Leveraging the development of our latest ASIC gem 4.0, we're able to continue releasing state-of-the-art products that meet the ever-increasing needs of both performance and design aesthetics, while keeping them affordable.
Speaker 4: ET-25, a groundbreaking ink habit lidar featuring an extremely thin profile of only 25mm in height, with extended range and enhanced resolution, was recently released at the Shanghai Auto Shell.
Speaker 4: EG25's revolutionary concept is attracting interest from OEMs globally who are demanding extremely miniaturized lidars behind windshields to achieve both an effective pleasing exterior vehicle design and optimal aerodynamics. To conquer the great challenges of putting lidars behind windshields.
Speaker 4: We teamed up with the global automotive glass leader, Fuyau Group, to create a specialized windshield.
Speaker 4: to enhance the laser transmitter efficiency by up to 3x.
Speaker 4: Finally, before I hand it over to Luis for a deeper look at the financial numbers, I wanted to congratulate the whole team, from operations to product innovation, on an exceptional quarter.
Speaker 4: With non-gap profitability and a positive operating cash flow in the first quarter, we showcased our potential for continued growth momentum. We remain confident in our ability to see development opportunities in both ADAS and AM market.
Speaker 4: bringing a higher level of safety to the future of intelligence driving systems.
Speaker 4: Now, I'll turn over the call to Louis to share more details on our financial performance and outlook. Louis, please go ahead. Thank you, David. Hello, everyone.
Speaker 4: We further demonstrated our commercial success with a stellar set of financial and operational numbers in the first quarter.
Speaker 4: Be mindful of the length of our earnings call today. I encourage listeners to refer to the first quarter earnings press release.
Speaker 5: for further details.
Speaker 5: We achieved record net revenues of RMB 429.9 million, US dollars 62.6 million, up 73% year over year and 5.1% quarter over quarter.
Speaker 5: Product revenues grew even faster, increasing 77.7% year-over-year to RMB $424.1 million, US$61.8 million.
Speaker 5: during the quarter. Gross margins were 37.8% for the first quarter, compared with 50.9% for the same period of 2022 and 30.0% for the fourth quarter of 2022 as our revenue continues to shift from higher margin autonomous mobility products.
Speaker 5: higher volume
Speaker 5: Although we were pleased with this quarter's gross margin,
Speaker 5: We do, however, anticipate a lower gross margin for Q2 and Q3 due to a large volume, that low margin order from a leading robo taxi OEM.
Speaker 5: We anticipate gross margins will rebound in Q4 as the Hertz Center production line kicks in with anticipated higher gross margins with updated ADAS products shipping in volume.
Speaker 5: At this early stage, we are willing to sacrifice some gross margin.
Speaker 5: in the short term in exchange for market share gains in the long term.
Speaker 5: and to some degree in autonomous mobility as well. The ADES and AEM led our market.
Speaker 5: and to some degree in the autonomous mobility as well. The ADES and AEM LiDAR markets are at an ancient stage of development.
Speaker 5: And at this critical point, we are prioritizing market share expansion, but we are still targeting
Speaker 5: We are prioritizing market share expansion, but we are still targeting blended gross margins.
Speaker 5: to stabilize in between 30 and 35 percent in the long term.
Speaker 5: First quarter deliveries totaled close to 35,000 units.
Speaker 5: an increase of over 400% year over year, but a slight decline from Q4 due to seasonal factors.
Speaker 5: We strategically pulled forward some volume in December to mitigate production constraints and manufacturing slowdown in Q1 due to the Chinese New Year holiday.
Speaker 5: AT deliveries accelerated in March and April , and we anticipate a record second quarter of ADES and AM deliveries to reach almost 50,000 units.
Speaker 5: and increase 40% quarter over quarter.
Speaker 5: and a tenfold volume increase.
Speaker 5: year over year, which would represent a record high quarterly LIDAR volume for FOREVER S MAC
Speaker 5: In the first quarter, we achieved non-GAAP net income of RMB 1.6 million, US dollars 0.2 million, excluding share-based compensation expense of RMB 120.5 million, US dollar 17.5 million. This increase in share-based compensation expense has been
Speaker 5: It's mostly attributable to the recognition of one-off expense of RMB $90.9 million, US dollar $13.2 million.
Speaker 5: upon the completion of our successful IPO in the quarter in relation to the stock option granted.
Speaker 5: with an IPEEL trigger condition.
