Operator: Call for the third quarter ended on 30 September 2026. During the presentation, all participants will be in a listen-only mode. Afterward, we will conduct a Q&A session. At that time, if you would like to ask a question, please press star one on your telephone keypad to raise your hand and enter the queue. As a reminder, this webcast is being recorded and will be available for replay on the Avery Dennison Investor Relations website. I would now like to turn the call over to William Gilchrist, Avery Dennison's Vice President of Investor Relations. Please go ahead, sir.
William Gilchrist: Thank you, Chase, and welcome to Avery Dennison's third quarter 2026 earnings conference call. Please note that throughout today's discussion, we will be making references to non-GAAP financial measures. The non-GAAP measures that we use are defined, qualified, and reconciled from GAAP on Schedules A4 to A8 of the financial statements accompanying today's earnings release. We remind you that we will make certain predictive statements that reflect our current views and estimates about our future performance and financial results. These forward-looking statements are made subject to the safe harbor statement included in today's earnings release. On the call today are Deon Stander, President and Chief Executive Officer, and Greg Lovins, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. I will now turn the call over to Dion.
Deon Stander: Thanks, Gilly, and good morning, everyone. We delivered strong third-quarter results, continuing to demonstrate the underlying strength and resilience of our business. Organic sales grew 4%, adjusted EPS grew 2% compared to prior year, and adjusted free cash flow generation continues to be robust at over $240 million. Considering the impact of customer inventory management, as shown on slide 5, our underlying business performance remains strong, with an estimated 6% organic sales growth and an estimated 8% adjusted EPS growth year over year. Reported sales growth was balanced across both high-value and base categories, with each up mid-single digits. As we indicated in our recent investor showcase event, high-value categories are a key part of our growth algorithm and future margin expansion. Q3 results reinforce the value of this portfolio of solutions, which are being driven by both secular demand growth and our differentiated competitive position.
Deon Stander: At an enterprise level, our operational priorities remain clear. First, investing in innovation and service-led differentiation to drive share gains and expand opportunities across base and high-value categories. Second, executing with commercial and operational agility, combining targeted pricing actions with relentless productivity to mitigate cost inflation. Third, disciplined capital allocation supported by a robust free cash flow as we continue to invest in our business and return cash to shareholders while maintaining our strong balance sheet. Turning to our segment results. Materials Group delivered organic sales growth of 5%, with both high-value and base categories growing mid-single digits. We continue to solidify our leadership position through commercialization of innovative solutions that support industry secular trends. Sales in the quarter came in ahead of expectations due to a more gradual pace of customer inventory destocking than anticipated.
Deon Stander: While this unwind is taking longer to materialize, destocking is ongoing, and we continue to expect the vast majority of the H1 pre-buy inventory to unwind by the end of Q4. While segment-adjusted EBITDA margins were down versus prior year, our teams continued to execute at a high level during the quarter, successfully managing volatile cost inflation and volume destocking to drive year-over-year growth in segment adjusted EBITDA. In the Solutions Group, organic sales increased 1% with a low single-digit growth in base categories and high-value categories comparable to prior year. Of note, strong growth in embellishments continued despite lapping a significant World Cup headwind. From a profitability perspective, our team executed exceptionally well, delivering adjusted EBITDA growth and strong adjusted EBITDA margin expansion. Shifting to enterprise-wide Intelligent Labels. Sales were up low single digits compared to prior year, reflecting contrasting dynamics across end markets.
Deon Stander: In apparel and general retail, sales rose approximately 10%, driven by program expansions and general retail recovery. In food, adoption momentum continues to build with strong growth as we ramp up another large grocery customer, expand pilot activity, and continue to move towards commercialization with the largest US grocery retailer. In logistics, sales declined double digits, reflecting the normalization of outsized share gains in 2025, alongside softer overall. We remain actively engaged across logistics providers and continue expanding pilots with new partners. Turning to our full year 2026 outlook. Reflecting our strong year-to-date execution, we are slightly raising the midpoint of our range, representing roughly 7% growth at the midpoint on full year organic sales growth of 3.5%. Regarding Q4, operationally, our business remains healthy, and we anticipate that the remaining pre-buy inventory will largely conclude by year-end.
