Back to News
Market Impact: 0.25

2 Stocks Down 45% and 37% to Buy Right Now

Artificial IntelligenceTechnology & InnovationConsumer Demand & RetailCompany FundamentalsCorporate EarningsManagement & GovernanceTax & TariffsShort Interest & Activism
2 Stocks Down 45% and 37% to Buy Right Now

Lululemon shares are down ~45% year-over-year amid slowing North American demand, tariff pressure and a CEO transition, yet Q3 revenue rose 7% with Americas down 2% and international up 33% (China +46%, RoW +19%), net income of $306.8M, over $1B cash, zero long-term debt and a forward P/E near 15 versus a historical >30. Zebra Technologies is down ~37% Y/Y but reported Q3 revenue of $1.32B (+~5% YoY) with EVM contributing $865M and AIT $455M; management is pivoting into edge AI and AI-powered applications (e.g., Zebra Companion) with commercialization expected to begin in 2026 while exiting its AMR business. Both names are pitched as buy-the-dip opportunities based on durable fundamentals, international expansion (LULU) and an AI-driven software/hardware transition (ZBRA), but corporate governance changes, competition and execution risk counsel caution for allocators.

Analysis

Market structure: LULU’s pain is concentrated in North American discretionary spend while its international revenue (China +46% Q3, RoW +19%) and fortress balance sheet (>$1bn cash, zero LT debt) preserve pricing power and margins; suppliers of premium fabrics and tariff-exposed inputs are losers as margin leakage could widen ~100–300 bps if tariffs persist. ZBRA benefits from secular enterprise digitization and edge-AI upgrades; exiting AMR reallocates capital to higher-margin software/subscription mix, shifting share toward software-enabled hardware vendors and increasing recurring revenue share. Cross-asset: deeper LULU drawdowns would modestly increase consumer discretionary credit spreads and equity implied volatility (IV up 20–40% vs 30‑day), strengthen USD safe-haven flows short-term, and pressure cotton/textile commodity cyclical names if retail destocking persists.

Risk assessment: Tail risks include activist-driven asset sales or buybacks at suboptimal prices (LULU), a failed AI monetization or chip supply bottleneck at ZBRA delaying revenue beyond 2026, and macro consumer credit stress that knocks NA comps down >10% YoY. Time horizons: days — headline volatility around CEO/activist disclosures; weeks–months — Q4 comps, spring 2026 product refresh; 12–36 months — international expansion and ZBRA AI revenue realization. Hidden dependencies: LULU’s Chinese growth depends on local retail demand and FX; ZBRA’s edge-AI rollout hinges on semiconductor availability and pilot-to-contract conversion rates. Key catalysts: CEO appointment (30–90 days), activist filings, Q4 earnings, and ZBRA’s 2026 commercial AI rollouts.

More News