Back to News
Market Impact: 0.35

Better AI Software Stock: Figma vs. Adobe

FIGADBEGSNFLXNVDANDAQ
Artificial IntelligenceTechnology & InnovationProduct LaunchesCorporate EarningsCompany FundamentalsIPOs & SPACsAntitrust & CompetitionM&A & Restructuring
Better AI Software Stock: Figma vs. Adobe

Adobe has folded AI into its stack (Firefly plus integrations with 25+ models), driving a 15% YoY rise in monthly active users in FY2025 and record fiscal Q4 revenue of $6.2 billion (from $5.6 billion) with net income of $1.9 billion (vs. $1.7 billion). Figma, newly public, is embedding AI via Figma Make, the Weavy acquisition and a ChatGPT partnership, producing Q3 revenue of $274.2 million (+38% YoY) but a $1.1 billion net loss largely from IPO-related stock-based compensation; 30% of customers with ≥$100k ARR use Figma Make weekly. Given Adobe's stronger profitability, large-account booking growth (>25% YoY in $10M+ ARR customers) and a materially lower price-to-sales multiple than Figma, the piece argues Adobe is the more attractively valued and fundamentally resilient software investment despite AI disruption risks.

Analysis

Market structure: Incumbent platform owners with enterprise contracts and proprietary training data (ADBE) are the primary near-term winners; they can package AI as a sticky value-add and upsell larger ARR customers (Adobe reported >25% YoY growth in >$10M ARR customers). Fast-growth pure-play design SaaS (FIG) benefits from viral developer & API channels (OpenAI tie‑ins) but faces higher valuation risk as generative models commoditize point tools. Cross-asset: stronger large-cap software earnings tighten IG spreads and lower skew in ADBE options while keeping FIG implied vol elevated; GPU/semiconductor names (NVDA) remain a positive lever for compute scarcity and margin pressure on smaller AI incumbents. Risk assessment: Key tail risks are regulatory (EU/US suits over model training/copyright within 3–18 months), antitrust (resurgence of merger scrutiny), and margin squeeze from rising compute costs (NVDA pricing) that could compress software gross margins by 200–500bps over 12–24 months. Short-term (days–weeks) moves will be earnings/feature-driven; medium-term (3–12 months) depends on enterprise renewals and ARR expansion; long-term (1–3 years) hinges on who owns customer workflows+data. Hidden dependency: reliance on third‑party models (OpenAI) and on-prem/cloud GPU supply chains are single points of failure for product road maps. Trade implications: Favor capital-efficient, asymmetric exposure: bias long ADBE (durable cashflows, cheaper P/S) and short FIG on relative valuation; express via dollar-neutral pair trades or ADBE call spreads versus FIG short-dated puts if FIG vol is rich. Size positions to risk: initiate 2–4% net long ADBE exposure, 1–2% short FIG or equivalent notional, hold 6–12 months, trim on +20% move. Use 12–18 month call spreads on ADBE to capture re-rating while selling near-term FIG calls to harvest vol. Contrarian angle: Consensus underestimates the pace at which enterprise procurement votes; Adobe’s enterprise tenures and $1M+ bookings create higher switching friction than retail AI demos suggest — the market may be over-penalizing ADBE. Conversely, Figma’s premium P/S assumes rapid margin expansion and profitable scale; if stock-based comp or customer churn persists, downside could be 30–50% from current levels. Historical parallel: incumbent re‑rating after platform AI upgrades (Microsoft in cloud era) — winners were those who monetized enterprise workflows, not the flashiest apps. Unintended consequence: regulatory action that limits model training sets would advantage companies with licensed/owned assets (ADBE) and punish open‑data reliant players (some FIG workflows).