Deon Stander: On the leadership front, I am extremely pleased to welcome Helen Sheirbon as our new President of the Solutions Group effective 3 November. Helen brings over two decades of global leadership, most recently serving as Senior Vice President and Chief Operating Officer of Global HP Solutions. Her proven track record in driving growth, transformation, and customer-centric innovation across solutions, and her deep operating experience fit exceptionally well with leading the Solutions Group moving forward. In summary, our Q3 results demonstrate improving underlying growth while reinforcing the durability, differentiation, and competitive moat of our business. We remain focused on driving our long-term strategies while executing with discipline needed to navigate near-term inventory and cost inflation dynamics. Supported by robust free cash flow generation and a strong balance sheet, we maintain the financial flexibility to invest in high-value opportunities while consistently returning capital to shareholders.
Deon Stander: As always, I want to thank our global teams for their support, their leadership, and their agility, and in continuing to make possible solutions for our customers and value creation for all of our stakeholders. With that, over to Greg.
Gregory Lovins: Thank you, Dion, and hello, everybody. In the Q3, we delivered adjusted earnings per share of $2.42, up 2% compared to prior year, coming in above our expectations, largely due to a more gradual pace of customer destocking in Materials Group, as well as strong operational execution. We estimate that customer inventory destocking unfavorably impacted sales by roughly 2 points and adjusted EPS by roughly $0.15 or 6 points in the quarter, leading to underlying growth in adjusted EPS of roughly 8%. Reported sales rose 5% year over year to $2.3 billion, with organic sales growth of 4%. This was driven by low single-digit price realization to offset raw material cost inflation and a low single-digit impact from volume mix growth. Reported sales growth also benefited by more than a point from the Taylor Adhesives acquisition.
Gregory Lovins: Adjusted EBITDA margin was 15.8%, which was down year over year as strong productivity initiatives were more than offset by the dilutive margin percentage effect of passing through raw material related pricing, the normalization of incentive compensation, and unfavorable mix. Free cash flow generation remained very strong. We generated adjusted free cash flow of $246 million in the quarter, bringing year to date adjusted free cash flow to $716 million, a conversion rate well above 100% of net income. Our balance sheet remains strong, with net debt to adjusted EBITDA improving to 2.2x. Capital allocation remained consistent with our disciplined framework. We continued to invest organically in our business with capital spending on a year to date basis up versus last year. While we also returned approximately $135 million to shareholders during the quarter through $75 million in dividends and $60 million in share repurchases.
Gregory Lovins: This brings year to date capital return to shareholders to more than $480 million. In addition, year to date, we spent approximately $80 million on venture investments, underscoring our ongoing focus on strengthening our portfolio. Turning to our segment results, Materials Group sales increased 8.5% to $1.6 billion, with organic sales up 5%. Destocking was an approximate 3-point headwind to segment organic growth. As Dion mentioned, while inventory destocking did begin in the Q3 in Label Materials, it proceeded more gradually than we had anticipated. High-value categories grew mid-single digits organically, led by specialty and durable labels and performance materials. Base categories also grew mid-single digits, supported by end market growth, share gains, and pricing in labels. Materials Group adjusted EBITDA dollars grew slightly, with margins at 16.4%, which was down roughly a point compared to prior year.
Gregory Lovins: This was driven by 2 primary factors: the dilutive impact on the margin percentage from pricing actions to offset cost inflation and higher employee-related costs. Together, these drivers more than offset strong productivity savings. Shifting to Solutions Group, reported sales were $687 million, down 1.8%, with organic sales up 1%, slightly higher than anticipated. Base categories grew low single digits, while high-value categories were comparable to prior year. Within high-value platforms, Embelex overcame World Cup headwinds and grew mid-single digits, Vestcom rose low single digits, and Intelligent Labels sales within Solutions Group declined, driven by the anticipated share normalization and softer customer demand in logistics. Solutions Group adjusted EBITDA grew year over year, with margins expanding 80 basis points to 17.8%, as our teams continued to drive significant productivity, which more than offset higher employee-related expenses.
