Kevin Clothier: Thank you, Rich, and good morning. With me on today's call is Tim Donahue, Chairman, President, and Chief Executive Officer. If you do not already have a copy of the earnings release, it is available on our website at crowncork.com. On this call, as in the earnings release, we will make a number of forward-looking statements. Actual results could differ materially from those statements. Additional information concerning factors that could cause actual results to vary is contained in the press release and our SEC filings, including Form 10-K for 2025 and subsequent filings. Reported diluted earnings per share were $2.08 compared to $1.85 in the prior year quarter. Adjusted earnings per diluted share were $2.39 compared to $2.24 in the Q3 2025, an increase of 7%. Net sales increased to $3.7 billion compared to $3.2 billion in the prior year quarter.
Kevin Clothier: The increase primarily reflected higher global beverage can shipments and the pass-through of higher material costs, partially offset by $8 million of unfavorable foreign currency translation. Global beverage can volumes increased more than 6%, including double-digit growth in Asia, 6% growth in North America, and 4% growth in Europe. Segment income was $484 million compared to $490 million in the prior year quarter. Higher global beverage can shipments were offset by inflationary cost pressures and lower results in transit packaging. Inflationary pressures from the Middle East conflict impacted Q3 segment income by approximately $17 million across all businesses and adjusted diluted earnings per share of $0.12. We have included a similar impact in our Q4 estimate. Adjusted free cash flow was $771 million through the first nine months of the year, with capital spending of $310 million.
Kevin Clothier: As we continue to invest in growth projects in Brazil, Spain, and Northern India, capital allocation remains an important component of our value creation strategy. During Q3, we repurchased $81 million of the company shares, bringing year-to-date share repurchases to $598 million, including $115 million of dividends. When including $115 million of dividends, we returned more than $700 million to shareholders during the first nine months of 2026 while maintaining net leverage ratio at approximately 2.5 times. Based on our strong year-to-date performance, we expect full year 2026 adjusted diluted earnings per share to be in the range of $8.35 to $8.45, and the Q4 adjusted diluted earnings per share to be in the range of $1.63 to $1.73 in Q4.
Kevin Clothier: Our full-year outlook assumes net interest expense of approximately $355 million, exchange rates at current levels, including a euro dollar at approximately $1.12, effective tax rate of approximately 25%, depreciation of approximately $325 million, non-controlling interest expense of approximately $145 million, dividends to non-controlling interest of approximately $110, adjusted free cash flow of at least $950 million, capital spending approximately $550 million, year-end adjusted net leverage of approximately 2.5 times. The company is executing well, delivered another strong quarter. As we look ahead, our strong balance sheet, consistent free cash flow generation, and disciplined capital allocation strategy position us well to continue to invest in attractive organic growth opportunities while returning capital to shareholders. With that, I'll turn the call over to Tim.
Tim Donahue: Thank you, Kevin, and good morning to everyone. As Kevin just summarized, the company had another solid quarter of performance as continued strong global demand for beverage cans helped offset the majority of rising input costs. Global beverage can shipments advanced 6% in the quarter, following 5% growth in both Q1 and Q2. With year-to-date growth standing at close to 6%, we remain confident in the outlook for beverage can demand with our full-year global growth target in the 4% to 5% range. The company's businesses are responding well to global economic challenges to continue supporting our customers' needs as we all navigate a world of growing tensions. As Kevin described, inflationary headwinds, primarily a result of the Middle East conflict, were greater in Q3 than we previously anticipated, and we've included a similar headwind in our Q4 estimate.
Tim Donahue: Energy, industrial gases, freight, among other costs, all remain elevated from pre-conflict levels. As many of you are aware, the contractual recovery of these and other non-metal costs will occur in 2027 via a look-back formula. Revenues in the Americas Beverage segment advanced 20% in the quarter, primarily a result of $240 million in the pass-through of higher metal costs and higher sales unit volumes. Volumes in North America grew 6%. Brazil was up 4%, with Mexico down about 1% in the quarter. Against a strong prior year comp, income improved in the quarter on the back of contribution from volume gains, although the majority of the volume contribution was offset by rising input costs. Adjusting for the pass-through of higher material costs, segment income margin was 17.7% of sales in the quarter.
Tim Donahue: Can demand remains strong in North America, and we expect full-year shipments to be up in the 3% to 4% range. European volumes increased 4% in the Q3, with 7% growth recorded across the continent offset by a 4% reduction in the Gulf states. Capacity expansion projects in Greece and Spain remain on plan, and we are also installing a third line to the Peterborough, UK, plant. These capacity additions will bring much needed capacity to our system, helping to serve our customers' growing needs. Income, level to the prior year, reflects higher volumes offset by rising input and startup costs. Income in Asia Pacific advanced during the quarter on the back of mid-double-digit Southeast Asian volume gains, helping to offset higher energy and transport costs. Performance across the transit packaging business disappointed in the Q3, with both volumes and profits falling short of prior expectations.
