Back to News
Market Impact: 0.8

Gas prices could soon breach $5 a gallon if Strait of Hormuz remains shut, J.P. Morgan analysts say

Energy Markets & PricesCommodities & Raw MaterialsGeopolitics & WarInflationTrade Policy & Supply ChainTransportation & LogisticsFiscal Policy & BudgetElections & Domestic Politics
Gas prices could soon breach $5 a gallon if Strait of Hormuz remains shut, J.P. Morgan analysts say

Gasoline could top $5.00/gal as soon as late April if the Strait of Hormuz remains closed through mid-April, J.P. Morgan warns; the U.S. average was $4.14/gal, up $1.16 from $2.98 pre-conflict. J.P. Morgan estimates each $0.10/gal rise adds ~$12B to annual gasoline outlays and the current increase, if sustained, could knock roughly $100B off consumers' purchasing power. Ship transits through the strait plunged from ~130/day in February to six/day in March, and recent political escalation from President Trump increases the risk of further supply disruption and higher global oil prices.

Analysis

An extended closure of a key oil chokepoint rents open a multi-node squeeze: refined product logistics (especially gasoline and diesel) become the binding constraint more quickly than crude production does. Rerouting tankers around longer passages, higher voyage times, and war-risk insurance will raise delivered product costs and create regional crack-spread divergence that favors coastal refiners with export flexibility while stranding inland distribution networks. The hit to real household purchasing power is non-linear and front-loaded — higher pump bills compress discretionary budgets in the weeks after a shock and can materially drag retail sales, discretionary autos and leisure spending into the next quarter. That shifts the Fed/market trade-off: headline inflation spikes lift policy uncertainty while resulting demand destruction (via lower consumption and higher transport costs) can reintroduce stagflation risks over ensuing months. Key near-term catalysts to watch are shipping transits, insurance premium moves, coordinated SPR or allied releases, and refinery run-rate changes; any of these can rapidly unwind or exacerbate the move. The consensus binary (spike = sustained pain) understates tactical supply responses — refiners can raise runs and exports, sovereign SPRs can be coordinated, and temporary demand elasticity (shift to transit/telework/short-term rationing) can cap the peak — so scale and timing are the dominant risks to position sizing rather than directional conviction alone.