Operator: Good afternoon, and welcome to the Enova International Q3 2026 earnings conference call. All participants will be in listen-only mode. Should you need assistance, please signal a conference specialist by pressing the star key followed by zero. After today's presentation, there will be an opportunity to ask questions. To ask a question, you may press star, then one on your telephone keypad. To withdraw your question, please press star, then two. Please note, this event is being recorded. I would now like to turn the conference over to Lindsay Savarese, Investor Relations. Please go ahead.
Lindsay Savarese: Thank you, operator, and good afternoon, everyone. Enova released results for Q3 2026, ended 30 September 2026 this afternoon after market close. If you did not receive a copy of our earnings press release, you may obtain it from the investor relations section of our website at ir.enova.com. With me on today's call are Steve Cunningham, Chief Executive Officer, and Scott Cornelis, Chief Financial Officer. This call is being webcast and will be archived on the investor relations section of our website. Before I turn the call over to Steve, I would like to note that today's discussion will contain forward-looking statements, and as such, is subject to risks and uncertainties.
Lindsay Savarese: Actual results may differ materially as a result from various important risk factors, including those discussed in our earnings press release and in our annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Forms 10-Q, and current reports on Forms 8-K. Please note that any forward-looking statements that are made on this call are based on assumptions as of today, and we undertake no obligation to update these statements as a result of new information or future events. In addition to US GAAP reporting, Enova reports certain financial measures that do not conform to generally accepted accounting principles. We believe these non-GAAP measures enhance the understanding of our performance. Reconciliations between these GAAP and non-GAAP measures are included in the tables found in today's press release. As noted in our earnings release, we have posted supplemental financial information on the IR portion of our website.
Lindsay Savarese: With that, I would like to turn the call over to Steve.
Steve Cunningham: Thank you, Lindsay, and good afternoon, everyone. I appreciate you joining our call today. We are pleased to report another quarter of healthy growth and credit as originations, receivables, revenue, and adjusted EPS all grew 25% or more year over year. Our Q3 results are a testament to the strength of our strategy, improving capabilities, and the powerful combination of our talented team, diversified product offerings, scalable online-only operating model, and world-class risk management capabilities. Reflecting the demand we saw during the quarter, originations growth was strong across both consumer and small business, resulting in consolidated originations of $2.6 billion, which was up 31% from Q3 2025. This marked our 12th consecutive quarter of consolidated year-over-year originations growth of 20% or more.
Steve Cunningham: Originations growth increased our consolidated portfolio to $5.9 billion, or 30% higher than a year ago, with small business products representing 68% of the portfolio and consumer products accounting for 32%. With strong portfolio growth, revenue increased 26% year over year and exceeded $1 billion during a quarter for the first time in our history. In addition, net charge-off rates across the portfolio reflect stable or improving performance, with the consolidated net charge-off ratio for Q3 declining to 8.1% from 8.5% in the year-ago quarter. This solid credit performance, combined with the operating leverage inherent in our online-only business model, drove a 33% increase in adjusted EPS from a year ago, marking the ninth consecutive quarter of year-over-year growth in adjusted EPS of 30% or more.
Steve Cunningham: Our results for Q3 reflect a resilient macroeconomic environment, despite ongoing concerns about inflation and potential impacts on future interest rates and economic growth. The most recent Federal Reserve Beige Book showed economic activity increasing across most of the country, with no district reporting a decline. In addition, the Commerce Department's latest GDP revisions show the economy is stronger than first reported as both Q1 and Q2 GDP growth was revised higher. Broader economic strength has supported a steady labor market characterized by weekly unemployment claims and a tight band around historical lows, a stable unemployment rate, and wage growth pacing with inflation. Our consumer results reflect the resiliency of the US consumer, as originations during the quarter reached a record $807 million, 37% higher than Q3 2025, while consumer revenue grew 21% over the same period.
