Back to News
Market Impact: 0.35

Should You Buy Lucid While It's Below $13?

LCIDNFLXNVDANDAQ
Automotive & EVCompany FundamentalsCorporate EarningsConsumer Demand & RetailTax & TariffsInterest Rates & Yields
Should You Buy Lucid While It's Below $13?

Lucid shares have tumbled about 50% to under $13 amid widening losses and weak scale: Q3 revenue rose 68% year‑over‑year to just over $336 million but operating loss widened to $942 million from $770 million a year earlier; production reached 3,891 vehicles (up 116% YoY) and deliveries 4,078 (up 47% YoY), yet volumes remain low for a four‑year public EV maker. The quarter’s sales were partly driven by customers exploiting a leasing loophole before federal EV tax credits were eliminated at the end of September, making the boost temporary, while macro headwinds—higher borrowing costs, elevated car prices, rising layoffs and falling consumer EV preference—suggest demand may soften. Management is expanding the lineup (Gravity SUV and a planned sub‑$50k model), but timing and take‑up are uncertain, leading the author to conclude the stock is too risky to buy now.

Analysis

Shares of Lucid have fallen roughly 50% to under $13 over the past year while the company reported Q3 revenue of just over $336 million, a 68% year‑over‑year increase, yet operating loss widened to $942 million from $770 million a year earlier. The revenue improvement was at least partially driven by customers exploiting a leasing loophole ahead of the federal EV tax-credit elimination at the end of September, signaling the quarter’s sales gain may be temporary. Lucid produced 3,891 vehicles in Q3 (up 116% YoY) and delivered 4,078 (up 47% YoY), but the absolute volumes remain low for a business that has been public for more than four years, leaving a large gap between scale and competitors. Management is expanding the lineup with the Gravity SUV and a planned sub‑$50,000 model, but the article highlights unclear timing and unknown demand for those launches. Macro and demand indicators are adverse: the article notes the federal credits were ended early, auto loan rates and car prices are higher, U.S. layoffs are elevated, and an EY survey showed global EV preference fell from 24% to 14% year over year. Taken together, these factors imply Lucid needs sustained, above‑trend production growth and clear margin improvement to justify a bullish stance; absent that, downside risk from continued cash burn and weak demand is material.