Tim Donahue: Soft volumes across all product offerings were compounded by higher input costs, notably freight. While we do see some green shoots, we remain cautious until increased quoting activity results in firm orders. Strong vegetable and pet food demand contributed to high single-digit volume gains in North American food, offsetting softer aerosol can sales. Activity across our beverage can equipment business remains strong as global beverage can makers look to increase their capacity to meet a world of continuing growing can demand. To summarize before opening the call to questions, global beverage can volumes advanced 6% in the quarter, full-year growth now estimated at 4% to 5%. Earnings per share advanced 7%, up 11% through nine months. Cash flow remains robust, and as Kevin described, the company has now returned more than $700 million to shareholders year to date.
Tim Donahue: The balance sheet remains strong, with leverage remaining unchanged at 2.5x through the peak summer selling season. With that, Rich, we are now ready to take questions. Thank you.
Operator 2: Thank you. We will now begin the question and answer session. If you would like to ask a question, please press star followed by the number one. Please unmute your phone and record your name clearly when prompted. Your name is required to introduce your question. To withdraw your request, you may press star two. One moment please for the first question. Okay, our first question is from George Staphos from Bank of America. Your line is now open.
George Staphos: Thank you. Hi, everyone. Good morning.
Tim Donahue: Hi, George.
George Staphos: Thanks for the details. Tim, I wanted to ask a question maybe with a couple of parts trying to get at Q4. Can you talk about what sort of exit rate you are seeing on volumes from Q3 into Q4 for your key regions? Relatedly, and again, trying to get at Q4, and you said most of this is the elevated level of inflation. With inflation being higher than expected, what is the offset such that your free cash flow is actually going up? You would think that with inflation being a bigger burden, understandably, that the free cash flow guide would have been lower, but it is higher. So help us understand what is going on volume in Q4 as you are entering and how you are offsetting the inflation such that free cash flow is up. I had a quick follow-on.
Tim Donahue: Okay. So very quickly, George, I will let Kevin deal with the cash flow element. We got two things in our Q4 estimate. One, as Kevin described, if we had previously told you that we expected inflation to be about a $0.10 headwind in the back half of the year, it probably a little bit more than double that split equally between Q3 and Q4. So we have another, what Kevin? $0.12 or $0.13 baked into our estimate for Q4. The way we are able to offset that, at least in Q3, was exceptionally high volume. As you know, contribution for more volume can cover a lot of costs and other problems. As you described, exit rates coming into Q4, still fairly strong.
Tim Donahue: It is hard for us to sit here though and anticipate that we are going to have 6% global volume growth in Q4. So, our estimate for Q4, probably on the order of 3.5% to 4% global volume growth, which historically speaking, George, you have been around a long time like I have. I always say that. It helps to have you around because I do not feel so old.
George Staphos: Watch it, Tim.
Tim Donahue: 3% to 4% historically, in the can business, we would all do back flips if we could do that every quarter. It is just not the 6% we had in Q3, but 3% to 4%, maybe a little bit better than that, we are quite happy. So, continued elevated costs, continued volume growth, although hard to sit here today with an estimate to give you to think that while we are going to have volume growth, it could be as strong as Q3. Still have volume growth, maybe a touch lighter. And I will let Kevin deal with the inflation vis-a-vis cash flow.
George Staphos: Yeah, we were just trying to see that there wasn't something that had now become negative, but I appreciate that, Tim. Keep going. Hey, Kevin.
Kevin Clothier: Hey, George. Yeah, George, think about it. Look, the midpoint of the guide is still exactly where it was at the end of Q2. So even though we've had higher inflationary pressures, we've basically offset it with volume here. And that's the expectation because we've maintained the midpoint, we just narrowed the range. And then the delta to get the cash flow higher is just working capital is just running better than it ever has. So we expect working capital to be better than what we originally expected, and that's why we feel we can get at least $950 out versus at least $900.
George Staphos: Okay.
Tim Donahue: George, I just want to. One last thing I'll talk about, because Kevin talked about working capital. We have two primary metrics whereby our managers are compensated in their bonus, economic profit and cash flow. And people will perform based on how you compensate them. They are well aware of how they are compensated, and they work to generate as much cash as possible. So, it's just a function of a compensation program that we've had for almost two decades that works quite well.
George Staphos: Understood. Tim, I'll turn it over to be fair, and it's tenure, it's not age. Anyway, thanks. I'll turn it over.
Tim Donahue: It's experience, yes.
George Staphos: Thank you.
Tim Donahue: It's perspective, yes. Rich, next question.
Operator 2: Thank you. Our next question is from Matt Roberts from Raymond James. Your line is now open.
Matt Roberts: Hey, Tim Donahue, Kevin Clothier, Tom, good morning.
Kevin Clothier: Good morning, Matt Roberts.
Matt Roberts: I am at volume strength. North America Q3 really strong and actually better than Q2 despite World Cup benefit last quarter. Maybe in hindsight, is the strength in Q2 still due to World Cup, whereas North America just generally stronger given it carried through into Q3? Any timing or spot volume considerations in H2 here and given those strong underlying trends despite harder comps in 2027? Any early indications on what we could expect for North America in 2027?
