Learn All Crypto Topics | Phemex Blog

Trump signed an executive order on May 19 directing the Fed and federal regulators to review payment-account access rules for fintech and crypto firms, with a transparent application process and decisions required within 90 days. The change could benefit Ripple, Anchorage Digital, and Wise by improving access to Fed master accounts, potentially easing dollar settlement and reducing banking friction. For XRP, the impact is indirect: it may support Ripple's payments business, but token demand depends on whether more settlement flows are routed through XRPL.

Analysis

The market is likely to misread this as a clean “crypto-bullish” headline, when the real transmission is institutional plumbing. The nearer-term beneficiaries are not just crypto rails, but any balance-sheet-light payment intermediary that can convert regulatory permission into lower funding friction and fewer bank dependencies; that should compress counterparty risk premia across the fintech complex even if end-user volumes do not re-rate immediately.

Second-order, the policy mix is more threatening to incumbent payment networks than to banks. If a regulated crypto firm can access central-bank-style settlement paths and is protected from arbitrary offboarding, the moat shifts from network ownership to compliance and distribution. That is structurally negative for PYPL/V/MA because the value of their rails increasingly depends on being the default gateway for compliant flows, and the marginal risk is that merchants and fintechs route around them where fees are highest.

For JPM, the read is more nuanced: big banks lose some optionality around squeezing niche crypto clients, but they also gain as the obvious “safe harbor” counterparties for firms that still cannot access the Fed directly. Over months, the bigger issue is whether this accelerates deposit disintermediation into nonbank settlement accounts and stablecoin-like cash management products, which could pressure low-cost operating deposits if usage becomes habitual rather than episodic.

The contrarian point is that the move is probably more important as a process change than as an immediate revenue catalyst. The 90-day clock is valuable because it creates observable checkpoints, but one or two approvals will not materially alter payment volumes unless the firms can scale compliant distribution and liquidity provisioning. The best trade is therefore not a broad crypto beta expression, but a relative-value bet on firms with direct regulatory optionality versus those whose take rates are most exposed to disintermediation.

Key Decisions for Investors

• Short PYPL/V/MA into strength over the next 2-6 weeks: use the policy rally to fade multiple expansion, with a 3-5% tactical downside target if the market realizes approval is procedural, not revenue-accretive.
• Long JPM vs short PYPL as a 1-3 month relative-value pair: JPM has the balance-sheet and compliance infrastructure to capture any spillover from firms needing banking partners, while PYPL faces the highest risk of being bypassed in compliant crypto flows.
• Buy call spreads on a regulated crypto infrastructure beneficiary over 90 days, sized as event-driven optionality rather than core beta: the catalyst is the first conditional approval, but monetize only if settlement access starts translating into disclosed volume growth.
• If holding XRP exposure, reduce spot into strength and re-enter only on evidence that XRPL settlement volume is increasing; the policy catalyst can lift the token, but the structural link from corporate access to token demand remains weak.
• Watch for a failed or delayed first 90-day decision as the best short signal on the entire theme; if the Fed resets the clock, re-short fintech and crypto infrastructure names because the market will have priced a false process breakthrough.