Operator: Good day, and welcome to the Bank of Hawaii Corporation Q3 2026 earnings conference call. At this time, all participants are in listen only mode. After the speaker's presentation, there will be a question and answer session. To ask a question, you will need to press star one one on your touchtone telephone. Please note this call may be recorded. I would like to turn the call over to Chang Park, Director of Investor Relations. Please go ahead.
Chang Park: Good morning and good afternoon. Thank you for joining us today for our Q3 2026 earnings conference call. Joining me today is our President and CEO, Jim Polk, CFO, Brad Satenberg, Chief Risk Officer, Brad Shairson, and Manager of Investor Relations, Patricia Lam. Before we get started, I want to remind you that today's conference call will contain some forward-looking statements. While we believe our assumptions are reasonable, the actual results may differ materially from those projected. During the call today, we will be referencing a slide presentation as well as the earnings release. Both of these are available on our website, boh.com, under the investor relations link. Now, I would like to turn the call over to Jim.
Jim Polk: Thanks, Chang. Good morning and good afternoon, everybody, and thank you for joining us. Bank of Hawaii delivered another solid quarter reflecting continued improvement in our financial performance, the underlying strength of our franchise, and our disciplined balance sheet management. For the Q3, we reported diluted EPS of $1.49 and net income of $64.3 million, up 0.7% and 1.4% respectively from the prior quarter and up 24.2% and 20.5% when compared to the Q3 of 2025. Return on average common equity was 15.4%. Our results continued to benefit from the repricing of our earning assets, supported by the strength of our deposit franchise, sound credit quality, and disciplined expense management. While encouraged by our progress, our focus remains on sustaining this performance while strengthening the drivers of longer-term earnings growth.
Jim Polk: Turning to our results, net interest income increased to $156.1 million, and our net interest margin expanded by 4 basis points to 2.82%, marking our 10th consecutive quarter of expansion in both measures. The cumulative improvement in our margin has been an important contributor to our earnings growth, and we continue to see opportunities for additional repricing. At the same time, we recognize that sustaining earnings growth over the longer term will require a greater contribution from organic deposit, loan, and fee income growth. While we remain mindful of the evolving interest rate environment and competitive landscape, our focus continues to be on maintaining a stable, high-quality deposit franchise, preserving balance sheet flexibility, and generating attractive risk-adjusted returns. Average deposits declined 0.8% for the quarter, largely reflecting the normal deployment of customer liquidity associated with completed real estate projects, distributions to owners, and working capital needs.
Jim Polk: We also made a deliberate decision to reduce certain higher-cost public deposits towards the quarter end, which impacted the end-of-quarter spot balance. Despite the competitive environment, our average cost of deposits remained stable at 1.27%, while non-interest-bearing deposits continued to represent roughly 27% of total deposits. Customer activity and deposit pipelines remain healthy, and based on what we see today, we anticipate returning to modest deposit growth in Q4. On the lending front, total loans increased by $85 million, or 0.6% for the quarter, 2.4% annualized. Commercial loans increased by $73 million, or 1.2%, supported by healthy customer activity and solid pipelines. While consumer lending grew marginally, reflecting the ongoing impact of higher interest rates, particularly in residential lending. Looking ahead, we anticipate overall loan growth to continue in the low mid-single digit range, with commercial lending being the primary driver of growth.
Jim Polk: Credit quality remains a fundamental strength of Bank of Hawaii, and our disciplined approach to underwriting and portfolio management continues to serve us well. Brad Shairson will provide additional commentary on this shortly. I also want to highlight our continued progress in wealth management, where targeted investments over the past several years have been driving a meaningful improvement in results. For the nine months ended 30 September 2026, trust and asset management fees and annuity and insurance fees totaling $45.2 million increased by 11.5% over the same period in 2025. We are seeing the benefits of the investments we have made in Bankoh Advisors, as well as in our trust and asset management businesses. We also see opportunities through stronger coordination between commercial banking and wealth management, particularly through our Center for Family Businesses and Entrepreneurs.