Speaker 5: Before discussing the size 2023 outlook, we would like to reiterate the statement.
Speaker 5: In our April 17, 2023 press release responding to Alster's IP infringement lawsuits against Alster's We believe Alster's claims are deeply flawed and lack merit.
Speaker 5: The site's independently developed lidar technology is the result of years of investment in research, development, and engineering.
Speaker 5: LIDAR technology is the result of years of investment in research, development, and engineering. So side disputes are the result of years of investment in research, development, and engineering.
Speaker 5: allegations of patent infringement and will vigorously defend ourselves against such allegations. Since the lawsuits are pending, upon the advice of counsel, we will not comment further or take any questions on this matter.
Speaker 5: Now, moving to the financial outlook. For the second quarter of 2023, the company expects our net revenue to be between RMB $410 million, US$59.7 million, and RMB $430 million, US$62.6 million.
Speaker 5: year-over-year increase of approximately 94.3% to 103.8%.
Speaker 5: This represents an expected doubling in Q2 2023 revenues year over year, and an expected tenfold increase year over year in LIDAR shipments.
Speaker 5: to almost 50,000 units.
Speaker 5: demonstrating our continued optimization in operational execution and strong market demand for our products.
Speaker 5: It should be noted, however, that last year's Q2 was negatively impacted by the COVID lockdown in Shanghai. The above outlook is based on the current market conditions.
Speaker 5: and reflects the company's preliminary estimates of market and operational conditions.
Speaker 5: and reflects the company's preliminary estimates of market and operational conditions. And customer demand, which are also subject to change.
Speaker 5: In closing, it should be clear to you investors by now that HOSAII is the undisputed global leader in the ADES and autonomous mobility LIDAR markets. In fact, we continue to easily outpace the competition, easily delivering higher annual and quarterly revenues.
Speaker 5: LIDAR shipments than our six other U.S. listed LIDAR peers combined.
Speaker 5: This concludes our prepared remarks.
Speaker 5: for today. Operator, we are now ready to take questions.
Speaker 1: Thank you.
Speaker 2: Thank you. If you'd like to ask your question via the phone, you need to press the star key followed by the number 1 on your telephone keypad.
Speaker 2: If you'd like to ask a question via the webcast, you'll need to type your question into the Ask a Question box.
Speaker 2: For the benefit of all participants on today's call, if you'd like to ask your question to management in Chinese, please immediately repeat your question in English.
Speaker 2: For the sake of clarity and order please ask it one question at a time Management will respond and feel free to follow up with your next question Your first question today comes from Tim from Morgan Stanley . Please go ahead.
Speaker 5: Hi, David and Lewis and Tim. Thanks for taking my questions and congratulations on a strong first quarter result. So I have two questions.
Speaker 4: The first question is about our gross margin guidance because during the presentation, I think Louis mentioned second quarter, third quarter margin would be lower despite the record by themselves due to the product makes. So we have the rough breakdown between the Tums, driving the mechanical IDAR.
Speaker 4: and add a solid-state one in first quarter, in the second quarter. And separately, when are we going to see the inflection point of more medieval growth margin improvement, as Liz mentioned, back to like 35 percent or above. So that's my first question. Thank you.
Speaker 5: Thank you, Tim. I'll take this one. For the gross margin for Q1 on AM versus ADA, we are no longer disclosing the individual breakdowns for competitive reasons. You can imagine that our customers see the same information and use it against us in negotiations.
Speaker 5: So we are now disclosing a blended gross margin for our company. And as we noted earlier, that's 37.8% up 780 basis points from the prior quarter. So we will no longer be breaking down each individual product line, the gross margins. For the trend, Q2 as you know, we did disclose and Q3 will be slightly lower.
Speaker 5: because of the largest order in our history for robotaxi lidar. And so that one we conceded a lower price to get the volume. The total contract is approximately 200 million US dollars.
Speaker 5: So it's a huge contract. So it's worth it to us to do that. We do believe the inflection point on your last question relates to probably Q4 when the Hertz facility is up and running and producing AT units in volume. At that point we expect the gross margin to rebound. Our total gross margin guidance for the year
Speaker 5: remains at 25 to 30 percent and our long-term gross margin target it still remains at 30 to 35 percent.
Speaker 5: and our long-term gross margin target still remains at 30 to 35 percent. Thank you.
Speaker 4: Thank you very much for a detailed answer. My second question is about the new product. So could the management team elaborate a bit more about Closest new product ET25, the in-cabin LIDAR regarding the project weaning.