Gregory Lovins: Turning to our full year 2026 outlook, we are narrowing our adjusted EPS guidance range to $10.10 to $10.24, and slightly raising the midpoint of our guidance. The new midpoint represents roughly 7% growth year-over-year. We anticipate reported sales growth of approximately 5.5% for the year, including organic sales growth of approximately 3.5%, approximately 1.5 points from currency translation, roughly 1 point from the Taylor Adhesives acquisition, and approximate 40 basis point headwind from the calendar adjustment. Key earnings drivers supporting our full year outlook include incremental restructuring savings now exceeding $65 million. A net EPS benefit of approximately $0.30 from favorable currency translation and lower share count, partially offset by higher interest expense and adjusted tax rate. Headwinds from wage inflation and the continued normalization of 2025 temporary savings, largely related to incentive compensation.
Gregory Lovins: We are forecasting stronger free cash flow, targeting conversion of greater than 100% for the year, with capital expenditures anticipated approximately $240 million. Regarding Q4, we expect the vast majority of the remaining balance of customer inventory destocking to conclude by the end of the fourth quarter. on a year-over-year basis, Q4 earnings will also have an approximate 1.5% headwind to sales growth and modest headwind to EPS growth from the calendar shift we implemented at the beginning of 2026. In summary, we delivered strong third quarter results with organic sales up 4% and adjusted EPS of $2.42, outperforming our expectations. Considering the impact of customer inventory management, our underlying business performance has improved, with an estimated 6% organic sales growth and an estimated 8% adjusted EPS growth year-over-year.
Gregory Lovins: Our free cash flow generation continues to be very robust and our balance sheet remains strong. We have continued to invest organically in the business and through portfolio enhancing investments while returning capital to shareholders through a growing dividend and reducing our share count. We are slightly raising the midpoint of our guidance for the year. With that, we will now open up the call for your questions.
Operator: Ladies and gentlemen, we will now begin the question and answer session. If you would like to ask a question, please raise your hand now using the star 1 on your telephone keypad. If your question has been answered and you would like to withdraw your question, please press the star 1 key again. To accommodate all participants, we ask that you please limit yourself to 1 question and then return to the queue if you have additional questions. Please stand by as we compile the Q&A roster. Your first question comes from the line of George Staphos with Bank of America. Please proceed with your question.
George Staphos: Hi, everyone. Good morning. Thanks for the details. My question is on margin trends, if you could unpack a bit of what happened in both segments. Specifically within Materials, can you talk about the mix effects with the destocking that would seem to help mix, especially with high value growing, and I think you said mix was a little bit lower. Then within Solutions, can you talk about the productivity benefits and how sturdy those are on a going forward basis? The performance here was quite good. Thank you, guys.
Gregory Lovins: Thanks, George, for your question. Yeah, overall, on Materials Group, when we look at margins from a year-over-year perspective, largely in line with our expectations, but down about 1 point from where they were a year ago. Again, as I said in the prepared remarks, the primary driver of that was the pricing impact on the margin percentage calculation, as our focus, as you know, over an inflationary cycle is to really cover the dollars of inflation through both material re-engineering as well as pricing. Then when we're in the deflationary part of the cycle, margins would improve in that instance if we're passing back inflation as well, and the margin percentage would improve. So throughout a cycle, generally even margins across the cycle of inflation.
Gregory Lovins: At the same time, year-over-year, we did have a bit of an incentive compensation headwind as last year, obviously, as you know, we were performing below our original expectations. Then mix was just a slight impact, I think, in the quarter on a net basis overall. We did have destocking, which was more in the base. We also had some share gain in the base, though. So overall, not a major impact. Our growth in the base was also strong, just like it was in high value categories within Materials Group. On Solutions Group, overall, we're continuing to drive strong productivity. The majority of our restructuring benefits are in the Solutions Group as well, as that team has been driving a significant number of actions to grow and improve their margins.
Gregory Lovins: I think we've said over time, even back to the 2024 Investor Day, that we see continued margin opportunities within Solutions, and we're continuing to drive towards that. So overall, we do expect to continue driving those strong margins in the Solutions business.
Operator: Your next question comes from the line of Gansham Panjabi with Baird. Please proceed with your question.
Ghansham Panjabi: Thank you, and good morning, everybody. I understand that destocking is obviously very tricky, and it can mask a lot of things in terms of the underlying dynamics in terms of growth. How would you characterize the end markets for your Materials Group segment overall? A lot of your peers are calling out incremental consumer weakness. The same is being called out by the consumer staples companies on a multi-region basis. What are you seeing beyond that? I am getting at really the trend line going into 2027. Thank you.
