Back to News
Market Impact: 0.35

Down 31% in 7 Days, Is XRP Still a Buy?

NFLXNVDAINTCNDAQ
Crypto & Digital AssetsFintechInvestor Sentiment & PositioningMarket Technicals & FlowsGeopolitics & WarTechnology & InnovationCommodities & Raw Materials
Down 31% in 7 Days, Is XRP Still a Buy?

XRP has plunged amid broad crypto market weakness, falling about 31% over the past week and dropping 21% on Feb. 5 alone, driven by a macro-driven risk‑off rotation away from recent winners such as AI stocks and gold rather than any reported technical or issuer failure. Ripple continues to develop the XRP Ledger as institutional plumbing that could underpin long‑term demand for XRP, but geopolitical and macro headwinds keep near‑term timing uncertain, prompting advice for patience among risk‑averse investors; Motley Fool discloses a position but did not include XRP in its current top-10 Stock Advisor picks.

Analysis

Market structure: XRP’s crash (–31% week, –21% on Feb 5) is a classic risk-off re-pricing where crypto spot and custody providers, retail leveraged holders, and crypto-native market-makers are direct losers while USD funding desks, US Treasuries and cash-rich corporates (payment rails, banks) pick up optionality. Competitive dynamics favor entrenched settlement rails and stablecoin/custody providers that can offer on/off ramps; XRPL’s low-cost plumbing is an advantage but does not buy near-term price support without institutional flow. Supply/demand tilts toward transient oversupply as selling from leveraged retail and project treasuries meets thin OTC demand; implied vol in crypto and related single-name options will stay elevated, pushing option spreads wider. Risk assessment: Tail risks include a US/UK regulatory shock (ban or restrictive ruling) or Ripple treasury dump — both >1%/month probability but 10–30% price impact if realized. Near term (days–weeks) expect momentum cascades and stop liquidity events; medium term (1–6 months) depends on macro liquidity and ETF/regulatory catalysts; long term (6–24 months) outcome tied to XRPL institutional adoption metrics (counterparty listings, custody integrations). Hidden dependency: XRP price recovery depends on third-party on‑ramps (banks, custodians) not just Ripple tech; monitor custodial listings and Ripple escrow release cadence. Trade implications: For risk-managed exposure, stagger entries and use options to define max loss. Tactical ideas: small long exposure to XRP (scale-in), hedge-tech long exposure via NVDA LEAP call spreads while shorting legacy chip exposure (INTC) as a relative-value pair, and buy put spreads on crypto-exposed equities to monetize elevated vol. Rotate 3–6% portfolio into short-duration US Treasuries (1–3yr) to buy optionality if risk-off deepens. Contrarian angles: Consensus underprices XRPL’s path to institutional settlement and overprices immediate link between price and utility; if a payments partner announces live liquidity usage, a >2x move inside 6–12 months is plausible. Reaction appears overdone relative to on-chain activity metrics in prior drawdowns (2018–19); risk is a negative feedback loop where depressed prices choke liquidity and delay adoption, creating a multi‑quarter recovery rather than a snapback.