Björn Tibell: Hi everyone, and welcome to the presentation of ASSA ABLOY's Q3 report in 2026. My name is Björn Tibell. I am heading Investor Relations, and joining me here are ASSA ABLOY CEO Nico Delvaux and our CFO Erik Pieder. We will start this conference now with a summary of the report, and when we are done with that one, we will open up for your questions. Nico, I would like to hand over to you then.

Nico Delvaux: Thank you, Björn. Also, good morning from my side. Q3 report. A report with a lot of records. A record top line. For the first time in our history, sales above SEK 40 billion with a good organic sales growth of 4% with the Americas divisions and the EMEA division contributing in the first place. Also a record high EBIT for the first time above SEK 7 billion and a record EBIT margin of 17.4%. Excellent operating leverage close to 50% And second-best cash flow ever, an increase of the cash flow of 6% versus last year. Also this quarter, again, strong growth of our electromechanical product category. We had an organic sales growth of 9% in our regional divisions. Then we completed three acquisitions, and we will also launch our new manufacturing footprint program, MFP11, in Q4.

Nico Delvaux: If we look a little bit into the numbers, our sales of almost SEK 41 billion, 7% up, 4% organic growth, 2% net acquired growth. This quarter, again, a positive effect on FX. That is because of the weaker SEK +1%. A record EBITDA margin of 18.7%, 80 basis points up. EBIT margin, like I mentioned, 17.4%, 60 basis points up. EBIT above SEK 7 billion, 11% up, and our earnings per share 14% up. If we make a bit a tour of the world, starting in North America, and I would say very similar market conditions as I mentioned in Q2 and perhaps as in Q1. In North America, still very strong market conditions on the non-residential side, commercial, institutional, where we continue to see very high activity.

Nico Delvaux: Residential still much more challenging now definitely also with the Fed again increasing interest rates, where we do not see that recovery on the new build any time soon yet. But where at least on the R&R side, we believe the market has bottomed out, and we see a slight recovery of the R&R business in North America. The logistics vertical important for Entrance Systems. Also there, still a more flattish development of the market. If you go to Europe, similar picture as in North America. Also here, very strong non-residential market conditions and perhaps on the residential side, a little bit more positive than in North America. Here we see R&R definitely coming back with a lower growth rate, and we even see new build in some markets like Finland and Sweden starting to grow again. Similar on the logistics side. Also here, logistics side, no recovery.

Nico Delvaux: If already something, market most probably still a little bit down in Europe. In Australia, New Zealand, similar as Europe and North America. Also here, good strong market conditions on the commercial side, weaker residential in Australia and good residential in New Zealand. LATAM, still good market conditions overall in most markets in LATAM. We have also now had elections in Brazil. Let us see how that plays out. Africa, smaller continent for us. Then in Asia, very mixed picture where we see good market condition and good growth for us in India, in Southeast Asia. Where we see continuous challenging market conditions in South Korea with housing market down double digit, and then also in Greater China, where the market is not recovering and where we also are still having a negative growth. Some highlights from around the world.

Nico Delvaux: DoorBird expanded its portfolio with the world's first IP video door station with 4G, 5G connectivity, mainly for residential and commercial applications. Entrance Systems expanded their swing door portfolio with a new door operator designed for interior applications, offering a more streamlined solution for everyday use. On the project win side, a very nice project win in Germany for a premium automotive manufacturer with our eCLIQ solution, where the contract includes more than 15,000 cylinders. So, a very nice, big project win. It is now seven quarters in a row that we see again a positive organic growth, and I would say an acceleration of that organic growth, and still complemented with good growth through acquisitions. So, top line that goes up and also an operating margin that goes up towards the higher end of the 16% to 17% band, which we want to be in.

Nico Delvaux: Year to date, we are at 16.6%. On a 12-month moving trend, we are at 16.7%. EBITDA, like I mentioned earlier, also at a record high 17.8% on a 12-month moving trend. So, higher top line, better margins, therefore also strong acceleration of our operating income, record above SEK 7 billion for the first time and 81% up if we compare with 2021. On the acquisition side, like I mentioned, three acquisitions completed in the quarter, 11 completed year to date. Those 11 acquisitions represent an annualized sales of around SEK 3.2 billion. If I highlight two of them that we did in Q3, Classic Brass, US manufacturer of premium cabinet and door hardware, complementing, extending our core for the Americas division. They had sales of around SEK 155 million last year. PACLOCK, an acquisition that complements our organic development of padlock product range in North America.