Tim Donahue: Well, the first thing I will answer is Q3. The comp last year, Q3 was very high. As you say, we had a very strong Q3 in earnings terms. Would have liked it to have been better given the volume growth. But I think what you do not see is that, although we have talked about it before, we had positive volume momentum in Brazil in Q3, whereby in Q2, I think we had negative volume momentum. So Brazil was a little bit of a turnaround. I do not believe, although we had 4% growth in Brazil in Q3, I think the industry probably did better than that. We are still running behind the industry a bit in Brazil, given customer mix.
Tim Donahue: Our Q3 in Brazil was stronger than our Q2 in Brazil, and that is the reason why you might be referencing that Q3 was better than Q2. A little early to say what 2027 is going to look like. I hesitate to say this, but it feels like we are going to be full next year in North America. The upshot of that is that we will not have a lot of spare capacity, so we will see how it progresses from here until the next time we talk to you.
Matt Roberts: Okay, thanks Tim. On Europe, another strong growth there on volume, segment income was flat. Was that really all the inflation impact or any impact from startup costs that were
Tim Donahue: Well, you have startup costs, Kevin, I do not know, maybe $4 million or $5 million or something like that. I think the other thing you have is on the continent, we were up 7%, and in the Gulf states, i.e. the Middle East, we were down 4%, and so you have some mix issues. But again, given everything that is going on in Europe, we are not disappointed with that result.
Matt Roberts: Right. With the startup costs, is there any way Q4 operating income could be up, or should we have more startup in Q4 or any considerations there?
Tim Donahue: I think we're going to continue to have startup costs, and that's already baked into the Q4 estimate, and we'll even have a little bit of startup costs in the Q1. That's right. We've got enough projects going on right now between the three projects in Europe, we've got a project in Brazil. As I mentioned to you in the prepared remarks, our equipment business, the order book is really firm, and it's not just a North America or European thing, it is a global growth spurt right now we're experiencing across beverage cans. It feels a little bit like pre-COVID, although this feels a bit more organic. It's not fueled by COVID. This feels like there's a real momentum globally towards beverage cans, either from the growth of beverages and/or substrate changes globally. So this feels really positive as we look forward.
Matt Roberts: Very good. Appreciate that as always. Thank you.
Tim Donahue: Thank you, Matt.
Operator 2: Thank you. Our next question is from the line of Ghansham Panjabi from Baird. Your line is now open.
Ghansham Panjabi: Yeah, thank you, operator. Good morning, everybody.
Tim Donahue: Morning, Gansham.
Ghansham Panjabi: Morning. On the cost inflation piece, I understand there has been a lot going on this year, and it just continues to get more volatile, et cetera. If costs hold at this point, for 2027, will you be price cost at least neutral, or will there be some lags, or will you be ahead of the cost curve?
Tim Donahue: As we sit here today, you all are well aware of the contractual mechanism we use, at least in the North American market, which is PPI. Correct me if I am wrong, Kevin or Tom, but I think PPI right now is running at about 9%.
[Company Representative] (Crown Holdings): That's right.
Kevin Clothier: Yep.
Tim Donahue: So it's a pretty big number as we get into 2027 as we reprice mostly around the 1 April timeline. It'll be a fairly large repricing, which will recapture much of the headwind we've had in 2026. We'll see where prices go next year. With any luck, we'll get some abatement on rising prices. We're already starting to see LME levels come down. That's not part of the PPI, but declining LME is a good sign with respect to the affordability of cans for our customers and the consumer. I'd like to say yes to answer your question, Gansham. Why don't you let us come back to you in late January when we talk to you and just firm that up.
Tim Donahue: It feels like we're going to be in a much better position next year than we are this year with respect to the Middle East inflationary pressures.
Ghansham Panjabi: Okay, perfect. For volumes, again, looking out to 2027, I realize it's early. It sounds like the Americas Beverage segment is in a pretty good spot. You mentioned being sold out, et cetera, certainly North America. What about the other regions? Would Europe start to benefit from the incremental capacity additions? Can Asia sustain the growth? I'd love to hear your initial thoughts on those other regions.
Tim Donahue: Yeah. Listen, you and I have talked before, Gansham, there's always business that moves around.
Tim Donahue: People don't always like to hear that. Perhaps some business has moved around, but we're going to be full next year. And we think we're going to be full with a better mix. I'll just say it that way, in the North American market. We are hopeful that customer mix will be a benefit to us in Brazil next year as opposed to a headwind this year. Europe, we expect to continue growing in the order of 3% to 5% or 2% to 4%. It's off a much bigger base now, the market, and we are as well-positioned to benefit from market growth as anybody else. So we feel like we're at least in line with market growth in Europe. Hopefully, it is a big hope, but we get a resolution to the Middle East conflict or we get the Strait of Hormuz loosening up a bit.
