Back to News
Market Impact: 0.5

Marriott Issues 2026 Guidance

MARNDAQ
Corporate EarningsCorporate Guidance & OutlookCapital Returns (Dividends / Buybacks)Travel & LeisureCompany FundamentalsConsumer Demand & RetailMarket Technicals & Flows
Marriott Issues 2026 Guidance

Marriott provided fiscal 2026 guidance calling for worldwide RevPAR growth of 1.5–2.5%, net rooms growth of 4.5–5%, adjusted EBITDA up 8–10% and more than $4.3 billion in capital returns, with full-year adjusted EPS guided to $11.32–$11.57 and Q1 adjusted EPS $2.50–$2.55. In Q4 revenue rose 4.1% to $6.69 billion, adjusted EPS was $2.58 (vs. $2.45 a year ago) while GAAP EPS was $1.65 on $445 million, and shares were up ~2.65% pre-market to $340, reflecting a constructive outlook on profitability and shareholder returns.

Analysis

Market structure: Marriott’s guidance (RevPAR +1.5–2.5%, net rooms +4.5–5%, adj EBITDA +8–10%, >$4.3B capital returns) favors asset-light operators, franchisors, and fee-based managers that scale with room inventory, while high-leverage hotel owners/REITs face margin squeeze as supply growth (~4.5–5% rooms) outpaces demand (~1.5–2.5% RevPAR). Pricing power is modest—single-digit RevPAR growth implies occupancy/ADR pressure and potential intra-chain rate competition, especially in gateway markets. Expect incremental share gains for global brands with strong loyalty programs and corporate bookings, and relative weakness for independent or balance-sheet-heavy owners. Risk assessment: Tail risks include a macro shock (US GDP contraction >1% or 100bp+ hike in unemployment) that could cut RevPAR >5% and impair EBITDA; interest-rate volatility that raises owner financing costs and slows transactions; and event risk (pandemic/geopolitical) hitting group travel. Near-term (days-weeks) risk is earnings/guidance repricing and macro data; medium-term (3–12 months) depends on travel seasonality and rate cycles; long-term (1–3 years) centers on supply pipeline absorption and global corporate travel recovery. Hidden dependency: Marriott’s fee revenue ties to owner economics—owner distress could feed back into franchise growth and renegotiations. Trade implications: Tactical long MAR (ticker MAR) exposure to play fee leverage and buybacks; consider a 2–3% portfolio position, scaling in under $345 with target $380–$400 in 6–9 months and 8% stop-loss. Pair trade: long MAR vs short HST (Host Hotels & Resorts) sized 1:0.6 to express franchisor vs asset-owner divergence; reweight if RevPAR downside >100bps. Options: buy 6–9 month MAR call spread (e.g., Aug–Nov 2026 340/420) to cap downside while capturing upside from EBITDA/share buyback tailwind; alternatively sell a covered 3-month 310–300 put for yield if implied vol > historical by 20%. Contrarian angles: Consensus underestimates owner distress and renegotiation risk—if owner cashflows deteriorate, fee growth could slow even as rooms expand, compressing multiples. The market may be underpricing buyback impact: >$4.3B returns can be EPS-accretive by mid-2026 if leverage stable, supporting multiple expansion — but this is conditional on RevPAR not slipping >200bps. Historical parallel: post-2015 supply waves depressed RevPAR for 12–18 months before consolidation; monitor transaction volume and owner cap rates as early warning signals.