Back to News
Market Impact: 0.55

Is Newmont Stock Still a Buy After a 26% Rally in 3 Months? (Revised)

NEMBAEMKGCDSV.TONVDANDAQ
Commodities & Raw MaterialsGeopolitics & WarInterest Rates & YieldsMonetary PolicyCorporate EarningsCompany FundamentalsCapital Returns (Dividends / Buybacks)Analyst Estimates
Is Newmont Stock Still a Buy After a 26% Rally in 3 Months? (Revised)

Newmont shares have risen ~26.2% over three months on a record gold rally (gold trading above ~$4,600/oz) and better-than-expected earnings momentum; Zacks consensus EPS for 2025 is $6.32 (implying ~81.6% YoY growth) with ~15.4% growth expected in 2026. The company reports strong liquidity ($9.6B, including ~$5.6B cash), record free cash flow of $1.6B and $2.3B in operating cash flow, has repurchased ~$2.1B of stock this year and plans $3B after-tax proceeds from 2025 divestitures to bolster the balance sheet. Offsetting risks include a ~15% YoY drop in Q3 2025 production to 1.42M ounces and continued grade and shutdown issues, but management expects ~5.9M oz for 2025 with Ahafo North ramping toward full capacity.

Analysis

Market structure: The immediate winners are gold producers (NEM, B, KGC) and gold-backed liquidity providers as bullion trades above ~$4,600/oz; consumers and rate-sensitive cyclical sectors are losers as safe-haven flows reallocate capital. Newmont’s strong liquidity ($9.6bn) and $3bn divestiture proceeds increase its pricing power (can sustain CAPEX, buybacks) versus smaller peers, while constrained new mine supply and central-bank buying tighten the physical supply/demand balance over 6-24 months. Risk assessment: Key tail risks include a sudden Fed hawkish surprise (rates/yields spike -> dollar rally -> gold drop >20% within weeks) and operational/sovereign setbacks in Ghana/Peru that could remove 100s of k oz of production. Time buckets: days — momentum/technical trades; weeks — Fed statements and Q4/2026 production updates (Ahafo North ramp to 275–325k oz in 2026); quarters/years — mine life and capital allocation drive EPS trajectory. Trade implications: For equity exposure favor capitalized, low-leverage names (NEM) for defensive carry; prefer controlled option structures to limit downside. Consider relative-value trades (long Barrick B vs short higher-premium NEM) to isolate company execution from metal moves, and use short-dated options around macro catalysts (Fed, CPI) to manage volatility. Contrarian angles: Consensus underestimates the risk that production declines (15% YoY Q3) will keep per-share output depressed even if gold stays high — earnings beats may prove transient. NEM’s ~5% P/E premium and 26% move vs Barrick’s 46% suggest either NEM is conservatively valued or already past its re-rating; historical precedent (post-2011 gold peak) warns miner equities can lag bullion sharply if macro regime reverses.