Jim Polk: Helping business owners navigate wealth planning, succession, and ownership transition represents an important opportunity to deepen relationships and generate additional fee income going forward. Beyond our quarterly results, we remain focused on strengthening organic growth across the franchise. Bank of Hawaii benefits from a leading deposit market share position, long-standing customer relationships, and a trusted brand built over more than 125 years. Today, we hold over 34% of the bank deposit market and have expanded our market share by 6.7% over the last 20 years. These are important advantages. However, we believe there is an opportunity to translate them into even stronger organic growth across the franchise. Our focus is on deepening existing relationships, capturing greater share of our customers' financial needs, and becoming more effective at attracting new customers.
Jim Polk: Across commercial banking, wealth management, and retail banking, we see opportunities to broaden relationships and better leverage the strength of our franchise. Turning briefly to the local economy, Hawaii continues to demonstrate resilience, although growth remains modest. Current forecasts call for low single digit real GDP growth in 2026, with growth projected at 1.6% for 2027. Unemployment remains low at 2.8%. Tourism results have been mixed as of late. Through August, visitor arrivals and spending were above prior year levels, despite a softer weather-affected August. While military construction activity, public investment, and military spending continue to provide meaningful support to the economy. With that said, we continue to monitor inflation, energy costs, and interest rates, particularly their impact on consumer spending, business investment, and visitor demand. Overall, we view Hawaii as a stable but modest growth market.
Jim Polk: This reinforces the importance of expanding our customer relationships and market penetration rather than relying primarily on underlying economic growth. As I reflect on the quarter and our progress this year, I am encouraged by the continued improvement in our financial performance and the strength of our franchise. Our near-term focus is on sustaining that momentum, while our longer-term opportunity is to translate our competitive advantages into stronger organic growth and greater operating efficiency. We will pursue these opportunities thoughtfully, maintaining the financial and risk management discipline that has long characterized Bank of Hawaii. With that, I will turn the call over to Brad Shairson.
Brad Shairson: Thanks, Jim. I will begin with an overview of our credit portfolio and conclude with asset quality metrics. As you will see, our performance has remained strong, consistent with prior quarters. Turning to our lending philosophy, Bank of Hawaii is dedicated to serving our local communities, lending primarily within our core markets where our expertise allows us to make informed and disciplined credit decisions. Our portfolio is built on long-tenured relationships with approximately 60% of both our commercial and consumer clients having been with the bank for more than 10 years. Geographically, our loan book is concentrated in markets we know well. Approximately 91% of our loans are based in Hawaii, with 5% in the Western Pacific and 4% on the mainland, primarily supporting clients in our market that also have operations on the mainland. Our loan portfolio remains well-balanced between consumer and commercial exposure.
Brad Shairson: Consumer loans represent 56% of total loans or approximately $8.1 billion. Within the consumer portfolio, 86% consists of residential mortgage and home equity loans with a weighted average LTV of 49% and weighted average FICO score of 798. The remaining 14% of consumer loans are comprised of auto and personal lending. Credit quality in these segments also remains strong, with average FICO scores of 730 for auto loans and 763 for personal loans. Turning to commercial lending, the portfolio totals $6.3 billion, representing 44% of total loans. 73% is secured by real estate with a weighted average LTV of 55%. This reflects our ongoing emphasis on collateral protection. CRE remains the largest component of the commercial book, totaling $4.5 billion, or 31% of total loans.
Brad Shairson: In Oahu, the state's largest CRE market, a combination of consistently low vacancy rates and flat inventory levels continues to support a stable real estate market. Across industrial, office, retail, and multifamily property types, vacancy rates remain below or close to their 10-year averages. Our CRE portfolio remains well-diversified, with no single property type exceeding 10% of total loans. Conservative underwriting practices continue to be applied consistently, with weighted average LTVs below 60% across all CRE categories. In addition, diversification within each segment remains strong, supported by modest average loan sizes. Scheduled maturities are also well-balanced, with more than 60% of CRE loans maturing in 2030 or later, reducing near-term refinancing risk. Given the recent rise in interest rates, I will also mention that interest rate sensitivity is an important consideration in our underwriting process.