Steve Cunningham: In addition, the consumer net charge-off rate followed our typical seasonality sequentially and declined to 100 basis points from Q3 2025 to 15.1%. Recent data also shows that US consumers continue to spend despite recent declines in sentiment. The Bureau of Economic Analysis reported that consumer spending during August was the largest monthly increase this year, on the heels of a healthy pace of spending during Q2. Consumer spending not only plays a key role in overall economic growth, it is a fundamental driver of the health of small businesses. Against this constructive consumer and macroeconomic backdrop, small business confidence remains high.
Steve Cunningham: In line with previous findings, our 12th edition of the Small Business Cash Flow Trend Report, released in conjunction with Acquis, found that small businesses remain optimistic about the future, with 93% of small businesses expecting moderate to significant growth over the next year. Recent surveys from the Chamber of Commerce and the NFIB have echoed similar small business optimism, and a majority of small business owners responding to these surveys remain confident in the health of their own individual businesses. Notably, according to the NFIB, the top reported issue among small businesses was no longer inflation, but instead has been replaced by labor quality and availability, which is a positive sign for the future stability of the labor market. Continued small business confidence and financial health is reflected in the continued growth and stable credit of our SMB business.
Steve Cunningham: SMB originations rose 28% from Q3 2025, resulting in a 34% increase in our well-diversified portfolio as we continue to leverage our leading brand presence, scale, and strong competitive position. In addition, the SMB net charge-off rate was unchanged from last quarter at 4.8% and has remained in a tight range consistent with our expectations over the last 12 quarters, while quarterly year-over-year originations growth has consistently exceeded 20% over the same period. As we have moved into Q4, we continue to see stable growth and credit across both our consumer and SMB businesses. As Scott Cornelis will discuss, assuming the operating environment stays constructive as it has all year, we expect to close 2026 with strong Q4 financial results. Before I wrap up, I would like to spend a few moments discussing our strategy and outlook.
Steve Cunningham: Our business is as healthy as ever, and we remain well-positioned to continue delivering on our commitment to driving long-term shareholder value while meeting our mission of helping hardworking people get access to fast, trustworthy credit. We have built a high-growth, highly profitable, and resilient business at Enova, serving large fragmented markets with diversified products powered by our online-only business model, world-class technology and risk management, talented team, and competitive funding capabilities. We have never wavered from our focus on meeting the credit needs of consumers and small businesses that are not well-served by traditional banks. Those populations are large, with upwards of 100 million consumers and more than 35 million small businesses in the US, most with credit needs that fall outside of the interest or underwriting expertise of traditional banks.
Steve Cunningham: Over the years, we have adapted and evolved to strengthen and diversify our business while responsibly meeting the credit needs of these customers, and today offer both installment and line of credit products across the entire non-prime credit spectrum, with risk-based pricing reflecting the repayment risk of the borrower. Our exclusive online-only focus has us well-positioned to capture the rapidly increasing customer preferences for quickly transacting digitally anywhere and at any time. Uniquely, we serve both consumers and small businesses with these products and capabilities at scale. The application of our powerful machine learning analytics to the fast feedback from our product repayment terms in combination with our unit economics discipline allows us to adapt quickly to emerging issues or opportunities across a wide range of operating environments to deliver consistent financial performance.
Steve Cunningham: In fact, in our 12-year history as a public company, we have never experienced a quarter of negative adjusted net income. That consistency has supported our ability to raise financing with highly competitive terms and rates that support our flexibility, profitability, and capital return capabilities. Our ability to continue to deliver meaningful growth and profitability has not been diminished at all by our decision last month to withdraw our regulatory applications to become a bank. In fact, our planning over the past year brought to light new product, operational, and risk management insights that will support meaningful long-term growth by defending and extending our competitive positions and allowing us to leverage our technology and analytics capabilities to continue to take share in existing markets and thoughtfully expand into adjacent markets, either directly or with partners.
Steve Cunningham: As we always have, we will continue to adapt our existing offerings and experience as the competitive environment and customer preferences change. Additionally, we will explore expanded offerings such as a deposit advance product, secured consumer lending, and SMB-embedded finance offerings. As we address new opportunities, we will continue to follow the approach that has driven our innovation for many years: focus on areas with the greatest opportunities through testing and experimentation while being very deliberate with launching and scaling new initiatives, products, and geographies. As we look forward to the significant opportunities ahead of us, we believe there is meaningful upside to our current share price. Continuing to unlock the value our company creates remains a top focus of Enova's leadership. In addition to investing in the aforementioned growth opportunities, we will also continue to opportunistically lean into share repurchases to support our valuation.
