Back to News
Market Impact: 0.85

‘Go get your own oil’: Trump’s message to allies who haven’t backed war in Iran

Geopolitics & WarEnergy Markets & PricesCommodities & Raw MaterialsInflationInfrastructure & DefenseTrade Policy & Supply Chain

Brent crude is trading around $107/bbl (up >45% since Feb. 28) and U.S. average gasoline has topped $4/gal as Iran-linked hostilities and closure of the Strait of Hormuz disrupt global oil and gas supply. The conflict has reportedly caused >3,000 deaths and included strikes on energy infrastructure (e.g., a Kuwaiti tanker), prompting U.S. threats to expand strikes (Kharg Island, desalination plants) and allied basing/airspace restrictions. Expect sustained oil price volatility, upward inflationary pressure on transport and consumer goods, and a broad risk-off bias—recommend reviewing energy exposures and implementing hedges for commodity and inflation risk.

Analysis

The immediate market mechanics are dominated by logistics and risk premia rather than crude fundamentals: higher voyage times, contingency routing and rising war-risk insurance multiply effective delivered costs for refiners and end-users (order-of-magnitude: tens of percent on freight and insurance bills), compressing refinery crack spreads for facilities dependent on seaborne Gulf grades. That dynamic benefits asset-light owners of tankers and storage (they capture day-rate and utilization upside) and operators who can flex production quickly; it penalizes integrated midstream and refiners sitting on narrow feedstock flexibility. Second-order winners include defense contractors and regional security integrators due to accelerated basing, overflight and munitions logistics demands, and reinsurers who will reprice political-risk layers; losers beyond airlines are consumer cyclicals and trade-exposed manufacturers facing input-cost passthrough and margin pressure. Time horizons diverge: expect sharp P&L effects in days-weeks from logistics and insurance repricing, a supply response from flexible onshore producers in 2–6 months, and structural capex/reshoring moves over multiple years that change regional trade flows. Tail risks skew to the downside for risk assets if the conflict widens — a ground incursion or simultaneous disruption of additional choke points would materially raise the probability of stagflation and trigger central bank policy confusion. Conversely, two catalysts could unwind the move within 60–120 days: discrete diplomatic backchannels combined with coordinated strategic reserve releases, or a rapid and sustained ramp from high-cost but flexible producers that erodes the premium. A contrarian read is that options and forward curves are already pricing prolonged dysfunction; realized supply elasticity historically curtails multi-quarter price elevation once price signals exceed the breakeven for incremental non-Gulf barrels. That argues for structures that own convex upside to geopolitically driven spikes while monetizing elevated implied volatility rather than naked directional exposure.