Brad Shairson: Where appropriate, we evaluate borrowers under stress rate scenarios to assess their ability to absorb higher debt service costs. This helps us understand repayment capacity not only under current conditions, but also under a range of potential rate environments. Looking at the distribution of LTVs, there isn't much tail risk in our CRE portfolio. Just 2.3% of CRE loans have greater than an 80% LTV. C&I accounts for 11% of total loans, totaling $1.7 billion. This portfolio is diversified across industries characterized by modest average loan sizes, and there is very little leveraged lending. Turning to asset quality, overall credit performance remains strong and generally in line with the trends we've seen over the past several quarters. Delinquencies and net charge-offs remained at favorable levels during the quarter at 46 basis points and 9 basis points respectively. In addition, criticized assets declined by 44 basis points from 2.81% to 2.37%.
Brad Shairson: That said, you will notice an increase in our non-performing assets to 30 basis points from 8 basis points. That increase was driven by a single commercial loan rather than broader weakness across the portfolio. The loan is real estate secured, and we expect to exit this exposure either this quarter or early next quarter as the borrower finalizes the sale of this asset. Absent this one relationship, non-performing would have been flat at 8 basis points to the previous quarter. As an update on the allowance for credit losses on loans and leases, the ACL ended the quarter at $146.2 million. That's down $800,000 to linked quarter. The ratio of our ACL to outstandings ends down 1 basis point at 1.02%. This concludes my remarks. I will now turn the call over to Brad Satenberg for a discussion of our financial performance.
Brad Satenberg: Thanks, Brad. For the quarter, we reported net income of $64.3 million and a diluted EPS of $1.49, up $459,000.02 per share compared to the linked quarter. NII increased $2.5 million and NIM expanded 4 basis points to 2.82%, primarily benefiting from our fixed asset repricing, partially offset by an unfavorable deposit mix shift. This marked the second consecutive quarter where the mix shift was negative, and although it accelerated this quarter, I expect it to moderate in Q4 and return to a range more in line with prior four quarters. Excluding the impact from the non-accrual loan that Brad Shairson mentioned during his comments, our NII would have increased by $3 million on our NIM would have been 2.83%. The yield on earning assets increased 5 basis points during the quarter, primarily due to the fixed asset repricing.
Brad Satenberg: The September rate hike had a limited impact this quarter, but it should add several basis points to earning asset yields in Q4 as our floating rate assets benefit from this increase for the full period. The cost of interest-bearing liabilities was unchanged at 1.83% for the quarter. Deposit costs also held steady at 1.27%, while the end of quarter spot rate was 2 basis points higher at 1.29%, reflecting only a modest impact from the September rate hike. Deposit costs also benefited from the strategic runoff of approximately $200 million of high-cost public funds during the quarter. As discussed last quarter, I'm expecting that any additional rate hike will benefit NII and NIM for the first several quarters until our deposits fully reprice. At the end of the quarter, our fixed-to-float ratio was 57%, down 1 percentage point from the prior quarter.
Brad Satenberg: $200 million of forward starting swaps became active during the quarter, and we finished the period with an active pay-fixed receive float swap portfolio of $1.6 billion with a weighted average fixed rate of 3.25% and an average life of 1.2 years. $1.1 billion of these swaps hedge our loan portfolio and $500 million hedge our securities. Non-interest income was $42.7 million for the quarter, compared to $43.3 million during the linked quarter. This quarter included a $600,000 charge related to a change in the Visa B conversion ratio, while the prior quarter included a similar $400,000 charge. Excluding these items, non-interest income declined $400,000, primarily reflecting lower gains on leased asset sales and a decline in trust-related tax services revenue from a seasonally stronger Q2. Higher deposit fees partially offset these declines. My forecast for Q4 is that normalized non-interest income will be approximately $44 million.
Brad Satenberg: Non-interest expense was $112.3 million, compared to $111.2 million in the linked quarter. The current quarter had no non-recurring items, while Q2 included a $500,000 benefit from the net forfeiture on unvested restricted stock units. Excluding that benefit, expenses increased approximately $600,000. Q4 normalized non-interest expense is expected to be approximately $112.5 million. During the quarter, we also recorded a provision for credit losses of $2.8 million, resulting in a coverage ratio of 1.02%. In addition, we reported a tax provision of $19.4 million during the quarter, resulting in an effective tax rate of 23.2%. The higher tax rate compared to the linked quarter was primarily due to additional valuation reserves set aside for certain LIHTC investments. Turning to the balance sheet, loans grew at an annualized rate of 2.4% during the quarter.
