Back to News
Market Impact: 0.3

Who controls the internet — and has the power to turn it off?

MSFTCRWDAMZNGOOGL
Technology & InnovationCybersecurity & Data PrivacyGeopolitics & WarRegulation & LegislationSanctions & Export ControlsInfrastructure & DefenseEmerging MarketsTrade Policy & Supply Chain
Who controls the internet — and has the power to turn it off?

Widespread government-driven internet shutdowns and the rise of national intranets are creating durable economic and geopolitical risks: AccessNow logged nearly 300 shutdowns in 54 countries in 2024, NetBlocks and other monitors counted 17 national blackouts of a week or more since 2019, and Iran’s recent blackout blocked roughly 99% of web traffic and entered its 24th day while relying on a $6bn National Information Network to preserve essential services. Historic examples show material economic costs (Egypt’s five-day 2011 blackout cost an estimated $90m), and the article highlights growing policy responses — from EU push for European cloud sovereignty to UK legal powers to restrict networks — that could reshape demand for cloud, telecom, defense and censorship-evasion technologies. Hedge funds should monitor demand shifts for cloud and telecom resilience, defence/electronic-warfare suppliers, and regulatory-driven reshoring initiatives that could reallocate capex and create winners and losers in infrastructure and cloud services.

Analysis

Market structure: Internet sovereignty accelerates demand for on‑premises, sovereign cloud and local data‑centres while compressing addressable market for US hyperscalers in sensitive regions. Expect 5–15% market share shift in EU/EM cloud spend toward local or hybrid suppliers over 2–4 years; cybersecurity vendors lose telemetry-driven upsell during blackouts, compressing near‑term ARR growth by single‑digit percentages in affected markets. Risk assessment: Tail risks include government seizures of local infra, extraterritorial sanctions forcing abrupt service withdrawal, or large-scale BGP/DNS manipulation causing multiweek outages — these can hit revenue recognition and drive credit spread widening for affected tech issuers within days to weeks. Hidden dependencies: critical services (payments, healthcare) riding public cloud create systemic operational risk; catalysts to accelerate change are EU/UK sovereign cloud legislation and another high‑profile outage within 30–180 days. Trade implications: Tactical shorts on names most exposed to regulatory decoupling (MSFT, CRWD) and longs in data‑centre/sovereign cloud plays and defense/telecom infrastructure are warranted. Implement 1–3% portfolio-sized directional positions: buy selective data‑centre REITs/telecom infra and defense suppliers over 3–24 months, hedge with 3‑6 month put spreads on MSFT/CRWD; rotate 3–5% from high‑multiple growth tech into infrastructure/value over next 6 months. Contrarian angles: Consensus treats hyperscalers as only losers — they also sell sovereign/hybrid solutions and will capture some reshoring capex, so outright permanent shorts may be overdone. Historical parallels (telecom nationalisation, post‑9/11 security spend) show initial volatility followed by consolidated winners; pursue relative value (long EM local cloud suppliers vs short hyperscalers) with event triggers rather than blind directional bets.