Back to News
Market Impact: 0.65

Trump Is Slashing Grad School Loans. These Companies Are Scrambling To Step In

SLMSOFINAVI
Regulation & LegislationFintechCredit & Bond MarketsElections & Domestic PoliticsFiscal Policy & BudgetInterest Rates & YieldsCompany FundamentalsPrivate Markets & Venture
Trump Is Slashing Grad School Loans. These Companies Are Scrambling To Step In

The Republican-led "One Big Beautiful Bill Act" will eliminate the Grad Plus loan program and significantly cap federal student borrowing for graduate students and parents starting July 1, 2026, creating a substantial funding gap. This regulatory shift is poised to drive significant growth for private student loan lenders, with market leaders like Sallie Mae projecting an additional $4.5-$5 billion annually in originations and College Ave anticipating a $10 billion increase in graduate business alone. While presenting a considerable market opportunity for specialized lenders, the changes also raise concerns about access for students lacking co-signers and may prompt universities to explore risk-sharing models to maintain enrollment.

Analysis

A significant legislative shift, the "One Big Beautiful Bill Act," is set to eliminate the Grad Plus loan program and cap other federal student loans effective July 1, 2026, creating a substantial and immediate market opportunity for private lenders. This change is projected to nearly double the private student loan market from $13 billion to approximately $24 billion annually. Publicly traded firms are positioned to directly benefit: market leader Sallie Mae (SLM) anticipates adding $4.5 to $5 billion in annual originations to its current $7 billion base, and SoFi (SOFI) is also cited as a key beneficiary. The competitive landscape is intensifying, with fintechs like College Ave projecting they could capture $10 billion in new graduate loan business. However, risks and market segmentation are emerging. A potential constraint on this growth is the creditworthiness of borrowers, as 93% of private loans currently require a cosigner, potentially excluding students from lower-income backgrounds and tempering the total addressable market. In response, newer players like Ascent Funding and Funding U are pioneering risk-sharing models with universities and using alternative data to underwrite students without cosigners, creating a new sub-market. Conversely, Navient (NAVI) faces headwinds from a past CFPB settlement, reflecting underlying regulatory and reputational risks in the expanding sector.