Back to News
Market Impact: 0.3

Billionaire Bill Ackman May Be the Next Warren Buffett -- 2 AI Stocks Make Up 39% of His Portfolio (Hint: One Just Partnered With Nvidia)

BRK.BHHHGOOGLGOOGUBERMORNMETAWRDNVDA
Artificial IntelligenceTechnology & InnovationCorporate EarningsCompany FundamentalsAnalyst EstimatesInvestor Sentiment & PositioningTransportation & LogisticsAutomotive & EV
Billionaire Bill Ackman May Be the Next Warren Buffett -- 2 AI Stocks Make Up 39% of His Portfolio (Hint: One Just Partnered With Nvidia)

Bill Ackman is positioning Howard Hughes Holdings as a 'modern Berkshire' with 39% of Pershing Square's Q3 portfolio concentrated in two AI-exposed names: 19% in Alphabet and 20% in Uber. Alphabet is leveraging AI across Search and Cloud with TPUs and the Gemini family, and street estimates expect EPS growth of ~16% annually over the next three years at a ~32x multiple; Google Cloud revenue has accelerated. Uber, the largest global rideshare and delivery platform, is monetizing consumer data and pursuing autonomous-vehicle partnerships (Waymo, WeRide, Nvidia) with a 100,000-robotaxi ambition by 2027; analysts forecast ~31% annual earnings growth and an ~11x earnings multiple. The piece frames both stocks as attractive growth opportunities supported by AI adoption and strategic partnerships, relevant for allocators weighing concentrated, conviction positions.

Analysis

Market structure: The immediate winners are Alphabet (GOOGL) and platform-native cloud/AI infrastructure suppliers (NVDA, Google Cloud/TPUs) and marketplaces that can monetize multi-service apps (UBER). Losers are ad-dependent pure-plays and smaller clouds that lack custom silicon — expect 5–15% reallocation of incremental ad dollars toward AI-enabled search/cloud over 12–24 months, shifting pricing power to firms owning both models and distribution. Risk assessment: Tail risks include an antitrust break-up or heavy fines against Alphabet, a high-profile AV safety incident that delays commercialization, or a chip supply shock that raises AI infra costs; each could produce 20–40% downside to affected names. Near-term (days–weeks) risk is sentiment/earnings; medium-term (3–12 months) hinges on Cloud AI revenue cadence; long-term (2–5 years) on AV monetization and ad query resilience. Trade implications: Construct directional and relative-value exposure: long GOOGL for infra + ad resilience and long UBER for network effects/AV optionality, but size positions to reflect execution risk (smaller for GOOGL at rich 32x forward PE). Use options to express convexity (12–24 month LEAP calls on UBER; hedged call-spreads on GOOGL) and rotate into AI infra stocks on pullbacks of 8–15%. Contrarian angles: Consensus underestimates two risks — generative-AI reducing raw search query volumes and AV commercialization slipping past 2027 expectations; these could compress multiples (GOOGL -20% from current level if queries fall 10–15%; UBER earnings could miss by >30% if robotaxi rollout lags). Also watch for commoditization of chips (TPU externalization) which would paradoxically pressure cloud margins despite broader AI adoption.