Back to News
Market Impact: 0.12

As public servants lose their jobs, where's the work in Ottawa?

Fiscal Policy & BudgetEconomic DataTax & TariffsInfrastructure & DefenseTechnology & InnovationPrivate Markets & VentureTrade Policy & Supply Chain
As public servants lose their jobs, where's the work in Ottawa?

The federal government is trimming the public service — targeting nearly 40,000 fewer employees from a 2023-24 peak of 368,000 — and more than 10,000 public servants were recently notified their jobs may be affected, contributing to Ottawa-Gatineau's unemployment rising to roughly 7% from 3–4% in 2022. Economists characterize the local labour market as soft and sluggish with knock-on effects downtown, though pockets of demand persist in health care, professional/scientific/technical services, and notably defence and tech, where increased military investment and venture capital flows are expected to cushion job losses. Policymakers and business groups are calling for a transparent transition strategy to manage the regional impact.

Analysis

Market structure: Ottawa public‑service cuts create a narrowing winners pool: defence contractors, defence‑tech startups, and healthcare providers that supply public programs. Expect local service providers, downtown retail and office landlords to lose demand; negative GDP impulse concentrated in Q2–Q4 2025 if attrition accelerates. Pricing power shifts toward firms tied to NATO/defence budgets (higher margin, backlog visibility) and away from commercial real‑estate landlords servicing government tenants. Risk assessment: Tail risks include a deeper federal hiring freeze or cancelled procurement (low probability, high impact) that would remove the defence upside and amplify downtown vacancies; an escalation of U.S. tariffs could transmit additional job losses into Ontario and push unemployment >8% regionally within 3–6 months. Hidden dependencies: venture capital inflows to Ottawa tech are sensitive to provincial incentives, IP-transfer policies and a handful of anchor deals; absence of a transparent transition plan raises consumption downside. Catalysts: federal budget/procurement announcements and NATO spending timelines (next 3–12 months) will materially reprice exposures. Trade implications: Direct plays favor long aerospace/defence equities and ETFs (capture multi‑year NATO-driven spending ramp) and short downtown/office REITs and local retail names (6–18 month horizon). Preferred option structures are 6–12 month call spreads on defence names to limit premium decay while capturing procurement catalysts; short duration corporate bonds of exposed landlords for quick decays. Rebalance toward health-care services and professional/technical services sectors that show hiring resilience in the next 3–9 months. Contrarian angles: Consensus understates that net federal spending rises (defence+tech) even as headcount falls—this favors capital‑equipment and software vendors over employment‑heavy service contractors. The market may be overdiscounting tech upside (underowned private exits pending) and overpricing permanent downtown office impairment; if hiring freeze lifts within 6 months, office REITs could retrace sharply. Historical parallel: 2010–2012 Canadian defence spend cycles show 18–24 month lags between commitments and hiring—trade timing should reflect that lag.