Back to News
Market Impact: 0.75

Hiring in the US drops to pandemic lows as job market under Trump stagnates

NDAQ
Economic DataMonetary PolicyTrade Policy & Supply ChainTax & TariffsGeopolitics & WarEnergy Markets & PricesArtificial IntelligenceInvestor Sentiment & Positioning

Job openings fell 358,000 to 6.882 million in February and hiring declined by 498,000 to 4.8 million (lowest since March 2020); quits were 3.0 million (1.9% rate). Private payroll growth averaged just 18,000 jobs/month for the three months to Feb, University of Michigan consumer sentiment dropped 6% y/y and 5.8% m/m, and average US petrol hit $4.018/gal (up ~$1.04 from $2.982). The piece flags Trump-era tariff/legal uncertainty, immigration restrictions and US involvement in the Iran conflict as drivers of labour demand weakness and energy-price risk, while the Fed has signalled downside risk to employment and is holding rates steady ahead of an April decision.

Analysis

The current mix — weakening labor demand at the margin alongside tariff- and war-driven input shocks — creates a bifurcated inflation picture that markets are under-pricing. Labour slack erodes wage-growth momentum (lessening persistent services inflation pressure over quarters), while energy and trade frictions inject episodic cost-push shocks that compress margins unevenly across sectors. Second-order effects will diverge by capital intensity and skill mix: AI-heavy firms accelerate capex (cloud, chips, software suppliers) and hunt for high‑skilled hires, insulating revenue growth even as overall payrolls sag; small employers, retail, logistics and staffing firms face sticky costs and reduced hiring flexibility, amplifying SME insolvency and reduced consumer-facing employment. Tariff/legal uncertainty also encourages onshoring/dual-sourcing capex plans for supply-chain resilient players — good for U.S. industrial OEMs and automation vendors but bad for import-dependent retail margins. Monetary policy becomes a binary hinge in 3–6 months: sustained labour softness increases the probability of Fed easing, which should lift growth multiple assets, but persistent energy-driven inflation would keep real yields elevated and favour commodity cyclicals and quality cash-generative names. That creates a volatile corridor where cross-asset dispersion rises and event risks (April Fed, oil thresholds, tariff court rulings) produce trading opportunities and quick regime flips. Action should therefore be asymmetric: capture convex upside in select AI/infra names and integrated energy while explicitly shorting staffing/consumer cyclical exposures and using duration and oil options to hedge policy/commodity tail-risk. Size positions to survive a policy surprise and set clear triggers (Fed communications, Brent $95/$110, tariff rulings) for rebalancing.