Back to News
Market Impact: 0.05

iPhone 18 could borrow a feature from Samsung’s foldable phones when it launches next year

AAPLGOOGLGOOG
Technology & InnovationProduct LaunchesConsumer Demand & RetailPatents & Intellectual PropertyAntitrust & Competition
iPhone 18 could borrow a feature from Samsung’s foldable phones when it launches next year

Sources indicate Apple is testing under-display 3D/front-camera technology for the iPhone 18, potentially enabling a reduced Dynamic Island pill and a more seamless display. Historical implementations (e.g., Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, RedMagic 11 Pro) suffered notable selfie-quality degradation, so any rollout carries product-quality risk; timelines remain unclear with suggestions the Pro model may arrive next year and a broader rollout possibly delayed until iPhone 20 (2027).

Analysis

Market structure: If Apple (AAPL) successfully ships a high-quality under‑display front camera, direct winners are Apple (premium pricing durability), image‑sensor suppliers (SONY) and advanced OLED/stack suppliers (Samsung Display, BOE) due to higher BOM complexity; losers include niche selfie‑camera module specialists and any OEMs that bet on lower‑cost under‑display tech. Incremental BOM cost is likely non‑trivial — estimate $5–30/device — which could compress iPhone gross margin by ~50–200bps absent price or scale offsets, but preserves Apple’s pricing power if user perceived value is high. Risk assessment: Tail risks include a quality failure that reduces iPhone upgrade intent by 5–10% for a cycle (reputational hit) or single‑supplier failures/IP litigation creating supply shocks; regulatory/antitrust risk is low near‑term but supplier concentration is a real operational risk. Time horizons: immediate (days) — rumor volatility in AAPL options and supplier names; short (3–12 months) — supply‑chain confirmations and order flows; long (2–3 years) — true mass adoption (iPhone 20/2027) or rollback as Samsung experienced. Trade implications: Primary actionable is asymmetric option exposure: small directional long on AAPL via defined‑risk 12‑18 month call spreads to capture product re‑rating; add 1–2% overweight in SONY (sensor exposure) and selective long on high‑end glass/stack suppliers (GLW, BOE proxy) while avoiding pure‑play under‑display module small caps. Use pair trade long SONY vs short pure‑display/under‑display hopefuls if supplier order flow disappoints; sell short‑dated straddles on AAPL only if IV > realized by >30% and liquidity supports it. Contrarian angles: Consensus focuses on novelty not execution — market may be underpricing reputational downside and overpricing supplier upside. Historical parallel: Samsung’s Fold3 under‑display camera led to product rollback; if Apple repeats, expect a sharp supplier revenue miss (20–40% order cut in a quarter). Conversely, Apple’s software/image‑processing could mitigate optical deficits faster than peers — a missed bullish scenario priced cheap into suppliers today.