Tim Donahue: Perhaps we can return to growth. We've had a little headwind in volumes in the Middle East operations. We get a little return to growth there. And Asia will continue to grow. It will not grow next year at the rates that it grew this year, but it will continue to grow in the low to mid-single digit range. So I think, as I said to Matt gave me the opening to comment about global beverage can demand, I think, not just for Crown, but for all can makers. I think we're entering a world over the next couple of years where we're going to see very strong demand.
Ghansham Panjabi: Okay, perfect. Thank you so much.
Tim Donahue: Thank you.
Operator 2: Thank you. Our next question is from the line of Phil Ng from Jefferies. Your line is now open.
Tim Donahue: Phil?
Phil Ng: Hi, Tim. Phil Ng. Sorry about that. Volumes are strong, certainly in an inflationary backdrop. You are still growing earnings this year, so kudos to the team. When we look out to 2027, obviously gave some great color on PPI, how that kicks in for North America. Europe, I believe there is an element that is tied to that, but I am most curious about other markets like Asia, transit, your ability to take price and to offset inflation. Certainly a very strong demand environment right now.
Tim Donahue: Asia, we do have a few long-term contracts. Many of the contracts in Asia are annual in nature, so we reprice those annually. Having said that, there are some markets in Asia that are very competitive. We always look to remain competitive and either maintain a very stable business with a lot of cash flow or grow it when there is an opportunity. I do think we will have an opportunity to grow the business next year. Little early to say where income will come in, but perhaps marginally up next year compared to this year. I am very hopeful that we will see the Middle East return to volume growth next year, as well as Brazil. Again, pass-through mechanisms in those markets, a little different than North America and Europe.
Phil Ng: Okay. Helpful. Given the cash flow generation, you are buying back stock, returning cash, what about growing the business outside the projects you have? I am most curious about North America. As you kind of alluded to, you are sold out. What is the path on that front? Is that something we should be focused on? Any other markets where you see an ability to deploy capital for organic growth?
Tim Donahue: Yeah. I think until we announce a project, I would tell you right now, we have four fairly large projects underway right now, three in Europe, and we are finishing one in Brazil. So it is a lot of work for our team. We do all of the work ourself in-house. We do not outsource the work. So we have a big, very sophisticated, competent project management and engineering team. We make a lot of our own equipment. I would just tell you that we continue to evaluate the opportunity with respect to how much we can sell ahead of making a commitment to put more capital in the ground. So until we make an announcement, you should assume that the four projects we have is what we have at this point.
Phil Ng: Okay. Appreciate the color, Tim Donahue. Thank you.
Tim Donahue: Thank you.
Operator 2: Thank you. Our next question is from Hillary Cacanando from Deutsche Bank. Hillary, your line is now open.
Hillary Cacanando: Great. Thank you. On transit, you mentioned some green shoots in quoting activity. Can you give us a little more color on where you are seeing that improvement and what would need to happen for you to become more constructive on the demand outlook into 2027?
Tim Donahue: Yeah. You could probably tell from my prepared remarks, we are a bit disappointed with the performance in transit. We have started to see an uptick in industrial demand. Certainly PMI, in both the United States and Europe, has been running in the expansion category for the last several months. We have yet to benefit from that. We are starting to see quoting activity pick up across the equipment sector. Obviously, we would like to sell more equipment. You sell more equipment, you get more tools and service in the future, and a lot of quotes, but we need to get some firm orders before we are going to get a little bit more constructive, to use your words, and/or confident, to use my words, before I want to put my neck back out there again. So disappointing, but it feels like things could be getting better.
Tim Donahue: We are just not ready to say it yet.
Hillary Cacanando: Got it. Thank you. As a follow-up, you recently broke ground on your first beverage can facility in India. Can you talk about the opportunity you see in the Indian market and how you're thinking about the ramp and return profile of that investment? Thank you.
Tim Donahue: Sure. I think one thing I'd like to say is that it's our first plant in India. But let's be clear, Crown has been at the forefront of entering new markets well ahead of anybody else for decades. We were the first Western can company in China. We're the first Western can company across Southeast Asia, in the Middle East. We've not had a lot of hesitancy to go into new markets. Our hesitancy with India over the years had more to do with the fact that it was more of a spirits market than a beer market. That is changing as the Indian consumer continues to consume more beer, as well as soft drinks. It appears that cans are becoming a more preferred package as well in that market, like many other regions in the world.
Tim Donahue: I think it's fair to say that India is a very large country with a very large population and a very large middle class. The population of the United States is 330 million. The population of India is pushing 1.5 billion, and I'll bet you the middle class in India is the entire population of the US, such that 20%, at least 20% of India, 300 million, is middle class, and they have growing disposable income. The opportunity set would be there for us to have not one plant. I don't think we ever would envision going to a market as large as India over a three, five, or 10 year period and only want to have one location. We'll look to get this capital in the ground and get started up as quick as possible. It's a big two-line plant.
Tim Donahue: I would tell you that right now, more than 90% is under contract. Our challenge is to get it up and running as quick as possible to serve those contracts. The payback should be in line or better than we've seen with other large projects that we've put in the ground over the last six years.
Hillary Cacanando: Great. Thank you. That is helpful. Thank you very much.
