Back to News
Market Impact: 0.35

Gold and Silver Slip as Comex Bulls Retreat, China Trading Shuts for New Year

CME
Commodities & Raw MaterialsCommodity FuturesFutures & OptionsDerivatives & VolatilityMarket Technicals & FlowsInvestor Sentiment & PositioningMonetary PolicyInflation

Gold and silver pulled back as China closed for Lunar New Year and US markets observed holidays, with spot gold down as much as 1.5% to $4,967/oz and silver down as much as 3.4% to $74.74 before midday London trade. Comex managed-money net longs in gold fell to a three-month low at a notional 289 tonnes (33.3% below the 1-year average) while silver net longs rose to 713 tonnes but fell to $1.8bn in value (lowest since Feb 2024); Comex volumes dropped to their lowest since Aug 2025 amid higher margin requirements and policy changes. China remains a bullish structural influence — SHFE gold futures were up 17% month-on-month in January and Chinese gold ETFs pushed SGE AUM to RMB333bn (US$36bn), up 38% from end-December — but holiday closures and reduced speculative intensity leave near-term upside constrained despite Fed rate-cut hopes after softer US inflation.

Analysis

Market structure: Short-term winners are physical bullion sellers, Chinese exchange participants (SGE/SHFE) and active allocator miners (GDX, NEM) because Chinese ETF/physical demand remains structurally strong while futures liquidity is intentionally being constrained by higher margins. Losers are leveraged speculators on COMEX and clearing-dependent products—reduced open interest and CME margin hikes compress speculative flow and lower intraday liquidity, capping momentum rallies by ~1–3% in the near term. Risk assessment: Tail risks include a Chinese regulatory squeeze (further margin/flow restrictions) that could spike Shanghai premiums and trigger arbitrage squeeze, or a Fed pause/no-cut that drops real rates and depresses gold (-8–12% shock possible). Timeline: immediate (days) = volatility around low liquidity/holiday flows; short-term (weeks) = position rebuilding as China reopens; long-term (quarters) = structural AUM growth in Chinese ETFs supporting higher base prices. Hidden dependency: A sustained RMB policy shift or capital-control easing would magnify cross-border physical flows. Trade implications: Tactical bias is to own physical/ETF/producer exposure over naked COMEX futures. Execute option-backed longs to limit margin bleed: prefer 3–6 month call spreads on GLD/IAU and 6–12 month exposure to GDX for convexity into Chinese reopen. Size selectively (1–3% NAV per position), add on confirmed liquidity recovery (SHFE volumes +20% week-on-week) or on >3% corrective dips. Contrarian angles: Consensus underestimates persistent physical tightness—silver backwardation in Shanghai suggests industrial + investment demand can reprice silver >15% faster than implied futures. The market may be over-penalizing exchange operators (CME) — volumes will likely recover post-holiday; shorting CME is a small, tactical contrarian only if you expect multi-month volume slump. Historical parallels (2016/2019 China-driven premiums) show physical squeezes can outpace futures positioning and create outsized miner/physical ETF alpha.