Back to News
Market Impact: 0.35

Tesla stock could plunge 60% as inventory of unsold cars jumps to record levels, JPMorgan says

JPMTSLAUBS
Automotive & EVCompany FundamentalsAnalyst InsightsAnalyst EstimatesInvestor Sentiment & PositioningCorporate Guidance & OutlookConsumer Demand & Retail
Tesla stock could plunge 60% as inventory of unsold cars jumps to record levels, JPMorgan says

JPMorgan reiterated an "Underweight" and $145 price target implying roughly 60% downside to current Tesla levels, citing a record inventory build after Tesla produced 50,363 more vehicles than it delivered in 1Q26. Tesla reported 1Q deliveries of 358,000 (4% below consensus and 7% below JPMorgan's 385,000 forecast); JPMorgan and UBS (which has a Sell rating) flag weakening demand as production is up ~80% since Q1 2023 while sales are down ~15% over that span, pressuring free cash flow and investor expectations.

Analysis

The immediate second-order winners are manufacturers and suppliers with flexible multi-brand platforms and lower fixed-cost leverage: incumbents who can throttle production (legacy OEMs) and vertically integrated Chinese players can undercut on price or absorb margin compression without the same FCF squeeze. Suppliers tied to high single-customer exposure to Tesla face asymmetric downside as slow-moving inventory forces longer payment terms and pushes working-capital risk onto upstream suppliers over the next 3-12 months. Inventory overhang propagates through financing and residual-value channels: excess new-car stock increases short-term incentives, which compresses realized ASPs and used-car prices, tightening lease residuals and kicking off mark-to-market losses on off-balance-sheet securitized receivables. Expect cash conversion to weaken before headline volumes show recovery — a 2-4 quarter lag is plausible as management chooses between margin protection and inventory clearance. Key catalyst windows are near-term delivery/production prints and China stimulus cadence; binary policy moves (tax/subsidy shifts or Beijing demand support) could materially alter the path within 1-6 months. Longer-term optionality (robotaxi, humanoids) remains non-linear and is valued by markets as convex upside, but it’s a multi-year/decade engine — do not treat that payoff as a near-term liquidity backstop. Contrarian read: the market may have overshot pricing-in of structural failure while underestimating management levers to monetize excess inventory (fleet sales, rental partnerships, short-term financing arrangements) and software/energy margin resilience. That said, these levers trade off durability of margins; they can buy time but are unlikely to restore near-term FCF without meaningful price concessions or capital structure moves.