Tim Donahue: You are welcome. Thank you.
Operator 2: Thank you as well. Our next question is from Arun Viswanathan from RBC Capital Markets. Arun, your line is now open.
Arun Viswanathan: Great. Thanks for taking my question. Congrats on the strong Q3 on the volume side. I guess I wanted to continue that discussion. So obviously, maybe you can just offer some of your thoughts on what you are hearing from some of your customers. We know that inflation is up. The beverage companies, I think, have been struggling with balancing promotions and price with volume. I guess, what are you hearing on that front? Do you expect promotions to continue as you enter into 2027? Do you expect you are facing a pretty tough comp, so do you think you can still grow volumes off of this, say, mid-single-digit performance in 2026?
Tim Donahue: Yeah. I think as I have said, Arun, to some of the previous questions, I think we see continued volume growth in 2027, albeit perhaps not to the same level, certainly in Asia that we see this year. You are not going to grow business double digit every year. Some of the Asian growth we had this year was on the back of a renewed commercial strategy. After a couple of years of getting our cost structure in line, we are now back in the market with a renewed commercial strategy. We will have growth next year, but as I said, low to mid-single digits. Middle East, I would hope, is better than this year in the face of a war. Europe is going to continue to grow.
Tim Donahue: It is just a matter of how quickly we can get capital in the ground and others can get capital in the ground to meet customers' growing needs across the European continent. As I said, we are very hopeful that customer mix next year is more positive for us in Brazil than it was this year. In North America, we are going to be sold out, and the limits of our capacity will be tested, and that will determine whether or not our growth next year is 2% or 4%. We will come back to you. Phil wanted to press the issue on new capacity in North America. We are not there yet, but we will come back to you in due time if we feel that is necessary.
Arun Viswanathan: Okay. Thanks for that. Then just real quickly on the promotional activity, I guess that is more what I am wondering about, is just customers, I guess last time when there was some inflation, the beverage companies raised prices, and then when the inflation retreated, they were not really willing to promote this immediately. So do you think those promotions will continue, that kind of buy two, get one free in North America specifically?
Tim Donahue: Yeah. I think they need to move volume, right? The parent companies look to sell syrup, and the bottlers look to move volume. I think the one thing that is very positive for the can makers, where the can makers sit right now is LME looks like it has dropped below 3,000 or very close to 3,000 from a high of what, Kevin, 3,500 or 3,600. So we are starting to see some easing on LME. It would be nice to see some easing on the Midwest premium. But certainly, the LME has come off almost 20%, and that will give the beverage companies the opportunity to promote if they continue to want to do so.
Arun Viswanathan: Okay. I appreciate that. Then just real quickly, if I could just squeeze in one more just on PPI. So, in years past when you've had an inflationary pass-through, maybe that weighed on EPS a little bit. Could you just kind of speak to how that would impact your 2027 outlook, if at all? Will there be a lag before you can see some earnings growth due to that PPI pass-through? Thanks.
Tim Donahue: Well, the pass-through will occur by contract. It is formulaic. Some contracts are early in the year. The majority, I think, are 1 April. So it is formulaic, and it is going to happen. The timing as it relates to the Q3 and Q4 of 2026 is unfavorable. But we know how this works every year. I think as Kevin has said before, for the last couple of years, I think PPI was flat or 1% or 2%, and clearly flat to 2% doesn't reflect the cost environment post-April this year when the war started. So we will get it back next year.
Arun Viswanathan: Thanks.
Tim Donahue: Thank you.
Operator 2: Thank you. Our next question will be coming from the line of Jeff Zekauskas from J.P. Morgan. Jeff, your line is now open.
Jeff Zekauskas: Thanks very much. I think this summer was the hottest on record in the United States and Europe. Do you think that that affected beverage demand and your can demand?
Tim Donahue: I do not know, Jeff, I do not know, to be honest with you. I think globally and even in the North American market, people are embracing cans. More fillers and more companies that are introducing new beverage products are introducing them in higher rates into cans than ever in the past. I think the younger consumer, which is not me, but the younger consumer is well aware of the sustainability benefits surrounding the can and the infinite recyclability of aluminum as opposed to mass piles of plastics that are floating in the ocean and clogging our nation's waterways. I think there are a lot of things that are positive for the can. You could argue if it is too hot, people do not go outside. If people do not go outside, they do not have picnics. You can look at it a lot of different ways.
Tim Donahue: I am going to try to stay out of the global warming debate.
Jeff Zekauskas: Okay.
Tim Donahue: I do not know. I think we are in a world where cans are being recognized for the benefits that they offer versus other substrates, and I will leave it at that.
Jeff Zekauskas: Okay. You talked about a look-back benefit in 2027 because of the inflation that was felt.
Jeff Zekauskas: In the second half of 2026, but not immediately recouped. All things being equal, should there be, I don't know, a $0.20 a share benefit that accrues to Crown in 2027 because of the inflation in 2026?