Deon Stander: Yeah, Gunjan, I think what we see right at the moment hasn't fundamentally changed. If you look at where GDP and retail sales volumes are, they are roughly 2% and 1% respectively, and we don't necessarily see that fundamentally changing as we move forward unless there is a material change in the macro. I think if I break it down by our individual customer segments overall, end customers for our Materials Group being largely CPGs and then some of our industrial customers, I still think there is a degree of caution just given the inflationary environment. We have started to see a little bit of unit volume expansion in CPGs, but it is still very muted. It is still below 1%, but at least it is seemingly picked up from last year, where it was typically flat. Mostly, really, we are seeing it in both HPC and food as well.
Deon Stander: Majority of our converting customers around the world say that they are not necessarily seeing any signs of significant growth from CPGs at the moment. That could change as we move forward. Most of them are managing with the constraints of where they are at the moment. If I turn to, and I will just address this now, if I turn to our customers more on the Solutions Group side of the business, our retailers, I think generally retailers overall still remain cautiously focused on what the consumer is going to do in this next six months, given, again, the high inflation. I know in our apparel customers, when we have talked to them, they have had an as expected back to school, not too bad, most of it relatively price-driven. The outlook for holiday is also pretty cautious, but they are expecting some growth, again, largely on price.
Deon Stander: What we are hearing is clear signs of bifurcation of consumer behavior. That is not surprising given where the inflationary pressure is at the moment. Of course, we remain vigilant looking at how inflation and price dynamics will play out consistently between this quarter as we go into next year as well. I think the biggest watch out that we are continuing to look at is just how does both the broader geopolitical situation unfold as well as the subsequent impacts on inflationary and including bond yields as well.
Operator: Your next question comes from the line of John McNulty with BMO Capital Markets. Please proceed with your question.
John McNulty: Yeah, thanks for taking my question. Maybe one on Intelligent Labels. By the sound of the Walmart ramp, et cetera, it looked like Q4, you should have a decent inflection. I guess, as you are looking out a little bit farther to 2027, can you speak to some of the pros and cons that you are seeing, at least at this point, maybe annualizing some of the logistics headwinds or at least difficult comps, the ramp in food? It sounds like you have got some increased pilots in logistics as well as maybe a new grocer in terms of a new expansion or platform. I guess, can you unpack that a little bit for us as well? Thanks very much.
Deon Stander: Sure, John. Let me actually deal with Walmart right up front because it is a key part of our growth algorithm as we move forward. We remain highly confident in the opportunity around fresh and actually strong progress across all of our customer pipeline. Regarding the Walmart Fresh program, our confidence there has always been based in our experience that they have with RFID in driving material change to their business. The ROI for them is very strong. They see that across the categories that they have implemented already, and they continue to believe that is the case when they roll out fresh overall. I actually recently met with their leadership team, where this commitment to the technology was reaffirmed as well. As is typical with sort of large-scale deployments, these timelines can sometimes vary quarter to quarter.
Deon Stander: And in this case, the start dates for this program have moved past the H2. We are expecting really the commercial ramp as we go through 2027. We are continuing to work right now very closely with their deployment team on what are the key commercialization milestones as we look forward. I will say, in addition to that, we are also seeing significant traction, as you highlighted, within the food category. I am very pleased that we have a third large grocer now in the early stages of commercial rollout, and we expect that to accelerate as we go through the Q4 into next year as well. It really, to me, reinforces my conviction in the long-term opportunity of this end market segment.
Deon Stander: We have more pilots, more trials happening in food overall, largely focused on fresh, largely focused on the benefits that get driven from lower inventory, higher fresh product, less markdowns, greater labor productivity in stores. If I look at the other segments overall, we touched on the fact that we are going through that period where, particularly in logistics, particularly with our largest customer, we are seeing double-digit declines, largely on the share normalization that we talked about earlier during the year. That should, which started somewhat in the back end part of the Q1, and as we get through the end of it, will be largely mitigated. We continue to see an increase in pilots in logistics overall.
