Back to News
Market Impact: 0.6

International Stocks Smacked the S&P 500 by About 15 Points Last Year, And One ETF Rode The Boom Higher | GSPC

TSMASML
Currency & FXFiscal Policy & BudgetMarket Technicals & FlowsInvestor Sentiment & PositioningCompany FundamentalsEmerging MarketsCapital Returns (Dividends / Buybacks)

International equities returned ~32% in 2025 versus the S&P 500's ~18% (≈14 percentage-point gap), driven by USD weakness, European fiscal stimulus, and a large valuation gap. VXUS trades at a P/E of 16.21 versus the S&P ~29, has ~$636bn AUM and a 0.05% expense ratio (closed $77.31 on Mar 24, YTD +2.48%); VYMI has a P/E of 13.39, 3.28% yield, 0.07% expense ratio (closed $93.54 on Mar 24, YTD +3.93%, 1yr +28%). Large ETF inflows (> $220bn in 2025 and ≈$250bn in the first six weeks of 2026) and Vanguard's 5–7% ex-US return projection underpin a constructive case for increased international allocation.

Analysis

The 2025 international rally looks less like a one-off and more like a regime shift driven by FX dynamics, policy-driven earnings catch-up, and a large valuation differential that forced reallocation. Passive ETF flows amplified local rallies — when hundreds of billions move into broad international wrappers they mechanically bid small- and mid-cap liquidity, compress cross-sectional volatility, and increase regional correlation, which benefits diversified funds but raises crowding risk in the most owned names. Winners will be those exposed to structural capex and trade reorientation: semiconductor equipment and foundry beneficiaries (the supply-chain nodes that set industry capacity) should capture outsized cash flow from an international capex uptick, while financials and energy in regions with rising term premia will outperform rate-sensitive long-duration tech if curves steepen. Second-order beneficiaries include EM commodity exporters and logistics providers that re-route trade toward regions receiving fiscal stimulus, and semiconductor capital-intensity will widen moat economics for incumbents with equipment scarcity. Key risks are a USD snapback, a policy implementation failure (fiscal promises delayed or sterilized), and crowding-driven reversals when passive flows slow; any of those can wipe 8–15% off international ETFs within weeks. Time horizons matter: currency and flows move fast (days–weeks), earnings re-rating plays out over quarters, and structural reallocation versus US growth is a multi-year trade that depends on persistent earnings convergence and capex follow-through. The consensus understates liquidity fragility — the rally is flow-heavy and concentrated in a handful of names and sectors; if tech earnings surprise positively, the valuation gap can widen again, muting international upside. That argues for a core exposure plus targeted, hedged alpha rather than an all-in shift away from US growth.