Nico Delvaux: Very excited about this acquisition. It adds expertise in delivering, I would say, customized high security solutions. They had sales of around SEK 155 million last year. If we then dig into the different divisions, starting with EMEA. EMEA had another very good quarter with an organic sales growth of 5%, with very strong sales growth in Central Europe, good sales growth in Middle East, India, Africa, and the Nordics, a small growth in South Europe, and then a stable growth in UK and Ireland. An excellent operational execution with an EBIT margin of 15.8%, with a strong operating leverage, 110 basis points driven by operational efficiencies, of course, the volume growth, and then a good price versus cost realization. FX was dilutive 10 basis points and M&A 20 basis points. We continue the positive journey, I would say, in the EMEA division.

Nico Delvaux: Also a very strong quarter for the Americas with an organic sales growth of 6%, with strong sales growth in the North America non-residential segment, a good sales growth in LATAM and in the North America residential segment. I would say excellent EBIT margin of 19.6%, 110 basis points up compared to last year. We have an excellent operating leverage, 140 basis points, and M&A dilutive 30 bps. APAC. APAC had an organic sales decline of 1%, a small sales growth in Pacific Northeast Asia, and a sales decline in Greater China, Southeast Asia, where, as I explained earlier, you should see this as a double digit negative growth in Greater China and a strong positive double digit growth in Southeast Asia. So, a very different mixed picture. An EBIT margin of 9.8% with a stable operating leverage and FX and M&A both dilutive 20 basis points.

Nico Delvaux: The M&A is more an internal transfer. We transferred residential business from HHI in Taiwan to the APAC division. Global Technologies, an organic sales growth of 4%. We have strong sales growth in HID and a good sales growth in Global Solutions. I would say an excellent EBIT margin of 20%, even higher than the very high 19.8 number of last year. Also here, excellent operating leverage, 80 basis points. FX and M&A both dilutive 30 basis points. Last but not least, Entrance Systems, an organic sales growth of 3%. Strong sales growth in pedestrian and in perimeter security. A small sales growth in doors and automation, but then a decline in industrial.

Nico Delvaux: Good growth in service and an EBIT margin of 17.1% with a strong operating leverage, 40 basis points. An M&A dilutive 70 basis points that is related to the bigger Sentinel acquisition we did in Canada, and then also related to acquisition cost for the upcoming Gunnebo Entrance Control acquisition that we are confident we will now be able to close in Q4. With that, I give the word to Erik for some more details on the financial numbers.

Erik Pieder: Thank you, Nico, and a very good morning also from my side. As mentioned before, we had a record high sales of the first time above SEK 40 billion, 7% up versus same period last year, 4% organic, 2% from acquisitions, and 1% positive from currency. The impact, of course, since the SEK continues to weaken, we expect when we calculate then from end of September that we are going to have a positive impact from currency in Q4 of about 5%. EBIT, also record first time above SEK 7 billion, up 11%. Here, just to mention that we have released a mid-single million SEK amount into our result, which sort of slightly helps it positively. EBIT, EBITDA, as mentioned, 18.7 up 80 basis points, EBIT up 60 basis points. Income before tax, net income, and EPS all are up with 14%. Cash flow also very strong at 6%.

Erik Pieder: Should also keep in mind that this quarter also had a higher CapEx, which is related to that we have acquired two buildings in Entrance North America. If we would exclude these two buildings, our cash flow would have been 13% up versus last year. Also encouraging to see that our return on capital employed is up with 70 basis points and are touching now the 15%. Operational value added also up with 10% and is now close to SEK 12 billion. If we look onto the bridge analysis and look on the organic, price was a strong 2%, which consequentially means that volume was a weaker 2%. The currency, as mentioned before, is related to the SEK. The flow-through ended at 47%, which is driven by the organic leverage then from price versus cost, as well as manufacturing footprint.

Erik Pieder: Saving this quarter, it was slightly above SEK 200 million, as well as other kind of operational efficiencies that we can do. If you look on M&A, it was top line, it was contributing with 2%. Bottom line, it is dilutive, but it has to do, Nico mentioned before, the Sentinel acquisition and also acquisition costs coming from that, as well as acquisition costs related to Gunnebo, which we hope to close before the end of the year. If you then look into the direct material or the cost breakdown, direct material is 80 basis points better than last year. Out of that, if I call it the true price versus cost, is +60 basis points. We see, however, in the market now that raw material, electronics, plastics are going up, but we are confident that we can mitigate that with additional price increases. Conversion cost 20 basis points better.

