Carson Jerema: Erin O'Toole's plan for permanent Liberal government

The market implication is less about ideology than about policy persistence with a new wrapper: Carney appears likely to preserve the Trudeau-era regulatory burden while improving the optics around execution. That reduces headline volatility but does not materially change the cost of capital for resource, industrial, and infrastructure-heavy balance sheets; the second-order effect is that domestically exposed cyclicals may continue to trade at a discount versus peers in more permissive jurisdictions. The biggest beneficiary is probably not any one sector, but the Liberal brand itself — a moderation narrative that can keep incumbency durable without forcing a real policy repricing.

For investors, the key risk is that consensus overweights the “centrist” signaling and underprices the durability of permitting friction, ESG overlays, and judicial/regulatory drag. That matters most over a 6–18 month horizon, where project timelines, capex commitments, and M&A underwriting are sensitive to whether policy is merely rebranded or actually simplified. If the government keeps delivering incremental concessions without structural deregulation, the result is a slow bleed for growth-sensitive domestic sectors rather than a discrete shock.

The contrarian read is that the opposition may be misallocating its attack surface, but markets should be cautious about extrapolating moderation into a pro-business regime. A government can be fiscally loose and rhetorically pragmatic while still preserving a high-friction regulatory state; that combination is usually bullish for incumbents with pricing power and bearish for new entrants that need approvals. Any rally in Canadian domestically sensitive equities on ‘Carney the moderate’ should be treated as a fade unless accompanied by tangible changes in permitting, tax, and labour policy.