Deon Stander: Again, timing of those, which are highly independent specifically to each logistics company, depending on whether they look at first mile or last mile, will still play a key part in our thinking as we look into next year overall. I would say more generally, if I took a step back, apparel, retail, and general merchandise continues to be positive. That is largely on new customers that we have driven early in the year, some customers also in the later part of this year. What we should see is the aggregated benefit of those rollouts as we go into next year. You will recall that in our Investor Day, the event, I did make the point that we are anticipating double-digit growth over the next couple of years in order to get to our growth algorithm as we laid out.
Operator: Your next question comes from the line of Josh Spector with UBS. Please proceed with your question.
Josh Spector: Yeah. Hi, good morning. I would just be curious on the Materials Group side, going back to margins. Where are you on the price cost journey? I guess, how much was that a positive or negative in Q3? What is at stake in the fourth quarter? Are we at the point where you are more than covering it, or is there still some catch-up you would expect that carries into 2027? Thank you.
Gregory Lovins: Yeah. I think when we look sequentially from Q2 to Q3, we continue to see a bit of deflation sequentially, particularly in paper. I think that it is probably low single digit inflation, I have to say, sorry, from Q2 to Q3, largely from paper. We have had some sequential pricing that impacted Q2 to Q3 as well. I think overall, when we look at the combination of material cost reengineering and pricing, still largely on a dollar basis covering the impacts of the inflation. Percentage basis, it is a little bit different, as I talked about earlier, but on a dollar basis, looking to cover that. We feel good about the progress we have made on that.
Gregory Lovins: While we expect relatively stable raw material basket right now from Q3 to Q4, there is still a lot of uncertainty there, so we continue to track that. We will evolve from a pricing perspective as we see how those markets move as we go through the fourth quarter.
Operator: Your next question comes from the line of Jeff Zekauskas with JPMorgan. Your line is open. Please proceed with your question.
Jeff Zekauskas: Thanks very much. A two-part question. How fast do you expect your food and logistics Intelligent Labels business to grow next year? Do you think the growth will be even through the four quarters? That is, it will start strongly in Q1 and continue, or is there a different cadence? Then for Greg, cost of goods sold is rising faster than your sales now, and propylene values are up. You talked about paper costs going up sequentially. Are your prices also moving up sequentially in Q4? Do you see more cost inflation and more price inflation? Thank you.
Deon Stander: Thanks, Jeff. I will deal with the first, and Greg can deal with the second. Just on our IL food growth specifically, we are expecting robust growth as we go through next year. Given the timing of some of the roll-outs, some we are already seeing now, some will start as we go through the beginning part of next year. I would say generally the phasing, while we will still confirm this as we get into January when we have our next discussion, the phasing is likely to still be at a general ramp as we go through the year overall. I think the thing that stands out for me in food overall is, you have three large grocers now actively engaged in this with multiple small pilots and trials happening. In addition, that is also geographically spread across the world.
Deon Stander: It is not just in the United States, it is in Europe as well, we are seeing a lot more action and activity. So I feel very good in terms of the opportunity ahead of us. Just a reminder, this is still a 200 billion unit at least market space, and we are just at the start of this adoption curve. So I think while timing of this can always move around, particularly in the early stages of adoption, I think the secular growth drivers support really a significant growth opportunity as we move forward. The whole concept that freshness drives consumer engagement in store and that the availability of fresher products makes a material difference to consumers, I think is a key piece that retailers are increasingly picking up on.
Gregory Lovins: Yeah, Jeff, on cost of sales, as I was mentioning a minute ago, we did continue to see inflation sequentially Q2 to Q3. From a year-over-year perspective, we are looking at mid or mid to high single digit inflation in Q3 versus where we were a year ago. We have got, on an overall company basis, a couple points of price to go with that to help offset that inflation, in addition to material cost reengineering that I talked about earlier. So I think overall from a cost perspective, material cost price perspective, we are managing that very well, as I mentioned a second ago to Josh's question. We are seeing, obviously, incremental merit-based wage inflation year over year, as we talked about a quarter ago as well. We are managing that by driving productivity to help offset that. We do have some incentive comp.
Gregory Lovins: Some of that goes into manufacturing expense as well that impacts us year-over-year, also. I think overall, our teams are focused on driving gross profits. When we look at gross profit percentage year-over-year, it is down a bit. Again, largely based on the pricing math that we see in Materials Group, but continuing to make progress on the Solutions side from a gross margin perspective.
