Back to News
Market Impact: 0.32

Above-Normal US Temps Undercut Nat-Gas Prices

BKRNDAQ
Energy Markets & PricesCommodities & Raw MaterialsNatural Disasters & WeatherCommodity FuturesMarket Technicals & FlowsInvestor Sentiment & Positioning
Above-Normal US Temps Undercut Nat-Gas Prices

March Nymex natural gas fell 0.73% to close at a four-week nearest-futures low as forecasts for warmer-than-normal U.S. weather through Feb. 19 and an upward revision to EIA 2026 U.S. dry gas production (109.97 bcf/day vs. prior 108.82 bcf/day) weigh on prices. Production metrics remain strong—Lower-48 dry production ~112.8 bcf/day (+6.8% y/y), rigs at a 2.5-year high (130)—while LNG flows (~19.5 bcf/day) and a record weekly EIA draw of 360 bcf signal tightness offset by inventories that are +2.8% y/y and only slightly below the 5-year average. Overall, warmer weather and higher supply projections are exerting near-term downside pressure on gas markets despite recent cold-driven spikes and elevated power demand.

Analysis

Market structure: Near-term winners are gas consumers, gas-fired generators and LNG buyers as forecasts for above-normal US temperatures and higher US production (EIA 2026 dry gas +1.1 bcf/d to ~110 bcf/d) compress spot prices. Short-term losers are volatility-sensitive E&P names and storage plays that benefitted from winter scarcity; service providers (BKR) gain from rising rig counts (130 rigs, 2.5-year high) which supports multi-quarter revenue. Supply/demand: the market shows ample production (112.8 bcf/d today, +6.8% y/y) vs demand still depressed (-11% y/y), suggesting structural downward pressure absent major weather shocks or LNG demand surge. Risk assessment: Tail risks remain high for discrete cold snaps or freeze-induced outages (50 bcf offline in January was ~15% of US output) and for European storage driving sudden LNG draws (EU storage 37% vs 5-yr 54%). Time horizons: immediate (days–weeks) = weather-driven swings and EIA weekly storage; short-term (1–3 months) = rig count/production response; long-term (6–24 months) = base production growth per EIA. Hidden dependencies include basis differentials (HH vs TTF), shipping chokepoints, and power-sector fuel switching; catalysts are upcoming 4 weekly EIA prints and model runs for Feb–Mar weather. Trade implications: Tactical short exposure to front-month NG is attractive into the warm forecast, while owning service exposure (BKR) captures higher activity; use calendar spreads to exploit seasonal contango compression risk. Options: buy put spreads on front-month NYMEX gas to limit draw to premium; hedge with cheap long-dated call spreads (Nov 2026) to protect against tail cold. Sector rotation: reduce pure-play gas equities, rotate into diversified energy services (BKR) and defensive utilities that benefit from lower input costs. Contrarian angles: Consensus understates downside convexity from sustained warm temps and rising US supply but also underprices upside tail from a single Arctic event or an unexpected LNG surge given low EU storage — a shock can move prices >$2/mmBtu quickly. Reaction may be partly overdone in front-month futures; a balanced approach is to use small directional positions plus low-cost asymmetry (OTM long calls and puts) because mean reversion and production elasticity can flip within 4–8 weeks. Historical parallel: January freeze–thaw 2022–2023 showed rapid drawdown then swift re-supply; expect high intramonth volatility, not a new trend.