Steve Cunningham: To wrap up, we are pleased to deliver another quarter of strong growth and profitability. Our future is bright, and we remain focused on generating sustainable and profitable growth while delivering on our commitment to driving long-term shareholder value and our mission of helping hardworking people get access to fast, trustworthy credit. With that, I would like to turn the call over to Scott Cornelis, our CFO, who will discuss our financial results and outlook in more detail. Following Scott's remarks, we will be happy to answer any questions you may have. Scott?
Scott Cornelis: Thank you, Steve, and good afternoon, everyone. As Steve noted in his remarks, we are pleased to deliver another quarter of top and bottom line financial performance that exceeded our expectations. Our Q3 results reflect strong growth in originations, receivables, and revenue, complemented by solid credit, continued operating leverage, and balance sheet flexibility. Turning to our Q3 results, total company revenue of $1 billion increased 26% from Q3 2025, driven by 30% year-over-year growth in total company combined loan and finance receivable balances on an amortized basis. Total company originations during Q3 rose 31% from Q3 2025 to $2.6 billion.
Scott Cornelis: Revenue from small business lending increased 32% from Q3 2025 to $459 million as the small business receivables on an amortized basis ended the quarter at $4 billion, or 34% higher than the end of Q3 2025. Small business originations rose 28% year over year to $1.8 billion. Revenue from our consumer businesses increased 21% from Q3 2025 to $537 million as consumer receivables on an amortized basis ended the quarter at $1.9 billion, or 24% higher than the end of Q3 2025. Consumer originations grew 37% from Q3 2025 to $807 million, reflecting the continued re-acceleration in consumer growth along with the strong credit we have seen over the past year. For Q4 2026, we expect total company revenue to be around 25% higher year over year.
Scott Cornelis: This expectation will depend upon the level, timing, and mix of originations growth during the quarter. Now turning to credit, which is the most significant driver of net revenue and portfolio fair value. The consolidated net revenue margin for Q3 was 61%, slightly better than our expected range and up from 57% a year ago as Q3 net charge-offs for the consumer, small business, and consolidated portfolios reflected continued stable to improving credit performance. The consolidated net charge-off ratio for Q3 was 8.1%, an improvement from 8.5% a year ago, driven by a 100 basis point year-over-year improvement in the consumer net charge-off ratio. The SMB net charge-off rate of 4.8% was flat sequentially and, as Steve Cunningham noted, has remained in a tight range consistent with our expectations over the last 12 quarters.
Scott Cornelis: The consolidated 30 plus day delinquency rate increased sequentially to 8%, driven by typical consumer sequential seasonality and a 40 basis point sequential increase in the SMB 30 plus day delinquency rate. As seen over the past two years, the 30 plus delinquency rate can vary more than the net charge-off ratio quarter to quarter. Small business customers often have multiple options for curing late payments, so payment delinquencies can be temporary before customers return to current status rather than rolling more predictably to charge off once delinquent, as is more typical with consumer loans. Combined with the effect of the size and timing of recent originations on the ratio, SMB delinquency rates have been more variable quarter to quarter recently, while charge-offs have held in a relatively narrow expected range.
Scott Cornelis: The consolidated consumer and SMB fair value premiums are all stable or improving sequentially and year over year, reflecting the quality of our recent originations and seasoning as expected along lifetime loss curves. Looking ahead, we expect the total company net revenue margin for Q4 2026 to be in the 55% to 60% range. We expect the SMB net revenue margin to remain in the typical 60% to 70% range, and we expect the consumer net revenue margin should continue to trend toward a more typical level of around 50% as our recent vintages continue to season as expected. This expectation will depend upon the portfolio payment performance and the level, timing, and mix of originations growth during Q4. Now turning to expenses.
