Back to News
Market Impact: 0.7

Jim Cramer says you can still find stocks to buy on tough days in the market

NVDA
Artificial IntelligenceTechnology & InnovationCompany FundamentalsCorporate EarningsProduct LaunchesAnalyst InsightsEnergy Markets & PricesInflation
Jim Cramer says you can still find stocks to buy on tough days in the market

The Dow fell over 750 points (−1.6%) as oil spikes and a hot February wholesale inflation report pushed the S&P 500 down 1.36% and the Nasdaq down 1.46%. Fed Chair Powell said inflation did not slow as much as hoped but downplayed 1970s-style stagflation, adding to market uncertainty. Jim Cramer recommended buying Nvidia, citing new product launches at GTC (new inference chip) and bullish guidance/expectations — Cantor Fitzgerald projects $15 EPS in 2027 (~12x 2027 EPS vs S&P at 18x) — while warning the stock is over-owned and near-term pressures from oil and Fed policy could weigh on shares.

Analysis

High ownership concentration has created a convexity mismatch: price moves are amplified by ETF/rebalance flows and retail gamma positioning, so headline macro shocks (oil, inflation prints) can push NVDA materially off fair-value for days even if fundamentals are intact. That creates tactical buying windows where conviction in secular AI demand can be purchased at better entry prices, but also increases the chance of fast, liquidity-driven reversals within intraday to multi-week timeframes. On the supply side, any meaningful acceleration in inference volume will stress foundry node allocation, HBM channel capacity, and high-voltage power delivery components over the next 6–18 months; beneficiaries are higher-end foundries and equipment suppliers (node capacity owners and lithography manufacturers), plus memory vendors with HBM roadmaps. Conversely, hyperscalers with custom silicon and vertically integrated stacks have leverage to slow Nvidia’s ASP expansion by pushing for alternative architectures or on-prem custom chips if economics deteriorate. Key reversal catalysts span time horizons: days — macro prints and repositioning by large passive funds; months — order flow visibility from hyperscalers and supply-chain data points (foundry utilization, HBM allocations); years — software portability and competitor silicon maturity that could compress long-term pricing power. Export controls and geopolitical risk are asymmetric tail risks that would truncate TAM in affected regions and re-rate multiples sharply. Given current structural positioning, the attractive risk/return is asymmetric only for size-constrained allocations: a small, delta-weighted exposure captures secular upside while limiting drawdown from macro shocks. Hedgeable implementations that monetize the illiquidity premium in NVDA's options market or rotate exposure to suppliers (foundry, lithography, memory) offer cleaner risk profiles if one expects a multi-quarter ramp rather than an immediate multiple expansion.