
Loar Holdings (LOAR) option ideas: a $35 put is bid $0.10 (implying an effective cost basis of $34.90 vs. current price $69.39) and analytics show a ~98% probability of expiring worthless, producing a 0.29% return (1.77% annualized) if so. On the call side, the $70 strike is bid $3.10; a covered call at current price would yield 5.35% if called at the Feb 2026 expiry, with a 47% chance of expiring worthless and a 4.47% YieldBoost (27.64% annualized). Implied volatilities are markedly different across contracts (put IV 94%, call IV 45%) versus a trailing 12‑month volatility of 42%.
Market structure: Short-dated sellers and yield-seeking accounts are the direct beneficiaries — selling the Feb‑2026 $35 put yields 0.29% (1.77% annualized) with a modelled 98% OTM chance, while covered‑call sellers can lock ~5.35% to $70 by Feb‑2026 (27.6% annualized). The large IV skew (put IV 94% vs call IV 45%) signals demand asymmetry for downside protection or illiquidity in deep‑OTM puts; this creates pick‑your‑risk between tail insurance (expensive by IV) and yield capture (cheap by absolute premium). Cross‑asset effects are limited, but heavy options selling would flatten term‑structure of equity vols and could mechanically dampen delta flows into underlying stock, with negligible direct bond/FX/commodity impact absent a broader equity shock. Risk assessment: Tail risk is concentrated — a sub‑50% collapse in LOAR (to breach $35) would inflict full notional assignment and high realized losses despite the tiny premium; regulatory or liquidity events in small‑cap names can gap bid/ask and invalidate the 98% model probability. Immediate (days) risks: execution & wide spreads (put bid $0.10) and early assignment; short/medium (weeks–months): IV reversion could double option mark if news hits; long term: fundamental business performance of LOAR will dominate total return. Hidden dependencies include borrow/short availability if taking synthetic positions and counterparty/broker assignment rules; catalysts: earnings, sector headlines, or market‑wide vol shocks (VIX spike) will rapidly repriced OTM tail exposure. Trade implications: For capital‑efficient income, prefer a covered‑call buy/write: buy LOAR up to $69 and sell Feb‑2026 $70 for net target return ~5% (max loss if equity falls — use 3% position sizing). Avoid naked short puts at $35 unless you plan to hold assigned shares and size cash‑secured put to <=1% portfolio risk; only sell puts if premium ≥$0.30 or put IV>60% to justify tail risk. Volatility strategy: consider buying Feb‑2026 ITM put protection or buying a cheap long‑dated put if you expect IV to rise, or implement put spread (buy $30 put / sell $25 put) to cap tail spend; prefer trades with defined loss and clear assignment plan. Contrarian angles: Consensus trusts modelled 98% OTM odds — that understates model and liquidity risk; empirical wide spreads (bid $0.10) suggest market makers are not pricing true tails. The low absolute premium for the $35 put is likely undercompensating for illiquidity and gap risk; sellers may be underpricing one‑time jump risk that historical 42% realized vol misses. Historical parallels: small‑cap names with steep put skew have forced sellers into assignment after single adverse announcements. Unintended consequence: aggressive put selling could result in concentrated share acquisition at $35 during a volatility spike, so plan capital and re‑hedges before selling.
AI-powered research, real-time alerts, and portfolio analytics for institutional investors.
Request a DemoOverall Sentiment
neutral
Sentiment Score
0.00
Ticker Sentiment