Back to News
Market Impact: 0.6

‘Crypto winter’: Why is Bitcoin crashing despite Trump’s support?

DB
Crypto & Digital AssetsMarket Technicals & FlowsInvestor Sentiment & PositioningRegulation & LegislationElections & Domestic PoliticsCommodities & Raw MaterialsMonetary PolicyInterest Rates & Yields

Bitcoin has plunged from an October peak above $127,000 to trade below $66,000 this week (around $62,900 Friday), and is roughly 30% lower year-to-date after sliding below $80,000 in late January; Ether fell ~19% this week to $1,854. Analysts attribute the sell-off to reversing institutional demand—US spot Bitcoin ETFs saw outflows of more than $3bn in January following ~$7bn and $2bn in November and December 2025—lower liquidity and fading hype, plus spillovers from volatile gold and silver prices and macro developments such as the Fed rate decision and the appointment of a new Fed Chair. Despite Trump-era pro-crypto policy moves (proposed strategic reserve, draft regulatory framework and a presidential family-linked stablecoin), external market flows and sentiment have driven the downturn, with some market participants characterizing this as a “crypto winter” likely to persist months but potentially followed by a rebound.

Analysis

Market structure: The move from frothy retail/institutional accumulation (peak BTC >$127k in Oct 2025) to sustained ETF outflows (>$3bn in Jan, prior months $7bn/$2bn) signals a liquidity-driven price regime shift — lower depth means 5–15% intraday moves become routine. Winners in the near term are cash-rich macro allocators, gold miners (GDX), and short-volatility desks; losers are spot-BTC providers, crypto-native lenders, and exchange operators (COIN revenue sensitivity to volumes). Competitive dynamics favor regulated, custody-backed products (spot ETFs) that can scale but only if flows reverse. Risk assessment: Tail risks include aggressive US regulatory tightening (clarified jurisdiction but punitive rules) or a major exchange/prime custodian insolvency; either could wipe >30–60% from nominal BTC prices in a shock scenario. Immediate (days) risk is liquidity gaps and vol spikes; short-term (weeks–months) depends on ETF flow momentum and Fed/Warsh rate signaling; long-term (quarters–years) pivots on legislation passage and institutional adoption. Hidden dependencies: BTC prices are now tightly coupled to macro FX/real rates and precious metals flows; sustained USD strength or risk aversion will pressure BTC. Trade implications: Tactical hedges and size-controlled opportunistic longs are optimal. If ETF outflows continue >$2bn/month expect another 20–35% downside into 45–55k; conversely, resolution of regulatory ambiguity or a dovish Fed pivot could trigger rapid 30–50% rebounds. Use options to define risk (asymmetric structures) and favor exchange equities hedged by spot ETF shorts for carry. Rotate 1–3% portfolio from high-beta tech into gold miners and cash during this winter. Contrarian angles: Consensus underestimates stickiness of institutional rotation — price already discounts a slow adoption path; downside may be overdone if Warsh signals a growth-friendly stance or USD weakens. Historical parallels: 2018 and 2022 winters recovered after ~12–18 months once liquidity returned — target-duration for mean reversion is 6–12 months, not weeks. Unintended consequence: policy support (Trump strategic reserve) could create a cliff if political conflicts or conflicts of interest (WLFI) trigger credibility loss, amplifying volatility.