Back to News
Market Impact: 0.68

Jerome Powell Just Threw President Donald Trump Under the Bus One Last Time Before His Term as Fed Chair Ends

NVDAINTC
Monetary PolicyInterest Rates & YieldsInflationEconomic DataTax & TariffsGeopolitics & WarElections & Domestic Politics
Jerome Powell Just Threw President Donald Trump Under the Bus One Last Time Before His Term as Fed Chair Ends

Powell’s final FOMC meeting as Fed chair reaffirmed that policy will remain data-dependent, with core PCE inflation at 3.2% year over year in March, still above the Fed’s 2% target. He explicitly said the elevated reading largely reflects tariffs in the goods sector, while also flagging Middle East conflict as a source of uncertainty. The remarks reinforce a cautious, hawkish outlook for rate cuts and keep pressure on equities, Treasuries, and rate-sensitive assets.

Analysis

The immediate market implication is not higher rates per se, but a longer-for-higher terminal path than consensus had priced. If tariff pass-through keeps core inflation sticky into the summer, the Fed’s reaction function becomes data-proof rather than politically flexible, which supports a firmer front end and keeps rate-sensitive multiples under pressure. That is a headwind for semis in the short run because they trade more on discount-rate duration than on near-term operating leverage, even though both NVDA and INTC have only modest direct sensitivity to this specific policy setup. Second-order, the real loser is the cyclical borrowing complex: levered capex, M&A-heavy software, and industrials that were hoping for cheaper financing into H2. A higher-for-longer regime also tightens the squeeze on corporate buybacks funded with debt, which can remove an important bid from large-cap equities if credit spreads widen even modestly. The geopolitical overlay matters because an Iran shock would complicate the disinflation narrative and delay any dovish pivot, making equity leadership more defensive and less reliant on multiple expansion. The contrarian setup is that the market may already be discounting a modestly restrictive Fed while underestimating how much of the inflation problem is actually fiscal/trade-driven and therefore not solvable by a leadership change at the Fed. If the incoming chair is perceived as more politically exposed, term premium could steepen even if cuts eventually arrive, meaning long-duration assets may not benefit as much as headline rate expectations suggest. For NVDA and INTC, that argues for treating any post-transition rally as a re-rating event to fade unless there is clear evidence that tariffs are rolled back or supply-chain pricing normalizes.