Brad Satenberg: Deposits declined $411 million from the linked quarter, primarily due to lower public funds in commercial deposits. As previously noted, the deposit runoff was intentional, while the commercial outflows were concentrated among a small number of larger customers utilizing deposits to fund construction projects and normal quarterly operating expenses. We used short-term borrowings to supplement our liquidity during the quarter, with overnight borrowings averaging $120 million. Our capital ratios remained above the well-capitalized regulatory thresholds during the quarter, with Tier 1 capital and total risk-based capital of 14.4% and 15.4% respectively. Consistent with the linked quarter, we paid dividends of $28 million on our common stock and $5.3 million on our preferreds. During Q3, we repurchased $20 million of common shares at an average price of approximately $78 per share. I am currently planning to repurchase an additional $20 million of stock in Q4.
Brad Satenberg: At the end of the quarter, $69 million remained available under the repurchase plan, and subsequent to quarter end, the board approved increasing the plan by an additional $200 million. Finally, the board declared a dividend of $0.70 per common share that will be paid during Q4. Now I'll turn the call back over to Jim.
Jim Polk: Thanks, Brad. We would now be happy to answer whatever questions you may have.
Operator: If you would like to ask a question, please press *11. If your question has been answered and you would like to remove yourself from the queue, press *11 again. Our first question comes from Jeff Rulis with D.A. Davidson. Your line is open.
Jeff Rulis: Thanks. Good morning.
Jim Polk: Hey. Good morning, Jeff.
Jeff Rulis: Maybe a follow-on on the margin, Brad Satenberg. Do you have an average for September? I wanted to kind of nail down net of the nonaccrual impact, as well as the public deposit runoff kind of came late. Is that also an additional tailwind to the margin? Sorry about that.
Brad Satenberg: Yeah, no. Good question. September, just excluding the impact in that non-performing asset was recorded in September. Excluding the impact from that non-performing asset, the NIM would have been 2.83% in September. The public funds ran off throughout the quarter, but more towards the end. So that should be a modest tailwind about a basis point or so on our cost of deposits and on our NIM going forward.
Jeff Rulis: Okay. I guess any other interest in running off the public deposits further or expectations there?
Brad Satenberg: We're always looking at the public funds. I do think there's an opportunity there to run off additional deposits, but I don't expect it to be this quarter. I think we'll look at them on a case-by-case basis and see where the opportunities are. I do think there's an opportunity, but I would not anticipate it this quarter.
Jeff Rulis: Got it. Then maybe one last one just on the overall demand on the loan side, particularly if we see additional rate hikes. Got that the commercial outlook looks pretty strong, maybe not so much on the consumer, but any update on demand that you are seeing as it relates to rate moves?
Jim Polk: I will jump in on this one, Jeff. Obviously, I commented on the strength of the commercial pipeline, I think the outlook, as far as we can see at this point, remains good. I feel comfortable around that. The interesting one is just consumer and resi is just challenged by the current rate environment. What I am encouraged by is we were able to get some growth out of the home equity line portfolio, I am optimistic that as people with lower rate sort of first mortgages who do not want to do anything with that will look more towards home equity lines to tap some of the equity in their homes. So our pipeline remains stable in that space, optimistic that we can get some growth out of that front.
Jeff Rulis: Appreciate it. Thank you.
Operator: Thank you. Our next question comes from Matthew Clark with Piper Sandler. Your line is open.
Matthew Clark: Yeah, good morning, everyone. Thank you.
Jim Polk: Good morning.
Matthew Clark: Just on the margin. We got your spot rate. Heard you speak to the public funds, maybe a little bit of an incremental benefit there. But how should we think about the interest-bearing deposit beta through the cycle here? I think on the way down you were around 44%.