Scott Cornelis: Total operating expenses for Q3, including marketing, were 35% of revenue compared to 31% of revenue in Q3 2025. Our marketing spend continues to be efficient and supported the originations growth we delivered during the quarter, particularly from new consumer customers. As we have discussed in the past, market demand and the credit we observe across our products drive our marketing spend. During Q3, strong demand and credit, combined with our nimble and sophisticated technology and analytics and the rapid credit feedback from our products, allowed us to efficiently scale our marketing investments and originate loans with attractive unit economics. Marketing costs were 23% of revenue, or $230 million, compared to 18% of revenue, or $147 million, in Q3 2025. As a percentage of total originations, marketing remains within our expected range.
Scott Cornelis: We expect marketing expenses to be around 20% of revenue for Q4, which will depend upon the growth and mix of originations. Operations and technology expenses for Q3 were 8% of revenue, or $81 million, compared to 8% of revenue, or $65 million, in Q3 2025. Given the significant variable component of this expense category, sequential increases in O&T costs should be expected in an environment where originations and receivables are growing, and we expect O&T costs to be around 8% to 8.5% of total revenue going forward. Our fixed costs continue to scale as we focus on operating efficiency and thoughtful expense management. General and administrative expenses for Q3 were $46 million, or 4.6% of revenue, compared to $40 million, or 4.9% of revenue in Q3 2025.
Scott Cornelis: The current quarter included $1.4 million of costs related to the Grasshopper transaction. Excluding these items, G&A expenses were $45 million, or 4.4% of revenue. While there may be slight variations from quarter to quarter, we expect G&A expenses in the near term will be between 4.5% and 5% of total revenue, excluding any one-time costs. Our balance sheet and liquidity position continue to give us the financial flexibility to successfully navigate a range of operating environments while delivering on our commitment to drive long-term shareholder value through both continued investment in our business and returning capital through share repurchases. We ended Q3 with $1.3 billion of liquidity, including $508 million of cash and marketable securities and $817 million of available capacity on our debt facilities.
Scott Cornelis: Our cost of funds for Q3 was 8%, down slightly from Q2 and 60 basis points lower than a year ago as we continue to see strong execution in the capital markets. During the quarter, we completed the largest term securitization in OnDeck's history at a lower credit spread than a comparable transaction a year ago, and we increased available capacity on our debt facilities by more than $350 million from the end of Q2. During Q3, we more than doubled our pace of share repurchases from Q2, repurchasing 243,000 shares at a cost of $46 million, leaving $252 million of repurchase capacity available under our senior note covenants entering Q4. As Steve mentioned, we believe there is meaningful upside to our current share price, and we expect to continue to opportunistically lean into share repurchases.
Scott Cornelis: So far in October, we have already matched our buyback activity for the entire Q3. Finally, we continue to deliver meaningful profitability this quarter. Compared to Q3 2025, adjusted EPS, a non-GAAP measure, increased 33% to $4.48 per diluted share, resulting in an annualized quarterly return on equity in excess of 30%. To wrap up, let me summarize our expectations. For Q4, we expect consolidated revenue to be around 25% higher year over year, with a net revenue margin in the 55% to 60% range. Additionally, we expect marketing expenses to be around 20% of revenue, O&T costs of around 8% to 8.5% of revenue, and G&A costs of 4.5% to 5% of revenue. These expectations should lead to adjusted EPS for Q4 2026 that is 30% to 35% higher than Q4 2025.
Scott Cornelis: Our Q4 expectations will depend upon the path of the macroeconomic environment and the resulting impact on demand, customer payment rates, and the level, timing and mix of originations growth. Our performance this quarter reflects the consistency of our model, a diversified product set, a scalable online-only platform, and a disciplined approach to unit economics that has delivered dependable results across many environments. Backed by a strong balance sheet and a talented team, we are well-positioned to keep investing in the business, return capital to shareholders, and deliver profitable growth and long-term value. With that, we would be happy to take your questions. Operator.
