Back to News
Market Impact: 0.25

WMT Quantitative Stock Analysis

WMTNDAQ
Company FundamentalsAnalyst InsightsConsumer Demand & RetailMarket Technicals & Flows
WMT Quantitative Stock Analysis

Validea's guru fundamental report indicates that Walmart (WMT) receives an 81% rating based on their Multi-Factor Investor model, inspired by Pim van Vliet's strategy of identifying low-volatility stocks with strong momentum and high net payout yields; while WMT passes the market cap and standard deviation tests, it is neutral on momentum and net payout yield, ultimately failing the final rank criteria within this specific model.

Analysis

Walmart Inc. (WMT) receives an 81% rating from Validea's Multi-Factor Investor model, a score derived from the firm's underlying fundamentals and the stock's valuation, and based on Pim van Vliet's strategy emphasizing low-volatility stocks with strong momentum and high net payout yields; such a score typically suggests the strategy has some interest. The analysis indicates WMT successfully passes the model's criteria for market capitalization and standard deviation, aligning with the desired low-volatility profile. However, WMT is assessed as neutral on 'Twelve Minus One Momentum' and 'Net Payout Yield'. Critically, despite the 81% overall rating reflecting some positive fundamental and valuation aspects, the stock ultimately receives a 'FAIL' on the 'Final Rank' within this specific quantitative strategy, indicating it does not fully meet all the stringent conditions for a strong endorsement by this particular model.

AllMind AI Terminal

AI-powered research, real-time alerts, and portfolio analytics for institutional investors.

Request a Demo

Market Sentiment

Overall Sentiment

mildly positive

Sentiment Score

0.30

Ticker Sentiment

NDAQ0.00
WMT0.45

Key Decisions for Investors

  • Investors should recognize WMT's favorable low-volatility characteristics as identified by the Pim van Vliet model, but also note its 'FAIL' on the strategy's final rank due to neutral scores on momentum and net payout yield.
  • For those strictly adhering to Pim van Vliet's multi-factor conservative equity strategy, WMT's failure to pass all criteria suggests it may not be a prime candidate despite the initial 81% interest score.
  • Consider these model-specific findings alongside broader fundamental analysis, as WMT's strengths in low volatility might be appealing, but its performance on other factors within this particular screen (momentum, net payout yield) is suboptimal.