Speaker 6: potential shipment round new contribution this year and how does the margin of this product look like and separately without the change to the car body design with the roof line Would ET25 be actually be easier for OEM to install this product in their cars?
Speaker 4: or by any chance to accelerate the process of LIDAR adoption. So that's my second question. Thank you. Thank you, Tim. The two questions, right? One you wanted to know. By the way, this is CEO David Lee. So you wanted to know the expected gross margin compared to AT, right?
Speaker 4: So we don't have this number yet because we don't have signed contracts to disclose on the selling price yet. But I could comment is that I think any LIDAR or any in general hardware product, if you are unique.
Speaker 4: Your replay E-Witch is traceable for some of the technical features that competitors don't have. Usually, a product like this enjoys a better margin. We tend to think ET is a unique product in the sense that it solves the problem of the
Speaker 4: quite a few extremely technically challenging aspects of LiDAR. One is that ET stands for Extremely Thin. It's of 25 mm height.
Speaker 4: which makes it possible to install behind the windshield in the cabin. If you didn't have that, if you're very thick.
Speaker 4: Then the problem is that it will be too bulky and it will take up a good part of your windshield as the entire system That's impossible Second is that if you install something behind the windshield you can imagine the windshield doesn't really help with the Long-distance detection it actually hurts it because it absorbs the light on the way out
Speaker 4: and on the way back in. So it does that twice. So you need to have very special process, especially highly integrated process with both the OEM and especially the glassmaker to do that. We disclosed that one of our partner is FUYA group, one of the biggest auto glassmaker in the world.
Speaker 4: And so it takes a long time to develop processes like this to make sure the seamless integration. For those reasons, and also of course on top of it you need to be very quiet. The NVH needs to be very good. For all those reasons ET is a very unique product that makes it more unique and we expect them to have higher margins.
Speaker 4: Everyone pretty much gets the same hardware. For ET, the platform is the same, but there is integration work. And that's why we are starting to engage with quite a few domestic and the global OEMs in starting to try to integrate that into their vehicles before they give us official nomination because it's well understood that.
Speaker 4: It is an interactive process with a customer.
Speaker 4: I actually consider this is a good thing because this makes it further unique as a product. Especially if you use our ET, it would be more challenging for you two, for somebody else to come in and try to replace us just because they have the performance. Integration is also very challenging.
Speaker 6: Thank you very much for your teacher sharing, David and Lewis. Thank you.
Speaker 6: Thank you very much for sharing, David and Lewis. Thank you. Thank you.
Speaker 2: Thank you. Your next question comes from Bin from Credit Suisse.
Speaker 2: Your next question comes from Bin from
Speaker 7: Thank you everyone. I also got a question about a growth margin because the full year would be 25 to 30%. If I want to decouple by quarter, I have an easy calculation to show that. The second quarter may be 15% growth margin and the last quarter may be 30% growth margin can achieve this full year 25 to 30% guidance.
Speaker 7: So can you correct me if my calculator is wrong about the margin, especially in the number four quarter, because OI is on the margin to cover in the number four quarter. Thank you. Next time you can give me the number four quarter margin titles. Thank you.
Speaker 5: Thank you, thank you, Wang Bing. As I said earlier, we won't give you quarter by quarter analysis on the gross margin, but based on your calculation, it makes sense what you said. So, 37.8% for Q1.
Speaker 5: Q2 will be slightly lower, as we already indicated. Q3 will be lower as well, and Q4 will rebound. And our target is 25 to 30 percent for the year.
Speaker 4: it's still intact. So, I wanted to give you a little more insight on what's happening as we transition. So, yeah, we talk about that it's going to be a V shape on growth margin this year.
Speaker 4: Q2, Q3 are relatively lower compared to Q1 and Q4 will be better on all the products and also on the blended. So let's look at them in two sectors separately. So robotatsy
Speaker 4: we had the biggest order in our history, but that order is a big order that's standing over a couple years. So you can imagine for a big order like that.
Speaker 4: It's a negotiated price of all the lifetime.
Speaker 4: But the truth is that for this year, as we're starting to shift in small volume,
Speaker 4: the margin is low. That's why Q2, Q3 had some impact, some impact, limited impact, but some impact on the margin. But starting next year, we will have upgraded product on the Pandar series that will bring the RobotechC margin to a reasonable level for RobotechC, which is historically relatively higher than ADA.