Operator: We will now begin the question and answer session. To ask a question, you may press star then 1 on your telephone keypad. If you are using a speakerphone, please pick up your handset before pressing the keys. To withdraw your question, please press star then 2. At this time, we will pause momentarily to assemble our roster. Our first question today comes from John Hecht with Jefferies. Please go ahead.
John Hecht: Hey, guys. Thanks very much for taking my questions. I guess the first one is, Steve, you talked about new products, and you gave a pretty strong list of them. Maybe can you give us a sense for timing and how you might prioritize these new products and when we may see them hit the market and the revenue?
Steve Cunningham: Yeah. Hi, John. Thanks for joining us today. The product list that I gave you, those examples, obviously we had mentioned some of those before over this year. We have already begun thinking about those. We will be thinking about how to, as I mentioned in my remarks, how we go to market. I think our approach in the past, I think I have told you, is that I am giving you a little bit of a sense of what we are thinking about in terms of innovation.
Steve Cunningham: It's not something that we intend to update you on every quarter, but I think we let the results speak for themselves. As they start to become more meaningful parts of our business or we hit certain milestones, we will give you updates. The biggest point is that, as we look forward, we expect that we are going to lean into the capabilities that we have built to look for opportunities to build adjacencies, to innovate within the products that we have today and leverage those strengths that you have come to know from us.
John Hecht: Okay. We will look forward to all those announcements. With respect to your strong origination flows that we have observed for several quarters, maybe can you talk about a mix of new versus returning and then any change in composition of the small business side in terms of the types of industries you are focused on?
Steve Cunningham: Well, so I think if you look across new versus returning, just with the return of growth this year in consumer, if you remember last year, Q3 and Q4, we were growing more like lower single digits year over year on purpose, if you go back and remember our commentary back then. As we got back to sort of our normal approach in the marketplace, you have seen those growth rates pick up the pace, in some cases on easier laps. You shouldn't expect we are going to sustain 30%-plus growth rates in consumer. I would expect that it will look a lot more typical to what you saw back in prior years. It won't be low single digits, but it's not going to be 30%-plus. Anytime you are doing that, you are going to see a bit more new customers in the mix.
Steve Cunningham: I would say in the consumer side of things, we have seen an uptick over the past few quarters as that growth rate has picked up with more new customers, which is great because those will be returning customers for us as we move through time. The SMB side of things has been a bit more stable as it relates to new and returning. John, we are underwriting into hundreds of industries. Our, what I would call the watch list, the industries we pay special attention to that we have mentioned in the past, like trucking or construction or those industries that have been more exposed to trade and tariff policies. We continue to keep a close eye on those, but we are not really rotating materially different in terms of our industry push or exposures.
Steve Cunningham: We are really following what we have always done, which is making sure that we are reaching the customers and underwriting as many as we can while meeting the unit economics framework that has been so critical to our success over the past.
John Hecht: Okay. That is great. Thank you very much.
Steve Cunningham: You bet.
Operator: The next question is from Bill Ryan with Seaport Research Partners. Please go ahead.
Bill Ryan: Good afternoon. Thanks for taking my questions. First one is looking at the consumer loan origination mix. Looked like it kind of shifted a bit more towards revolving this quarter. Installment was still up year over year in originations, but the cadence of increase kind of slowed a little bit. Are you seeing a change in consumer preference for the type of consumer loan that they are taking out? I have one follow-up question.
Steve Cunningham: Yeah. As we have talked about before, we are pretty indifferent in terms of where the growth comes from. Over time, we have seen that consumers definitely prefer that line of credit products. We have seen that growth over time outstripping installment. There are times when we see the installment piece of the consumer book growing faster than the line of credit business. I would say it is a bit of a reflection of us continuing our growth this year, the customer preference for the line of credit products that we offer. As you pointed out, the installment business is continuing to grow nicely as well. The two of those work very well together and complement each other and allow us to meet the preference that the customers have that we are attracting into our franchise.
Bill Ryan: Okay. Following up on the small business, the delinquencies, as you noted, were up a bit year over year. Charge-off rate pretty stable. You talked about that there are several ways that small businesses can cure themselves, that consumers do not have that option. If you could maybe talk about what some of those cure mechanisms might be. Then if this trend continues and the charge-off rate remains stable, I know you have always talked about the SMB revenue margin kind of normalizing over time, but if this is the case, is it possible that it stays elevated, that maybe we are kind of at a new normal in SMB at this point?