Erik Pieder: As mentioned before, we have operational efficiencies, MFP and so forth. SG&A is at the similar level as where it was last year. We have been able to continue to invest in R&D as well as selling, and this has been offset by admin and back office efficiencies, including, I would say, the first results that we see of our AI initiatives. Operating cash flow, as mentioned before, including the buildings, we are 6% better than the same period last year, excluding 13% better. If you look on cash conversion in the quarter, it was 117%, and if you look on a 12-month rolling, it is at 109%. Gearing net debt to equity landed at 54%. We continue to drive also down the net debt to EBITDA and was now at 2.0.

Erik Pieder: If you look over a year period, we have been able to lower our debt with roughly SEK 2.5 billion, and we continue to have a very strong balance sheet so we can continue our acquisition strategy going forward. If you look on the last slide, I mentioned the number before. Earnings per share was up with 14% versus same period last year. With that, some concluding remarks, Nico.

Nico Delvaux: Good. Yeah. Like we said, we believe, up to you to judge, of course, but we believe a very good quarter with a lot of records. Record top line with good organic sales development of +4%, record operating profit and record margin, and the second-best cash flow in our history. Like we mentioned, we will launch now in Q4 our manufacturing footprint program number 11. I would say that we are proud of what we have accomplished in the first 9 months, and we are confident in our ability to deliver another strong year for ASSA ABLOY. With that, I give the word back to Björn for Q&A.

Björn Tibell: Thank you very much. Yes, that means it is time to open up for your questions. Could I just remind you to please limit yourself to one question each with one follow-up? Then we will allow everyone to ask questions. Once you have actually asked your question, feel welcome to put yourself in the queue again. I think it is likely that we will be able to come around the queue and start with you over again. Operator, that means that we are ready to kick off the Q&A session. Please go ahead.

Operator: Thank you very much. We will now begin the question and answer session. Anyone who wishes to ask a question may press star and 1 on the telephone. You will hear a tone to confirm that you have entered the queue. If you wish to remove yourself from the question queue, you may press star and 2. Questioners on the phone are requested to disable the loudspeaker mode while asking a question. Anyone who has a question may press star and 1 at this time. Our first question comes from George Featherstone from Barclays. Please go ahead.

George Featherstone: Hi. Morning, everyone. Thanks for the questions. The first one just be on EMEA. Obviously, you talked recently about having some tailwinds from this NIS2 regulation and the growth has obviously been very strong again. Just wondered if you could parse out for us what the contribution you think is from that regulation this quarter. Then just on the margin, obviously, it is trending towards the sort of 16% it was before on the EBIT level in the region. You are having good volume growth. What is the sort of next step to get us back above 16% from here?

Nico Delvaux: Yeah, George, I can say we are very happy with the development of EMEA over the last four quarters or so, you could say, because we have really seen organic volume growth coming back, and we have seen an acceleration of that organic volume growth. I would say that is very widespread. Yes, NIS2 contributes, but NIS2 contributes most probably around 0.5% organic growth, because NIS2 today is still very much DACH related, you could say, and Nordics related. It still has to pick up at a higher speed in the rest of Europe. We are confident that that will happen going forward because that is normally also how things happen in Europe.

Nico Delvaux: Things first start in the Nordics and perhaps in the DACH, then it spreads more over the rest of Europe as also the local countries start to adapt the European directive into a local law. I would say it is much more widespread. We see very good volume growth on the commercial side in most, if not all, markets. We have, of course, the emerging part with India, Middle East, Africa, that also contributes. Then, like I said, on the residential side, we are a bit more positive than in North America, where we see R&R slightly coming back and where we even have seen new builds a little bit coming back in countries like Sweden and the Nordics. Then, of course, next to the organic volume growth, we have also the price component.

Nico Delvaux: As we continue to see higher inflation, that also gives us then the possibility to further increase prices in EMEA. When it comes to margin, you see if you have a little bit of organic volume growth and you see an acceleration of that organic volume growth, you see also a better volume leverage, and that volume leverage then leads to better bottom-line results. You see in EMEA, the last 3, 4 quarters, they have been able to improve margin sequentially quarter after quarter. I am confident that that will continue for the next quarters as we confidently will continue to see that organic volume growth. They have a very good cost structure that with a little bit of organic volume growth, we can get very good operational efficiencies.

George Featherstone: Thank you very much for that, Nico. Just a follow-up on what you said on Global Solutions as well, mostly in the release. You talked about this temporary depressed retail segment. Can you just give us a little bit more context in how temporary that will be, when you think it will recover? Clearly, you can see something in the order book, I guess, otherwise you would not have said temporary.