Speaker 4: Similar phenomenon happened for our ADAS.
Speaker 4: growth margin, the fact that we were starting in small volume last year and started to ramp up this year, and then as part of the negotiation with the customer, we have slightly lower ASP compared to last year.
Speaker 4: And we also try to address this by upgrading our technology on the semiconductor side on the product. And also as we ramp up in volume, we will be further able to take advantage of the economy of scale. That's why we expect by Q4.
Speaker 4: the ADAS margins go back to a healthy number. That's why we're taking this V shape, but we already see...
Speaker 4: on the technical side and on the economic side that this will happen.
Speaker 5: The final point there, one thing, is that the Hertz Center will be open in Q4 and that has lower manufacturing costs.
Speaker 4: Thank you. Thank you.
Speaker 7: Thank you. And my second question about volume. Can you provide a full year volume guidance again, especially in the second quarter because you think that the ASP will decline because you ran the guidance similar as the first quarter but volume has been 40% increase. Can I resume the second quarter?
Speaker 7: ADAS has a much higher growth span of 40%, QNQ, but AM, Penta will be stable. Is that the right assumption for the mix for the second quarter in BONU? Thank you.
Speaker 5: Certainly ADAS is growing in Q2 because in Q1, as we mentioned, Chinese New Year holiday, the deliveries were pulled forward into December of last year. I think the year-over-year guidance stays in about 240 to 260,000 total units.
Speaker 5: of which 220 to 230,000 are still expected to be ADAS. So there's no change in the annual guidance, which means that Q3 and Q4 obviously will be a higher wrap in ADAS and remember by Q3, late Q3, six OEMs will be shipping and by Q4, we have 11 OEMs for next year. Many of them will be taking some significant delivery numbers.
Speaker 5: in Q4 as they ramp up for their model release in 2024. So Q4 we expect the largest volume for ADAS in Q4, which has traditionally been the case for us. I know this is only in two years, but we expect a larger volume of ADAS in Q4. And then with the Hertz Center up, the margin should go up. arms
Speaker 5: over 40,000 units for ADAS is what we're targeting. It's not done yet, there's still a lot of work to do. So we said almost 50,000 is our target.
Speaker 2: Thank you so much. There's one more question. Thank you. Thank you. The next question comes from Olivia from Goldman Sachs. Please go ahead. Thank you David and Luis. There are two questions from my side. The first question is about the pricing cut in the EV industry.
Speaker 8: AIDA slider products.
Speaker 4: Thank you, Olivia. This is David. We anticipated a limited impact for a few reasons. The first reason is that the type of price first, right? So the nature of those multi-year contracts is that we negotiated price at the earliest stage of this contract. Essentially, they're locked in.
Speaker 4: They have a projection on the volume, but yes, of course, it's depending on their actual volume shipment. But when there is a price cut on the customer side, it's not a good idea to have a price cut.
Speaker 4: the contract we have with them on the nomination still holds. And then, of course, more importantly, it's the volume. We're very fortunate that our biggest SOP customer, Liato, is going very strong.
Speaker 4: And that's one of the bigger reasons that we still are very optimistic on the guidance we gave. Especially given the fact that earlier this year when we had the original guidance, we already knew there was going to be a price war. And we usually OEMs knew that way before.
Speaker 4: the rest of the market and that was also part of the negotiation we had prior to this. So we're actually now seeing that our customers, especially the top ones, are going very strong. And then if we put money aside, if we purely talk about technology...
Speaker 4: If you think about it, LIDAR is not your leather seat because it provides a very strong active function on the safety side. Most of the OEMs are using LIDAR as one of their top selling points to help them sell LIDAR, a sell vehicle, as opposed to being purely a cost.
Speaker 4: So that's why a lot of people, even for the cheaper models, they're still considering using LiDAR to help them differentiate from the rest of the peers who offer a slightly inferior product just because they didn't have LiDAR-equipped driving systems. So that's why we're also seeing a lot of interest, even though some of the prices have fallen, you know, that's why we're unreliable for Mr. Baseball.
Speaker 4: because traditionally when you buy a car, the value of the car depreciates over time as pure hardware. But an intelligent driving system with LiDAR, the moment you buy it, the value actually goes up over time as they keep developing more software on it and they push to the customer. So it's essentially...
Speaker 4: After buying a car in 6 months or 12 months, your car could be more valuable to you because it provides more functions via the software. One of the interesting examples we started seeing on the market is for example for the Alto L9 with our LIDARs, right? And their AED function with LIDARs became much stronger.
