Back to News
Market Impact: 0.45

Commentary: Crypto promoters saw Trump as their savior. Then reality set in

Crypto & Digital AssetsRegulation & LegislationElections & Domestic PoliticsTax & TariffsCybersecurity & Data PrivacyInvestor Sentiment & PositioningDerivatives & Volatility

Bitcoin and broader crypto markets have suffered sharp losses despite pro-crypto actions from the Trump administration, with bitcoin tumbling from an Oct. 10 intraday high of roughly $124,752 to about $87,845 (≈30% decline in six weeks) and down more than 11% since Jan. 20 while the S&P 500 gained nearly 12%. Key drivers include leveraged liquidations (about $19 billion forced liquidations during Oct. 10 ‘Black Friday’), large hacks (Bybit lost $1.5 billion traced to North Korea), about $3.5 billion of ETF outflows this month, regulatory rollbacks (SEC cases deferred/closed and the GENIUS Act easing stablecoin rules), and political conflicts-of-interest concerns tied to World Liberty Financial and pardons of industry figures—factors that increase tail risk for retail holders and amplify market volatility.

Analysis

Market structure: The immediate winners are crypto service insiders, stablecoin issuers and politically connected firms (World Liberty-type players) that benefit from regulatory forbearance; losers are leveraged retail holders, margin-heavy OTC desks, miners (high operating leverage) and crypto-ETF liquidity providers. The market is thinner and far more procyclical than equities — lack of circuit breakers and concentrated leverage means price moves amplify quickly; expect greater intraday volatility (>$10B forced liquidations possible in single days) and episodic market-share swings toward custodial ETFs at the expense of unregulated exchanges. Risk assessment: Tail risks include major regulatory reversals (Congress or SEC re-tightening), systemic exchange or custodian failures, or large-state-sponsored thefts (North Korea-style) that could wipe >10–20% of circulating liquid supply. Time horizons: days–weeks dominated by liquidity shocks (tariff headlines, forced liquidations), months by ETF flows and corporate treasuries, quarters+ by legal/regulatory structure and stablecoin legislation. Hidden dependencies: US trade policy and cybersecurity posture are now principal drivers of crypto liquidity, not macro inflation alone. Trade implications: Short-volatility/long-safety bias is rational: expect FX USD strength and UST demand on risk-off; equity breadth may continue to outperform crypto-exposed equities. Tactical trades favor asymmetric downside protection on bitcoin exposure, selective shorting of capex-intensive miners and reallocating small allocations into long-duration Treasuries or cash equivalents until structural clarity returns. Contrarian angles: Consensus treats all crypto as unitary risk — but regulatory carve-outs (favored stablecoin issuers, ETF providers) create durable oligopolies that could capture fees and vesting revenue. The selloff may overshoot if institutional deleveraging completes; a disciplined buy-on-violent-mean-reversion (20–35% intraday) could be profitable, but only with strict custody and counterparty selection.