Brad Satenberg: I would say on the way up, our expectation on total deposits, the betas will be around 34%. Again, I think that will depend on the competitive market, which I think has been rational to this point, as well as customer behavior. But I think to get to that 34% is going to take several quarters to achieve that beta.
Matthew Clark: Yep. Okay. You saw an increase in CDs. Can you update us on the CDs that are maturing this coming quarter and the kind of roll-off and roll-on rates? Or at least as it relates to your expectations in terms of the promo and what you expect it to roll into.
Brad Satenberg: Yeah. About 50%, a little bit over 50% of our CDs are kind of mature or will mature within the next 3 months at a rate of about 290. I expect it to roll on at an average rate of about 3% or so, somewhere between 2. There are new money promotions at 3%, so I do expect us to see the 3-month bump up slightly or the CD rate bump up slightly this quarter.
Matthew Clark: Okay. Just last one for me. On the borrowings, I know at least at the end of the quarter, they were up a little more meaningfully. How should we think about, assuming deposit growth resumes, how should we think about the $853 million of borrowings going forward?
Brad Satenberg: We did utilize short-term borrowings this past quarter and at the end of the quarter. On a spot basis, it was about $345 million of short-term borrowings. My expectation is that deposit growth will return in Q4 and Q1 of next year, and that our reliance on short-term borrowings will slowly be mitigated by that deposit growth.
Matthew Clark: Okay. Fair enough. Thank you.
Operator: Thank you. Our next question comes from Jared Shaw with Barclays. Your line is open.
Jared Shaw: Thanks a lot. Hey, everybody.
Jim Polk: Hey, Jared.
Jared Shaw: Yeah, I guess just on segment of deposits, when we look at the total outflows and the DDA outflows, was that really all primarily public funds? What were some of the trends on the core side? When you talked about stabilizing the growing deposits, should we expect total and DDA to see some tailwinds?
Jim Polk: Yeah. So obviously we talked about the public funds. That was an intentional move on our part. Within the commercial is really just a multitude of things that really normal activity that in combination with each other put a little pressure on the quarter-end deposits. So a lot of that was related to just normal business activities, investment in real estate projects, as Brad pointed out, working capital requirements. We had some distributions to business owners. We also had some funds that ran off related to completed condominium projects that we had expected some additional inflows from related projects to help offset that. We expect that to come in in the future. But those are really the primary drivers. It was not one thing in specific as all regular customer activity just was a lot at the end of the quarter.
Jared Shaw: Okay. On the non-performer that moved over, sounds good that it is going to be resolved or potentially resolved in the coming quarter or so. But is there any specific reserve or did you take any specific charge off on that or how should we think about potential loss content?
Brad Shairson: That is a good question. Thanks for the question. This is Brad Shairson. What I can tell you about that NPA is that the loan matured during Q3 and the borrower elected to pursue a sale of the property. So I am not going to comment on the specific credit or property type while a sale is pending, but I would just say it is an idiosyncratic credit situation rather than indication of any broader stress within any particular portfolio segment. To get to the heart of your question, based on our current assessment, any loss associated with the sale is expected to be immaterial.
Brad Shairson: had already been adequately reserved for. As a result, we would not expect the resolution of this credit to increase our future provision expense.
Jared Shaw: Okay. Thanks for that. Then just maybe a final one on the buyback. With the increased authorization and the $20 million per quarter seems like pace, what would cause you to accelerate the buyback above that $20 million per quarter level?
Brad Satenberg: Yeah. Like you said, we plan to buy $20 million this quarter. We will reevaluate it going into 2027, what our plan is. We do think at the current level, it is a good opportunity to buy back the stock. We think it is undervalued and we will take it on a quarter-by-quarter basis, and we will determine whether we want to accelerate that or not. But for now, $20 million this quarter, and again, going into next year, we will reconsider and we will look at that.
Jared Shaw: Great. Thank you.
Operator: Thank you. Our next question comes from Andrew Liesch with StoneX Financial. Your line is open.
Andrew Liesch: Thanks. Good morning, everyone.
Jim Polk: Good morning.