Speaker 4: and there was verifiable evidence that this became a much safer feature. And then LNAI also scored five starts in the CNCAF crash safety test. I think to be fair to say that LiDAR was a creative part of it. And that is all the value that LiDAR is providing to the customer, and that's also the reason we believe.
Speaker 4: And the bar critic will start to adopt that actually in an increasing manner.
Speaker 8: Thank you. That's very clear. My second question is about the 4D middle wave radar. What's your view on that? Would that be a supplement or the substitute to LiDAR?
Speaker 4: Yeah, great question. Yes, we do believe they're complementary at this stage. So, well, it's kind of a bigger question because we probably won't be able to comment without mentioning that.
Speaker 4: one of the companies who hasn't used the LIDAR, Tesla, right? So, at least from my opinion, it's great that Tesla is considering using 4D radars because for me, from a technical standpoint, this is a strong message that Tesla agrees that vision-only systems are not the only way to do it.
Speaker 4: isn't sufficient. At least they used to say that all I needed is a camera because, you know, humans don't need other than our eyes to drive. But now they're voting to incorporate more sensors because it really makes perfect sense for technology to complement each other, for sensor fusion to function.
Speaker 4: in a much safer way than one sensor alone, and they see different part of the world. So if we agree with that, I think the natural question is that we do agree you need a multi-sensor modality, multi-sensor fusion.
Speaker 4: There's radar, there's LiAR, and there's camera. How do people make the decision in the end? I feel like in the end now it's not a technical decision. More so that it's always better. It's a commercial decision. How affordable we can make it.
Speaker 4: and this camera how do people make the decision in the end I feel like in the end now it's not a technical decision what does there's always better it's a commercial decision on how affordable we can make it today 40 radar isn't cheap
Speaker 4: 4D radar is still a fraction of LiDAR, but not by a huge factor, probably two or three, roughly. And we're seeing the LiDAR being more affordable.
Speaker 4: if you see the history of LIDAR will be much more affordable and the trend is going right.
Speaker 4: much more affordable and the trend is going, right? and I love
Speaker 4: The last thing is you want to compare the performance. 4D radar, due to the nature of the wavelength that is roughly 1000 times longer than the LIDAR, it sees limited sets of objects. For example, it would be much more challenging for 4D radar to see stuff like this.
Speaker 4: lost cargo, it would be hard to see a tire because the conductivity of those objects are difficult. Even for humans, it's much more difficult for radars to see compared to radars. So it doesn't cover the food depth.
Speaker 4: And lastly, but very importantly...
Speaker 4: the resolution. Resolution for 4D radar is very limited. Used to be even work for 3D radar.
Speaker 4: Today, 4D radar is about roughly 1% of the resolution of LIDAR, like 100 times the difference.
Speaker 4: A good analogy would be when the resolution is so low, it's like you have short sighted eyes without glass and you're driving like that because you only have 1% of the resolution. Is it better than not having your eyes? Yes, I would agree, but that might not be a very good argument if you want to replace LiR.
Speaker 4: So then in the end if you look at it, really.
Speaker 4: So then in the end, if you look at it, really, LIDAR is much better in performance.
Speaker 4: becoming cheaper and cheaper over time and this is a verified sensor to be the critical part of the driving system.
Speaker 4: everyone agrees that centrifugation is critical. That's why we're still very optimistic, actually more excited that more companies are looking into the fact that vision only isn't going to be sufficient.
Speaker 4: that sensor fusion is critical. That's why we're still very optimistic, actually more excited that more companies are looking into the fact that vision only isn't going to be sufficient. Thank you very much. That's all my questions.
Speaker 2: Thank you. Your next question comes from Paul from UBS. Please go ahead. Yeah, thanks guys for taking my questions. I have only one question. It's regarding the innovation in terms of the direction and the pace.
Speaker 2: and the shape of the lighter. So the reason I'm asking this question is
If the innovation pace is too slow, of course that would limit the adoption of LIDAR. But if it's too quick, for anyone who might be out of airline today, driving for the next 10 years, for the first two years, he is happy. It's a state of art, NIDAR, but for the remaining 8 years.
high-end, expensive, largest UV would bear backwards light compared to the latest products by then in the market. So how should we think about this balance in terms of the innovation, in terms of both the pace as well as the direction, the products, let's say two years later, if it's better than today, where it would be better. Thank you.