Nico Delvaux: I would not say it is depressed. It is perhaps more an operational execution challenge at 2 of our bigger customers for the InVue business. I think HID and Global Technologies had a very good quarter, very good solid organic growth. Global Solutions, the same thing if you exclude InVue. InVue is very dependent on a couple of bigger customers that have placed very big orders with us, and they have some delays in operational execution of those projects, you could say. Some of that sales is now postponed till Q4 and most probably even to Q1 next year. I would say there is no drama. It is just a little bit delay in us receiving the sales. In a way, perhaps it is even good for us because InVue is very seasonal.

Nico Delvaux: Normally Q1 is very weak, so if we can get now some sales that we should have gotten in the H2 in Q1 next year, it will help also due to the seasonality. That is the reason why perhaps Global Technologies is a little bit weaker than anticipated on the organic growth side.

George Featherstone: Okay. Can you quantify that?

Nico Delvaux: Perhaps you see. Sorry, perhaps you see, just to comment, if you see then if we have a little bit less organic growth, then we also deliver on our promise that at least we will deliver the bottom line and the cash flow because you have seen very strong bottom line and cash flow. Sorry, go ahead.

George Featherstone: I was just going to say, thanks. Can you quantify the amount of the InVue slippage, maybe in terms of organic growth?

Nico Delvaux: I do not know, to be honest, exactly the number, but I would say it is between one and on Global Technologies level, it is around 1%, I would say.

George Featherstone: Okay. Thank you very much.

Operator: The next question comes from Phil Buller from JPMorgan. Please go ahead.

Phil Buller: Hi. Good morning. Thanks for taking the questions. Firstly, I was hoping if you could help us understand if there is any one-offs on the resi side in the US. Good growth here seems to be at odds with the leading indicators. Is that a one-off ahead of price increases? Is there anything one-off in the 140 bps operating leverage, such as a tariff refund? Thanks. That is the first question.

Nico Delvaux: Specifically for the Resi, there is no one-offs. I would say that in general, it is a clean quarter for the group. Definitely also a clean quarter for Resi. Yes, we have seen some growth in Resi, some price and some volume. Like we have said at many occasions, we do not need a very strong recovery on the Resi side to see very good margin improvement. As a matter of fact, we had a very good margin for Q3 in Resi, North America, thanks to that volume growth, because we have that cost structure now that a little bit of growth gives immediately very good volume leverage. It has nothing to do with price increases or anticipation. Of course, you should not read too much in one quarter neither.

Nico Delvaux: Like I mentioned earlier, we believe that new build is still very challenging in North America and is definitely not improving compared to three months ago with the Fed now further increasing interest rates, and you see also mortgage rates further going up. If already something, I think the recovery of the new build will be further delayed in North America. Like I also mentioned, we believe that at least R&R has bottomed out and perhaps has started to grow with very low single-digit numbers perhaps. Of course, we have a lot of growth initiatives where we try to do better than the market. We have launched a complete new padlock range, a product that we did not have in our portfolio before. We have invested a lot in digital door locks and have a very wide product range today.

Nico Delvaux: We have also invested in renewing our mechanical core for CLIQ. There is a lot of initiatives that we launched to try to do better than the market.

Erik Pieder: Perhaps just to add, because your question was a bit related to tariffs. The mid-single digit million dollar amount that I talk about, that affected Global Technologies and Entrance Systems. There is nothing in the Americas result.

Phil Buller: Okay, thank you. As a follow-up on that macro uncertainty topic, obviously there is a lot of uncertainty out there and we have a new restructuring program. Is that in anticipation of perhaps markets getting a little bit softer as we think ahead to 2027, or is this more of a reflection that you have identified further cost out opportunities as part of the current program that you would have looked at even if the outlook was less uncertain, I guess. Thanks.

Nico Delvaux: No, it has nothing to do with market conditions. As you know, we do an MFP program every around 18 months, and it is 18 months ago that we did the previous one. As we continue to buy companies, we continue also to buy factories, warehouses, sales offices that we then can further consolidate. That is what we will do now also in MFP11. So drivers are very similar as our previous 10 MFP programs, I would say.

Phil Buller: Thank you very much.

Operator: The next question comes from Ines Lofranc from Goldman Sachs. Please go ahead.

Ines Lefranc: Hi, thank you very much for taking my question. My first one is just on the manufacturing footprint program. Could you give us any color on expected restructuring charges, targeted savings, or payback period? Thank you.

