Back to News
Market Impact: 0.45

2 AI Defense Stocks Soar 30%+ in 2025, Poised for More in 2026

PLTRBBAINDAQ
Artificial IntelligenceTechnology & InnovationInfrastructure & DefenseCorporate EarningsCorporate Guidance & OutlookM&A & RestructuringCompany FundamentalsAnalyst Insights
2 AI Defense Stocks Soar 30%+ in 2025, Poised for More in 2026

Palantir reported Q3 revenue of $1.18 billion, up 63% year-over-year and 18% sequentially, with U.S. commercial revenue of $397M (+121% YoY) and government revenue of $486M (+52% YoY); the company raised Q4 revenue guidance to $1.327–1.331B and full-year to $4.396–4.400B while forecasting positive GAAP operating and net income and ~42.5% expected earnings growth next year. BigBear.ai posted Q3 revenue of $33.1M (down 20% YoY) but agreed to acquire Ask Sage for $250M, raised full-year revenue guidance to $125–140M and reported a cash balance of $456.6M, underpinning a projected ~73.1% earnings growth next year. Both stocks carry a Zacks Rank #2, presenting a bullish, AI- and defense-focused trade thesis with differentiated risk profiles (established Palantir vs. speculative BigBear.ai) for investors allocating to AI/defense exposure.

Analysis

Market structure: Palantir (PLTR) and BigBear.ai (BBAI) are direct beneficiaries of rising AI demand in defense and commercial analytics; incumbents with legacy analytics tech and niche VARs risk losing share as platform-based AIP/Ask Sage offerings scale. Sticky government contracts (multi-year, high renewal rates) give PLTR sustained pricing power; small-cap suppliers face lumpier, demand-driven revenue streams, concentrating downside risk in BBAI-like names. Cross-asset: larger defense capex expectations should modestly steepen the yield curve (10–50bp over 6–12 months) and lift USD via safe-haven corporate demand; expect elevated equity implied vol in small-cap AI names for 30–90 days post-guidance/earnings. Risk assessment: Tail risks include DoD budget cuts or contract cancellations (>5% hit to expected FY revenue), US/EU AI export controls, and failed M&A integration at BBAI (Ask Sage). Near-term (days-weeks) price spikes tied to headlines; medium-term (1–4 quarters) guidance misses or delivery slippage; long-term (2+ years) dependent on commercial monetization of AIP and persistent government spend. Hidden dependency: Palantir’s commercial growth is sensitive to enterprise adoption cycles and contract cadence; BigBear’s upside is M&A-dependent and cash-intensive. Trade implications: Tactical: favor quality large-cap exposure (PLTR) and keep small-cap BBAI as a capped-convexity punt. Use directional equity exposure sized to risk (PLTR 2–4% NAV, BBAI 0.5–1.5% NAV) and express through time-limited option structures (6–12 month call spreads/LEAPs). Pair trades: long PLTR vs short a 50–100bps-weighted basket of small-cap AI-defense names to isolate idiosyncratic risk. Use short-dated call spreads to harvest IV and 6–12 week put spreads to buy dips of ~10–15%. Contrarian angles: Consensus overlooks multiple-compression risk in PLTR—42% EPS growth priced into rich multiples; a 10–20% multiple contraction could erase gains despite revenue beats. Conversely, BBAI’s cash hoard ($456m) and Ask Sage IP could be underappreciated if integration executes—binary upside but high downside if FY26 revenues miss the newly raised $125–140m guide. Historical parallel: 2015–2016 defense tech IPO/boom shows rapid rerating when procurement priorities shift; position sizing must reflect asymmetric payoffs.