Deon Stander: Jeff, the only thing I would add on top of that is in terms of how the actions the team are taking in terms of matching price and cost overall across the cycle. It is also worth noting that since last year, we have generally gained share in our materials business across most regions. I think that is because some of the drivers we are seeing out in the market in terms of secular drivers around sustainability as customers and customers are needing to get to adherence on things like the PPWR and extended producer responsibility requirements are coming up in the next couple of years. We are seeing a significant drive towards more filmic products where we have an advantage, we are more vertically integrated. We are also seeing much more emphasis on how we are able to help both our converting customers as well as our end customers over there.
Deon Stander: Also, I think I called out in the last time, part of our share gain has also come from typically when things get more uncertain and where there is more material pricing inflation that you see out in the market, we tend to see a natural orientation towards ourselves as the largest player with the most global reach and the most consistent service and quality. That typically also supports a case for our customers reaching out to us.
Operator: Your next question comes from the line of John Dunigan with Jefferies. Please proceed with your question.
John Dunigan: Thank you very much. Appreciate all the details, Dion and Greg, and congrats on the quarter. I want to start off with the de-stocking. One of your Label Materials peers called out very large industry declines quarter-over-quarter in the European market. It looks like it's given back more than the Q2 gains the market had. Just wondering if this is what you're seeing, how that compares to your portfolio, and maybe if you've seen more de-stocking there, if it's maybe de-stocking that you expect in North America to catch up more so here in Q4.
Gregory Lovins: Yeah. Thanks for the question, John. The stocking/de-stocking cycle that we've seen have largely been in Europe as well as parts of Asia. When we look at Asia, we saw some stock build in Q2. We think we're mostly through that de-stocking by the end of Q3, for the most part. In Europe, we saw stock building in Q2, some of that coming out in Q3, not to the same extent as the stocking we saw in Q2, though. That's where largely we expect the remaining de-stocking in Q4 to come out of Europe. I would say that when we look at the chart we included in our slides, you can see that the impact in Q2 is about double the impact that we saw coming out in Q3.
Gregory Lovins: Overall, we expect the H2 to kind of offset the H1's de-stocking for the most part. Certainly a bigger impact on stock build in Q2 than we saw de-stocking happening in Q3.
Deon Stander: John, the only thing I'd add to that is, in that Q3, what we saw really was the de-stocking in Europe starting to happen a little bit in August, but really accelerating in September. We continue to see that in October, giving us large confidence that most of it will be done by the time we get to the end of Q4.
Operator: Our next question comes from the line of Mike Roxland with Truist Securities. Please proceed with your question.
Mike Roxland: Thank you, Dion, Greg, Gilly, for taking my question. Dion, just a little bit of follow-up, in terms of Intelligent Labels. One of your chip suppliers mentioned that there could be another leg of growth with the large retailer through beauty, personal care, and over-the-counter meds right now, which have low penetration. Realizing that food is still your largest end market with most growth potential, would love to get your thoughts around that potential expansion, and expanding the collaboration with that particular retailer.
Deon Stander: Yeah, Mike, we don't often talk about some of the adjacent segments to general retail overall in specific detail because the other segments are so large in terms of logistics, food, and apparel, and general retail we lump together. We do have a number of pilots underway with specific beauty providers as well, where we're really focused on trying to understand how we can get to the same outcomes in retail that we typically see in apparel, which is really availability on shelf of items. There's a separate case that sits behind that for even loss visibility as well. As we continue to see some traction there, we'll continue to provide information on the opportunity. We currently see it under sort of all of a general retail and general merchandise opportunity.
Deon Stander: If there are specific retailers that are that way orientated, we're going to continue to work with them to make sure that we can bring some of the solutions that we have clearly seen in apparel, and make them available in the beauty segment as well.
Operator: Our next question comes from the line of Matt Roberts with Raymond James. Please proceed with your question.
Matt Roberts: Dion, Greg, Gilly, good morning. Total apparel was up mid-single digits. How did Intelligent Labels apparel specifically compare to that? How much of the variance, if there was one, was due to new programs versus maybe higher growth or share gains from certain customers? Given the implied double-digit IL growth in 2027, 2028, what are your assumptions for apparel markets or what are you seeing given that you noted some caution around holidays? What gives you confidence on the apparel side of that? Thanks for taking the question.
