Back to News
Market Impact: 0.35

Here's Everything Investors Need to Know About the Rising Popularity of Tokenized Gold

COINNFLXNVDANDAQ
Commodities & Raw MaterialsCrypto & Digital AssetsFintechInflationFiscal Policy & BudgetGeopolitics & WarCurrency & FXInvestor Sentiment & Positioning
Here's Everything Investors Need to Know About the Rising Popularity of Tokenized Gold

Gold has surged above $5,000 per ounce and is up roughly 172% over the past five years, while tokenized gold trading reached $178 billion in 2025—exceeding the SPDR Gold Shares' $165 billion in AUM—driven by growth in gold-backed stablecoins like Tether Gold and Paxos Gold available on major platforms. The rally is attributed to geopolitical tensions, elevated inflation and mounting U.S. fiscal stress (U.S. debt > $38 trillion and a near $1.8 trillion FY2025 deficit), prompting the view that a 5–10% allocation to gold can serve as an inflation and currency hedge.

Analysis

Market structure: Tokenized gold (PAXG, XAUT) and trading platforms (Coinbase/COIN, custody firms) are direct winners as they lower transaction friction and can siphon AUM/flow from ETFs (GLD/IAU) and physical vault providers, pressuring ETF fees and creating two liquidity pools (on‑chain vs OTC). Expect price discovery fragmentation (on‑chain spot vs LBMA) and tighter intraday spreads but higher out‑of‑hours basis risk; token turnover of $178B in 2025 vs GLD $165B signals substantial shift in retail/institutional routing over 12–36 months. Risk assessment: Key tail risks are regulatory intervention (stablecoin reserve/attestation mandates), custody/hacking losses, and forced redemptions that could create acute dislocations between tokenized gold and physical spot (days–weeks). Near term (0–3 months) volatility spikes around macro/geopolitical events; medium term (3–12 months) depends on audit/regulatory outcomes; long term (12–36 months) hinges on central bank behavior and dollar trajectory. Hidden dependency: many token models rely on off‑chain custodian liquidity and prime-broker credit lines that can seize up under stress. Trade implications: Direct play — favor allocated physical ETPs (PHYS/IAU) for core 3–5% allocation and keep 1–2% as tokenized exposure (PAXG via regulated venues) for settlement/FX efficiency. Tactical pair — long GLD/short long‑duration Treasuries (TLT) via 6–9 month 5–7% OTM TLT puts to express inflation/real rate risk. Allocate 0.5–1% long COIN to capture trading fees but size small given regulatory uncertainty; add on confirmed audit/reserve transparency within 60–90 days. Contrarian angles: Consensus understates regulatory and custody fragility — $178B turnover is not the same as fully reserved, audited AUM and could unwind quickly under a run; 2011 gold peak shows rapid mean reversion is possible if real yields rise. Mispricing risk: token growth may already be priced into COIN multiples and fee compression could make GLD/ETP returns lag. Unintended consequence: concentrated on‑chain redemptions could spike physical lease rates and temporarily decouple spot from token prices, creating arbitrage opportunities.