Back to News
Market Impact: 0.35

Crude Rallies on Rising Geopolitical Risks

BKRCOPNDAQ
Energy Markets & PricesCommodities & Raw MaterialsGeopolitics & WarSanctions & Export ControlsCommodity FuturesCurrency & FXEconomic DataMarket Technicals & Flows
Crude Rallies on Rising Geopolitical Risks

February WTI rose $1.00 (+1.74%) and February RBOB gained $0.0218 (+1.28%) as crude recovered on rising geopolitical risk (attacks on Russian refineries/tankers and new US/EU sanctions), OPEC+’s decision to pause Q1 production increases, a softer dollar and risk-on stock moves. Supply-side indicators were mixed: Vortexa showed tanker storage down 3.4% w/w to 119.35m bbl (week ended Jan 2) and Kpler flagged China’s December crude imports up ~10% m/m to a record 12.2m bpd, while IEA/OPEC forecasts point to a sizable 2026 surplus and the crack spread slid to an 11‑month low, pressuring refiners. US data: Nov OPEC production at 29.09m bpd, EIA weekly US crude inventories ~3.0% below the 5‑yr average, US production ~13.827m bpd (week ended Dec 26) and Baker Hughes rigs rose to 412.

Analysis

Market structure: Winners are integrated and upstream US producers (ConocoPhillips/COP) and oilfield services (Baker Hughes/BKR) as geopolitical shocks (Ukraine attacks, sanctions) and an OPEC+ pause tighten prompt availability despite medium-term surplus forecasts. Losers are refiners and product-linked names (Valero/PSX/PBF) because the crack spread is at an 11-month low, discouraging runs; shipping/insurance cost rises could further widen delivered-cost dispersion. Net: prompt balance is tighter near term even as the market prices a ~3.8–4.0m bpd 2026 surplus per IEA/OPEC, implying higher volatility across the curve. Risk assessment: Tail upside (supply shock) from escalated tanker/refinery attacks or additional sanctions could spike WTI > $90 within weeks; tail downside if OPEC+ resumes hikes or China demand stalls could push WTI < $65 by H2 2026. Immediate (days): high event-driven volatility tied to FX/dollar moves and equity risk appetite; short-term (weeks/months): inventories and rig counts (US 13.8m bpd production, rigs 412) will drive repositioning; long-term (quarters): capex restraint may erode spare capacity, offsetting projected surplus. Hidden dependency: weak crack spreads reduce refinery crude demand, materially increasing crude inventory even if upstream cuts occur. Trade implications: Bias overweight upstream producers and services, underweight refiners and physical product exposure. Tactical plays: long COP and BKR, short refinery exposure (VLO/PBF), and buy limited-cost call spreads on WTI around OPEC/geo-political catalysts. Use calendar spreads (front-month vs 3–6 month) to express near-term tightness but protect vs 2026 surplus risk. Contrarian angles: Consensus overweights the 2026 surplus and underestimates structural loss of Russian refining/export logistics — if sustained, prompt tightness will persist despite long-dated contango. Crack spread pessimism may be overdone if Chinese gasoline restocking and winter heating increase refinery runs; historical parallels: 2019–20 saw rapid sentiment flips when logistics—not production—drove prices. Unintended consequence: prolonged sanctions could raise shipping/insurance premiums, amplifying delivered-cost shocks and refining margin bifurcation.