Back to News
Market Impact: 0.25

LARRY KUDLOW: For the midterms, it’s still early in the game

Elections & Domestic PoliticsEconomic DataInflationFiscal Policy & BudgetTax & TariffsTrade Policy & Supply ChainConsumer Demand & RetailInvestor Sentiment & Positioning
LARRY KUDLOW: For the midterms, it’s still early in the game

Recent economic indicators cited include a combined ISM purchasing managers' index for manufacturing and services at its best level in nearly two years, with a cited productivity boom and wages outstripping inflation. Political data show improving personal financial sentiment in a Harvard CAPS/Harris poll and strong support for restrictive immigration and a platform of lower spending and taxes, while fundraising figures indicate substantial campaign firepower for President Trump—$26 million from his joint fundraising committee in H2 last year, $8 million to his leadership PAC, and a linked super PAC holding more than $300 million (roughly $375 million total). Together these data suggest a constructive macro backdrop and significant political capital that could influence fiscal and trade policy expectations ahead of the midterms.

Analysis

Market structure: A credible narrative of stronger growth (ISM up, wages > inflation) favors cyclicals, small-caps and commodity-exposed names — industrials (XLI), consumer discretionary (XLY), regional banks/financials (XLF) and copper/mining (FCX/COPX) are primary beneficiaries as pricing power and loan growth expectations rise. Defensives and long-duration growth (XLV, XLRE, XLK mega-caps) are the losers as discount rates and real yields rise; expect 3–6 month relative outperformance of cyclical baskets by mid-to-high single digits if macro momentum persists. Risk assessment: Tail risks include a surprise policy shock (major tariff/immigration move) or an unexpected midterm outcome that re-prices policy risk — each could flip sentiment in days and widen credit spreads by 50–150bp. Time horizons differ: immediate (days) — volatility spikes on polls/fundraising headlines; short-term (weeks/months) — data-driven rotation around ISM/payrolls; long-term (quarters) — fiscal/tax policy changes that structurally alter earnings and rates. Hidden dependencies: sustained consumer strength depends on real wage growth continuing vs. one-off rebates; catalysts to accelerate the trade are ISM >55, payrolls beat >300k, or 10y yield >3.6%. Trade implications: Favor modest, size-constrained rotation into cyclical ETFs and miners while protecting duration — use 2–4% tactical exposures (IWM/XLY/XLF/FCX) and hedge rates via options or short-duration inverse Treasuries. FX and rates: a stronger growth/less-dovish-Fed mix supports USD (UUP) and TIPS (TIP) on higher real yields; commodity exposure to copper/oil is attractive if PMI holds above 52 for two consecutive months. Options: use defined-risk call spreads on cyclicals and buy puts on 7–10yr Treasuries (IEF) as asymmetric protection. Contrarian angles: Consensus assumes a clean policy pivot from campaign rhetoric to market-friendly tax/trade — that’s not guaranteed; campaign cash ($300m+) buys volatility, not policy certainty, so being long only cyclicals risks sudden idiosyncratic drawdowns. The market may be underpricing the risk that tighter labor supply (from stricter immigration) boosts wages and inflation unpredictably — this would hurt margin-levered retailers but boost payroll-sensitive sectors. Historical parallel: 2010-style fiscal/political shocks produced quick cyclical reversals; size positions accordingly and prefer spreads over outright leveraged bets.