Nico Delvaux: Not really, because we are still finalizing the numbers, but I understand that you want to have at least an idea. Most probably, the new MFP will be a little bit bigger than MFP 10 because that's normal. We have further grown our company. If you grow, you can also do more restructuring. I think from a dynamic perspective, factories, warehouses, customer centers will be very similar. I think from which divisions contribute, it will also be very similar, and we are very confident that we will have a very good payback on this one as well. But too early to give you the detailed numbers. That will be something for the next call.

Ines Lefranc: Okay, makes sense. If I could just ask one follow-up on the tariff impact, that mid-single digit million dollar in Global Technologies and Entrance Systems, is that a one-off for this quarter? Do you expect any tailwinds next quarter too? Any color would be really useful. Thank you.

Erik Pieder: Well, if I should elaborate a little bit more on the tariffs. First of all, I would say that so far we have received, I would say, a high double-digit million-dollar amount in the result in Q3. We have, in reality, we have a mid-double digit million dollar amount that has been going to the result. Most of that money we have then used for, let's say, writing off PPA initiatives in R&D. Let's say we have invested that in the business. In Q3, out of that, as I mentioned, it was a mid-single digit million dollar that impacted the result. If you have a high, as I mentioned, a high, which means that we still have, let's say, money left also for Q3.

Erik Pieder: We have to see a bit, let's say, how much will in practice then impact the bottom line. That is not really clear yet.

Ines Lefranc: Makes sense. Thank you.

Operator: The next question comes from Aron Ceccarelli from Bank of America. Please go ahead.

Aron Ceccarelli: Hello. Hi, good morning. Thanks for taking my question. I have a two-part question on North America. Your largest peers in the US has been printing now stronger pricing than you, at least that's what appears from the numbers for couple of quarters at least. I was wondering, is this because of your deliberate action to potentially gain market share in a weak residential market, or is something different? Do you expect this gap to persist?

Nico Delvaux: No, I think it is not that we try to gain market share with reducing prices or keeping prices lower. First of all, our price is on group level, and the price component has been higher than group average for the Americas division. That comes because the Americas division is also more steel-related, and steel has seen important price inflation. I think another explanation is that we, as the market leader, we were also the first ones to increase prices when things started with tariffs and also inflation. I think if you look over a longer period, and our colleagues also report price quarter after quarter. If you look over a longer period over the last 3 years, you will see that price component most probably is very similar.

Aron Ceccarelli: Thank you.

Operator: The next question comes from Gael de-Bray from Deutsche Bank. Please go ahead.

Gael de-Bray: Thanks very much. I have 2 questions, please. Firstly, I would like to hear your thoughts on the new partnership between Apple and LG to develop doorbells and smart door locks. I think you already have many products that can integrate with Apple's ecosystem. So maybe just your views on the risk there would be much appreciated, and perhaps a reminder of your actual exposure to the smart door lock business.

Nico Delvaux: Yep. This is an initiative in North America. I would say we like the initiative very much because clearly Apple has a much bigger marketing budget than we have. I think it is good that people like Apple start to make more publicity in the market for digital door locks that will help the sales of digital door locks in general. As you rightly said, we have a very wide range of digital door lock products that are compatible with the Apple ecosystem, with the Amazon and Google ecosystem, and with all the new standards that you have in the US. If you see also the positioning of this new product from Apple, it positions rather high in the market.

Nico Delvaux: You could say that it is a bit a competitor of what we used to have with Yale, when we were still the owner of Yale before that divestment when we acquired HHI. Today with Kwikset we play much more in the middle segment. Yes, we have the ambition to move up to that, you could say Yale, high-end segment, but that is still today a smaller part of the market. The big volumes are in that value segment. I think for us it is a positive thing. It will create more marketing, it will create more noise in the market around digital door locks, and it will drive more business in that sense. When it comes to a part of our business, I think the digital door locks are around 5% of the North America resi business.

Nico Delvaux: It is a smaller part of our revenue today, you could say.

Gael de-Bray: Okay. Understood. Still pretty small indeed. The second question I have is, I did not fully understand the rationale for selling the PKI business unit. It has a strong margin. It includes a SaaS business. Why is it that you cannot grow the business further?

Nico Delvaux: Actually, what we divested was a combination of four companies that came through acquisitions long time ago: ActivIdentity, IdenTrust, ZeroSSL, and HydrantID. I would say HydrantID was the biggest part. It is a small business altogether, around $50 million to $60 million. But this HydrantID, they had this PKI, so Public Key Infrastructure certificates. What they do is they do the life cycle management of those certificates, you could say. It is a very interesting business, fast-growing indeed, and highly profitable, but with very little synergies with the rest of what we do in HID and with the rest of what we do within the group. We are a small player in that field. We are a number four or five. There are a couple of very dominant players. As you know, we have always the ambition to be a leader in what we do.

