Back to News
Market Impact: 0.35

ASML Stock Isn't Cheap, but It Might Still Be a Bargain

ASMLNVDAINTCAMZNMSFTGOOGLMETAAVGOTSMNFLX
Artificial IntelligenceTechnology & InnovationCompany FundamentalsAnalyst EstimatesPatents & Intellectual PropertyCorporate EarningsAntitrust & CompetitionInvestor Sentiment & Positioning
ASML Stock Isn't Cheap, but It Might Still Be a Bargain

ASML shares are up 79.5% over the last year; analyst consensus forecasts EPS of $29.69 in 2026 and $37.51 in 2027, implying a 35.1x multiple on 2027 projected earnings. EUV systems — the product of over €6 billion and 17 years of R&D — accounted for 56.1% of Q4 2025 net bookings, while servicing (predominantly DUV) contributes about 25% of revenue, supporting rising revenue and margins. The article argues AI-driven fab upgrades and the early high-NA EUV rollout provide a long runway for ASML, making it attractive for ultra-long-term investors despite an extended valuation, though shares could cool as earnings catch up.

Analysis

The market is pricing multi-year structurally higher capex into ASML, but the real optionality sits in the shape of revenue — lumpy equipment sales frontload cash then create an annuity via service, spare parts and software upgrades. That frontloaded-to-annuity conversion creates asymmetric outcomes: a year where end-customers pause purchases produces a sharp EPS hit, while sustained fab buildouts compound free cash flow for several years thereafter. Second-order beneficiaries are outside the immediate lithography ecosystem: specialty chemicals, ultrapure gases, precision metrology vendors and logistics providers will see order flows become stickier as fabs expand capacity; their margins expand because recurring consumable demand is less cyclical than tool orders. Conversely, OEMs that depend on a rapid replacement cycle or sell commoditized parts face margin pressure as OEMs capture more aftermarket value. Key risks are policy and supply-side rather than pure demand — export controls, a localized Chinese tooling program that accelerates onshore substitution, or a technical setback in next-gen throughput could compress the long-run multiple quickly. Near-term inventory cycles at large foundries and a shift in AI architecture that lowers per-chip compute intensity are plausible catalysts to reverse sentiment within 3–12 months, while upside requires multi-year execution and continued capital intensity by hyperscalers and foundries.