Back to News
Market Impact: 0.33

These 2 Healthcare Stocks Beat the Market in 2025. Should You Buy Them in 2026?

CRSPHCANFLXNVDANDAQ
Healthcare & BiotechTechnology & InnovationCompany FundamentalsCorporate EarningsProduct LaunchesRegulation & LegislationAnalyst InsightsInvestor Sentiment & Positioning
These 2 Healthcare Stocks Beat the Market in 2025. Should You Buy Them in 2026?

CRISPR Therapeutics (up ~44% YTD vs S&P 500 ~18%) is being framed as a high-upside, high-risk gene‑editing play as early-stage candidates CTX310 (LDL/triglyceride reduction) and CTX320 (Lp(a) reduction) show promising data while the company remains minimally revenue-generating and unprofitable; management also expects commercial progress for approved product Casgevy in 2026. HCA Healthcare (up ~58% YTD) has beaten expectations, trades at ~16x forward EPS versus a healthcare peer average of 18.2x, and benefits from strong hospital rankings and demographic tailwinds, but faces near-term policy risk (uncertainty over extension of enhanced premium tax credits) that could affect patient demand.

Analysis

Market structure: Clinical-readout-driven small-cap biotech (CRSP) benefits from positive binary events; large hospital operators (HCA) benefit from scale, payer relationships and aging demographics. Positive CTX310/CTX320 data would reprice CRSP's expected cash flows and attract M&A interest, while adverse policy moves (insurance premium tax-credit changes) would shift demand away from elective hospital services and pressure utilization. Cross-asset: a biotech risk-on run raises equity vols and squeezes short-dated puts, while negative clinical news would widen credit spreads in small-cap biotech financings and push investors into defensive hospital equities and healthcare MLP/REITs. Risk assessment: Tail risks include an FDA clinical hold or safety signal at CRSP (low probability, >60% downside on headline failure) and a federal policy rollback in H1–H2 2026 reducing insured volumes by an estimated 1–3% (2–6% EPS hit for some hospitals). Near-term (days–weeks) volatility will be dominated by option markets and newsflow; medium-term (3–12 months) by trial readouts and policy decisions; long-term (2–5 years) by commercial execution of Casgevy and pipeline launches. Hidden dependencies: CRSP’s valuation is levered to partner financing and equity markets for follow-on funding; HCA’s margins depend on payer mix shifts and outpatient migration. Trade implications: Tactical postures: small, asymmetric exposure to CRSP (binary upside) and core holding in HCA (value/defensive). Use option structures to buy convexity on CRSP and sell premium on HCA. Rotate 2–4% portfolio weight from broad healthcare ETFs into select operators with secular advantages and from floating-rate hospital REITs into high-quality hospital equities if credit spreads compress. Contrarian angles: Consensus underestimates commercialization risk for Casgevy (execution, pricing) and overestimates immediate upside for CTX programs — the market often overpays pre-readout for gene-editing optionality. Conversely, implied vol may overprice downside in CRSP after recent run; buying calibrated long-dated call spreads can capture asymmetric upside while capping loss. Historical parallels: gene-editing winners often saw 2x+ moves on Phase 2 success and near-total write-downs on safety failures; position sizing must reflect that skew.