Thank you. Thank you, Paul. This is David. I totally agree that you don't want to be too fast and you definitely don't want to be too slow in pushing forward the pace of the innovation.
Let's divide that into a few technical aspects. I will talk about what we think we've done and what we think remains as a potential path moving forward.
First is distance. So today it's roughly 200 meters and some of the competing technology has 250 meters and we're also moving in that direction. I think it's roughly meeting the expectation.
Second is form factor. Form factor is interesting because it's not about how big it is, it's about how you install that.
So I think we made a major progress in being able to install that, make it so small and install that behind the windshield. I feel like that part the market is extremely excited about, and we definitely see a lot of potential for doing so.
So that part is done. And then I want to talk about what hasn't been fully done and remains as the opportunity and the challenges. One is resolution. Let me give an apple to apple example. So if you think about it, the typical good camera for cars today is 8 megapixels per frame.
8 million pixels, right? So LiDARs, what we have today is only 1.5 per second, which means that it's a tenth of it per frame, which is 150K per frame. 150K versus 8 million, that's like 60 sometimes, room of improvement for LiDAR resolution to meet camera.
which is a natural thing people would want. So we have 16 more times to innovate. Of course, our next generation will significantly shorten, close this gap, but that's one of the opportunities we are looking at. And the other one is price. I won't be able to give you specific numbers, but we definitely see for some...
And then, Hasea as a company is very determined to be able to take the advantage of our in-house manufacturing and our strong semiconductor platform to be able to drive down the cost. If anybody, I feel like we have the best chance to do that. And it remains a challenge and the biggest opportunity moving forward.
Those are the things that are on my mind to move forward.
that on my mind to move forward. Okay, thank you so much.
Very helpful. Thank you. Thank you. Your next question comes from Tony Chen from Hawaii Type Securities. Please go ahead.
Hi David and Louis and management. Thank you for taking my questions. As we saw the intense EV competition in China and some defects trend from the product, many functions will be trapped in their low-end model and become optional in their high-end product. This is one trend and as Tesla you just mentioned they choose to use
Thank you. Let me make it very clear. I think the reason I mentioned Tesla is a friend, not an enemy, in the sense that they're actually acknowledging that camera alone. It's not that it's not even sufficient, because they're introducing RAID 40 radar.
Again, my argument is that Tesla used to claim very confidently that vision only is sufficient.
And now by introducing 4D radar, at least we know, they now agree that multimodality sensor fusion is going to be.
very very helpful for increased safety. So that's what I see. That's the reason I'm more excited for this because I feel like if LIDARs we keep going in the direction making it better and cheaper there's a very good chance that people would agree that this should be part of their systems.
So, and then back to your question on the China EV. So I think I also talked about it already. We are seeing even for the cheaper models, they want this to be a differentiator. And then, and for smart EVs, LiDAR is one of the iconical things. And yes, today, for very low-end models, it's relatively expensive. We're also making the effort to hopefully drive down the cost.
So we already see a wide range of adoptions this year and by next year we'll be shipping with 11 OEMs. Some of them are on the more affordable models but they still use it and some of them even use it as a standard configuration for all the car's relationships.
because they see that as a strong safety feature that they cannot live without.
to win competitive advantages. Thanks.
Yes, can you give us more color about the R&D progress in ASIC solution?
just like chips or stuff. Yeah, so we're at the development of the fourth generation. So each generation is a major step forward in more highly integrated components.
to further reduce the cost while having exponentially higher performance. When we talk about performance, we're talking about a few things. One is the range.
Today, we're about 180 to 200 meter range, and then our next generation is going to go way beyond that.
And the reason we're able to do that is we made a lot of progress on the component, the laser and the receiver side to be able to drive that part of the efficiency up in a way for lack of analogies like your cell phone camera 20 years ago if you take a photo at night.
You barely see anything. Now it's super clear, and it sees more things than your eyes. And we're driving our components in that direction to be able to detect further. Async also allows us to handle way more data as we send out the light pulses than we can receive them because our current 80 is 1.5 million points.
The next generation will be many times more than that. The reason for that is our A60 handles way more laser pulses and we can just...
multiply a big factor on what we do many points per second-wise. Resolution-wise, it's hugely perfect.