Steve Cunningham: Well, let me just say, I think the SMB net revenue margin is in the normal range. I would say the 60% to 70% range is the range that Scott has guided to over time. We are sitting in the upper half of that, but we kind of bounce around that 65% plus or minus quite frequently. So I would say we are sort of sitting in a more normal than not normal range for the net revenue margin. I think the point in Scott's commentary around delinquency cure rates and SMB, if you think about consumers, it is very employment driven. If you lose your job and you cannot get another job, you are sort of dependent on savings or otherwise. You see roll rates, I think if you look over time, are a little bit more predictable through the delinquency buckets. I think SMBs are a little bit different.
Steve Cunningham: Think about a small business that has an owner, and they are doing very well. Perhaps they have not collected the receivables as quickly as they would have hoped. They might fall behind a payment, but they quickly catch up as those receivables are collected. Or you might have a provider that steps in to bridge along the way. You can end up with more variability in terms of, I will call it bouncing around in delinquency buckets. Or people behind a payment and paying you and have not completely caught up to current, so they are stuck in a bucket as well. The point of all that is, and you can see this if you look at our supplement, is that those 30-plus day delinquency rates are not great predictors of future net charge-off rates because of that.
Steve Cunningham: In addition, we have advanced our capabilities on the collection side over time as well, where in addition to traditional collection practices, we also have a lot more self-service and digital capabilities, which helps these customers cure and do it on their own terms as well.
Bill Ryan: Okay. Thanks for taking my questions.
Steve Cunningham: You bet.
Operator: Again, if you have a question, please press star then one. The next question is from David Scharf with Citizens Capital Markets. Please go ahead.
David Scharf: Hey. Good afternoon. Steve, hear you loud and clear on the stable credit trends. It is consistent with what we are hearing elsewhere. Did want to just follow up a little on the prior question about consumer versus SMB, and I guess in particular, especially since delinquencies tend to be more variable and volatile, as you said, with SMB. Is there a way to internally, are you able to gauge whether consumer or SMB is sort of a better leading indicator of potential credit stress down the road? It seems like households have almost gotten used to inflation and adapted to it well, but higher input costs can impact a business in a lot of different ways. I am just wondering if you are seeing any indicators that are different when you analyze your small business borrowers than your consumer borrowers.
Steve Cunningham: Listen, I think on the consumer side of things, obviously employment is very important, right? We have talked about in the past, the way we monitor our credit performance, we can see very quickly, let us just say initial defaults on recently originated vintages are a really good indicator of how things are going. We are fine-tuning that all the time. If there was something big going on, and there absolutely is not, we would probably see it faster in our book, just given our breadth, than you would in the macro stats. I think on the small business side, it is a lot less homogeneous than consumer. As I mentioned, we are in hundreds of industries and through different economic cycles.
Steve Cunningham: There are still industries that are doing very well that you lend to, and there are industries all the time that you are being careful with, even in the best of times. So we have a very structured approach to that industry evaluation. Similar to consumer, we are definitely looking at missed payment rates as indicators where they vary from what we would have expected. We are also trying to get an early read by looking into our electronic bank statement data for net cash flow, the quality of applicants, all of those things that can give you an early read on where there may be stress in certain industries or certain corners of the country.
Steve Cunningham: I think we've spent a lot of time and energy with the team building these capabilities, and I feel like we have a really good idea, as we demonstrated last year, that we know when we need to pull back, when we start to see things that we don't expect. I would tell you right now, it's a very constructive environment, as I highlighted, and we see very stable to improving credit overall across our portfolio, which has supported our ability to continue to grow nicely.
David Scharf: Got it. No, that's very helpful. Then maybe just as a follow-up. On the capital side, I know that your level of buybacks is covenant-constrained or covenant-defined. But taking a step back, if we sort of suspended reality and ignored your senior note covenants for a moment, how do you think about the target ROE of the business and whether there's a natural ceiling on it that indicates more capital should be returned? You're kind of operating in the high 20s at this point.
