Back to News
Market Impact: 0.55

One AI bubble has already burst. The next one—a ‘rare’ kind—is still growing, economist warns

CRMNOWNVDAGS
Artificial IntelligenceTechnology & InnovationCorporate EarningsInvestor Sentiment & PositioningPrivate Markets & VentureTrade Policy & Supply ChainGeopolitics & WarCommodities & Raw Materials

Capital Economics' John Higgins concludes the AI valuation bubble has burst as IT/Big Tech price-earnings ratios have fallen to their smallest level since the pandemic (after peaking near ~75% in late 2024). There are 498 AI unicorns valued at $2.7 trillion and OpenAI was reported at $730B (up from $500B six months earlier); Salesforce and ServiceNow are each down ~30% YTD, while Nvidia reported Q4 revenue of $68.1B (+73% YoY). Higgins warns the greater risk is an 'earnings bubble' — Goldman Sachs projects $539B in AI capex for 2026 — and macro/geopolitical shocks (e.g., Iran war cutting Qatar helium, ~1/3 of global supply) could trigger a sharp earnings and sector correction.

Analysis

Price action has likely removed a lot of the easy upside in AI-exposed tech, but the more dangerous second-order risk is that reported earnings themselves are a cyclical bubble. Many AI winners exhibit high operating leverage and front-loaded R&D/capex: if enterprise adoption stalls or macro demand softens, revenue growth can flip to mid-single-digit declines within 2-4 quarters while cost bases lag, producing outsized EPS compression relative to the top-line move. SaaS incumbents with subscription models and multi-year renewals face asymmetric downside from two directions — multiple compression driven by investor sentiment and a structural churn risk as customers reallocate spend to cloud infra, system integrators and specialist AI tooling. Semiconductor and materials suppliers sit on a fragile intersection of demand front-loading and concentrated commodity constraints; a localized supply shock (helium/energy or logistics) can tighten gross margins across the stack for 1-3 quarters even if end-demand remains intact. Key catalysts to watch: 1) corporate capex schedules and 2) quarterly renewal/attrition metrics from large enterprise customers — these will show whether AI is additive or simply reallocating existing IT budgets. Tail risks are short-dated and event-driven (geopolitics, supply interruptions) with 0–6 month impact, while earnings mean-reversion from adoption fatigue plays out over 6–18 months. Monitor dispersion between implied vol and realized vol: options markets are pricing asymmetric outcomes into a handful of names, creating tactical entry windows. Contrarian angle: sentiment may be over-penalizing generational platform owners while underweighting the durable service revenue that will glue ecosystems together (cloud infra, managed services, chip foundry partners). A targeted, hedged long of select infrastructure exposures versus short-duration SaaS beta captures that skew with defined downside protection.