Back to News
Market Impact: 0.25

Podcast: The 2025 EU-US relationship explained simply

Trade Policy & Supply ChainElections & Domestic PoliticsGeopolitics & WarFiscal Policy & BudgetRegulation & LegislationSanctions & Export Controls
Podcast: The 2025 EU-US relationship explained simply

With Donald Trump entering a second term in 2025, the administration cut funding to USAID and escalated a trade war with China, prompting Brussels to strike a summer deal with Washington that many in the EU viewed as uneven. Tensions further intensified in December after a Politico interview and release of the US National Security Strategy, leaving Europe to reassess its stance and options. For investors, the developments increase policy and geopolitical uncertainty across transatlantic trade, regulatory regimes and supply chains, warranting monitoring of potential EU concessions, retaliatory measures, and sector-specific exposure to China-related trade actions.

Analysis

Market structure: The primary near-term winners are US national-security and energy exporters — defense primes (LMT, RTX, GD) and LNG exporters (LNG/ CQP) — that gain pricing power from higher defence budgets and redirected energy flows; losers are EU export-heavy sectors (autos: BMW.DE, VOW3.DE; capital goods) facing tariff/market-access pressure. Supply-demand shifts: semiconductor on‑shoring benefits US fabs (INTC, MU) and equipment/software providers servicing them while China-exposed supply chains (TSM, ASML nuances) face volume/markup volatility. Cross-asset: expect USD strength vs EUR (target 3–6% move within 3–6 months), higher headline equity volatility (VIX +20–40% in shock), upward pressure on 10y yields (+10–30bp if fiscal/defence stimulus accelerates), and commodity upside in oil and industrial metals (+5–15% scenario). Risk assessment: Tail risks include a sharp tariff escalation (new tariffs >10% across autos/steel) or Chinese retaliatory embargoes causing earnings shocks >15% for exposed names and contagion into EU bank credit spreads (peripheral spreads +50–150bp). Time horizons: immediate (days) — FX and option vols; short (weeks–months) — earnings revisions, trade flows; long (2–5 years) — capex rerouting and supply‑chain reshoring. Hidden dependencies: EU firms’ revenue share from China/Taiwan and bank exposures to trade finance; second‑order effects include accelerated EU industrial subsidies that could re‑concentrate winners. Catalysts: new US tariffs, implementation language in the National Security Strategy, EU countermeasures — any announcement within 30–90 days will reprice risk. Trade implications: Concrete plays: establish 2–3% longs in LMT and RTX (12–24 month horizon) to capture higher defense spend; add 1–2% long INTC and MU as optionality on on‑shoring (24–36 months). Short 1–2% positions in BMW.DE and VOW3.DE (or a German auto ETF) for next 6–12 months to capture margin pressure; enter a 3–6 month EURUSD short via FX forwards or buy 3‑month EURUSD puts (strike ~1.05) sized to 2–3% NAV. Buy 1–2% exposure to CQP/Cheniere for secular LNG re‑routing (12 months). Options: use 3–6 month call spreads on LMT/RTX to limit cost and buy put spreads on BMW.DE/VOW3.DE to create asymmetric downside protection. Contrarian angles: Consensus may overstate permanent EU capitulation — historical parallels (2018 tariffs) show mean reversion in 12–24 months; this creates a mispricing in beaten-down EU exporters with strong China franchises — selectively buy cyclicals after policy noise fades (target entry when EURUSD stabilizes >1.08 or 12m forward revenue revisions turn positive). Beware of overshorting ASML/TSM: protectionism can accelerate EU subsidies and on‑shoring that ultimately benefits ASML and allied equipment makers. Monitor three thresholds in next 90 days: announced tariff rates (>10%), EURUSD move beyond 1.03 or above 1.10, and EU countermeasure package (size >0.5% GDP) to recalibrate positions.