Tim Donahue: Well, there is a benefit, yes. It won't be the full amount we incur this year because not all regions have that contractual look back mechanism. We certainly have it in North America, and we have it to a large extent in Europe. We do not really have it in the Middle East or Asia, as more of those contracts are annual in nature. So perhaps half of that number, you might want to fairly say that we should see next year.
Jeff Zekauskas: Great. Thank you so much.
Tim Donahue: You are welcome.
Operator 2: Thank you. Our next question is from Chris Parkinson from Wolfe Research. Chris, your line is now open.
Chris Parkinson: Awesome. Thank you so much. Tim, can we just circle back at the beginning of this year? Obviously, there are a lot of moving parts. When you take a step back and look at where you stood then versus where you stood now, what are the things you feel generally better about in terms of the way the industry is trending, specifically North America? And what are the one or two things we should be focusing on the most for 2027 in terms of the moving parts, in terms of your own thinking as CEO? Thank you.
Tim Donahue: Well, listen, I think if you had told me on 1 January that we would get through 9 months of the year and global beverage can shipments for Crown would be up on the order of 5% to 6%, I would have taken that in a heartbeat on 1 January. And if you told me then that my quoting activity and my order book at CMB Engineering, our beverage can equipment company, would be as full as it is now for the outlook, I would be thrilled. I do not think we anticipated demand for us in North America or the world to be as strong as it has been this year on 1 January. And we certainly did not anticipate the strength of equipment demand that we are seeing right now as we look forward.
Tim Donahue: So, I think, as I said earlier, it feels like we are entering a world of increased beverage can growth, and it certainly feels, as I said earlier, much more organic than it felt during the COVID period. So, I think the only thing I would tell you to look at as we get in the next year, because things feel pretty good as relates demand. Hopefully we see some easing on input cost pressures, such that when we do get the contractual mechanisms, we recover what we lost this year, that we are just not keeping pace with further cost pressures next year.
Chris Parkinson: Got it. Just a quick follow-up. A couple of questions ago, you kind of ran through some quick math in terms of the entry into the Indian market. You have obviously been focusing on a couple of anchor customers per the press releases, but how are you thinking about that intermediate to long term? Is that mainly the beer thesis? Are there possibilities with additional CSD customers? Just any additional color on how you are going to anchor yourself into that market and eventually, obviously, grow would be greatly appreciated. Thank you.
Tim Donahue: I am sorry. If I gave you the impression that we only had beer customers, what I was trying to say that historically, the Indian consumer was more of a spirit drinker than a beer drinker. But we do have soft drink customers under contract, and I would say that perhaps at least 40% of what we have under contract in this new facility is soft drink, with 60% of it being beer. So we have a number of soft drink customers, including some of the very largest soft drink companies in the world. Our growth aspirations, requirements in that country will be anchored to our customers as they want us to go to other regions of a very large market with a very large consumer base.
Chris Parkinson: Thanks for the clarification.
Tim Donahue: Thank you.
Operator 2: Thank you. Our next question is from Mike Roxland from Truist Securities. Mike, your line is now open.
Mike Roxland: Thank you, Tim, Kevin, Tom, for taking my questions. Tim, you mentioned that the last few years that you were focused on reducing costs, but now you are back to a renewed commercial strategy or commercial focus. Can you provide some more color on what that strategy or commercial strategy entails and maybe what has changed versus your prior strategy?
Tim Donahue: Well, I was specifically talking about Asia. One thing that happens in Asia, I will just give you a quick recap here. One thing that happens in Asia when you build a facility in many countries, you do not own the land. You get a long-term lease on the land. Fortunately or unfortunately for Crown, we have been there so long that some of the leases came due. The properties happen to be in areas which, while they were industrial in nature in the past when the factories were built, they are now more residential, and the government wanted those back to build residential housing as opposed to industrial complexes. So we had to exit two locations across Southeast Asia, three can lines and three end lines. So we took the opportunity as we were doing that to reset the cost base across Southeast Asia in the 2023, 2024 time frame.
Tim Donahue: And having completed that and getting the cost base back to where we wanted it, we had a look at our commercial strategy and understood that we could use that lower cost base to go back into the market and grow our business and increase utilization or absorption in the remaining factories that we had.
Mike Roxland: Got it. Very clear, Tim. Just one quick follow-up on food cans. You mentioned strong veg and pet food demand. Any impact on the pack due to hotter than expected weather in the Midwest as we go into-
Tim Donahue: No. I would tell you, we have a pretty balanced food can business. We have a number of East Coast producers, Southeast producers, and a big, strong presence in the upper Midwest, not the lower Midwest. So really, it has been a tremendous year. We have what we think is, it is not the biggest food can business, but we believe it is the best food can business. Really great partnerships with some great people, great family businesses and other businesses. We really enjoy the business, and it does well. We continue where we have opportunity to invest smartly, to support those customers. But it has been a great last couple of years and, again, another great campaign this year.
Mike Roxland: Thank you.
Tim Donahue: Thank you.
Operator 2: Thank you. Our next question is from Anthony Beccari from Citigroup. Your line is now open, Anthony.