Deon Stander: Sure, Matt. I think overall, our apparel growth in the Q3 was robust, largely on some of the new programs that we have been rolling out. We are going to anticipate seeing that also continue in the Q4 and roll over into next year as well. There is at least one of the world's largest value retailers involved in one of those programs, as well as a couple of other customers. That is both on the rollout of RFID, and then we continue to see additional traction on some of our loss visibility solution that we have used historically with somebody like Inditex. We have seen more traction with other customers though. Overall, my view is apparel is going to continue to be a growth driver for us as we go through 2027, and we should see continued momentum during that time as well.
Gregory Lovins: The only thing I would add to that, Matt, is that when we look at apparel in the Q3, Intelligent Labels were up roughly double digits, external or embellishments was up roughly mid-single digits, and apparel base was up low single digits. So that is the composition within the overall apparel growth in the quarter.
Operator: Our next question comes from the line of Anthony Pettinari with Citigroup. Please proceed with your question.
Anthony Pettinari: Good morning. I was wondering, you raised your restructuring savings target to over $65 million, and I think you started out the year at $50 million. Is there any way we should think about maybe rollover or further momentum on restructuring savings into 2027?
Anthony Pettinari: Or maybe incremental cash costs as that target has gone higher. Just any comments on just the activities that you are undertaking, and where you are in that process.
Deon Stander: Yeah. Thanks, Andy. I think as you said, we raised that number slightly here for the year, and we have delivered a pretty strong amount of savings already through Q3. So most of the cost that goes with that savings that we are talking about will be in this year, of course, or some of that may be at the end of last year with the carryover. But overall, we feel good about the projects that the teams are driving and the progress we are making there. Both groups are continuing to find ways to drive productivity, especially in what has been a pretty uncertain environment as we have gone through this year, and our teams have accelerated the pace of their actions. When we look at next year, certainly there will be some carryover related to the actions that we are driving this year.
Deon Stander: I would say that carryover is in the $0.20 or so impact, when we look year-over-year into 2027.
Operator: Our next question comes from the line of Hillary Cacanando with Deutsche Bank Securities. Please proceed with your question.
Hillary Cacanando: Hi, thanks for taking my question. At the HVC Showcase last month, you had said the food RFID pipeline was up about 40% year-over-year. With the new third large grocer now moving into the early stages of commercialization, where does the pipeline stand today? Are you continuing to see similar growth as opportunities convert into commercial programs?
Deon Stander: Thanks for the question, Hillary. Yes. In our pipeline measurement mechanism, once somebody moves to commercialization, the dollar denomination for that whole program moves out of the pipeline into rollout. That is the way we measure it, which means that the dollar denomination for the rest of the pipeline that is not there yet, clearly, if it is a very big one, goes down slightly. But the number of customers that we have in pipeline has actually gone up since that time as well, Hillary.
Operator: Our next question comes from the line of George Staphos with Bank of America. Please proceed with your question.
George Staphos: Hi, everyone. Thanks for taking the follow-on. I just wanted to confirm, with Intelligent Labels, that the large retail customer that you were piloting, the largest, that the rollout is now, as you put it, is taking maybe a little bit more time and going into 2027, but nonetheless, you still feel affirmed that the growth year-on-year in IL will be roughly double digits. Also along the lines of intelligent value added, high value added within Solutions, can you talk about how important some of the programs that retailers are trialing in terms of specific individual pricing strategies are to Vestcom's growth longer term, and what you are seeing in terms of retailer willingness to pursue these programs or maybe some hesitancy that has been coming out in some of the trade press recently? Thanks, guys, and good luck in the quarter.
Deon Stander: Thanks, George. Yes is the short answer to your question on the Walmart account specifically. We have seen the timing move just slightly, and we are going to see the ramp really starting in 2027. The teams are working very closely on kind of what those commercialization milestones look like, which, supported by the additional third grocer that we have and the amount of pilots and trials, I feel very confident in what we are going to see come through from food next year to support that double-digit growth that we talked about as well, George.