And also, if you are familiar with Moore's Law, we're also seeing that trend in the sense that
If you are familiar with Moore's Law, we're also seeing that trend in a sense that for every unit
the ASP isn't declining as very fast, but the performance per point.
is declining a lot because we're having many acts of increase on the resolution. So this is what ASIC is allowing us to do. And on top of it, it gives us better security train management ability because we used to sort a lot from different vendors. Some of the semiconductors now we just...
own the design and just ask Foundry to do that for us. And we're using very much your process node. So it's very much safer for us to work with Foundry.
not having to manage a global supply chain system. Okay, very clear. Thanks. That's all my questions. Thank you. Yep, thank you. Thank you. Your next question comes from Joel from Nomura. Please go ahead.
Thank you for taking my questions. So I'm asking for what Manu mentioned about the annual cost cut from OEM side. I want to, you know, can we share generally the situation here in terms of the annual cost cut level? If we can talk about the detailed numbers, can we say that's no single digit or maybe high single digit? Can we talk about that?
And also in terms of the OEM attitude toward LIDAR, we're talking about low-end car makers also, low-end car brands also thinking about LIDAR adoption. But in terms of the current situation, I would say because of the price competition in OEM market, do we see any further pressures or OEMs?
be more cautious in cost efficiency in this year and maybe impact the LIDAR market in the short term. Do you see any impact or any concern from OEM side? Thank you.
I'm your first question, Phil, this is Lewis. Regarding the price decline, we would estimate about five to 10% a year, year over year decline in the ASP side, but as David mentioned earlier, our contract has signed for the whole year. So they're kind of locked in, and sometimes it's multiple years where the price is locked in.
As far as the OEA adoption of lower price LIDAR in the competition, like I said, it's a long uphill process because they've already integrated with our LIDAR into their new models. It takes time to change. There is severe price competition and we faced that the last two or three years and that's why the prices come down.
A lot of companies used to pick just based on price, and then they've regretted it since because the performance is quite poor for the quality. So I think we're hoping that and expecting that price competition of Bates compared to the performance has the best LIDAR providers come out and able to show that they can produce auto-grade LIDAR at affordable prices.
So I think the price competition is beginning to wane a little bit. There's more about your product and a price that's affordable. You had a second question, so I didn't catch that correctly.
Okay, thank you. Actually, I want to follow up. So in terms of the because of the current market situation, so in terms of the short term top target, I mean, the task for the companies, so what's the key? It's about the cost down. It's about the new technology innovation in terms of short term and maybe within 20, 30.
That should be the first one, would be the first task. Short term, yeah. Short term is not as big a factor for us because the prices were locked in last year or at this point, and those models are coming out. So, and most of them are actually going to be delivered in 2024. So other than Li Auto, Lotus,
If you do four or five players in our universe, the ones that we sell to, there aren't a lot of new companies releasing cards this year for the short term. And then they are gearing up for 2024. And because LIDAR is a competitive advantage differentiator in the market, as competition increases you want to have it. So in the short term to answer your question is probably very, very little impact.
Since not that many models are shipping yet, longer term we'll have to see. Okay, Gaju, thanks. Thank you. Your next question comes from Olivia from Hightong International Securities. Please go ahead. Hi, David.
Okay, hi, Davia, Louis, thanks for taking my question. Could you provide an update on your new factories in Shanghai and Hangzhou? If I'm not wrong, I remember you said both will be put in operation by Q3. I also wonder if both factories are compatible for EP25 or other new products beyond. Thanks.
Thank you. So let me try to clarify a few things. Moving forward, we have two major factories. One is called Maxwell, we talk a lot about.
It's an R&D and manufacturing center in a sense that the main goal for Maxwell is to be able to fast iterate product development and manufacturing under one roof. So that's why the name is Maxwell. It's the name of the scientist who came up with the important equation. And then the other factory's name.
It hurts. Hurts is like a cycle time, how many units you produce per second, that type of nature. You can see it's for mass production only. The Hurts factory is extremely highly automated.
with 90% plus automation and the cycle time from used to be more than one minute, now Hertz is 45 seconds per LiDAR. And also because Hertz is built for high automation, in Hangzhou is a relatively cheaper place and it's actually the labor cost and manufacturing cost is also lower.
So having said that, with the two functions, there's another important concept I want to make it clear. So building a factory or retrofitting a factory is one thing, populating a factory with all its food production capabilities is another.
and those are completely different things. And sometimes people are confused by those. Building a factory like a Maxwell is like buying a big land.
