Back to News
Market Impact: 0.35

Global stocks to edge higher in 2026 but lag this year's strong run: Reuters poll

TRI
Artificial IntelligenceTechnology & InnovationTrade Policy & Supply ChainInvestor Sentiment & PositioningMarket Technicals & FlowsAnalyst InsightsCorporate Earnings
Global stocks to edge higher in 2026 but lag this year's strong run: Reuters poll

A Reuters poll of 87 equity strategists (Nov. 13-25) finds most major global indexes are expected to finish 2026 higher but with smaller gains than this year; median forecasts include the S&P 500 up 11.7% to 7,490, STOXX 600 to 623 (+~11%), Nikkei +13%, BSE Sensex +9% to a record 92,400 and Canada +5%. Fifty-six percent of analysts (49 of 87) expect a near-term correction, citing risks from ongoing U.S. trade restrictions/tariffs and an overconcentration in AI/mega-cap tech that could spark a sell-off and higher volatility despite generally positive earnings and growth drivers in regions such as Japan and India.

Analysis

Market structure: The year’s gains are highly concentrated in a handful of AI-driven mega-caps (NVDA, MSFT, GOOGL, AAPL) and semiconductor supply chains, creating asymmetric winners (chipmakers, cloud/data-center REITs, AI software) and losers (export-dependent manufacturing, small/mid caps, trade-exposed cyclicals). A 20% shock to the top 5 names would likely shave ~6–8% off the S&P given current concentration, amplifying index-level volatility and flow-driven dislocations. Supply/demand remains tight for leading-edge semiconductors through 2026 but could loosen if capex normalizes, pressuring prices and margins late-cycle. Risk assessment: Tail risks include an AI-themed liquidity unwind, renewed broad trade restrictions, or abrupt Fed policy shifts that reprice growth — each could produce 10–30% drawdowns in crowded names within days-weeks. Short-term (0–3 months) expect elevated volatility and a 5–15% correction probability (poll median); medium-term (3–12 months) outcomes hinge on earnings and Fed path; long-term (12–36 months) secular AI adoption supports selective outperformance. Hidden risks: passive/ETF concentration and derivative positioning (short-dated calls) can create cliff-edge feedback loops; catalysts are earnings, trade-policy announcements, and foundry capacity updates. Trade implications: Avoid blanket long-tech exposure; favor concentrated, conviction positions in cash-flow-positive AI beneficiaries (NVDA, MSFT) sized 1–3% each and hedge systematically. Implement tail insurance via 3–6 month VIX or index put spreads and size to 0.5–1% portfolio cost; rotate 2–4% into Europe (VGK/STOXX 600) and Japan (EWJ/Nikkei futures) for diversification and lower concentration risk. Pair trades: long STOXX 600 or EWJ vs short QQQ to express deconcentration; use staggered entries over 4–8 weeks to avoid timing risk. Contrarian angles: Consensus underestimates the durability of earnings in profitable AI leaders — a sharp but shallow correction could be a buying opportunity rather than secular derating. Conversely, tariffs and export controls may have permanently raised the floor for domestic-capex in non-U.S. markets, making European and Japanese industrials and local-capex beneficiaries an overlooked asymmetric trade. Watch for forced deleveraging windows (10–20% drops in NVDA/QQQ) as tactical buy triggers rather than signals to exit long-term exposure.