Steve Cunningham: Yeah. I'll start and then Scott can weigh in. But I think the way if you think about leverage being a pretty important factor, our capital ratio is a pretty important factor in that equation as well. We have a unit economics approach that's ROE-driven. We've been over 25% ROE for a long period of time with very healthy tangible capital. I think we look at the buyback as an opportunity to manage both leverage and to manage opportunism to support valuation. I'd say right now, our tangible capital position is pretty healthy. We've got some room to tighten that down a bit, in addition to the fact that our ROEs are growing or are about the same or maybe a touch higher than our growth rate, which gives you some excess capital to return as well.
Steve Cunningham: I think it's a combination of how all those things work together. But I would tell you within those covenant constraints, we are very well positioned to opportunistically buy. As Scott pointed out in his comments, we've already in the month of October matched what we did in Q3. We intend to be opportunistic, particularly at these valuation levels, to support the value of the company and while maintaining appropriate leverage and supporting our cash flow as well.
David Scharf: Got it. Thank you.
Operator: The next question is from Kyle Joseph with Stephens. Please go ahead.
Kyle Joseph: Hey, good afternoon, Steve and Scott. Thanks for taking my questions. Most of them have been answered, but just want to get your thoughts on NIM, as we think about the mix shift in terms of asset yields and any sort of shifts or anything you'd highlight there. On the cost of funds side, obviously, we know what rates have done, but I think Scott highlighted some good execution on the ABS front, so any incremental color you can provide us there. Thank you.
Scott Cornelis: Yeah, I think on the NIM front, we talked about our stable net revenue margin. We've seen the performance, and so I think there's no real change in what we'd expect from our NIM on both consumer or small business. On the cost of funds, yeah, we had some nice execution on that ABS deal that I mentioned, and our credit spreads continue to tighten. Seemingly every transaction we do, which is a great testament to the performance of the underlying assets. But the market interest rates are backing up a little bit. But I think the spreads kind of counteract that. So we expect a pretty stable cost of funds as we move forward.
Steve Cunningham: Kyle-
Kyle Joseph: Got it. Go ahead.
Steve Cunningham: I would just add on too, just a reminder on that net revenue margin front. The consumer side of things has been a bit elevated. Scott highlighted in his comments that as we get settled back in with the, I will call them the lapse, right? We have been growing that portfolio nicely against some comparables from last year. As we start to settle back in where the new vintages start to become sort of a similar size that we have seen in the past relative to the back book, you would expect that that net revenue margin will be around 50% again. Today, we are overachieving that, but our outlook assumes that we continue to see that net revenue margin, in particular for consumer, to get back into that normal 50%-ish range from where it has been over the past couple of quarters.
Kyle Joseph: Got it. Just in terms of the marketing guidance, obviously it has come in higher than that the last few quarters. I think that is directly attributable to better originations, which is obviously not a bad thing. Just as we are thinking about that, should we think about that as kind of a baseline? If there is more opportunities out there, that will be higher, but obviously, that is kind of a net positive?
Steve Cunningham: Yeah, I think that is why we have said around 20% for a long time. Not that long ago, we were getting questions as to why we were consistently below 20%. We have been a little above 20%, with again, as we have talked about in the past, we are not leaning into marketing. It is really like that marketing is supporting our ability to meet that demand in the marketplace. So when we say around 20%, it is plus or minus, right? I think we are operating within that range that we would expect when we say around 20%. Obviously, it depends on the macro environment and consumer demand, as we have talked about in the past. But that is probably the best way to think about it going forward.
Kyle Joseph: Got it. Sorry for the damned if you do, damned if you don't question. Thanks.
Operator: This concludes our question and answer session. I would like to turn the conference back over to Steve Cunningham for any closing remarks.
Steve Cunningham: We thank you all for joining our call today, and we look forward to updating you again next quarter. Have a good night.
Operator: The conference is now concluded. Thank you for attending today's presentation. You may now disconnect.
