Back to News
Market Impact: 0.45

2 Mining Stocks to Buy in March

AEMWPMNEMPPTAVALEBHPGSBACNFLXNVDAINTC
Commodities & Raw MaterialsEnergy Markets & PricesGeopolitics & WarCorporate EarningsCapital Returns (Dividends / Buybacks)M&A & RestructuringCompany FundamentalsCorporate Guidance & Outlook

Wheaton reported record 2025 results with revenue up 80% to $2.3B, net earnings +178% to $1.5B, adjusted net earnings +114.5% to $1.4B, operating cash flow +85.4% to $1.9B, EPS $3.24, produced 690k gold-equivalent oz, and raised its quarterly dividend 18% to $0.195. Agnico posted EPS $8.89 (+135%) and EBITDA $8.8B (+89%), all-in sustaining costs $1,339/oz, raised its 2026 quarterly dividend 12.5% after returning a record $1.4B in 2025, and guides 2026–2028 annual production of 3.3–3.5M oz while pursuing M&A (e.g., O3 Mining) and junior stakes. A gold structural bull market (prices >$5,000/oz; analyst targets up to $6,000/oz) and Wheaton's fixed purchase costs (~$400/oz) materially boost margins—Wheaton captures ~90% of recent gold upside—supporting further dividend upside and positive near-term stock performance for both names.

Analysis

Streaming vs. operating exposure is the key structural bifurcation investors are underpricing: streamers have option-like exposure to metal price upside with low incremental capex, while producers carry open-ended cost inflation and operational execution risk. That divergence creates a second-order effect where consolidation by large, low-risk-jurisdiction producers (who can pay cash or equity to acquire reserves) will shrink the addressable pool of high-quality, near-term ounces available for new streaming deals, compressing future streamer organic growth unless they pivot to earlier-stage equity/royalty stakes. Macro paths drive different timing and payoffs: a transient geopolitical shock can boost safe-haven flows in days but will be overwhelmed by multi-quarter real-rate moves if central banks respond to commodity-driven inflation. Counterparty and schedule risk sits in the middle — miners delaying ramp-ups or deferring capex (driven by energy cost shocks) reduces streamed volumes with a lag of one-to-three quarters, creating a window where streamers’ near-term cash generation can dip despite favorable metal prices. This setup implies asymmetric trade payoffs: between miners, low-cost, low-jurisdiction-risk producers will hold a premium and are less binary on execution, while streamers offer concentrated convexity to price moves but are exposed to partner operational failure and competition for new deals. Watch mining M&A and streaming deal cadence over the next 6–12 months as the primary signal that will reprice both business models.