Nico Delvaux: If you want to become a leader, we could not do that organically. We had to buy the number one or the number two. As these are pure software businesses, multiples are very high in this field. Paying a very high multiple to become a number one, paying a lot of money for a business that has little or no synergies with the rest of HID and the rest of the group, we thought that there were better ways to allocate capital. Rather than sticking on an interesting asset and over time having the risk that that would go down and dilute, we thought it was a better idea to sell it now at a good price, at a good valuation, and give it to somebody else that is clearly a better owner for that business than us in ASSA ABLOY.

Gael de-Bray: Thank you. If I may, is there any capital gain you expect to book on the transaction?

Nico Delvaux: Yes, we will come back to that in Q4. Like Erik said, it is a smaller acquisition, so also from a dilutive perspective, it will not really move the needle on group level.

Gael de-Bray: Thank you very much.

Operator: The next question comes from Alexander Virgo from Evercore ISI. Please go ahead.

Alexander Virgo: Yeah. Thanks very much for taking the question, gentlemen. Trust you well. Could you talk a little bit to the gross margin and Global Technologies margins? I guess it is two questions, but same question on margins. Gross margin is close to 44%. I think that is also something of an all-time high. So, just wondering if you can talk a little bit to how we should expect that to evolve over the coming years. And in Global Technologies now, I guess north of 20.5x FX and M&A headwinds, and strong incremental margins there. Are we now back to a new level in Global Technologies as well? Thank you.

Nico Delvaux: If I start with Global Technologies, we have always said that we have an ambition for Global Technologies to have margins above the 16% to 17% bandwidth. We should think more about something around that 18%. Yes, this quarter was extreme good quarter. Q3 is always the best quarter for Global Technologies. I think you should see this more over a business cycle and definitely over a full year. Today, I think if you look at on a year-to-date trend, we are at 18.5% for Global Technologies. So more in line with that 18% ambition that we have. For the time being, we believe this above the 17%, so 17% to 18% is still the right ambition for us because, yes, we have a couple of very mature and very profitable businesses in Global Technologies, like the PACS business in HID and the hospitality business in Global Solutions.

Nico Delvaux: But we have a lot of smaller businesses that we want to invest in R&D, in feet on the street that are much lower margin and that we want to bring up volume-wise, size-wise to similar levels as PACS or Hospitality. On the gross margin, of course, if you look back the last 2, 3 years, we have had a very good journey when it comes price to cost, direct material versus price increases in the market. We have had quarter after quarter strong accretion of that price versus cost. That is one big explanation. I think we have done the MFP programs, like Erik said, also helping on the gross margin side.

Nico Delvaux: I think we have done a very good job to our operational organization in, how to say, using our scale and our growing scale to get also better conditions out of our suppliers. Then next to that, all the operational efficiencies, like VAVE initiatives that we do in our factories and together with our suppliers. I think it is just a good operational job, well done, explaining the very nice gross margin improvement. I think that is across all divisions. I think all divisions you will see similar pictures.

Erik Pieder: Perhaps, Alex, also, if we look a little bit more short term, we expect also then for Q4 to have a tailwind on price versus cost. That is a bit how far we see, then we have to see how it goes in the first quarters next year.

Alexander Virgo: That is super helpful, Nico. Erik, just to follow up there on that 60 bps in Q3 then should be closer to 100 in Q4?

Erik Pieder: I said a tailwind. Normally I would say that I think you are way too high with that. I think it is going to be positive, and let's see if it reaches the 60 bps.

Nico Delvaux: But it should be another good significant accretion in Q4, Alex, because most probably not on the same level as in Q3 because you see material indexes further going up. You see definitely also energy inflation further going up, logistic inflation, and general inflation. But on the other hand, we also continue to increase prices, so we will see how the pricing intention we have plays out in the market.

Alexander Virgo: That is very helpful. Thank you.

Nico Delvaux: The Q4 should be another good accretion price versus cost.

Alexander Virgo: Thank you very much.

Björn Tibell: Before we jump over to the next question, could I just I am being informed we just have one person in the queue now, so if there are any follow-up questions, feel welcome to press, I believe it is star one. Operator, you can probably help with that.

Operator: Thank you very much. Our next question comes from James Moore from Rothschild & Co. Please go ahead.

