Back to News
Market Impact: 0.12

Canadians satisfaction with government down nationally says Angus Reid poll

Elections & Domestic PoliticsInflationTax & TariffsTrade Policy & Supply ChainHousing & Real EstateHealthcare & BiotechEconomic Data

An Angus Reid Institute survey of 4,025 Canadian adults (Nov. 26–Dec. 1, 2025) finds the Government Performance Index has fallen to 26 nationally from 34 in March, driven by a return of cost-of-living and health care concerns and rising priority on housing. Provincial breakdowns show Saskatchewan at 35 and Ontario at 20; in Ontario 79% rate the government poorly on cost of living, 77% on health care and 83% on housing, while one-quarter rate the government positively on the economy and public safety. Significant shares of Progressive Conservative voters also view their government as mishandling inflation (68%), housing (69%) and health care (63%), and U.S. tariffs are cited as weighing on provincial economies — signalling elevated political and policy risk rather than an immediate market shock.

Analysis

Market structure: High public dissatisfaction (e.g., 79% cite cost-of-living, 77% health in Ontario) implies weaker consumer sentiment and political pressure for policy intervention. Direct losers: residential REITs, Ontario provincial credit, consumer discretionary retailers; winners: provincial energy/commodity producers (Alberta/Sask) and private health providers if public care privatization debates accelerate. Expect downward pressure on Canadian consumer cyclical revenues by 3–6% over 6–12 months in provinces with >65% dissatisfaction. Risk assessment: Tail risks include a snap provincial election, tariff escalation from the U.S., or a sudden Ontario 10y+ spread widening (trigger: >30 bps) that would materially hit provincial bond prices and bank CDS. Immediate (days): equity volatility and CAD weakness; short-term (weeks–months): credit spread widening and REIT repricing; long-term (quarters–years): structural shift toward private healthcare and rental-supply policy changes. Hidden dependency: federal transfers could mute provincial pain but increase fiscal drag and taxation risk. Trade implications: Favor energy/infrastructure names exposed to Alberta (e.g., ENB.TO/ENB, SU.TO/SOOCF) — establish 2–3% long positions over 1–12 months; reduce Canadian bank overweight by trimming RY, TD, BNS by 2–4% each and hedge via 3-month 5% OTM puts on XIU.TO (TSX60 ETF). Short Canadian residential REIT ETF XRE.TO (1–2%) and buy USD/CAD 3-month calls 1.5% OTM to capture CAD downside; if Ontario 10y spread >30 bps, add provincial-credit shorts or CDS. Contrarian angles: Consensus undervalues the upside in energy/infrastructure and private health-service providers from dissatisfaction-driven policy drift; banks may be oversold — if TSX re-rates <5% then long selective large-cap banks (RY) on pullback. Historical parallel: regional political shocks (2014–2016 Alberta) produced 12–18 month recoveries in energy names despite short-term drawdowns. Trigger-based rule: if consumer-sentiment softens another 5–10 pts or Ontario spreads widen >30 bps, increase defensive shorts and CAD volatility plays.