Anthony Beccari: Good morning.
Tim Donahue: Morning.
Anthony Beccari: Tim, just following up on the Middle East. I think you previously had estimated a $0.07 to $0.10 headwind in the H2, after a $0.05 headwind in Q2. I am just wondering how you think that might shake out. You talked about Gulf volumes down 4% in Q3. Is that what you are seeing in October, or is there any-
Tim Donahue: Anthony, just to be clear, when we said $0.05 in Q2 and then $0.10 in the back half, we were talking about the inflationary impact of the Middle East conflict across our global operations. We clearly got that wrong in the back half. $0.05 in Q2 and $0.10 in the back half has morphed into $0.20 to $0.25, split equally between Q3 and now our estimate for Q4. Some of that being volume declines in the Middle East, much of it being elevated energy costs and elevated freight costs globally.
Anthony Beccari: Got it. The Gulf volumes down mid-single digits. Is that reasonable for Q4? Are you seeing any change there? Is there any kind of comp we should be mindful of?
Tim Donahue: No, until we see the Strait of Hormuz, the restrictions there ease, I think you should consider that our estimate for Q4 includes continued declines across a couple of the Middle East operations.
Anthony Beccari: Got it. Maybe just one more. You have been taking share from glass, maybe in most of your markets. I am just curious, as you see these moves in aluminum with LME spiking and now coming back down, does that really drive or impact adoption of cans versus glass or substitution out of glass? If you just think about the last three to five years, I am wondering if you can talk about that dynamic, if it is accelerating, slowing, how sensitive is it to LME? Just any kind of-
Tim Donahue: Yeah, you are going to give me a chance to talk about sustainability, and Kevin is going to get real excited here because he loves this. Let us be clear. In North America, there is almost no CSD in glass any longer. The CSD guys are not going back to glass. Where a declining LME helps us, it makes the can much more competitive against the PET bottle from a cost perspective, and we all know it is much more competitive across an environmental spectrum. Globally, glass only works globally when it is returnable glass. For those of you who have traveled internationally, you know that many storefronts are very small. Those shopkeepers do not want to recollect glass and have empty used bottles sitting there waiting for somebody to come pick them up because it is taking up very precious real estate they have to put saleable product.
Tim Donahue: They prefer to have saleable product on the floor, not empty bottles waiting to be picked up. The movement towards cans away from glass is real. Glass has a problem. I do not need to pile on the glass's problem. I am not trying to do that. But the opportunity for cans to continue growing at the expense of glass is very real.
Anthony Beccari: Okay. That is helpful. I will turn it over.
Tim Donahue: Thank you.
Operator 2: Thank you. Our next question is from the line of Josh Spector from UBS. Josh, your line is now open.
Josh Spector: Yeah. Hi, good morning. I wanted to come back to the inflation questions, I feel like you've been pretty comprehensive on North America and Europe. Just given the comments around Asia not having the pass-throughs, is that a good or bad thing for you now? I guess, as a tighter environment for cans, something you think you can get pricing faster, or do you see that being more of a lag recovery?
Tim Donahue: Well, depending on who the competition is, how realistic the competition is, and where the competition is, in terms of their own profitability, you would expect that we're larger. We have a much better footprint. I firmly believe we operate better. That is, more efficiently with less spoilage. We should have opportunities as the competition looks to raise price. We saw a little bit of that in China this year. For the first time in a long time, the Chinese competition raised price in China. I think we're going to expect to see that as we go forward. That as prices or as contracts reprice on an annual basis, we'll see the competition becoming more responsible.
Josh Spector: Okay, thanks. That's helpful. If I could shift gears quickly here, just on M&A. There's plenty of noise going around on one of the smaller competitors about potential restructuring. Can you just talk about your appetite for doing any large-scale M&A in cans today?
Tim Donahue: Well, I think as Kevin said, we are well-positioned to continue organic growth opportunities and returning cash to shareholders. Organic growth may contain can acquisitions. It's hard to see how we could do a large-scale can acquisition, just given the concentration across so many of the markets. Would we or do we have opportunity to pick up a plant here or there? Yes, and we'll see what happens. It's too early to say what might become available from any of the two or three situations that are out there or recently announced. But as we sit here today, no large scale M&A because we just don't think it's available in cans, and certainly no large scale M&A outside of cans.
Josh Spector: Okay. Thank you.
Tim Donahue: Thank you.
Operator 2: Thank you. Our next question is from Adlin Rodriguez from Mizuho. Your line is now open.
Adlin Rodriguez: Thank you, and good morning, everyone. Tim, quick one on transit. As you noted, a little disappointment there. What does Q4 look like? Given seasonality and the cost inflation, does it get much worse before it gets better? Should we expect a big step down in Q4's earnings for transit?
Tim Donahue: Well, I think that we would expect Q4 in transit to have a similar comparison to the prior year as Q3 did. So it will be down a little bit, but maybe similar to the third quarter.