Deon Stander: As it relates to kind of Vestcom specifically, I think if you recall at the Investor Showcase Day that we did recently, one of the growth drivers that we are seeing for Vestcom at the moment has been the lean forward that we have been able to get out of our new software solution that we have with them. In that regard, the stalling software, which as if you recall, basically takes all sorts of data through data composition engine and basically puts it out to either an ESL or an analog label overall. Part of that new software as a service role that is actually now commencing with a very significant US grocery retailer as well. So we feel good about that. Typically, the margins that we see in those businesses are at a premium, and they are more software related, and they are able to resolve significant issues.
Deon Stander: At the moment, I do not hear, George, that there are retailers considering any programs that are driving automation and efficiency in store to be reduced. What we have seen actually is the opposite of that. We have seen more interest in how some of the solutions that we provide or other solutions in the market are going to be able to be accelerated, just given where the macro environment is at the moment as well.
Operator: Our next question comes from the line of John Dunnigan with Jefferies. Please proceed with your question.
John Dunigan: Thank you, guys. Appreciate you taking the follow-up. I just wanted to go back to one of your major chip suppliers and some of their comments. They talked about maybe having some shipping constraints and backlogs for some of their customers that have extended into 1Q27. Just wondering if you have seen any kind of bottlenecking issues, and maybe that is what has caused some of the push-out in IL. Then, if you could just talk briefly on the lowered CapEx guide, what drove that and if that delta is being pushed into 2027. Thank you.
Deon Stander: John, I am not going to comment on an individual partner supplier's outlook. What I will say is we are not seeing any bottlenecks ourselves. One of the great strengths that we have as a business being the majority provider in the world is that we are able to balance supply and demand in a very effective way. It is the reason why many of these programs have historically started with us as well. We continue to invest ourselves in our capital efficiency of our assets as well. We are continuing to see more on productive output, and part of that is to make sure that when there are surges, not only do we have availability of raw materials, which we have, but also that we are able to meet those shorter-term demands.
Deon Stander: We are going to continue to do that because we believe that as leaders in activating these new segments, we have to be prepared should they move at any one point in time.
Gregory Lovins: Yeah, John, on your second question, I would not say there is any one big reason CapEx is a bit lower. I think it is really just largely timing of projects. When we look at this year, we have had quite a bit of, because of the stocking cycle that happened in the first half, particularly Q2, and destocking that we are seeing now, our teams have been pretty focused on managing those swings in volume. When we look at within Materials Group from Q2 to Q3, roughly 10-point swing in volumes one quarter to the next. Our teams have been focused on managing those swings within the supply chain, and that is likely pushed some of the timing of projects back a little bit.
Gregory Lovins: No major changes in our ongoing views on CapEx and where we are making our investments, and we are going to continue to invest for growth and continue to invest for productivity.
Operator: Our last question comes from the line of John McNulty with BMO Capital Markets. Please proceed with your question.
John McNulty: Yeah, thanks for taking my follow-up. Just wanted to drill down into the free cash generation maybe a little bit more. It looks like year to date, you are actually above last year's total, and I know normally your Q4 tends to be one of, if not the biggest cash-generating quarters. I guess anything odd about the cadence this year, the strength that you saw in the Q3 results? Or should we just assume that, look, you are executing well, you are tightening things up, and the cash flow should continue to come in at the normal cadence?
Gregory Lovins: Yeah, thanks, John. To your point, I think we are executing well across the business. We have talked, I think a few quarters ago, about our focus on getting working capital productivity, and our teams have been doing a good job there. Particularly our inventory turns have improved as we move throughout the year. So we are driving and delivering on that working capital productivity we were targeting, and that is one big driver of it. I would say from a year-to-date perspective, one of the shifts is that, I have talked about the headwind we have from a cost perspective on incentive compensation year over year. We also then had less cash payouts in the first quarter of this year from an incentive compensation perspective. So from a cash flow perspective in this year related to last year's incentive comp accrual.
Gregory Lovins: I think that is one timing factor, but otherwise, we would expect to continue to deliver above 100% conversion for 2026.
Operator: Mr. Gilchrist, there are no further questions at this time. I will now turn the call back to you for any closing remarks.
William Gilchrist: Thank you, Chase. On behalf of everyone at Avery Dennison, I want to thank you for joining today's call and for your continued interest in our company. As always, we are happy to address any follow-up questions you may have. Thank you again, and this concludes today's conference call.
Operator: Ladies and gentlemen, that does conclude the conference call for today. We thank you for your participation and ask that you please disconnect your line.