Andrew Liesch: Hey, guys. Question on expenses. Your guidance at the beginning of the year was for about 2.5% to 3% growth, and you are tracking pretty nicely below that today. I guess anything you can point to that drove that? Then if we look out back up into 2027, do you think we get back to a more normalized level of expense growth?
Brad Satenberg: Well, the way I look at it is when you normalize last year, so the prior year's expenses and compare it to where I think we're going to land or where I'm projecting us to land in 2026, the expense growth is just around 3%. We're always very careful, but I think we are right at that 3% level and we're very meticulous with our expenses and very cautious with expense management.
Andrew Liesch: You think that's like a normal level of expense growth going forward then?
Brad Satenberg: I would think so. Obviously, we're in the middle of our budgeting for 2027. But I would think 2.5% to 3% is our normalized run rate. Then we will look at other strategic opportunities and that may impact the expense growth for 2027. But again, we will be very careful of any time we're spending. We try to find opportunities to save as well. We try to keep that within a reasonable level of growth.
Andrew Liesch: Got it. Very helpful. You've covered my other questions. I'll step back.
Jim Polk: Thanks.
Operator: Thank you. Our next question comes from Kelly Motta with KBW. Your line is open.
Kelly Motta: Hey, thanks for the question. I would like to circle back to the earlier question about the buyback, specifically as it relates to capital. I believe 9% Tier 1 leverage is your goal here. TCE slipped a little with AOCI. Can you remind us how you are thinking about overall levels of capital and guideposts around specific regulators of how active you could get? Thank you.
Jim Polk: Well, I will take a shot at it. The way we have been viewing it is obviously we want to pay our dividends, we want to buy some shares back, and we want to allow for some organic accretion in the capital levels. I think we have been talking in the past about getting to 9% on that particular ratio.
Jim Polk: I think as we look forward, the increase in the authorization is really just to give us flexibility as we continue to improve earnings, as we continue to look at the valuation of the stock, and just to give us that sort of the opportunistic capability to buy when we feel that the time is right. So we will obviously make sure that we are managing to appropriate capital levels. But again, I think we have demonstrated the ability to be thoughtful with our distributions and to continue to allow our capital ratios to organically grow.
Kelly Motta: Got it. That is helpful. When I look at your slide on cash flow repricing, the quarterly impact on NII from cash flow repricing has not changed, but it looks like the cash flows you got this quarter came down a bit. Just wondering, with rates up, has there been any extension at all in the securities portfolio and change expected cash flows here? Thanks.
Brad Satenberg: I don't think you are going to see a significant change in the cash flows. I think about it as the cash flows are going to be in the range of $550 million to $650 million. In Q2, it was a little bit higher because we had some paydowns and payoffs. Obviously, with rates bumping up and since pulling back, the duration of our investment portfolio has increased modestly. I would think from a cash flow perspective, we are not seeing a material change based upon where rates are today or where they were at the beginning of the quarter and where they ended the quarter at.
Kelly Motta: Got it. That is helpful. Last one for me. I think you noted that you are going to be opportunistic again about potentially moving out some higher cost public deposits. It looks like they are about just over $2 billion at the end of the quarter. Can you size what amount of the book is kind of larger and more transactional might be potentially opportunistically moved out? Thanks.
Jim Polk: That is it.
Brad Satenberg: Well, I would say you are right. The portfolio is about $2 billion. I would think when I look at the portfolio, a big portion of it is operating accounts. I do not anticipate us to strategically try to run off any of those operating account balances. When I look at it, I would say about 10% of that portfolio still has an opportunity to either reprice or to be run off if we do not think the pricing is appropriate. Again, I do not anticipate it this quarter, but I do think down the road, we will be relooking at that and continue to focus on opportunities to bring down our cost to deposits, and that is certainly one area that we will be focused on.
Kelly Motta: Great. Thanks.
Operator: Thank you. I am showing no further questions at this time. I would like to turn the call over to Patricia Lam for closing remarks.
Patricia Lam: Thank you everyone for joining us today and for your continued interest in Bank of Hawaii. As always, please feel free to reach out to us if you have any additional questions.
Operator: Thank you for your participation. This does conclude the program. You may now disconnect. Good day.
