Form 144 MONOLITHIC POWER SYSTEMS For: 6 April

This is a generic risk disclosure stating trading financial instruments and cryptocurrencies involves high risk, including the potential loss of some or all invested capital and increased risk when trading on margin. It warns crypto prices are extremely volatile and may be affected by external financial, regulatory or political events, and that Fusion Media's data may not be real-time or accurate. The disclosure limits Fusion Media's liability, restricts reuse of the site's data, and advises investors to fully consider objectives, experience and to seek professional advice.

Analysis

Regulatory tightening and elevated risk disclosures increase the probability of a multi-month rotation from unregulated crypto native venues into regulated intermediaries and legacy financial rails. That rotation concentrates fee pools: traded-not-held exchange commissions, custody fees and institutional staking revenues become stickier revenue lines even if spot crypto volumes decline 20-40% for a 3-6 month shock.

A second-order effect is liquidity migration: as correspondent banking and on-ramp counterparty risk rises, OTC desks and regulated exchanges will internalize flow, widening bid/ask spreads on smaller tokens while compressing spreads on top-of-book BTC/ETH pairs. Market makers will demand higher compensation for tail events, raising implied vol and option premium across the curve — a persistent source of revenue for vol sellers but an immediate cost for flow-focused peers.

Tail risks cluster around two binary outcomes: (1) targeted enforcement actions against large CeFi lenders/exchanges within days-weeks that trigger runs and contagion, and (2) constructive legislation over 6-18 months that franchises regulated custodians and payment processors. The former creates acute funding squeezes and valuation haircuts of 30-70% for leverage-heavy players; the latter re-rates regulated custodians by 20-40% on durable revenue growth assumptions.

Consensus is focused on downside headlines; the underappreciated outcome is consolidation-led margin expansion for compliant intermediaries. If regulators force migration rather than elimination of crypto activity, incumbents with banking relationships and audited custody could capture 50-70% of trading/custody flows within 12-24 months, providing a multi-year durable earnings uplift despite near-term volatility.

Key Decisions for Investors

• Initiate a 9-18 month overweight in COIN (Coinbase) via a buy-write or long-call-spread to capture fee/custody re-rating: buy COIN 12-month 30-50% OTM call spread (size 1-2% NAV). Hedge with a 20% notional purchase of 1-yr protective puts if enforcement headlines surface; target asymmetric upside 2:1 vs downside capped loss of premium.
• Pair trade: Long COIN / Short MSTR (MicroStrategy) for 6-12 months — COIN benefits from custody/fees while MSTR is pure BTC beta. Size 2:1 by dollar exposure (COIN larger); set stop-loss at 25% adverse move on the pair and take profit if divergence >40% in relative performance.
• Volatility trade: Buy 1-3 month BTC/ETH straddles (via BITO options or direct exchange options depending on dealer access) ahead of key regulatory dates or committee hearings to monetize expected IV spikes. Keep tenor short (30-90 days) and roll if IV normalizes; allocate <1% NAV per event.
• Credit/fintech hedge: Long BNY Mellon (BK) or a major custodian bank on 12-24 month horizon to capture custody flows and settlement fees. Consider a collar (long equity + sell near-term calls) to finance downside protection; target 20-35% upside with limited drawdown of ~15%.
• Liquidity contingent: Maintain a nimble crisis bucket (cash + inverse crypto ETFs or delta-hedged short futures exposure) sized 1-3% NAV to deploy into distressed CeFi/DeFi asset sales post-enforcement; re-risk into regulated custodial equities if consolidation opportunities materialize.