Back to News
Market Impact: 0.3

What is Trump's approval rating? See polls on Venezuela, Epstein

TDAYNYT
Elections & Domestic PoliticsGeopolitics & WarLegal & LitigationInvestor Sentiment & PositioningEnergy Markets & PricesEmerging Markets
What is Trump's approval rating? See polls on Venezuela, Epstein

President Trump’s approval ratings remain net-negative and have stabilized after a November trough: RealClearPolitics shows 44.1% approve / 52.7% disapprove as of Jan. 9, 2026, the New York Times aggregator shows 43% / 55% on the same date, Economist/YouGov (Jan. 2–5; n=1,551; ±3.5) reported 39% / 56%, and CBS/YouGov (Jan. 5–7; n=2,325; ±2.4) recorded 41% / 59%. The piece highlights escalating geopolitical risk — U.S. forces captured Venezuelan leader Nicolás Maduro on Jan. 3 amid debate over motives including access to oil — and domestic legal/political pressure (impeachment talk and the Epstein controversy), increasing political uncertainty ahead of the midterms and implying potential volatility for risk-sensitive and energy-related assets.

Analysis

Market structure: Short-term winners are defense contractors (e.g., LMT, RTX, GD) and major oil producers (XOM, CVX) that could capture risk premia as geopolitical risk spikes; losers are Venezuelan assets, EM LatAm sovereign debt, and tourism/exposure plays in the region. Pricing power shifts toward integrated majors able to handle sanctions and toward U.S. defense suppliers; energy supply upside is conditional — physical Venezuelan output could add 0.5–1.5 mbpd only after months of investment and legal clearance. Cross-asset flows will likely push bids into USD/Treasuries and gold as safe havens while raising near-term oil volatility (realized vol +20–40% vs prior 30-day). Risk assessment: Tail risks include sustained regional military escalation or retaliatory cyber/energy attacks that could spike Brent >$10/barrel in days and trigger equity drawdowns >8% in risk assets; domestic political shock (impeachment effort) could flip sentiment and widen equity credit spreads by 20–40 bps. Immediate (0–7 days) risk is elevated realized volatility; short-term (1–3 months) hinge on sanctions, operational restoration of Venezuelan fields; long-term (6–24 months) depends on U.S. legislative response and oil capex. Hidden dependencies: oil upside requires hardware/knowhow and legal clearance; defense gains rely on cascade of procurement orders, not just rhetoric. Catalysts: new sanctions, midterm outcome (Nov), DOJ releases, or additional military actions. Trade implications: Direct plays: allocate tactical longs to defense (2–3% portfolio in LMT/RTX/GD basket) and oil majors (2–3% in XOM/CVX) with 3–6 month horizons; buy 2–3 month call spreads on XOM (5–10% OTM) to cap cost if Brent rises >$5. Pair trades: long XOM vs short small-cap energy explorers (E&P juniors) or long integrated majors (XOM) vs short EM oil exporters’ CDS; FX/credit: increase USD hedges (UUP) 1–2% while reducing EM sovereign debt exposure by 20–30% within 30 days. Options: consider buying volatility (OVX/WTI straddles) and 3-month protective puts on core equity holdings if drawdown >5%. Contrarian angles: Consensus may overprice a sustained oil supply shock — historical parallels (post-1980s interventions) show short-lived spikes followed by mean reversion once supply chains normalize within 3–9 months; conversely, markets may underprice persistent sanctions that permanently limit Venezuelan output, supporting higher long-term oil prices. The obvious defense longs could disappoint if Congress delays procurement or budgets tighten after midterms — cap upside to 8–15% and size positions accordingly. Watch Brent crossing $85 (buy) or falling below $70 (trim) as concrete execution triggers.