
Analyst moves were mixed across AI and semis, with Bernstein raising SanDisk’s target to $1,250 from $1,000 and outlining a $3,000 blue-sky case on strong NAND pricing and FY2027 EPS of $224. Stifel upgraded Texas Instruments to Buy with a $250 target on improving free cash flow, while UBS cut ServiceNow to Neutral and Guggenheim downgraded GitLab to Neutral on AI disruption and budget pressure. Guggenheim also upgraded Datadog to Buy, forecasting 27% 2026 revenue growth to $4.36B, helped by Anthropic and broader AI-native demand.
The clearest second-order read is that AI infrastructure spend is now becoming a redistribution game inside software and semis, not just an incremental growth story. Datadog and Texas Instruments look like beneficiaries of AI capex intensity rising faster than general IT budgets, while ServiceNow and GitLab are the canaries for where that budget is coming from: workflow and developer seats are the easiest line items to pressure when CFOs need funding for model training, inference, and power/compute. That makes the current market reaction less about near-term beats/misses and more about which vendors can prove they are attached to non-optional infrastructure rather than discretionary software usage. On the semiconductor side, SanDisk’s setup suggests the market is still underpricing the duration of the NAND cycle, but the real opportunity may be in the read-through to the broader storage/power chain rather than the single name. If memory pricing stays firm into mid-year, expect contract renegotiations and capex discipline across adjacent suppliers, which can extend margins for the group even if unit growth normalizes. Texas Instruments is interesting because AI data center buildout creates a bottleneck in power management before it becomes visible in revenue; that usually gives the analog complex a lagged but more durable earnings uplift than the headline AI GPU names. The contrarian risk is that the market is currently treating AI spend as structurally secular, while end customers may still force a budget reallocation cycle in the next 2-4 quarters. That is the key asymmetry: infrastructure names can keep compounding even if application software multiple compression continues, because the winners are selling capacity-constrained inputs; the losers are selling seats and workflow layers that can be partially substituted by agentic tools. If that narrative hardens, ServiceNow and GitLab could see multiple and estimate compression well before revenue growth breaks, making them cleaner shorts than the broader software index.
AI-powered research, real-time alerts, and portfolio analytics for institutional investors.
Request a DemoOverall Sentiment
neutral
Sentiment Score
0.10
Ticker Sentiment