Adlin Rodriguez: Okay. Makes sense. Also, in the other segment, should we expect similar trends in Q4, that $45 to $50 million in terms of earnings? Because it has been pretty steady this year, but not last year. Should we expect something similar to what we have been seeing the past couple of quarters?
Kevin Clothier: Yeah, I think you could expect. We were flat year-on-year in the third quarter. I think we are flat to maybe slightly down in the fourth quarter, is what I would expect. But definitely not in the $40 to $50 million range.
Adlin Rodriguez: Okay. Compared to last year, you are saying flat to slightly low. Okay.
Kevin Clothier: Yeah, flat.
Adlin Rodriguez: Okay. Thank you very much.
Tim Donahue: Thank you.
Operator 2: Thank you. Our next question is from Ketan Mamtora from BMO Capital Markets. Kiran, your line is now open.
Ketan Mamtora: Thanks for taking my question. Just coming back to North America volumes, Tim, any additional color you can provide as to how some of the products within product categories did, whether it is energy drinks, CSD, beer?
Tim Donahue: Well, energy has been exceptionally strong, as you know. What has been positively surprising this year is CSD, and for us, sparkling water is a big category, and we have done well in sparkling water. I always hate to say this, but it feels like beer is stabilizing. No, listen, it has been a really good campaign. I think if we look at the last 52 weeks, at least the data I saw recently, it looks like every category was up over the last 52 weeks. Beer might have been slightly down, but it might only been down, like, 1% or 2%. It was not down much bigger than that, but certainly offset by all the other categories.
Ketan Mamtora: Understood. No, that is helpful. Then, over in Brazil, last quarter, you mentioned that the team was targeting sort of flat volume for the year. Is that still how you all are thinking about it?
Tim Donahue: Yeah, I think what we said is the team was targeting flat volume. We weren't sure we believed it. We're still targeting on the top side. Maybe we're going to be down 2% for the full year.
Ketan Mamtora: That's helpful. I'll turn it over. Good luck.
Tim Donahue: Thank you.
Operator 2: Thank you. Our last question is from George Staphos from Bank of America. Your line is now open, George.
George Staphos: Hey, thanks very much for taking the follow on. Hey, Tim, you were candid, and we appreciate the comments on transit. You also talked earlier about your philosophy on managing and incentivizing. What do you think will improve, what changes might you make in terms of the incentives or anything else so that you do get better performance out of transit over the next year or two? Then, separate question, if you look out over the next year or so, assuming we continue along this path, there are no guarantees in life. But nonetheless, the company and the industry generates a lot of cash. Large acquisitions are seemingly less likely for obvious reasons. Can you help us think about what your goals might be on capital allocation, really share repurchase over the next year or so? Thank you, and good luck on the quarter.
Tim Donahue: Thank you. So on the first thing, George, I'll be further candid on the transit, and I'll tell you the team does a very good job in transit with respect to cash. If you want to blame somebody, blame the CEO of the company, that's me, for not giving them capital and/or bolt-on acquisition dollars that they would otherwise like. We made a decision several years ago, we were going to run this business for cash and use that cash to support our beverage can growth strategy globally, as well as our opportunity to return cash to shareholders. Now, we probably do need to look to spend a little bit more capital per year in that business, but nothing on the order of more than $20 million a year. So not massive numbers, but maybe we need to give them a little bit more money.
Tim Donahue: If we want to say where the blame lies, you can blame me. The team would like a little bit more money. We've said no. We've generated a lot of cash, and we've used it for what we believe have been good reasons, delever the balance sheet rapidly, return a lot of capital to shareholders, and grow the beverage business. As we look at the future, again, as you rightly point out, hard to understand how we could do large-scale metal M&A. Unlikely we're going to do large-scale non-metal M&A. Going to generate on the order of $900 million to $1 billion of free cash flow every year. I think Kevin would probably tell you he feels pretty confident about that. We pay a dividend right now on the order of $1.40, maybe that increases a little, but that leaves a lot of money to repurchasing shares.
Tim Donahue: In the absence of something that we believe returns more value to shareholders, we're going to continue to buy back shares.
George Staphos: Would you put any goals out there, Tim, at this juncture, or not at this juncture?
Tim Donahue: Well, we bought back $600 million year to date this year, and maybe Kevin would like to buy a little bit more than $100 million throughout the rest of the year, so that would be like $700 million. If you thought about $600, $700, $800 million a year for the next several years, I do not think that is too far out of the question. I think the share counts quickly approach. I think we are at 108 right now. I would say by mid next year, could we get down to 100 million on a share count? Man, that is 8 million shares. That would be roughly another $800, $900 million. There is no reason to believe we could not do that, and then we will see where we go from there. But listen, $600, $700, $800 million a year in share buyback is going to get the denominator down pretty quick.
George Staphos: Understood. Thanks so much, Tim. Good luck in the rest of the year.
Tim Donahue: Thank you, George. Rich, I think you said that was the last question, so thank you very much. As that was the last question, we again thank you all for joining us, and we will speak to you again in early 2027. Bye now.
Operator 2: And that concludes today's conference. Thank you everyone for participating. You may now disconnect.