James Moore: Morning, everybody. Erik, Nico, I wondered if I could ask a little bit about the forward-looking picture. Maybe you could please talk about specification. I am sorry if you said it earlier, I got cut off for a moment. And by region and globally, and also talk about the momentum into October, if you could, please.

Nico Delvaux: The traditional question we normally get is, how was the demand over the quarter and then the exit rate in October? That is the question you now ask, James. I would say in Q3, demand has been quite stable over the three months and now going into October, we see a similar pattern. Should not forget in Q4, in theory, we have one working day more, but what you see is of course that in October, which is an important month, we have one working day less, and then in November and in December, we have one working day more. But the working day in December is a working day more in a holiday month, you could say. So very similar from a working day perspective this year versus last year. The spec business, we have seen high single-digit growth of our spec business.

Nico Delvaux: It was a bit better in the Americas and in Australia, New Zealand. A bit lower in EMEA, but EMEA, it was just a difficult comparison with a quarter last year where we had a couple of very big projects that we quoted. If you correct for the, you could say the outline of also in the EMEA, we had a similar high single-digit pattern. So still very positive on the specification momentum. Still believe good driver going forward.

James Moore: Yeah. Thanks, Nico. Could I just follow up with some kind of point on that? We have seen indicators and permits deteriorate in the last three months, and as you point out, rates have gone back up a bit. So I was quite surprised to see your underlying US and European result. It is just a bit better than many thought. Would you characterize that as the market being better before the pain of rates kick back in, or that you have had the initiatives away from those that you talked about in HHI, which you seem to be taking some share in that market. But do you characterize the US non-res or the European resi non-res performance as being a function of any kind of indicators or more just like mix where you have got naturally bigger exposure?

Nico Delvaux: If you talk on the commercial or the non-residential side, as you know, we are late in the construction cycle. But I would say that at least as far as we can look forward, perhaps a year or so, looking forward, we do not see any slowdown. You could argue that higher interest rates indeed lead to less project. On the other hand, if you look, for instance, in the US, if you look at our two main verticals, education, schooling, as you know, it is a lot financed through local bonds, and I think local bonds have never been as high as they are today. So I do not think we see any slowdown there. And on the private side, it is money which is deployed in a different way.

Nico Delvaux: Like we mentioned at earlier occasions, if you want to be in education today in the US, upgrading your access solution is a license to operate with all the security concerns and all the shootings going on. I think a similar picture on healthcare, which is our second important vertical in North America. The demographics of population and also the need for healthcare is not going down, on the contrary. We also don't believe we will see any slowdown there. So we are still very positive on commercial in North America, and I think similar what I said for Europe.

James Moore: Thanks, Nico.

Operator: We have a follow-up question from Aron Ceccarelli from Bank of America. Please go ahead. Mr. Ceccarelli, your line is open. You may proceed with your question.

Aron Ceccarelli: Hello. Yes, sorry, I was on mute. I believe your tone on Europe seems incrementally positive. Perhaps can you give a little bit of a tour by country what drive this level of confidence increasing? Thank you.

Nico Delvaux: If we start perhaps in the Nordics and perhaps with Sweden, you know that Sweden was the first ones to reduce interest rates. They were 9 months before ECB, so they are a bit, you could say, the canary in the mine. They indicate a little bit what happens in the rest of Europe. We have seen, like I mentioned at earlier occasions, residential market in Sweden coming back first on the R&R side, and today we also slowly start to see it coming back on the new build side. A similar story is true for Finland, which are the two main markets for us in the Nordics.

Nico Delvaux: Commercial activity is high, like it is in all the regions in Europe, but it is even further boosted by this NIS2 regulation, where like I mentioned, Nordics is one of the drivers in applying physical hardware around NIS2 with a lot of CLIQ sales and so on. If you go to Central Europe, a similar story. NIS2 further boosts our commercial growth in the DACH region. As you know, in Germany, we are, or if you could call it a niche player, we are not very small on the residential side. We are strong on the commercial side, definitely on the high end of the commercial side. So we profit there also a bit that we are in the best market, you could say, in the DACH region, in Germany in particular. We see there very good high single-digit growth numbers, again, also boosted by this too.

Nico Delvaux: East Europe, good on the residential and commercial side in our main markets like Poland. To go to South Europe, I would say a bit more mixed picture. Spain, Italy have been maneuvering very good through the lower years, last year and so on. We continue to see good development there where France has been much tougher, definitely also last year. In France, we have a little bit of advantage that we have now an easier comp. Then we will see how all the unrest that we have seen in recent weeks in France plays out, because France, together with UK, are two important residential markets for us. Then UK and Ireland, I would say UK and Ireland has been flat since Brexit, and year after year have been hoping that UK, Ireland would recovery. That has not really happened so far.