So when you do that, if you wanted to have a lot of space, you can buy a couple of acres of land, that technically can hold hundreds of people to live if you do it in a hotel. But we're not stupid. What we do is actually we populate the production line based on the actual needs projected down the road. We can do this very quickly. And we're really ready for the start of that and we'll see what will happen.
Within less than six months we can populate those production lines. And we definitely don't want to build more than we will be able to ship. So that's why even for Hertz factory each line today we have is about 300 to 500.
thousand units per line and currently we only have one line because we already see if this will be and together with Maxwell we will be able to meet our needs. It's like you have a big land you buy it because the land itself is cheap but then you start to build those houses as you grow on the people but you don't want to build all those houses on the land.
yet because it only takes six months to do that. There's really no point in doing that. So that's why moving forward, we will only slowly expand hertz and some part of the Maxwell to keep it very, very lean because we know with the visibility we have, it takes less than six months to do so. And even for each line, it isn't extremely expensive. Lewis, do you want to comment on the top down the line?
I think the, yeah, I mean, David makes a very good point. The thing that is confusing the investors is we're not building 200, $300 million plants where the CapEx will eat up our cash. We've already guided CapEx this year and probably next year will be about 50 million US dollars. And that's all for mostly plant equipment. So it's about 10 to $15 million per line for the 18 fully 90% automated line.
and much less for the anticipated lines for the autonomous mobility, because that requires more manual labor. So it would be even much less for that. So don't get confused that we're building these plants that cost hundreds of millions of dollars that are eating up our cash. That's not the case.
So that's why even today we have four hundred and fifty seven million dollars of cash at the end of quarter That's much higher than any of our competitors
So we're not spending a lot of money on CAPEX other than for equipment and for the assembly line.
I hope I answered all the other quick questions. Do you think those lines can be used from one product to another? Well, that's a no. Every time you need to come to a different product, you need to redesign the full automation line to do that. That's also another reason.
we have the new AG product building heard, actually. Okay, gotcha. Thanks.
Right, and then even though the production lines are redesigned, some of the equipment can be reused as we are ramping down on some of the legacy products. And then because of the automation process, our shared in great similarity.
the majority of those equipment can be used, but the line needs to be redesigned. Thank you. Your next question comes from Jesse from Bank of America Securities. Please go ahead.
Hi, David. Hi, Louis. Thank you for taking my question. First of all, I know that you mentioned E.T. 25 hasn't received it from order yet. So we cannot disclose on ESP and margin, but just wanted to understand from a OEM standpoint. So when they need to purchase the upgraded windshield to go with this E.T. 25.
There are certain processes for a lot of the sourcing decisions. I think in the script we explained, we were in 8 RFI and RSQ processes for 5 major global OEMs. So I wouldn't say that we don't have progress, it's that we don't have the final nomination we could announce.
AT series. AT series is we started the shift in 2022. ET is a few years later. And then it will be able to leverage our new development on the semiconductor side. And as we move forward, even though the performance is going up.
and we always try to have better integration on the semiconductor side to control the total bond cost. So you mean like how much more money will be added on the glass side?
Okay, well that part is specific to OEMs. I don't expect that to be a major part of it because for the special processes, a simple phase is expensive, but a large production phase is just one of the relatively simple processes people do. It's no significant price increase.
It just looks so much better. So, aesthetically it's going to be a big factor, right? As OEMs make decisions. And of course OEMs are always learning things that are better, more beautiful, and cheaper. And that's reasonable.
Yes, yes, totally makes sense. So another question would be another peer also states that the software that goes with the LIDAR would be the key to win the long term process. So what's our view on on this? Thank you.
I agree. I think today a lot of the customers are already seeing that they may or may not be the most experienced user for the LIRR. That's why we provide the reference software system to the customer. Essentially that we know how to use them. We already have a package that will help them jumpstart. We don't fully take over their development because it's not the most experienced user for the LIRR.
most of the customers, they prefer still to own a process, but we provide the reference software to help them from anything from perception to tracing the targets to calibration and to some of the algorithms in calibrating and essentially helping them to get things up and running. And that part is very, very important because without that, it's a piece of dumb hardware that no one can take advantage of.
Did I answer your question? Thank you. Unfortunately, that does conclude our time for questions today. I'd now like to turn the call back over to the company for any closing remarks.
Thank you once again for joining us today. If you have any further questions, please feel free to contact our IR team. This concludes today's call and we look forward to speaking to you again next quarter. Thank you and goodbye.
This concludes today's conference call. You may now disconnect your line. Thank you.
I.