Back to News
Market Impact: 0.25

The S&P 500 is wrapping up a tough month. Why April could be better

NDAQ
Geopolitics & WarMarket Technicals & FlowsInvestor Sentiment & PositioningEnergy Markets & PricesInflationElections & Domestic PoliticsAnalyst Insights
The S&P 500 is wrapping up a tough month. Why April could be better

The S&P 500 is down more than 5% in March, pacing for its worst monthly slide since March 2025. Historically April is strong (average +1.4%) and often second-best month, but near-term risks — U.S.-Iran war spillover, rising oil prices and inflation concerns — plus midterm-election years (S&P April average -0.3%) create downside volatility. Almanac editor Jeffrey Hirsch expects choppy, range-bound action for several months with potential higher highs later in the year.

Analysis

Market participants who lean on calendar seasonality are implicitly short two outsized drivers today: geopolitical risk and policy uncertainty. A short-run April bounce, if it occurs, will likely be driven by technical and flow mechanics (month/quarter rebalancing, options expiries) rather than a durable de-risking of the Iran/Strait of Hormuz shock — meaning any gains could be transient and vulnerable to headline reversals within weeks. Rising energy prices create asymmetric payoff curves across sectors: energy producers and select industrials capture immediate cashflow upside, while consumer discretionary, airlines, and travel-exposed services face margin squeeze and demand elasticity that shows up inside a single reporting quarter. Investor positioning is shallowly long equities but light on geopolitical hedges; realized vol has room to spike off tactical events even if the macro backdrop remains rangebound. Midterm-cycle policy uncertainty compounds this, shortening the investment horizon for cyclical names and amplifying the value of convex hedges (options, pairs) over naked directional exposure. The key catalysts to watch over the next 30–90 days are (1) any measurable disruption in tanker traffic or insurance rates through the Strait; (2) incremental US or allied military involvement; and (3) liquidity-driven rebalancing around index tracking dates — each can flip reward profiles quickly. Consensus seasonal optimism is therefore a timing, not a directional, signal: flows that lift indices in April can invert as soon as geopolitical headlines deteriorate or as positioning squeezes unwind. That makes calendar-based longs most attractive when paired with explicit, low-cost downside protection or when implemented as short-dated, event-driven option structures. Conversely, durable multi-quarter themes — energy capex beneficiaries and defense contractors — deserve asymmetric exposure sized for binary outcomes rather than simple momentum chases.