Nico Delvaux: We see now at least some early signs that there might be some recovery, definitely on the commercial side in UK. Hopefully those early signs get confirmed now in the coming quarters. Then we have the emerging part, like I mentioned, Africa, Middle East, India. Perhaps surprisingly, but we see still good development in the Middle East. We see very good development in Africa and India. We were late to enter India. We only entered India in 2018 when I started in this position. But we have seen since then good double-digit growth in India starting from a smaller level. We are confident that that growth will continue.

Aron Ceccarelli: Thank you very much.

Operator: We have another follow-up question from Andre Kukhnin from UBS. Please go ahead.

Andre Kukhnin: Yes, good morning. Thank you very much for taking my questions, and sorry if there is some repeat. We had some technical issues here. I just wanted to start with NIS2. Is there any way you could help us quantifying the degree of help that this is creating for the market? Also, how should we think about it in terms of, is this kind of a one-off boost that we need to think about comping at some point in 2027, or is it a more of a multi-year growth driver where the addressable install base is so substantial that this will take many years to get through?

Nico Delvaux: Yeah, we also took the question when perhaps you had the technical problems, but it is true for EMEA accounts for around half a percent organic growth, we estimate. The reason being that today it is still mainly focusing on the DACH region and the Nordics, Sweden and Finland, where we have seen a lot of business for our CLIQ solutions or electromechanical solutions. As this becomes more widespread in the rest of Europe, we are confident that we will see similar patterns in other markets like France, Italy, Spain, you name it. But they are traditionally always slower or later than the Nordics and perhaps also than DACH because they are faster in implementing those new European directives into local legislation. We believe it is more a multi-year activity because even in DACH and in the Nordics, we are far from done.

Nico Delvaux: There is still a lot of companies, basically all mid-size and bigger companies have to do something around cybersecurity, and not only from a software perspective, but also from a hardware perspective. So even in DACH and in Nordics, we are not done yet, and then of course, all the other markets still have to come. So we see it as a cherry on the cake, you could say, for EMEA for several more years to come.

Andre Kukhnin: Great. Thank you, and apologies for a repeat question. If it is another repeat, then just leave it and I will come back to the transcript. But I wanted to ask about the MFP program that you are planning to launch during Q4. You indicated that it will be similar to prior programs, but obviously as the group gets bigger, I just wondered if those MFP programs should also be getting bigger or more frequent over time.

Nico Delvaux: The strength of the message is in the repetition. We also gave an answer on this one. We have said that MFP11 most probably will be a little bit bigger than MFP10, because as you rightly said, we have grown in the meantime, and we have also more possibilities, and we have continued to do acquisitions. So we have more factories, warehouses, sales offices that we can consolidate. But what we said from a mix and from a concept perspective, it will be very similar to the previous 10 MFP programs with all the different divisions contributing and with confidently also a good payback for this MFP11 program. But too early to give the exact numbers. That will come in our next call.

Andre Kukhnin: Thank you. Thanks for your patience as well.

Operator: Ladies and gentlemen, that was the last question. I would now like to turn the conference back over to Björn Tibell for any closing remarks.

Björn Tibell: Thank you very much. Thanks everyone for your participation. If there are any follow-up questions, feel welcome to reach out to us at Investor Relations. That means we don't have much more to say. We look forward to speaking and meeting with many of you in the coming days and weeks, and we wish all of you also a safe and secure end of the year. Thank you for your participation again, and have a good day.

Nico Delvaux: Thank you.

Alexander Virgo: Thank you.

Operator: Ladies and gentlemen, the conference is now over. Thank you for choosing Chorus Call, and thank you for participating in the conference. You may now disconnect your lines. Goodbye.

Browse all earnings call transcripts

Q3 2026 Assa Abloy AB Earnings Call

Demo

Assa Abloy

Earnings

Q3 2026 Assa Abloy AB Earnings Call

ASSA B

Tuesday, October 27th, 2026 at 8:00 AM

Transcript

No Transcript Available

No transcript data is available for this event yet. Transcripts typically become available shortly after an earnings call ends.

Want AI-powered analysis? Try AllMind →

Earnings analysis guides

Methods for extracting KPIs and checking source support when reviewing an earnings call.

Browse all earnings calls