Back to News
Market Impact: 0.6

Long-term care in the U.S. faces two existential threats: an immigration crackdown and Medicaid cuts

Elections & Domestic PoliticsRegulation & LegislationFiscal Policy & BudgetHealthcare & Biotech
Long-term care in the U.S. faces two existential threats: an immigration crackdown and Medicaid cuts

The U.S. long-term care system faces significant challenges from potential immigration crackdowns, which could exacerbate existing worker shortages (immigrants comprise 28% of the long-term care workforce), and proposed Medicaid cuts of $880 billion, which would impact the nearly 6 million people who rely on Medicaid for long-term care and could lead to service reductions and wage cuts for already underpaid frontline workers. These factors combined could create a critical workforce exodus, leaving vulnerable populations without essential support. Proposed solutions include increased Medicaid support, standardization of care, and exploration of new social insurance programs for long-term care.

Analysis

The U.S. long-term care system is confronting two substantial threats that could destabilize its already fragile structure: a potential immigration crackdown and significant proposed Medicaid cuts. Immigrants constitute a critical 28% of the long-term care workforce, with one in three home care workers being immigrants; recent estimates indicate 15% of immigrant home care agency workers are undocumented, and even lawful permanent residents face deportation risks. This situation is poised to worsen existing worker shortages, which have intensified since the COVID-19 pandemic, thereby negatively impacting care recipients and their families. Concurrently, proposed Medicaid cuts amounting to $880 billion, intended to finance other domestic agendas, pose a severe risk to the nearly 6 million individuals reliant on Medicaid for long-term care. The House bill passed on May 22, for instance, targets critical state financing options for Medicaid. Such cuts would likely compel states to reduce services, with home-based support for older Americans—an optional benefit—being a probable target. This could also lead to lower wages for frontline home care workers, who already earn an average of just under $22,000 annually, with 40% at or below the federal poverty level and over half relying on public assistance. The confluence of these pressures could trigger an unprecedented worker exodus, jeopardizing care for older adults and disabled individuals. The current system is characterized as piecemeal, inadequately designed for an aging society, with Medicaid support limited to the very poor, forcing the middle class to cover average long-term care costs of nearly $300,000, 60% of which is paid out-of-pocket. Proposed solutions include bolstering Medicaid, standardizing care, ensuring adequate reimbursement rates, expanding Medicare to cover long-term care, or establishing a new social insurance program like the WISH Act.